Laserfiche WebLink
<br />") RElJVEDI.J,.PUBUC 14EARINQ . <br />ON: . fY\~r c;.'" 14, ~OO(P <br />FILE NO:~C oiP -II <br /> <br />Public Testimony Before the Eugene Planning Commission <br />On Street Naming of the So Called Jrd/4th Connector <br />To Shelton Boulevard on Tuesday, March 14,2006 <br />By Ray Wiley, SMJ Associates Board Member <br /> <br />Approximately six years ago, the SMJ Board started to look at the possibility of naming <br />the street that runs east to west in front of the house with a name that would be historic to <br />tie it to the House. At the time, we were told that tIle only way that could happen would <br />be for all of the property owners along the street to agree on a name. The manager of the <br />apartment complex to the west of the House was contacted. Since the name of their <br />complex is "One West Fourth Apartments", they wanted to keep their current address. <br />So, in our mind, that killed the idea. <br /> <br />Some time after that, We folli1d otif that the City planned to brit1g that street up to local <br />standards with a major redesign, a.nd also that the Whiteaker Reflfiert1eftt Plan had <br />proposed many yeats ago giving the street an histonc name tied to the house. This raised <br />our interest in again pursuing an historic name. We talked with several councilors and <br />Public Works staff; they seemed to be very supportive of our desire. We preferred the <br />name ""Shelton Way", but someone told us that we couldn't use a name similar to another <br />in the City. Since there was already a very short street in SW Eugene named "Shelton <br />Ave.", we switched to McMurphey Way. A letter was sent to Mayor Torrey and the City <br />Councilors on September 23, 2003 requesting that name. At the time, we were given <br />assurance that would happen when the new construction was completed. <br /> <br />When the new street was nearing completion, Public Works staff asked us, what name did <br />we want for the street. We told them McMurphey Way. Later we were told by Mary <br />Walston, that we would have go tP.1"ough some kind of formal process, she wasn't sure <br />what, but we should talk with Gab Flock in Planning. I had a meeting soon after with Gab; <br />the most significant thing to come out of that meeting was that no one was sure whether the <br />street had ever been officially named. He said if that was the case, it would much easier to <br />fiame it. I called the surveyof, DOM Stetfitfi'S office, and they did significant research, and <br />determined the street had never been officially named, even though they used "3rd_4th <br />Avenue Connector" on the plat map. <br /> <br />I relayed this information to Gab and Eric Jones in Public Works. Eric told me that Ken <br />Guzowski had done considerable historic research on streets in that area and had found a <br />number of old Sanborn maps, but none showed a name for the street in question. There <br />was one very interesting fmding, two of the maps (1925 & 1962) showed that the street <br />