My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions of Feb. 27, and Mar. 6, 2013
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 03/11/13 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions of Feb. 27, and Mar. 6, 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 1:43:52 PM
Creation date
3/8/2013 1:30:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />latest. Based on the CPI-U, inflation since 1999 is at 173%, meaning that $5,000 in 1999 <br />equates to approximately $8,650 today. Since the last update occurred at least 14 years ago, <br />it is assumed that another increase would not be likely to occur for some time. From this <br />perspective, it makes sense to increase the limit on small procurements to account for past and <br />continuing inflation. Raising this limit would result in an increase in staff efficiency, allowing <br />employees across the organization to focus their purchasing efforts on larger, more complex <br />procurements that have a significant impact on the community. We believe this proposed <br />legislation to be significant, appropriate and a valuable tool to allow staff to effectively manage <br />their time while still acting as good stewards of public funds. HB 2212 would adjust the threshold <br />amount for small procurements for inflation, reducing processing and increasing purchasing <br />efficiency for small procurements, with the result of saving the City time and money <br /> Recommendation: Priority 1 Support <br /> <br />HB 2455 <br />: Broadens types of communications services on which municipalities may impose <br />privilege tax. Modifies privilege tax rate imposed on gross revenues of <br />st <br />communications service providers. Takes effect on 91 day following <br />adjournment sine die. <br /> <br />Relating to: Relating to privilege taxation of communications services; prescribing an effective <br />date <br />Sponsored by: <br /> <br />Staff Comments: Priority One Oppose as introduced, sponsored by Comcast. On 2-25-13 the <br />LOC informed Eugene their understanding that the current text would be entirely deleted and <br />replaced with LOC-referred text by its Mar 1 hearing. However, as introduced the bill is a pre- <br />emption of muni authority on many fronts; public right of way (ROW) use compensation, <br />taxation, gross revenue and service setting, and the pre-emption of construction permit fees. <br /> <br />The bill also contains a __ blank space whereby Comcast would insert a maximum allowable <br />rights of way use fee at an assumed lower amt than Eugene (which is in line with other cities) <br />has historically charged for commercial ROW use for decades. <br /> <br />None of Comcast’s desired pre-emptions are supported by any federal or state law or policy, nor <br />any judicial decisions. In fact, HB 2455 flies in the fact of Oregon judicial decision that ruled in <br />favor of municipal authority to enact Code updates such as the City of Eugene City enacted in <br />1997 consistent with the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. HB 2455 is an unwarranted <br />end run around Congressional intent, judicial decision and municipal authority under Oregon <br />Home Rule constitution. <br /> <br />HB 2455 as introduced would cripple Eugene’s General Fund compensation baselines to which <br />ROW use fees are allocated, likely with an annual multi-million dollar adverse impact. <br /> Recommendation: Priority 1 Oppose <br /> <br />HB 2702 <br />: Establishes process for Oregon Liquor Control COmmision to adopt rule <br />declaring alcohol impact area upon petition by municipality. Establishes <br />processes for granting exemptions and for review of rule. Declares emergency, <br />effective on passage. <br /> <br />Relating to: Relating to alcohol impact areas; declaring an emergency <br /> <br />2 | Page <br />February 27, 2013 IGR Committee Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.