My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: South Willamette Street Improvement Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 01/30/13 Work Session
>
Item A: South Willamette Street Improvement Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2013 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
1/25/2013 2:08:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/30/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I have always been of the opinion that bicycle paths should be a completely separate system within the <br />city and not just a part of the motorized vehicle ways - so-called bicycle lanes, which are just a strip of <br />paint in the roadway are confusing and scary and the SOLE REASON that I do not ride a bicycle for <br />transportation. The stripe on the street that is also used by passing traffic or turning vehicles or the <br />strip on the side that is cambered for run-off and dirt and rock accumulation is just a cheap, avoidance <br />of creating a true bicycle transportation system. I understand that the City is planning to repave <br />Willamette between 24th and 32nd to place a center bicycle/turn lane with no extra width for passing <br />busses. Some urban design decisions like storm swales make sense. Some, like cul de sacs, are just <br />stupid on so many levels. I think that no matter what you do, cars are going to pull out to pass busses <br />and having a generous lane in each direction is the safest way to go. Of course, if I had to make a <br />choice I would rather wait for a bus and see a center dedicated parkway with curbs and trees in it and a <br />winding true bicycle pathway that is maybe only 3-5 feet wide - just having paint on the ground and <br />telling people they cannot drive there is like entrapment because you know people are not going to <br />heed that and it will just be a waste of tax money as cheap, half-way measures almost always are. <br />Please get real and think about making separate bikeways run through the entire city, not just in parks. <br />I live just beyond the South Hills. In the discussions I have seen in the newspaper, everyone's concerns <br />are focused on bikes, and pedestrians and shoppers in those stores. No one seems to see this street <br />as a thoroughfare into the South Hills. One letter writer even suggested that cars traveling through find <br />an "alternative route." <br />Now, you and I know, there aren't any. This is a through street. <br />Let's just do the math. Logic tells me that fewer lanes in either direction will mean more backup, <br />especially coming to 29th and Willamette. Have you ever been there around, say, four or five PM <br />heading south? It's a long wait to get through that intersection now, and shoppers coming out of the <br />Woodfield Station wait even longer. <br />Here's my suggestion: Keep the existing lanes. Make the west sidewalk for walkers. Widen the east <br />sidewalk--where there is some setback of light poles and street plantings--for two directions of bikers, <br />who will be completely protected from road traffic--except when cars turn in to the shops, but that <br />danger is there even for ordinary bike lanes. <br />OR, put the bikes on the east side parallel street to Willamette--where Southtown Mall is--and on the <br />parallel west side street that ends in the 29th and Willamette mall. <br />With fewer than 100 bikers and walkers a day (LTD September 2012 <br />count) and 16,000 cars, let's not get into social engineering--the idea that if you make it difficult enough <br />to drive, people will abandon their cars in favor of bikes, buses and walking--which has a long track <br />record of not working). Let's engineer it to keep the traffic rolling, and the bikers and walkers SAFE. <br />As a south Eugene resident who drives Willamette daily to and from work, who frequents many <br />businesses on Willamette, and someone who is also a bicyclist and pedestrian, I have strong concerns <br />about the proposed idea of two traffic lanes with a center turn lane, and bike lanes. If you take the <br />number of cars traveling in two lanes in either direction and put (funnel) them all into one lane, the <br />center turn lane would be of little value since the single lane would be one long snaking train of cars, <br />with rare opportunity to find a gap between cars to make the left turn between them. This would be a <br />given during business hours, but probably impossible to turn left into east side businesses traveling <br />south during pm rush hours, or west side businesses traveling north during am rush hour.I love bike <br />lanes, but I prefer to use side streets for biking because I feel too vulnerable riding close to cars on <br />busier streets. I also ride on sidewalks and take care to yield to pedestrians. Willamette St. in its <br />present configuration is busy but functions as well as it could. Since it's not possible to make it wider to <br />create space for bike lanes, and it still functions pretty smoothly we should look to the other streets in <br />the area to create more bike paths/lanes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.