My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3E: Resolution 5084 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Adee-Connolly - A 13-1)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 04/08/13 Meeting
>
Item 3E: Resolution 5084 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Adee-Connolly - A 13-1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 11:39:02 AM
Creation date
4/5/2013 11:09:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Annexation Application Written Stateme <br />17-04-24-13 Lot #400 & 17-04-24-24 Lot #5500 <br />2.297 total acres (after Lot Line Adjustments) <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The River <br />Road/Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the adopted refinement plan for the <br />subject properties and also designates the area for residential uses. If the annexation is approved, <br />per EC 9.7 820(3), the annexation area will remain zoned R - and the /UL overlay will be <br />automatically removed from the annexation area. <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is not within a <br />subarea; of the general "Residential Land Use Policies" at Section 2.2, none appear to be directly <br />applicable to the subject request. The "Public Facilities and Services Element" policies of the <br />RR/SC UFP are directed at local government; however, the premise of these policies for the <br />provision of urban services is the assumption that the properties within the UGB will be annexed. <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) below, the <br />proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management policies and can be <br />served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation procedures beginning at EC <br />9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found throughout this report, the <br />annexation is consistent with State law. <br />The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban <br />facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, efficient, an�i <br />timely manner: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.