My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5084
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2013 No. 5076-5098
>
Resolution No. 5084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2013 8:18:58 AM
Creation date
4/10/2013 8:18:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
4/8/2013
Document_Number
5084
CMO_Effective_Date
4/8/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit C <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />Planning Director's Recommendations and Findings: <br />Adee - Connolly (A 13 -1) <br />EUGENE <br />Application Submitted: February 22, 2013 <br />Applicant: David Adee and Joan Connolly <br />Map /Lot(s): 17- 04 -24 -13 -00400 and 17- 04 -24 -24 -05500 <br />Zoning: R -1 /UL <br />Location: Southeast terminus of Oakleigh Lane, between River Road and the Willamette River <br />Representative: Willard Dixon, Willard Dixon Architect, LLC Surveyor: Jonathan Oaks, Poage Engineering <br />Lead City Staff: <br />I Becky Taylor, Associate Planner, (541) 682 -5437 <br />EVALUATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies with <br />Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in <br />accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through 9.7835. The <br />applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following <br />each. <br />EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city's urban growth boundary and is: <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other body <br />of water. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The annexation area is within the city's urban growth boundary (UGB) and is <br />contiguous to the city limits. The east boundary of the subject property abuts City park <br />❑YES <br />❑ NO <br />lands, which are within city limits. The portion of Oakleigh Lane, abutting the subject <br />property's northern boundary, has been annexed. <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any <br />applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The proposed annexation area is within the UGB. Several policies from the <br />Metro Plan generally support this annexation by encouraging compact urban growth to <br />❑YES <br />❑ NO <br />achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the UGB, including the <br />following: <br />C. Growth Management, Goals, Findings and Policies: <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city when it is found that: <br />a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area <br />in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />Adee - Connolly (A 13 -1) April 2013 Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.