Laserfiche WebLink
- April 14, 2010, Work Session <br />B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br /> <br /> C. Initiation of Public Comment Period on Proposal to Name New Willamette/I-5 Bridge <br /> the “Whilamut Passage Bridge” <br /> D. Approval of Presiding Judge Term Extension <br /> <br /> <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt the Consent Calendar. <br />Roll call vote: the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> <br /> Eugene Water & Electric Board Water Rights <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz introduced the topic. He said the hearing was an opportunity for the council to hear <br />from the public on the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) water rights issue and its proposal to <br />provide water to the City of Veneta. He said that action was scheduled for June 28, 2010. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Kevin Matthews <br />, PO Box 1588, President of Friends of Eugene, objected to EWEB’s proposal to sell <br />water to Veneta. He said Friends of Eugene was challenging the action as it had major growth <br />implications. He said water rights were complicated and multi-layered but he did not think there was any <br />“ticking clock deadline” other than the unstated goals of Veneta and EWEB. He called on the council to <br />take its time and understand its options as well as take the growth implications of the action into account. <br /> <br />Ashley Miller <br />, 2675 Norkenzie Road, objected to EWEB’s proposal to sell water to Veneta. She said that <br />EWEB was acting beyond its charter authority. She suggested that the sale would encourage unsustainable <br />growth by creating bedroom communities that promoted travel and added to green house gas emissions. <br />Ms. Miller also feared that the sale would set a precedent for sales to other communities. She said that the <br />water rights in the McKenzie River were not fully appropriated and there was no “back of the line” to <br />return to, as had been suggested. <br /> <br />Kathy Ging <br />, 2878 Harris Street, opposed EWEB’s proposal to sell water to Veneta. She noted the <br />lowering water table in the rural areas and the fact of groundwater contamination and suggested the west <br />was in a 500-year drought cycle. She said that people were aware of those facts when they moved to the <br />area. She asked if the City should extend water to those with arsenic or high iron levels in other areas of <br />the county as well. She discussed the danger of commuting back and forth from Veneta and said as a <br />realtor she did not support additional property development in Veneta. She questioned why the <br />subdivisions being created in such water-limited areas were not designed to exist appropriately in such a <br />setting, particularly given the anticipation of continued drought. Ms. Ging did not think that EWEB should <br />be selling water to Veneta when the community might need the water for its own agricultural use. <br /> <br />Michael Mattick <br />, Region 2 State Water Master, introduced himself to the council and volunteered to <br />answer any questions councilors might have that were related to water rights. He provided copies of his <br />business card to the council. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 14, 2010 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />