Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Exhibit C <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and <br />facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be consistent with the <br />Metro Plan. (page II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (page II-C-4). <br /> <br />Policy 16. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (page II-C-5) <br /> <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The <br />adopted refinement plan the River Road Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is <br />the adopted refinement plan for the subject properties and also designates the area for <br />residential uses. If the annexation is approved, per EC 9.7820(3), the annexation area will <br />remain zoned AG/CAS, and the /UL overlay will be automatically removed from the <br />annexation area. The applicant has submitted a zone change (City File Z 12-5) to rezone <br />the property to R-1 once the annexation has been approved. <br /> <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is just outside <br />of the k. Northwest Expressway subarea and of the general “Residential Land Use <br />Policies” at Section 2.2, none appear to be directly applicable to the subject request. The <br />“Public Facilities and Services Element” policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at local <br />government; however, the premise of these policies for the provision of urban services is <br />the assumption that the properties within the UGB will be annexed. <br /> <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br /> <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, <br />efficient, and timely manner. <br /> <br /> <br />Complies Findings: The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level <br />of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely <br />YES NO <br />manner as detailed below: <br /> <br />Wastewater <br />An 8-inch public wastewater line is available within the public streets adjacent to this <br />site, with an 8-inch stub to the subject property from Irvington Drive, per as-construct <br />Satterwhite Family Trust (A 12-1) July 2012 Page 2 <br /> <br />