My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 05/08/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:20 PM
Creation date
5/4/2006 9:17:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bettman said the issue at hand was the attitude demonstrated by the e-mail, which implied to staff <br />below management level that it was “okay” to portray and perpetrate a negative attitude toward elected <br />officials. She did not believe that staff and the council had a partnership because the playing field was not <br />level. She said she could take criticism; that was not the issue. The issue was the ability of a high-level <br />staff person to undermine her credibility with other staff when she was trying to advance the values of her <br />constituents. She reiterated that her communications were public and a matter of public record. If she said <br />something that someone did not like and it got around, she was accountable for that. When staff communi- <br />cated in secret away from the public, it did not add to a level playing field. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she knew there would be a backlash against her and people would make the issue about <br />her, but she brought the issue up because she found it so important. She said it was important that the <br />organization model respect for the councilors who worked hard to get elected, worked for practically free, <br />and attempted to do the best for their constituents. She concluded there should be zero tolerance for “that <br />kind of undermining.” <br /> <br />Ms. Muir said she was aware that in the past, Planning staff indicated to councilors that there was a <br />prohibition on direct communications but that had been a matter of misunderstanding. Chief Tallon added <br />that there was no prohibition in his department on communicating with the council, but the City Manager <br />indicated he wanted to know when conversations between the council and staff took place so that he was <br />aware of what was going on and staff could provide consistent information to all members of the council. <br />Chief Tallon thought the result was improved and consistent communication. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly expressed surprise at the remarks of Chief Tallon as he thought City Manager Taylor indicated <br />the council could talk only to him, the staff responsible for preparing an agenda item summary, and the <br />executive manager. He thought a clear, written clarification from City Manager Taylor to the council and <br />the executive management team about the policy would be in order. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said the organizational culture was nothing the council could impact directly and it could not <br />direct everyone to get along. However, culture could be influenced by respect, trust, communication, and <br />team work. If one worked on those four elements, one could begin to change a culture. He was concerned <br />that, currently, the culture between elected officials and staff was suffering. He attributed that to a lack of <br />respect, teamwork, communication, and trust. Mr. Pryor did not know where that came from, nor did he <br />care, but believed something needed to be done immediately to improve those four elements, which would <br />lead to improved relationships. He was concerned that the trust level between elected officials and staff was <br />not as good as it could be, and that second-guessing was going on. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor recalled that in an earlier process session, the council reviewed the staff contact <br />question, and it was his expectation that the council would generally communicate through the manager, the <br />assistant manager, the executive managers, and the staff responsible for an agenda item summary. With <br />regard to councilors communicating with other staff, that was perfectly acceptable and it was his expecta- <br />tion that the staff involved in the contact would let him and the executive manager know of it. He said he <br />would be happy to clarify that for the council in writing. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman shared Mr. Kelly’s recollection about council-staff communications. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked City Manager Taylor what happened when someone violated the City’s respectful work <br />environment policy. City Manager Taylor said that he would coach and counsel the individual, who may be <br />subject to discipline. He noted that there was an ongoing investigation into the incident. Ms. Bettman asked <br />if there would be a point at which City Manager Taylor could talk about the incident. City Manager Taylor <br />said yes, but he would not be able to discuss any disciplinary actions he took with regard to Assistant City <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 17, 2006 Page 11 <br /> Process Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.