Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Papé? then reported on a suggestion which came out of the LCOG Board meeting that there may be some <br />overlap within standing committees, including the Lane Metro Partnership, the Lane Economic Committee, <br />and the Lane Economic Advisory Committee. He said that consolidation of one or more of these committees <br />may occur. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor reported that the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency Board continued to struggle with the <br />issue of odors filtering out of industries into the community. She then referred to a previous set of minutes <br />which noted that the council was to discuss “stormwater” in relationship to development in February or <br />March. City Manager Dennis Taylor reported that that item was an assignment to staff at this point and <br />would be brought to the council on March 13. Ms. Taylor reminded staff that the council requested a <br />discussion on the implementation of a “naming” policy. She asked that the City Manager arrange for a way <br />in which such a discussion can be held. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor reported that on recent activities of the Lane County Metro Partnership, noting the openings of <br />the Royal Caribbean and Williams offices scheduled to occur in April. He shared that there was a <br />discussion around the decrease in “leads” throughout the state, as the type of land and property requests <br />being received were not currently available. Mr. Pryor explained that these requests were very specific with <br />regard to needs, properties, and infrastructures. He moved on to agenda items which included new member <br />orientation and the 2006 Work Plan. Mr. Pryor reminded the council that the five targeted industries for the <br />Lane County Metro Partnership were recreational vehicles and equipment, natural resources and specialties, <br />life technology, customer service “back-office,” and software. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor proceeded to report on the February Human Services Commission meeting, which included a <br />report on the budget and the fact that community need was increasing whereas the funds were not adequate <br />for that need. Mr. Pryor said that discussions to stabilize funding have begun. <br /> <br />In conclusion, Mr. Pryor said that the Enterprise Zone Committee conducted its last meeting and adopted its <br />final set of standards. He spoke highly of the process and complimented the members of the committee for <br />their exemplary efforts. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling reported that the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Group distributed Requests for <br />Proposals (RFPs) and purchased equipment for the 20-year facility upgrade at a cost of $144 million. He <br />said the majority of the work would be completed at the front end of the project as many of the upgrades <br />were the result of more rigid standards. Mr. Poling concluded that an authorization of expenditure for a <br />computer program to monitor the entire project has been approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Pape? took the floor once again to explain the inter-relationship between the Metropolitan Planning <br />Organization (MPO) and the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC). He said that the MPC was established <br />by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County as a problem-solving body; the MPO was an organization <br />designated by the governor, which subsequently delegated most of its authority in regard to transportation <br />planning to the MPC. However, members of the LCOG Board had recently expressed concerns that <br />responsibilities with regard to planning for roads and streets have become muddled and have discussed <br />reassuming that responsibility. Mr. Kelly pointed out that MPO, while appointed by the governor, exists <br />mainly because of fact the Eugene-Springfield area was a Transportation Management Area (TMA) and <br />must adhere to federal law requirements; additionally, some of its statutes dictate that both Lane Transit <br />District (LTD) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) be “at the table” which was <br />problematic for the LCOG Board unless it was somehow restructured. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 27, 2006 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />