My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 02/13/06 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:27 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 1:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Piercy called for comments on the motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said he reviewed the issue carefully and believed he could support the findings with the <br />provision there were ways for the owner-occupied properties to address the costs of the assessment in some <br />fashion. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the proposal was consistent with the City’s assessment policies, with which she did <br />not agree, so she would vote against the motion. She questioned what other neighborhoods the City would <br />identify to improve alley access after this, and said that such an assessment could be devastating to the <br />average homeowner. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé was supportive of efforts to improve City alleys and he was happy to start in west Eugene. <br />He referred to the soft costs referred to in the minutes and asked if the 28.5 percentage for engineering fees <br />cited was accurate. Mr. Klope did not know where that figure came from. The project was charged the <br />actual costs of staff time. He believed that the concerns cited by residents with regard to costs were based <br />on the fact that City engineering costs included overhead as well as benefit costs. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé said he would like the City to do such a project using private companies and compare that to <br />the City’s costs as he frequently heard complaints about the City’s higher costs. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé said he was also concerned about the perception of “bait and switch” in the costs as <br />evidenced by the minutes. He thought that created a breach in the public trust. Mr. Klope noted the earlier <br />estimates were done prior to the design. Councilor Papé acknowledged that but thought it a poor practice. <br />City Manager Taylor called Councilor Papé’s attention to a table comparing the City’s charge out rates with <br />private rates, showing the City’s rates were lower. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor indicated she would vote against the motion because she did not think the City’s <br />assessment system was fair and many did not want the proposed improvements. Even with ten years to pay, <br />the assessments were a significant amount of money for many residents. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor noted the ordinance had an immediate effective date, requiring six affirmative votes to <br />proceed. There would be additional costs associated with any delay. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor determined that it was City policy to assess for 100 percent of the costs of sidewalks. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly recalled the work done by a subcommittee of the City Council, which had developed the <br />system after a great deal of study. That did not preclude future changes. He pointed out, however, that <br />while the Garden Club was a nonprofit organization, so was PeaceHealth. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested there may be communication issues as representatives of a church she spoke to <br />believe the church was exempt from the assessment, which was not the case. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor responded to Councilor Kelly, saying that said the Garden Club did not make money and <br />PeaceHealth did. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting no. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 13, 2006 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.