Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />? <br /> Concerns <br /> <br />Process will break down before we get to the design process <br />o <br /> <br />Decision-makers outside the process will affect our work with this group <br />o <br /> <br />Our input is valued and actually will be part of the decisions made <br />o <br /> <br />No game playing <br />o <br /> <br />Operate in an environment of honesty and trust <br />o <br /> <br />The group might become polarized <br />o <br /> <br />We get the views of the entire neighborhood represented <br />o <br />? <br /> Fears <br /> <br />Fear of change in the neighborhood ambiance <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of more and faster traffic <br />o <br /> <br />Fear for health and safety of neighborhood wildlife <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of loss of tree canopy <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of empty wallets <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of streets being realigned too close to our homes <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of loss of social access because of street barriers <br />o <br /> <br />Fear of pitting neighbor against neighbor/street against street in street placement <br />o <br /> <br />decisions <br /> <br />Fear of loss of rural feel <br />o <br /> <br />Fear the city council won’t support our results <br />o <br /> <br />Moving Forward <br />Participants were asked to comment on whether they thought progress was made and to provide any <br />other comments regarding the process. Comments written on note cards are included here: <br />? <br /> <br />“Thanks for anticipating what this group will need to successfully complete our task (particularly <br />re: city staff). Yes, I see us moving along. I sense that city staff is moving into the zone where <br />they are positive about this process, Thanks.” <br />? <br /> <br />“We moved forward. I was uncomfortable after the last meeting, feel more comfortable now.” <br />? <br /> <br />“Good combination of process and substance tonight. Got us through rough spots to decisions. <br />Good time management.” <br />? <br /> <br />Meeting was a little less positive that the last, bit more muddled. Very important issue raised- not <br />allow people that haven’t come to last meeting to take too much time with getting caught up or <br />second guess decisions.” <br />? <br /> <br />“We moved forward slowly, I feel” <br />st <br />? <br /> <br />“Moved forward some. Too much re-hashing of last week’s agenda the 1 hour. Need to get <br />started on time. People who have been absent from a previous meeting need to read minutes and <br />consult with a fellow member prior to meeting.” <br />? <br /> <br />“Feels good.” <br />? <br /> <br />“Yes, we moved forward. So far, there is more trust in the group than I expected.” <br />? <br /> <br />“Question: why can’t Storey/Crest/Friendly benefit from simply letting the Blanton Rd. model <br />apply?” <br />? <br /> <br />“We need some skills for dealing with members who seem to be so distrustful of <br />anything/everything going on that they threaten to derail the process.” <br />? <br /> <br />“We made progress, but so much depends on what the city says must be done next meeting. Can <br />we by consensus stop or redirect the musts?” <br />Page 12 of 27 <br />