Laserfiche WebLink
Through traffic that does not patronize any of the businesses could be "pushed" onto Amazon <br />Parkway. Most automobile drivers and bus drivers know how to handle a bike lane on the right <br />hand side so I don't think it should be thought of as a negative aspect for vehicle or transit <br />access/ mobility. <br />Need to make bike lanes visible to cars, sidewalks less ideal. <br />Safe bike blvds. Or lane with buffer. <br />This is difficult to choose as details of a potential "cycle track" on the wider sidewalks were not <br />provided. Comparing the bike path and non -bike path plans is difficult with this info missing. <br />First and foremost I believe we need dedicated bicycle lanes. But where the bike lanes are <br />provided for, if lane widths can be narrowed to provide more sidewalk, that is my next personal <br />priority. I cycle on this stretch of Willamette 4 -6 days/ week and do most of my shopping there, <br />using a bicycle and a trailer. <br />Please consider the needs of aging citizens. We walk, use the bus and our children and grand <br />children bike and bus to work and school. The auto continues to be importat but is not the most <br />important. Willamette between 24th and 29th has wonderful businesses who would thrive <br />under improved conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. <br />Bike/ ped infrastructure improvements = increased business! <br />If you are looking at Portland for a bikeway, what happens southbound to get from 27th and <br />29th, no way you can expect cyclists to climb the hill on 27th to Linclon. Oak North doesn't get <br />you to 24th either. Getting cyclists and pedestrians in the other area will increase business. Goal <br />decrease cars, increase bikes and pedestrians. <br />Top priorities in my opinion (in this order): Safety; bike lanes; cleaned up sidewalks, as wide as <br />possible; fewer, wider driveways. <br />Please become aware of your language use, it has real life consequences: capacity, volume are <br />making yourdesigns but always refering to automobiles that then have to be accomodated. <br />What about taking biking/ walking capacity as your guideline? <br />Bike and ped only and public trans (bus). With a town as progressive as Eugene, start a <br />greenway where cars have to go around. Pedestrians and bikes and trees will have the right of <br />way. There would be space for parades, "street" performers, musicians, etc... <br />Improve street trees. Improve bike ways in the area. <br />Both as a driver and a cyclist, I prefer having a curb between cars and bikes. I have some <br />concerns re: mixing bikes and pedestrians on the sidewalk, although that already happens on <br />the existing 6 ft sidewalk. <br />I believe left turn lanes would please businesses and car commuters to continue car flow. <br />However, I am a pedestrian hoping to be a bicyclist visiting these businesses (already a bicyclist) <br />if it were safer. Fewer lanes would make it so much better to cross. Wider sidewalks make a real <br />visual impact that the area is being slowed down... also potential for beautification, which <br />should be positive for businesses. Prevent driving on sidewalk with trees? Landscaping? Bicycle <br />parking that doubles as preventing cars? Envision Eugene ideas for furniture, etc. <br />I understand that VMT are decreasing, suggesting that we should weight non -auto needs higher <br />than current usage to better prepare for the future. <br />