Laserfiche WebLink
on a fair and equitable system of taxation and other revenue sources and are adequate to main and <br />deliver municipal services." The 2001-2002 City Council Work Plan Item 1 under this goal called for an <br />effort to "Identify and implement funding sources (including possible reallocation of existing sources) <br />for operation, maintenance and preservation of the transportation system." It was based on this charge <br />that the Citizen' s Subcommittee on Transportation System Funding began meeting in September of <br />2000 to study this issue and develop its report and recommendation. <br /> <br />Additionally, the City's FinancialManagement Goals andPoficy, A. 4, states that the City's municipal <br />service priority Level 2 (second only to the preservation of the public safety system) is to "maintain and <br />replace the City' s fixed assets, which includes.., infrastructure.., so as to optimize their life." <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br />Option 1: The council could choose to take no action at this time with regard to the need for additional <br /> pavement preservation funding. <br />Option 2: The council could direct the City Manager to bring back for discussion an ordinance to <br /> increase the local motor vehicle fuel tax by 7 cents, to a total 1 O-cent tax, to address unmet <br /> pavement preservation program funding needs; <br />Option 3: The council could direct the City Manager to bring back for discussion an ordinance to <br /> reinstitute a transportation maintenance fee to generate an additional net $4.5 million <br /> annually for pavement preservation funding; or <br />Option 4: The council could direct the City Manager to bring back for discussion ordinances which <br /> would implement a combination increase in the motor vehicle fuel tax, along with a more <br /> modest transportation system maintenance fee, in order to generate an additional net $4.5 <br /> million annually for pavement preservation funding. <br /> <br />Each one-cent incremental increase in the fuel tax is estimated to generate $650,000 to $700,000 in <br />additional net revenue. Attachment A illustrates the projected consequence of no additional funding for <br />the pavement preservation backlog. <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION <br />The City Manager recommends that the council hold additional work sessions and public hearings prior <br />to the end of the calendar year to consider the implementation of a two-cent increase to the existing local <br />motor fuel tax and the reinstitution of an ordinance imposing a Transportation System Maintenance Fee. <br /> <br />The goal for this initiative would be to raise an additional $4.5 million annually for critical pavement <br />preservation needs. This new revenue, together with existing dedicated revenue sources, would generate <br />approximately $9 million annually to address this high-priority funding need. This overall target <br />revenue goal is consistent with the funding level recommended by the Citizen Subcommittee on <br />Transportation System Funding in its report to the council in October 2001. This funding level <br />continues to be an appropriate target because it would allow the City to make effective progress in <br />addressing the backlog of pavement preservation projects while also mitigating the disruption to the <br />transportation system and the community due to the number of street projects going on in any one <br />construction season. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040927\S040927B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />