Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Ortiz said it puzzled her that someone would put energy into something that hurt the community’s <br />children. She was saddened that people would work to overturn something the community obviously voted <br />for and supported. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling congratulated the representatives of LEAD, adding that he was proud of LEAD partici- <br />pants and that they should keep up the good work. He noted, regarding the Youth Activity Levy, that he <br />was going to ask the same questions Councilor Ortiz asked. Whether he agreed with the judge’s ruling, the <br />fact remained that more than 70 percent of the voters approved the levy. He felt the City owed it to the <br />voters to respect their will and appeal that decision. He called youth one of “the best renewable resources” <br />the community has. He underscored that today’s youth are tomorrow’s leaders. He found the state level of <br />funding for education to be an embarrassment. He supported doing whatever it took to help youth obtain an <br />education that would enable them to compete in the world. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor was pleased to hear a specific recommendation from LEAD. He said if it was possible to <br />make something happen, he was a huge supporter of youth and teen centers and the City should try to see if <br />a teen center could be created. <br /> <br />Regarding public safety, Councilor Pryor agreed it was a core service. He stated that the City should never <br />forget the fact that it was in the business of providing certain core services and public safety should be at the <br />top of the list. He said he wanted “to move heaven and earth” to see if ways could be found to provide that <br />level of core service to the satisfaction of the people living in the community. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor reminded the council that he also worked hard to pass the school levy. He said the <br />relationship between the City and the school districts with regard to the community’s children was the same. <br />He underscored that the basic concept of the levy had not been ruled invalid. He wanted to try every option <br />to ensure the 24,000 young people in this community were taken care of. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé commended the LEAD youth for the good job done on the public speaking. <br /> <br /> <br />3. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br /> - January 5, 2006, State of the City Address <br /> - January 23, 2006, Work Session <br /> - January 25, 2006, Work Session <br />B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br /> <br /> C. Adoption of Revised Neighborhood Association Charters <br />D. Adoption of Resolution 4859 Extending the Completion Date for Construction of Residential <br />Units Granted a Multiple-Unit Property Tax Exemption Under Resolution No. 4816, as <br />Amended Under Resolution No. 4824. (Arthur C. Carmichael, Jr. and Larry Von Klein) <br /> <br /> Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to adopt the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor pulled Item D. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item D was approved with a <br />unanimous vote, 7:0. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council -- February 27, 2006 Page 6 <br /> City Council Meeting <br /> <br />