Laserfiche WebLink
Unimproved Street System <br />The City's transportation system consists of 533 centerline miles of improved and unimproved <br />streets. The unimproved portion of this total includes 51 centerline miles (87 lane miles) of asphalt <br />and bituminous surface streets. This section of the report is intended to describe the overall condition <br />of unimproved asphalt streets, potential treatment needs, associated rehabilitation costs, along with a <br />projected backlog repair cost for addressing this classification of street. It is important to note that <br />any treatment short of being brought up to full urban street standards should be considered <br />temporary. The estimated cost to improve this classification to meet the urban street standards is <br />approximately $60 million. In addition, the following backlog figure is separate from the improved <br />street backlog figure. <br />Based on 2012 rating data of the unimproved streets system there is a backlog of temporary repair <br />projects, typically maintenance overlays, totaling an estimated $9.8 million, down from $11.3 million <br />reported in 2011. The following charts and graphs indicate that 45 percent of the system falls into a <br />no treatment category, up from 36 percent reported in 2011, due in large part to recent maintenance <br />overlay and FDR treatments completed over the past five years. More than 75 unimproved streets <br />have benefited from full or partial treatment since 2008. Thirty three percent of the system falls into <br />the "poor" category. Currently, Public Works Maintenance plans on spending $200,000 annually over <br />the next four years to address a portion of these streets. <br />2012 Unimproved Asphalt Street <br />Condition and Rehabilitation Report <br />(2012 Rating Data) <br />OCI <br />Lane <br />Miles <br />% of <br />System <br />Condition <br />Rehabilitation <br />Cost <br />Unit Cost /SQFT <br />0 -10 <br />6.77 <br />7.61% <br />Poor <br />$2,573,683 <br />$6.00 <br />1120 <br />11.72 <br />13.18% <br />Poor <br />$2,970,317 <br />$4.00 <br />21 -30 <br />10.68 <br />12.01% <br />Poor <br />$1,522,541 <br />$2.25 <br />31 -40 <br />6.01 <br />6.76% <br />Fair <br />$856,786 <br />$2.25 <br />41 -50 <br />4.18 <br />4.70% <br />Fair <br />$595,901 <br />$2.25 <br />51 -60 <br />7.56 <br />8.50% <br />Fair <br />$1,077,754 <br />$2.25 <br />61 -65 <br />1.72 <br />1.93% <br />Fair <br />$245,203 <br />$2.25 <br />66 -70 <br />1.63 <br />1.83% <br />Good <br />$0 <br />$0.00 <br />71 -80 <br />2.63 <br />2.95% <br />Good <br />$0 <br />$0.00 <br />81 -85 <br />3.89 <br />4.37% <br />Good <br />$0 <br />$0.00 <br />86 -90 <br />4.75 <br />5.33% <br />Excellent <br />$0 <br />$0.00 <br />91 -100 <br />27.42 <br />30.83% <br />Excellent <br />$0 <br />$0.00 <br />Total <br />Rehabilitation <br />$9,842,185 <br />88.96 <br />100.00% <br />* Unit cost based on <br />2010 estimated costs <br />19 <br />