My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3E: Resolution 5084 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Adee-Connolly - A 13-1)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 04/08/13 Meeting
>
Item 3E: Resolution 5084 Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Adee-Connolly - A 13-1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 11:39:02 AM
Creation date
4/5/2013 11:09:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Exhibit C <br />Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Director’s Recommendations and Findings: <br />Adee-Connolly (A 13-1) <br /> <br />Application Submitted: February 22, 2013 <br />Applicant: David Adee and Joan Connolly <br />Map/Lot(s): 17-04-24-13-00400 and 17-04-24-24-05500 <br />Zoning: R-1/UL <br />Location: Southeast terminus of Oakleigh Lane, between River Road and the Willamette River <br />Representative: Willard Dixon, Willard Dixon Architect, LLC Surveyor: Jonathan Oaks, Poage Engineering <br /> <br />Lead City Staff: Becky Taylor, Associate Planner, (541) 682-5437 <br /> <br />EVALUATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies with <br />Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in <br />accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through 9.7835. The <br />applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following <br />each. <br /> <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary and is: <br /> (a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br /> (b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other body <br />of water. <br /> <br /> <br />Complies Findings: The annexation area is within the city's urban growth boundary (UGB) and is <br />contiguous to the city limits. The east boundary of the subject property abuts City park <br />YES NO <br />lands, which are within city limits. The portion of Oakleigh Lane, abutting the subject <br />property's northern boundary, has been annexed. <br /> <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any <br />applicable refinement plans. <br /> <br /> <br />Complies Findings: The proposed annexation area is within the UGB. Several policies from the <br />Metro Plan generally support this annexation by encouraging compact urban growth to <br />YES NO <br />achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the UGB, including the <br />following: <br /> <br />C. Growth Management, Goals, Findings and Policies: <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city when it is found that: <br /> a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area <br />in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />Adee-Connolly (A 13-1) April 2013 Page 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.