Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
the Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs) called for communities to inventory substantially under-utilized <br />land, that term was not defined in the OARs. He believed that Mr. Duncan, the author of the Eugene Area <br />Chamber of Commerce's study, had implicitly defined %ubstantially underutilized" in a way that precluded <br />the examination of much redevelopment potential. Councilor Kelly wanted a study that gave the council the <br />facts about that issue. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly suggested that, as recommended by the mayor's committee, the study look at the potential <br />of parcel assembly. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he hoped the motion was not tabled, and suggested alternatively it be amended to call for <br />the establishment of an RFP to be reviewed by the Metro Partnership's Board of Directors. He noted that <br />all jurisdictions were represented on the board and that Councilor Kelly was his alternate on the board and <br />would ensure a thorough evaluation of the RFP. He asked the council to avoid micromanaging the study. <br />He believed the community knew how such a study could be done. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor favored tabling the motion to give the council the opportunity to develop criteria to guide <br />the consultant. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling pointed out that Eugene was only one of three jurisdictions participating in the study, and <br />suggested that the council's motion regarding the issue be simple. He did not want to overcomplicate the <br />issue and suggested the scope of the study be left to the Metro Partnership and the consultant ultimately <br />hired. He wanted to proceed with the study following the State guidelines that govern the issue. Councilor <br />Poling said Eugene's funding was crucial to completing the study. He believed the study was one small step <br />to the road to the community's economic recovery; while no one thing would accomplish that alone. In <br />addition, the study would assist the City in planning for the future for all land types. <br /> Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Pap~, moved to amend the motion as follows: <br /> ~To provide $15,000 in contingency funds for the commercial/industrial lands study pend- <br /> ing an RPF approval by the Lane Metro Partnership Board." <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for comments on the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly did not support the amendment. He said the dynamics of the board meetings he had <br />attended did not lend themselves to the appropriate review of such a document. While he did not think the <br />council should review the RFP, he did want to review the proposed scope of work in September. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman also opposed the amendment. She agreed with Councilor Kelly that it would be <br />micromanaging to review an RFP, she believed the council could establish some guiding principles for the <br />components of the study. Councilor Bettman was concerned about the fact a contractor had already been <br />named as well as the expedited six-month process called for in the scope of work. She feared an expedited <br />process would lead to an inadequate study. Councilor Bettman said there was no emergency or need for an <br />expedited timeline, and there was time to inculcate the City's needs and requirements into the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman expressed hope the amendment was voted down and a work session held to review the <br />scope of work that allowed the council to provide criteria to guide the study process. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon indicated support for the motion and thanked the mayor for his suggestion. She was <br />concerned about attempts to discredit the Metro Partnership's Board of Directors or Mr. Roberts. She <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 9, 2004 Page 11 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />