Laserfiche WebLink
opportunities; not all those opportunities were acquisitions. He would have difficulty supporting a bond that <br />was just for acquisition. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor proposed a substitute motion to direct the City Manager to prepare a <br />Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Bond Measure for 2006 in an amount not to <br />exceed $20 million for uses to be determined by the end of March 2006. Ms. Ortiz <br />provided the second. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor opposed the substitute motion and thought that land acquisition was the important thing. She <br />asked the cost of all land acquisition on the list. Ms. Weiss replied the cost was approximately $23 million. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor said that to be successful on the November 2006 ballot it was necessary to demon- <br />strate the City was maintaining level of service in terms of the main library and branch libraries, maintaining <br />its commitment to schools and taking an opportunity approach to parks based on community needs instead <br />of limiting expenditures to acquisition and the wetlands center. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman stated she did not believe that a $50 million bond would pass, but a limited bond for the <br />purpose of acquisition could be successful. She said that library services should be paid for out of the <br />City’s general fund and existing revenue and a levy should not be placed on the ballot. She thought that a <br />parks bond focused on land banking would have a favorable response from the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly indicated he would vote against the substitute motion because a measure in 2006 needed to be <br />focused. He agreed that maintenance was important and the project list was well thought out, but <br />acquisition was most important. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé said he was willing to continue to move the issue forward but was prepared to fight for parks in <br />the northern area of the City. <br /> <br />The substitute motion failed, 7:1; Mr. Pryor voting in favor. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor moved to substitute enough funding to acquire all the land on the list. <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor reminded everyone that in 1938 when the community had a population of fewer than 50,000 the <br />ridgeline was saved for future generations. She pointed out there were communities that did not save land <br />and were now demolishing buildings to create parks. <br /> <br />The main motion as amended passed, 6:2; Ms. Solomon and Mr. Poling opposed. <br /> <br /> <br />D. WORK SESSION: Downtown Development Update – Oregon Research Institute <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced Denny Braud of the Community Development Division to discuss the <br />Oregon Research Institute’s (ORI) proposed purchase and redevelopment of the former Sears building site. <br /> <br />Mr. Braud reviewed the history of the council’s selection of the ORI project based on ORI’s longstanding <br />presence in and contributions to the community. He said the Platinum Level LEED (Leadership in Energy <br />and Environmental Design) building proposed by ORI was an impressive undertaking and would be an <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 13, 2006 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />