Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Torrey asked staff to communicate the need for speed to EWEB. He thought the City Council could <br />reach its goal of having the hospital in Eugene and he hoped EWEB would assist in achieving that goal. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, with the concurrence of the second, Mr. Poling, offered the following revised motion to the <br />body: <br /> <br /> "Move to direct staff to pursue a development agreement for the benefit of providing access to <br /> McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center via Patterson Street, contingent upon McKenzie Willamette <br /> Medical Center providing an $85 million hospital development with a substantial Willamette River <br /> setback." <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: West Eugene Parkway Memorandum of Understanding <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced the item, reporting that the Oregon Department of Transportation had <br />asked the City to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding street standards and maintenance <br />negotiations about how the West Eugene Parkway might be developed and maintained. He asked Mr. Corey <br />to discuss the background of the request and the subject of negotiations for the MOU. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey recalled that the project was initiated in 1980 by ODOT and the Federal Highway Administration <br />(FHWA). Since its inception, the project had been the subject of many studies, including a Supplemental <br />Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) prepared in 1997. That SDEIS was in the process of being <br />reevaluated to determine what factors had changed in the last few years, and whether the project can be <br />advanced to the publication of a Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement or if a new SDEIS <br />must be prepared. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey said as a result of the reevaluation, it was determined that the parkway east of Beltline (Unit lA) <br />would be too congested at peak hours by 2025 to meet ODOT's design standards. Subsequently, ODOT <br />asked the City to consider a jurisdictional transfer for Unit 1 following construction, because while Unit lA <br />would not meet ODOT's mobility and accessibility standards, it would meet the City of Eugene's design <br />standards for arterial streets. The MOU would acknowledge to ODOT that the City would enter into <br />negotiations for an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) to discuss the specifics of a jurisdictional transfer <br />and all the related issues. <br /> <br />Regarding the specific differences between ODOT and City standards, Mr. Corey said that City standards <br />were more liberal in allowing congestion at intersections; in addition, ODOT required 30-percent reserve <br />capacity from the design year, which was not a City requirement. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor anticipated that as a result of the negotiations that would shape the IGA, ODOT <br />would pay for the construction and maintenance of the West Eugene Parkway. He said that was the City's <br />previous expectation, and he would continue to convey that expectation to ODOT. He intended to sign the <br />MOU and hoped to return with an IGA on an expedited timeframe in partnership with Lane County. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called on the council for comments, reminding the council it would not take action on the <br />MOU; the city manager had charter authority to sign it. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 22, 2004 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />