CCMinutes - 07/26/04 Mtg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Taylor said the MWMC was generating a detailed memorandum to all three jurisdictions regarding the potential partnership with Coburg. 5. ACTION: Adoption of Resolution 4801 Calling a City Election on November 2, 2004, for the Purpose of Referring to the Legal Electors of the City of Eugene a Measure Authorizing the Issu- ance of a Maximum of $6,790,000 of General Obligation Bonds to Partially Fund the Civic Center Vision Project Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to adopt Resolution 4801 calling a city election on November 2, 2004, for the purpose of referring to the legal electors of the City of Eugene a measure authorizing the issuance of a maximum of $6,790,000 of general obligation bonds to partially fund the Civic Center Vision Project. Councilor Taylor noted that the last sentence on page 229 of the agenda packet indicated that funding from the General Fund may need to be reallocated for operations and management of the new Community Safety Building. She asked why this was so, as the Eugene Police Department (EPD) would be vacating its City Hall location and this would create more space for City functions that were currently renting. She posited that the savings in rental expenditures would match the increased cost of the new structure. Mr. Carlson cited two issues in response: the current costs would increase given the larger size of the new Community Safety Building; and the current costs of the City Hall would still be there. While it was possible the rental savings could offset the new costs, he said the savings would not likely be greater than the increased expenditures. Councilor Taylor opposed the motion. She opined that it was not the right time to place such a bond measure on the ballot. In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Mr. Carlson explained that the $5.2 million in right-of- way revenues listed in the agenda item summary (ALS) was the franchise fee revenue that had been deferred revenue for several years. In response to another question from Councilor Bettman, Mr. Carlson assured her that the one percent allocated for public art in the new building was included in the total construction costs. Councilor Bettman asked what would happen should the bond pass and the at-risk revenue was not available. Mr. Carlson said it was hoped that the legal issues would be resolved by then. He stated that bonds would not be sold until there was a firm financing plan for the entire facility. Councilor Bettman then asked what staff would do should the revenue not be available. Mr. Carlson explained that staff would have to return to the council to determine whether to go forward or to backfill with another revenue source. Councilor Bettman asked what was planned, should the bond fail. Mr. Carlson responded that the current staff recommendation would be to proceed with the construction of a new basic police services building with existing resources. Councilor Bettman expressed her opposition to the motion. She called the bond measure short-sighted. She asserted this would build a police station with capacity for only ten years. She reiterated her preferred option that the bond measure finance both the police building and the Civic Building.