My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions of Feb. 27, and Mar. 6, 2013
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 03/11/13 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions of Feb. 27, and Mar. 6, 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 1:43:52 PM
Creation date
3/8/2013 1:30:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
framing, plumbing, wiring, mechanical work, etc. Under the new rules in order for an individual <br />to be able to do that he/she would have to be a journeyman electrician and a journeyman <br />plumber, and be a licensed architect or engineer or have a number of years’ experience working <br />as or for a general contractor. It is safe to assume that there are very few, if any, people in <br />Oregon with that resume. There is an efficiency gained in sending a single inspector to a jobsite <br />rather than three or four, and the City has made deliberate, significant investment in the cross- <br />training of the inspection staff. There will be an on-going increase in the cost of proving <br />inspection service if this ability is effectively eliminated. The bill would reduce the eligible <br />applicant pool for future hires, remove hiring flexibility and make it harder to find the “right” <br />people for Eugene. The required work experience in very limited and specific, and any ability to <br />consider equivalent experience and training is taken away. We have an excellent staff <br />consisting of highly skilled and competent individuals, yet under the prosed rule changes the <br />majority of our plan reviewers and building inspectors would not be considered qualified to <br />perform their current jobs if they were applying for them today. <br /> Recommendation: Priority 1 Oppose <br /> <br /> <br />SB 0468 <br />:Establishes process for Oregon Liquor Control Commission to adopt rule <br />declaring alcohol impact area upon petition by municipality. Establishes <br />processes for granting exemptions and for review of rule. Declares emergency, <br />effective on passage <br /> <br />Relating to: Relating to alcohol impact areas; declaring an emergency <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Senator Dingfelder, Representative Tomei <br /> <br />Staff Comments: No additional information – Similar bill in the past, recommendation was for <br />support. <br /> Recommendation: Priority 1 Support <br /> <br />4 | Page <br />March 6, 2013 IGR Committee Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.