Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Put simply, the new national fee schedule, which covers 60 to 70 percent of all transports, does <br />not allow most ambulance providers to recover the cost of providing the service. Instead, where <br />we once had the ability to collect the full reasonable charge (which has risen over the years from <br />$535 to $1,600 per transport), we are now reimbursed between $200 and $400, depending on the <br />type of call. Medicaid, the state of Oregon’s health insurance program, reimburses similarly. <br />While Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement reductions are the primary reason that emergency <br />medical transport in our region has become a revenue-negative enterprise, two national trends are <br />also contributing to the problem. One is the growing number of individuals eligible for Medi- <br />care. The other is the economy generally, as the provider agencies – which do not refuse <br />transport because of inability to pay – are being forced to write off more and more bills as uncol- <br />lectible. <br />The Eugene Fire & EMS Department has taken many steps to try to keep the ambulance service <br />self-sustaining including increasing the transport rates; reducing ambulance coverage for non- <br />peak times; and cutting costs for administrative staff, materials and supplies. The department has <br />also worked closely with City Finance staff to identify the appropriate cost split between the <br />Ambulance Transport Fund and General Fund to ensure the ATF is not supplementing General <br />Fund services. <br />In addition, with Eugene’s ambulance system capacity very thin, the department elected to sub- <br />contract much of its non-emergency transport work to a private provider through an RFP process <br />as a cost avoidance strategy. With inadequate revenue to increase the number of advanced life <br />support ambulances on the street, the department elected to privatize this portion of the service <br />and match a more appropriate level of resource with particular non-emergent call types. <br />Springfield Fire & Life Safety staff has focused on maximizing existing revenue sources for all <br />three providers through the joint FireMed program and development of new revenue sources <br />through Mobile Health Services research and design. <br />However, none of these adjustments individually or in whole has created a sustainable fund dur- <br />ing any 6-year financial forecast period. Eugene’s Ambulance Transport Fund reserves have de- <br />creased from $1.1 million in FY07 to $165,000 in FY09. The financial goal is to maintain a re- <br />serve equal to two months’ operating expenditures. For Eugene, this total for FY10 is $1.16 mil- <br />lion. At this point, the projections show the fund will be out of reserves by the end of FY10. <br />Additionally, for FY10, the fund is unable to support its medic unit replacement reserve resulting <br />in lengthening the time for fleet replacement. <br />Springfield’s Ambulance Transport Fund reserves were depleted as of FY09. The City Council <br />allocated up to $500,000 in General Fund support, of which approximately $300,000 was need- <br />ed. An additional $300,000 in support is allocated for the current fiscal year. <br />The Lane Rural Fire/Rescue District was granted an Ambulance Service Area (ASA) encompass- <br />ing the northwest portion of Eugene’s ASA in 2001 and in 2002 began providing emergency <br />medical transport in addition to fire and rescue services to that area, resulting in a reduction of <br />ambulance transport revenue as well as FireMed membership revenue for Eugene. As a pre- <br />existing taxing authority, Lane Rural has been able to augment its overall revenue with ambu- <br />lance fees and FireMed revenue, but not to the extent that the ambulance service is fully self- <br />3 <br /> <br />