Laserfiche WebLink
 <br />Introduction <br /> <br /> <br />, requires the Board to <br />and present an annual report to the city council that: <br /> <br />(a)Summarizes the civil <br />the preceding year; <br /> <br />(b), <br /> <br />(c)e, including whether the office is functioning as <br />intended. [ORD 20374; 2.246 (7)] <br /> <br />(CRB) is designed to provide transparency and help ensure public <br />confidence in the police complaint process. The Board evaluates the work of the independent Police <br />Auditor, and reviews complaints to provide a community perspective about whether complaints are <br />handled fairly and with due diligence. <br /> <br />During case reviews, Board members discuss, deliberate and analyze the Internal Affairs <br />investigation, Auditors monitoring of the Eugene Police Department internal <br />administrative investigations and have the opportunity to discuss, agree or disagree on the <br />n. The review of the <br />investigations may include, but are not limited to: reviewing investigative files, listening to digital <br />recordings of interviews and live audio from the scene of an incident, and observing videos related <br />to complaints. We decide whether we agree with the classification of the complaint and have the <br />opportunity to review policy and service complaints classified as something other than an allegation <br />of misconduct. Service Complaints are complaints aboutolice employee performance or <br />with both the complainant and the officer. The supervisor prepares a memo detailing their review of <br />the complaint and contact with the involved parties. The OPA reviews the materials for <br />completeness and thoroughness, and then contacts the complainant for a follow-up and a survey. <br />CRB reviews of service complaint files do not contain the same level of detail found in the <br />investigative files related to allegations of misconduct. Nonetheless, we try to make a practice of <br />reviewing service and policy complaints during at least one meeting per year. Further, each month <br />we receive information regarding all complaints received by the OPA (including inquiries, service <br />complaints, and policy complaints). Questions regarding the classifications of such complaints are <br />posed to the Auditor during board meetings. <br />Our meetings are open to the public and provide an opportunity to learn about the complaint process. <br />While we are committed to maintaining the confidentiality of the involved parties, discussing <br />complaints in public allows the community to learn about the complaint intakes, classifications, <br />investigations and determinations as they are discussed openly and critically. <br /> <br />In addition to case reviews, the CRB engages in continuous learning associated with police practices, <br />civil rights, constitutional based policing practices, and interactions with vulnerable communities. <br />The efforts in continuous learning prove beneficial to the Bto its mission by <br />ensuring a comprehensive understanding of relevant processes and community factors influencing <br />various decision makers and affected parties. <br />ϯ <br />