My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20300
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2003 No. 20274-20306
>
Ordinance No. 20300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:44:50 PM
Creation date
10/11/2004 4:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
10/27/2003
Document_Number
20300
CMO_Effective_Date
11/26/2003
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.486 <br /> <br />2.488 <br /> <br />244.120(1 )(a) and 244.120(2)(b)(B), are hereby incorporated into this code <br />as the methods public officials shall use when met with an actual or potential <br />conflict of interest. A public official with an actual conflict of interest shall not <br />discuss, debate or vote as a public official on the matter in which the public <br />official has an actual conflict of interest. <br /> <br />Public Official Code of Ethics - Complaint Process. <br />(1) Complaints Aqainst Executive Mana,qer. When a written complaint is <br /> made against an executive manager alleging a violation of section <br /> 2.482 or 2.484 of this code, and the complainant has affirmed the <br /> truthfulness of the allegation(s), the complaint shall be reviewed and <br /> investigated by the city attorney. The city attorney shall make an initial <br /> determination as to the merits of the complaint. <br /> (a) If the city attorney finds that the complaint is without merit, the <br /> city attorney shall notify the city manager in writing of the <br /> allegation and the finding. The city manager shall direct the <br /> city attorney to investigate the matter further or direct the city <br /> attorney to dismiss the matter. <br /> (b) If the city attorney finds that the complaint has merit, the city <br /> attorney shall provide an investigative report to the city <br /> manager who shall handle the situation in the same manner as <br /> other city employee matters. <br />(2) Complaints Against Elected or Appointed Official, City Manaqer, or <br /> Municipal Court Judqe. When a written complaint is made against an <br /> elected official, a committee or commission member appointed by the <br /> council, the city manager or a municipal court judge alleging a <br /> violation of section 2.482 or 2.484 of this code, and the complainant <br /> has affirmed the truthfulness of the allegation(s), the complaint shall <br /> be reviewed and investigated by the city attorney. The city attorney <br /> shall make an initial determination as to the merits of the complaint. <br /> (a) If the city attorney finds that the complaint is without merit, the <br /> city attorney shall notify the city council in writing of the <br /> allegation and the finding. Unless the city council directs the <br /> city attorney to investigate the matter further, the city attorney <br /> will dismiss the matter. <br /> (b) If the city attorney finds that the complaint has merit, the city <br /> attorney shall prepare an investigative report and forward the <br /> report to the Oregon Government Standards and Practices <br /> Commission. A copy of the city attorney's report also shall be <br /> forwarded to the city council. <br /> <br />Public Official Code of Ethics - Intentional Violation by Elected Official. <br />If the city attorney prepares an investigative report on a complaint against an <br />elected official alleging an intentional violation of section 2.482 or 2.484 of <br /> <br />Ordinance - 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.