My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Ordinance on EWEB Downtown Riverfront Property
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2013
>
CC Agenda - 06/17/13 Public Hearing
>
Item 1: Ordinance on EWEB Downtown Riverfront Property
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2013 2:51:17 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 2:41:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/17/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EWEB DOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT <br />LAND USE COMPONENTS <br /> <br />A Programmatic Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared as part of this proposal (Exhibit D <br />TPR/TIA Report). The TIA measured peak hour impact under the proposed zoning for selected <br />redevelopment scenarios. The findings, as outlined in findings for Goal 9 in EC 9.7730(3)(a), <br />demonstrate no significant effect to existing transportation facilities. The proposed amendment is <br />compliant with existing regulations, including the TIA requirements, which demonstrate that it meets <br />roadway standards. Therefore, the proposed amendments and zone change are consistent with <br />Policy F.17. <br />Public Facilities and Services Element <br />Services to Development Within the Urban Growth Boundary: Planning and <br />Coordination <br />G.5 The cities shall continue joint planning coordination with major institutions, <br />such as universities and hospitals, due to their relatively large impact on <br />local facilities and services. <br />Implementation of the land use components of the proposal will consummate the results of joint <br />planning coordination between EWEB, the City of Eugene, and the University of Oregon, which <br />owns property adjacent to the subject site, through participation and involvement in the Master Plan <br />visioning process and development of the implementation tools herein. Based on these findings, <br />the proposed amendments and zone change are compliant with Policy G.5. <br />Energy Element <br />J.7 Encourage medium- and high-density residential uses when balanced <br />with other planning policies in order to maximize the efficient utilization of <br />all forms of energy. The greatest energy savings can be made in the <br />areas of space heating and cooling and transportation. For example, the <br />highest relative densities of residential development shall be concentrated <br />to the greatest extent possible in areas that are or can be well served by <br />mass transit, paratransit, and foot and bicycle paths. <br />J.8 Commercial, residential, and recreational land uses shall be integrated to <br />the greatest extent possible, balanced with all planning policies to reduce <br />travel distances, optimize reuse of waste heat, and optimize potential on- <br />site energy generation. <br />This proposal establishes the framework for a vibrant, active, pedestrian-oriented mixed-use <br />redevelopment. Form based development standards and transportation system standards in the <br />proposed S-DR Zone (Exhibit B S-DR Downtown Riverfront Special Area Zone) implement Nodal <br />Development and Transit-oriented Development principles. The subject site is located within <br />th <br />walking distance to the downtown core and the 5 Street commercial corridor, as well as LTD <br />transit routes and the Amtrak rail station. On-site circulation patterns and public amenities along <br />the riverfront are designed to promote pedestrian and bicycle activities. Based on these findings, <br />the proposed amendments and zone change are consistent with Policies J.7 and J.8. <br />The findings in EC 9.7730(3)(b) above demonstrate that the proposed amendments and zone <br />change are consistent with all applicable Metro Plan policies. As such, approval of this proposal <br />does not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. This criterion is satisfied. <br /> <br /> <br /> Cameron McCarthy FINAL SUBMITTAL | December 5, 2012 <br />{00091176;1 } <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.