Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Page 2of4 <br />Satterwhite Family Trust (A 12 -1) July 2012 Page 2 <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and <br />facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be consistent with the <br />Metro Plan. (page 11 -C -4) <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (page 11 -C -4). <br />Policy 16. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (page 11 -C -5) <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The <br />adopted refinement plan the River Road Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR /SC UFP) is <br />the adopted refinement plan for the subject properties and designates the area for <br />medium density residential and commercial uses. If the annexation is approved, per EC <br />9.7820(3), the annexation area will remain zoned C -1 /WR and R -1 /WR, and the /UL <br />overlay will be automatically removed from the annexation area. <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR SC UFP the subject property is in the <br />Maxwell /Park Avenue subarea. The recommendations in this area apply to the <br />designation and zoning of properties but not annexation. The general "Residential Land <br />Use Policies" at Section 2.2, none appear to be directly applicable to the subject request. <br />The "Public Facilities and Services Element" policies of the RR SC UFP are directed at <br />local government; however, the premise of these policies for the provision of urban <br />services is the assumption that the properties within the UGB will be annexed. <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, <br />efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level <br />of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely <br />❑YES <br />❑ NO <br />manner as detailed below: <br />Wastewater <br />Public wastewater is available; there is an 8 -inch public line within N. Park Ave and an fl- <br />inch stub to serve the vacant property (per as- construct record, micro file no. 3040.040). <br />Satterwhite Family Trust (A 12 -1) July 2012 Page 2 <br />