Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Poling encouraged the council to avoid changing the MUPTE rules midway through the process. He <br />said he did not consider the MUPTE score alone; he considered other factors, such as the overall <br />community benefit of a project. <br />Mr. Poling recommended that the council consider a separate ordinance regarding long-term on-site <br />management for multi-unit projects over a certain size. <br />Ms. Ortiz declared a potential conflict of interest due to her employment with PeaceHealth. <br />Mr. Zelenka noted the letter the council received from the Sustainability Commission in support of the <br />project. The commission had recommended the council create a mechanism for accountability in regard <br />to the green building aspect of the project. He asked how the council could assure accountability outside <br />the MUPTE resolution. Ms. Laurence indicated that the developer’s commitments could be memorialized <br />in the resolution adopted by the council adopting the MUPTE. Assistant City Manager Medary indicated <br />that staff could look at other technical approaches as well. <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Brown, moved to extend the meeting for ten minutes. The <br />motion passed, 7:1; Ms. Taylor voting no. <br />Ms. Taylor emphasized the council’s authority over the MUPTE. She left the meeting. <br />Mr. Brown feared that Capstone Collegiate Communities would sell the development as it had sold <br />developments in other communities and would not continue to manage it. The problems occurred after <br />the developer was gone, which heightened the importance of ensuring the developer’s commitments were <br />transferable to another party. <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting at 1:33 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Beth Forrest <br />City Recorder <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 25, 2012 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br />