Laserfiche WebLink
Plans for phase two improvements include an expanded play area, an extended <br />path system, signage, a small central gathering space with picnic tables, and <br />potentially a picnic shelter. Phase two improvements are given a priority one <br />ranking in the Project and Priority Plan with a $100,000 budget. <br /> <br /> <br />5. Provide clarification on the growth allocation percentages, specifically address: <br /> <br />. All of the <br /> Testimony regarding existing deficiencies of neighborhood parkland <br />? <br />growth allocation percentages, including that for neighborhood park land <br />acquisition, are derived based on a capacity needs analysis. Growth <br />allocations are based on examination of system-wide capacity using <br />examination of the future LOS resulting from the proposed Project Plan, <br />with land acquisition and park development levels of service evaluated <br />separately. In the case of neighborhood park land acquisition, the future <br />LOS resulting from the projects in the proposed Project Plan is slightly less <br />than the existing level of service. After allocating existing neighborhood <br />park land to meet the needs of the existing population, all of <br />neighborhood park land acquisition in the Project Plan is needed to meet <br />the capacity needs of growth. A system-wide analysis and the simplifying <br />assumption that capacity needs of the existing population are met first by <br />the existing parks inventory avoids the complexity of an analysis of the <br />exact location of individual parks and park service areas in relation to the <br />exact location of individual developments. If capacity in existing parks <br />were allocated to both existing users and growth, the value of growth’s <br />share of existing park capacity would need to be recovered through a <br />reimbursement fee SDC. The capacity analysis used is less complex and <br />relies on fewer assumptions while the net effect is anticipated to be <br />generally cost-neutral, both to growth and the existing community. <br /> <br /> <br />The <br /> Will SDC’s be charged for projects outside of the Urban Growth Boundary? <br />? <br />Project and Priority Plan includes projects which are located outside of <br />Eugene’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). When identifying parcels for <br />park acquisition, the preference is on obtaining properties that are in close <br />proximity to residents, and therefore within Eugene’s UGB. However, <br />there are some instances when it may become necessary to look outside of <br />the UGB. For example, it is a goal of the PROS Comprehensive Plan to <br />provide a variety of outdoor experiences for Eugene residents, including <br />the rural, natural qualities that one encounters in the Ridgeline Park <br />system. Additionally, there may be times when the type and size of <br />parcels which are sought to provide specific park services are not <br />available within the UGB because of previous development. Because <br />these projects are intended to provide park services to City residents, <br />SDC’s can be collected for growth’s share of the proposed projects. <br />Project and Priority Plan- May 8, 2006 <br />Council Response Page 3 <br />