Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be consistent with the <br />Metro Plan. (Page II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (Page II-C-4) <br /> <br />Policy 16. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (Page II-C-5) <br /> <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The <br />River Road/Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the adopted refinement plan <br />for the subject properties and also designates the area for residential uses. If the <br />annexation is approved, per EC 9.7820(3), the annexation area will remain zoned R-1, <br />and the /UL overlay will be automatically removed from the annexation area. <br /> <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is not within a <br />subarea; of the general “Residential Land Use Policies” at Section 2.2, none appear to be <br />directly applicable to the subject request. The “Public Facilities and Services Element” <br />policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at local government; however, the premise of <br />these policies (regarding the provision of urban services) is the assumption that the <br />properties within the UGB will be annexed. <br /> <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br /> <br /> <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, <br />efficient, and timely manner. <br /> <br /> Findings: The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level <br />Complies of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely <br />manner as detailed below: <br />YES NO <br /> <br />Wastewater <br />Public wastewater is provided by the existing 8-inch mainline located within Maple <br />Drive, which serves the existing dwelling on the subject property. <br /> <br />Stormwater <br />Public stormwater facilities are not available, but on-site management of stormwater <br />runoff from future development of the site appears to be feasible. Soil infiltration testing <br />Raterman (A 12-4) December 2012 Page 2 <br /> <br />