Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Poling did not want to limit the study but based on the community input ODOT received he would <br />support the amendment. <br /> <br /> The amendment to the motion passed, 7:1; Mr. Papé voting no. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé advocated for a study of signage throughout the State system. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé clarified with Mr. Sessions that the figures he had offered were specific to traffic traveling to <br />Eugene, not to Springfield. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé said the State might not have identified a problem to the State system but that did not mean there <br />were no local problems at the Franklin and Glenwood interchanges. He thought there were many safety <br />issues that existed in the area in question. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor moved to give priority in the study to environment, aesthetic, and cost factors, <br />as well as neighborhood impacts. The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 7:1; Ms. Taylor voting no. <br /> <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Strategies for Long-Term Financial Stability for Transportation <br />System Operations, Maintenance, and Preservation <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kurt Corey and Senior Management Analyst Larry Hill of the Financial Services <br />Division were present for them item. Mr. Corey reminded the council of its September 26 work session on <br />the topic, during which it discussed the three elements of road funding in Eugene (operations and mainte- <br />nance, capital preservation, and new construction). At that time, he had reported that a $586,000 shortfall <br />existed in the operational budget, which was projected to grow to $800,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2007 and $2 <br />million in FY08. He attributed the shortfall to the fact the service was funded through the State gas tax and <br />Lane County Road Fund. The gas tax had not increased in ten years and revenues from the Road Fund had <br />steadily decreased. The capital preservation budget continued to be about $4.7 million short annually, <br />although some progress had been made. The deferred maintenance backlog was now in excess of $100 <br />million. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey indicated that additional efficiency gains sufficient to fill the gaps were not possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey reviewed a series of strategies for the long-term financial stability of transportation funding. <br />They included street lighting fees; a total or partial shift of funding for street trees and median maintenance <br />to the Stormwater Fund and other City funds; and establishment of a transportation system maintenance fee <br />(TSMF). He said that attachments B and D in the Agenda Item Summary (AIS) provided additional history <br />on the TSMF. He also called attention to the staff memorandum prepared as Attachment A in response to <br />questions regarding the City’s current list of street projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to direct the City Manager to include in the <br />FY07 Proposed Budget a shift in 50 percent of the funding for the street trees/median main- <br />tenance program from the Road Fund to the Stormwater Fund. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 15, 2006 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />