Laserfiche WebLink
<br />however, is proposing extensive development setbacks, almost two acres more, than are <br />required by current code. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this issue in detail during their deliberations and ultimately <br />found that the proposal resulted in an overall expansion of the protected and enhanced area along <br />the river. <br /> <br />Attachment B illustrates the proposed Willamette River Greenway setback, and the extent of areas <br />that are otherwise exempt from the Water Resource overlay setbacks (currently paved or existing <br />buildings). <br /> <br />Potential Funding Sources for Public Improvements <br />Implementing the master plan will require on-going collaboration and leveraging of funds from <br />multiple sources. There are a variety of public and private funding sources that will likely be <br />considered. Private sources primarily include developer investment, potentially from multiple <br />developers. Public sources could include grants from state or federal sources, Riverfront urban <br />renewal funds and other City-controlled sources, as well as participation from EWEB. As an <br />example, Public Works staff is coordinating with EWEB to pursue federal grant funding to <br />reconstruct and realign the section of riverfront path within the master plan area. Additional <br />options such as the formation of a local improvement district and other public-private <br />partnerships have also been discussed. Until a development entity and a timeline are secured, <br />amounts and sources are difficult to estimate. <br /> <br />Options and future decisions regarding financial tools, incentives, and public-private partnerships <br />will come back to the council for further discussion once the regulatory framework is in place. <br /> <br />Future Park Site/ Riverfront Open Space <br />The same is true of options that exist for future park ownership and maintenance, which will <br />depend largely on the outcome of this process to first establish the park location and basic <br />regulatory framework for redevelopment of the site. In the case of the EWEB property, an existing <br />Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) identifies the City’s option to declare interest in all or a <br />part of the site, once the proposed land use application package is adopted and EWEB indicates its <br />intent to sell the property. A variety of options exist and have yet to be decided in terms of future <br />ownership and management of the park site. <br /> <br />Based on the level of interest in the proposed riverfront open space, additional details are <br />provided in Attachment C, including a set of design guidelines and a detailed open space diagram <br />from the plan. These materials help to show the intended location for various park improvements, <br />riparian enhancements, native habitat areas, interpretive sites and other park elements including <br />areas that could be available for community gardens. <br /> <br />The proposal is based upon a “Riverfront Ecological Analysis and Design” report that was prepared <br />during the master planning process, which includes an analysis and recommendations about the <br />site’s ecological condition, riparian restoration, and balancing of these opportunities among <br />economic, social, and environmental concerns. A specific native planting list developed as part of <br />this analysis is included in the adoption package. These materials help to show the balanced <br />approach envisioned in the master plan for compact urban development, reconnecting downtown <br />S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130612\S130612A.doc <br />