My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-09/27/04Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:19 PM
Creation date
9/23/2004 9:34:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Solomon said the property owners had not opposed the improvements in their entirety so much as <br />they felt the planned improvements were excessive for the street. She agreed that much good will had been <br />created with the River Road/Santa Clara area and this forced annexation could harm the progress that had <br />occurred. She noted that a resident there had suggested an "Annexation Amnesty Day," adding that she <br />thought it was an idea with merit. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson said while it was obvious what the City stood to gain from the annexation, the City <br />needed to ask what the property owners stood to gain. She acknowledged that many people benefit from <br />living and working in the urban area without having to pay for the urban services or having to vote. She <br />supported annexation in most cases. She commented that the project was necessary and inevitable, but that <br />for the present, it would be better to select another project from the capital improvement project list. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner stated that he had been working on the idea of an "Annexation Amnesty" day with <br />assistant City Manager Jim Carlson for "many months." He expressed hope that they would get a response <br />to it. He felt testimony had indicated that the opposition to the improvements was not absolute. He noted <br />that the Crest Drive neighbors had sought input on a different design of street changes and suggested that the <br />City look into a more flexible design for River Avenue. He said he would not support a forced annexation. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Solomon, Ms. Cahill said the interchange to Beltline Road would <br />not be improved in this plan as it was not under the jurisdiction of the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey averred that, though the City largely focused on the River Road area, there were a number of <br />islands of non-annexed property. He observed that many people in the River Road area had signs on their <br />front lawns that expressed their extreme opposition to annexation to the City. He advised against approving <br />the forced annexation of the River Avenue properties as it would promote anti-annexation sentiments. He <br />recommended the City Council hold a discussion on its approach to annexation. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion failed by a unanimous vote, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for a five-minute break. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 13, 2004 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.