Laserfiche WebLink
Voter Control Referral <br />SJR 10/HJR 8 <br />Description <br />The League’s proposed constitutional referral would allow local voters the ability to consider a temporary tax outside <br />of compression. The referral would not raise anyone’s taxes, but would empower voters to authorize a tax for local <br />operations. <br />Background <br />Under Oregon’s current system, statewide limitations can prohibit local voters from having the ability to raise their <br />own taxes to support services they demand. Measure 5 limitations restrict general governments (cities, counties and <br />special districts) and schools to levying no more than $10 and $5 per $1,000 of real market value respectively. Any <br />taxes levied in excess of those limitations are reduced until the limitations are met, a process known as compression. <br />Temporary taxes that are in addition to the municipality’s permanent rate that are approved by voters to provide <br />funding for operating expenses are compressed first under this system. As a result, voters residing in a municipality in <br />compression are limited in their ability to raise revenue to support services they desire. <br />Example <br />Sweet Home, a timber-dependent community of roughly 9,000 residents in Linn County, has a low permanent tax rate <br />for a city of its size. As a result, the city has provided essential police protection and library services via voter- <br />approved temporary taxes since 1986. In 2010, voters in Sweet Home approved these temporary taxes with 60 and 55 <br />percent of the vote respectively. <br />However, Linn County has its own voter-approved temporary tax that competes against Sweet Home’s, and property <br />values in Sweet Home have fallen in recent years. As a result, temporary tax revenue losses due to compression have <br />increased from $300,000 to $730,000 – nearly a third of what the levy was supposed to collect. As a consequence, the <br />public safety and library services are not being provided at the level local citizens wanted. <br />Statewide Impacts DEOH6WDWHZLGHFRPSUHVVLRQORVVHV <br />7 <br />Compression is becoming a growing problem for local <br />‡˜‡—‡Ž‘•––‘‡”…‡–‹…”‡ƒ•‡‹ <br />governments statewide. Since 2008-09, total revenue <br />…‘’”‡••‹‘‹…‘’”‡••‹‘Ž‘••‡• <br />lost to compression has increased from $51 million, or <br /> ͚͙͙͙͚͘ȋ‹‹ŽŽ‹‘•Ȍ•‹…‡ ͚͘͘͘͠͡ <br />1.13 percent of property tax collections, to $144 million, <br />…Š‘‘Ž•͆ȋ͟͜Ǥ͘͝Ȍ͚͙͞ά <br />or 2.8 percent of collections (see Table 1). All counties <br />are in compression, as are half of all cities and more than <br />‘—–‹‡•͆ȋ͛͜Ǥ͛͘Ȍ͙͜͝ά <br />90 percent of all school districts. <br />‹–‹‡•͆ȋ͚͠Ǥ͚͘Ȍ͙͙͞ά <br />Last May, local voters approved 18 of 21 (86 percent) <br />temporary taxes, including six out of six city tax levies <br />and four out of five county tax levies. While voters <br />may still be concerned about the state of the economy, <br />in many instances they clearly realize the value of <br />local government services and are willing to tax <br />themselves to provide those services. Whether or not <br />any local voters approve temporary taxes outside of <br />compression limitations is irrelevant. What matters is <br />that voters currently do not have the freedom and <br />opportunity to do so. <br />For more information, visit www.orcities.org/toolkit or contact Chris Fick at (503) 588-6550 or cfick@orcities.org. <br />