Laserfiche WebLink
Work Plan Objective 3.3 – Coordinate joint meetings with the Citizen Review Board and <br />Human Rights Commission to increase mutual understanding and trust. Status: A joint <br />meeting was held with the Civilian Review Board in September. A joint meeting is <br />scheduled for May 29 with the Human Rights Commission to discuss alternatives to the <br />Downtown Public Safety Zone. <br /> <br /> <br />Goal 4 – Encourage problem solving and partnerships between people, neighborhoods and other <br />agencies and police <br /> <br />Work Plan Objective 4.1 – Organize and hold a community panel on the State of Public <br />Safety. Status: This Panel will be held June 27. Invited panelists include the District <br />Attorney, Municipal Court Presiding Judge, Eugene Police Chief, Director of St. Vincent <br />de Paul’s, Police Auditor, and Lane County Sheriff. <br /> <br /> Work Plan Objective 4.2 – Pursue including hate crimes work in with Gang Symposium <br />scheduled in Fall 2012. Status: Met with planners of the Gang Symposium in July, and <br />due in part to feedback from the Police Commission, the Symposium facilitator selected <br />had significant expertise and experience in hate crimes. The definition of “gang” was <br />created to include gangs which engage in hate crimes. <br /> <br />Goal 5 – Provide fair opportunities for the public and criminal justice professionals to comment and <br />participate in the commission’s work recognizing the interconnectedness of the criminal justice system <br /> <br />Work Plan Objective 5.1 – Coordinate and organize a panel to discuss the State of Public <br />Safety, to garner community support Status: This Panel will be held June 27. Panelists <br />include the District Attorney, Municipal Court Presiding Judge, Eugene Police Chief, <br />Director of St. Vincent de Paul’s, Police Auditor, and Lane County Sheriff. <br /> <br />Work Plan Objective 5.2 – Through community discussions about domestic violence, and <br />participation in the gang symposium, provide opportunities for the public to comment about <br />these aspects of criminal justice. Status: Held discussion at January and March Police <br />Commission meetings. Received recommendations on changes. <br /> <br />An additional priority objective was developed regarding reviewing resources, meeting schedules and <br />balancing the priorities of the Commission. While this does not fit in the adopted Commission goals, <br />in FY 2013 it will be critical for the Commission to continually review and assess its priorities and <br />resources. The Police Department has redirected staff resources from the Police Commission to <br />perform duties formerly completed by vacant positions. Up to approximately 510 hours of staff time <br />are available and can be contributed to the Commission’s work plan. Status: Fewer committee <br />meetings and abbreviated minutes have helped reduce the staff time demands for the Police <br />Commission. Continued review and assessment of commission priorities and resources will <br />remain critical. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FY 2014 – FY 2015 Police Commission Work Plan <br />