My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20513
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2013 No. 20504 - 20519
>
Ordinance No. 20513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2013 11:57:21 AM
Creation date
7/11/2013 11:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20513
Document_Title
EWEB Master Plan
Adopted_Date
7/9/2013
Approved Date
7/9/2013
CMO_Effective_Date
8/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
501
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) Master Planned Development <br />Appendix B <br />APPENDIX 6 LEVEL -OF- SERVICE CONCEPT <br />October 2012 <br />Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such <br />elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by <br />other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six <br />grades are used to denote the various level of service from "A" to "F ".1 <br />Signalized Intersections <br />The six level -of- service grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table B1. <br />Additionally, Table B2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average control delay per <br />vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped <br />delay, and final acceleration delay. Using this definition, Level of Service "D" is generally considered to <br />represent the minimum acceptable design standard. <br />Table B -1 Level -of- Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) <br />Level of <br />$ervice <br />Average Delay per Vehicle <br />Very low average control delay, less than 10 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely <br />favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths <br />A <br />may also contribute to low delay. <br />Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle. This <br />generally occurs with good progression and /or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a level of service A, <br />B <br />causing higher levels of average delay. <br />Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle. <br />These higher delays may result from fair progression and /or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may <br />begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass <br />C <br />through the intersection without stopping. <br />Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle. The <br />influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of <br />unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume /capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion <br />D <br />of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. <br />Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle. This <br />is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally (but not always) indicate <br />poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume /capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent <br />E <br />occurrences. <br />Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. <br />This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume /capacity ratios below 1.0 with <br />many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay <br />F <br />values. <br />' Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, (2000). <br />I / Kittelson & Associates, Inc. B -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.