Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br />limit to environmental conditions, lack of public agency financial resources, or land use <br />constraint factors. It is not the intent of TSI Roadway Policy #2: Motor Vehicle Level of <br />Service to require deferral of development in such cases. The intent is to defer motor <br />vehicle capacity increasing transportation system improvements until existing constraints <br />can be overcome or develop an alternative mix of strategies (such as: land use <br />measures, TDM, short-term safety improvements) to address the problem. <br /> <br /> <br />Policy F.15 of the Eugene-Springfield Area Metropolitan Plan, is amended as follows: <br /> <br />F.15 Motor vehicle level of service policy: <br /> <br /> <br />a.Use motor vehicle level of service standards to maintain acceptable and reliable <br />performance on the roadway system. These standards shall be used for: <br />(1) Identifying capacity deficiencies on the roadway system. <br />(2) Evaluating the impacts on roadways of amendments to transportation <br />plans, acknowledged comprehensive plans and land-use regulations, <br />pursuant to the TPR (OAR 660-12-0060). <br />(3) Evaluating development applications for consistency with the land-use <br />regulations of the applicable local government jurisdiction. <br /> <br />b. Acceptable and reliable performance is defined by the following levels of service <br />under peak hour traffic conditions: <br />(1) Level of Service F within Eugene’s Downtown Traffic Impact Analysis <br />Exempt Area; <br />(2) Level of Service E within the portion of Eugene’s Central Area <br />Transportation Study (CATS) area[,] that is not within Eugene’s <br />Downtown Traffic Impact Analysis Exempt Area; and <br />(3) Level of Service D elsewhere. <br /> <br />c. Performance standards from the OHP shall be applied on state facilities in the <br />Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. <br /> <br />In some cases, the level of service on a facility may be substandard. The local <br />government jurisdiction may find that transportation system improvements to bring performance <br />up to standard within the planning horizon may not be feasible, and safety will not be <br />compromised, and broader community goals would be better served by allowing a substandard <br />level of service. The limitation on the feasibility of a transportation system improvement may <br />arise from severe constraints including but not limit to environmental conditions, lack of public <br />agency financial resources, or land use constraint factors. It is not the intent of TSI Roadway <br />Policy #2: Motor Vehicle Level of Service to require deferral of development in such cases. The <br />intent is to defer motor vehicle capacity increasing transportation system improvements until <br />existing constraints can be overcome or develop an alternative mix of strategies (such as: land <br />use measures, TDM, short-term safety improvements) to address the problem. <br /> <br /> <br />Section 13. <br /> Notwithstanding Section 9 of this Ordinance adopting amendments to EC <br />9.8030(16), the previous amendment to EC 9.8030(16)(a) adopted by Ordinance No. 20513 on <br />Ordinance - Page 16 of 17 <br />