My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 03/08/06 Workshop
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 03/08/06 Workshop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:16 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 1:53:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Suggested Changes: <br /> <br />? <br /> #2 Facilitate government efficiency <br />? <br /> #8 Strive for focus <br />? <br /> #7 Rewrite <br /> <br />Ms. Teninty clarified that “transparency” referred to transparency of the process surrounding the project. <br /> <br />The council agreed that the consultant team would rewrite #7 of the project values to reflect the input that <br />had been received in regard to the need for city hall to be reflect inclusivity and access to government as well <br />as welcoming to the public and a place where people could meet their friends before going to an event. Ms. <br />Bettman suggested the wording “maximizes or supports public access to the public’s representatives and <br />city government.” <br /> <br />5. Forum Preview <br /> <br />Ms. Teninty reported that people could sign up to participate in the forum at www.eugenecityhall.com. The <br />forum was scheduled to occur on March 23 from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at First United Methodist Church. <br /> <br />Ms. Teninty previewed the agenda for the upcoming community forum. Councilors asked questions <br />clarifying the information to be presented and offered suggestions for changes, including a suggestion from <br />Ms. Bettman for the addition of an open-ended question regarding the public’s criteria for selecting a model <br />and elimination of the small group sessions. Speaking to the latter suggestion, Ms. Teninty indicated the <br />consultant team would attempt to minimize the use of small groups but would use some small group formats <br />in order to hear from more people. She said that participants would also fill out surveys at the end of the <br />event and could express their thoughts through that instrument. Mr. Hacker expressed support for not <br />showing the public the criteria but rather asking them an open-ended question regarding what they thought <br />important in a site. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that it was not necessary to solicit public comment on the project values as those <br />would be used by the council and she did not envision a productive discussion would ensue. She thought <br />input on the other two major topics was more needed. Mayor Piercy suggested that starting with a <br />discussion of values would help engage people and they could use the values as a filter for the other <br />decisions they would be asked to make. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor concurred with the remarks of Ms. Bettman with regard to the value of an open-ended question <br />and the elimination of the small group sessions. <br /> <br />Ms. Teninty suggested the consultant team refer to the project values in the opening remarks and solicit <br />written feedback on them. There was council concurrence. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 8, 2006 Page 8 <br /> Work Shop <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.