HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem B: Sequencing of Financial Measures
ECC
UGENE ITY OUNCIL
AIS
GENDA TEM UMMARY
Work Session: Sequencing of Financial Measures to Present to Voters
Meeting Date: November 28, 2007 Agenda Item Number: B
Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Jim Carlson
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5524
ISSUE STATEMENT
The purpose of the work session is to provide information for the council discussion regarding the
timing and sequencing of proposed local option levies, general obligation (G.O.) bonds and other
measures to be presented to the voters. Developing a tentative election schedule provides direction to
staff on where and when to focus their efforts in terms of ballot measure preparation.
BACKGROUND
The City has a number of unfunded financial challenges and opportunities. Those financial
challenges and opportunities arise through a number of avenues, such as council goals, planning
documents, and other community priorities.
On February 12, 2007, the council adopted 10 goals. A summary of those goals is included in
Attachment A.
On January 17, 2007, staff presented the Multi-Year Financial Plan to the Budget Committee. This
plan identifies both the capital and operating needs of the entire organization for a six-year period.
The plan incorporates unfunded projects and revenue shortfalls from other planning documents such
as the Capital Improvement Plan and the General Fund Six-Year Financial Forecast. A summary of
the Multi-Year Financial Plan is included as Attachment B. The complete Multi-Year Financial Plan
was included in the Budget Committee materials distributed for the January 17, 2007, meeting and is
available on the City internet site as part of the published budget document. An updated Multi-Year
Financial Plan will be presented to the Budget Committee in early 2008.
There are limited opportunities to ask voters to approve money measures, and the City should be
strategic about what it places on the ballot to ensure that those measures address the highest priority
council goals. The objective of this work session is to get feedback from the council about the
strategy for making the best use of available election dates given the currently identified needs of the
City. That means that this information does not focus on the financial feasibility or financing plan for
each of the proposed local option levy measures.
The history of all City revenue measures presented to the voters since 1990 is included as Attachment
C.
F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071128\S071128B.doc
Proposed 2008 Measures:
There are two property tax measures proposed to go before voters during
2008:
?Property tax levy (could be G.O. Bond measure or capital local option levy) for transportation
system capital preservation projects in May 2008. This item is scheduled for council discussion
on December 10, with follow-up discussion on January 14 and council action on February 11.
?City Hall and Police Patrol Facility G.O. Bond measure in November 2008. This item is
scheduled to be discussed by the council on December 12, and on several additional dates during
2008.
Future election cycles could include G.O. bond measure proposals for parks, recreation and open
space projects and items related to the council’s goals or in the Multi-Year Financial Plan.
Discussions with the City’s intergovernmental partners indicate that the 4J School District and Lane
Community College have thought about placing measures on the ballot in 2008. The County does not
have any plans to do so, and Bethel School District has no plans during 2008 or 2009, but may have a
measure in future years.
In order to think strategically about opportunities for asking voters for additional funding, staff used
the following set of questions to develop the tentative election schedule:
1.If applicable, what is the likelihood of a 50 percent turnout of registered voters?
2.At the time of the election, will voters have had the opportunity to consider the benefits and
financial impact of the measure?
3.Will the proposed City measure(s) compete with each other or with measures offered by other
jurisdictions?
4.Is the measure politically feasible?
5.When are the funds needed?
6.Is there an optimal timeframe in advance of needed funding in which to ask voter approval in
order to provide for multiple attempts, if necessary?
7.Are there any alternate funding mechanisms that could be used to pay for the service?
Timing:
The May 2008 election is the presidential primary, along with the primary for some council
seats. It is possible that this election could exceed the 50 percent required turnout to approve
property tax measures. The May 2000 primary election had a 60 percent turnout and the May 2004
primary turnout was 56 percent. The Council Subcommittee on Transportation Funding
recommended consideration of this election date for a property tax for transportation needs. Any
measure placed on the May 2008 ballot must be approved by the council by February 18.
The November 2008 election is the next opportunity to ask voters to approve a property tax measure
without a double-majority requirement. Planning and preparing to place measures on the November
2008 ballot will take a significant period of time. The council must take action before going on break
in early August of 2008 for a November 2008 ballot measure.
Attachment D includes a proposed election calendar for the next six years, including potential ballot
measures by other governmental partners.
F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071128\S071128B.doc
RELATED CITY POLICIES
The Budget Committee has adopted financial management goals and policies that guide financial
decisions of the organization. The policies include statements related to the appropriate level of
property taxes, such as the policy on diversification of the General Fund revenue base, the level of
unappropriated ending fund balance, and the use of G.O. bonds to finance capital improvements. In
addition, there is a policy on serial tax levies that states that, to the maximum extent possible, serial
tax levies will be used only for time-limited operating services or for capital improvements subject
to the rate limitation for non-school governments.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1.The City Council may provide direction to approve the tentative election schedule as presented.
2.The City Council may provide direction to staff on modifying the tentative election schedule.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends approval of the tentative election schedule.
SUGGESTED MOTION
Move to approve the tentative election schedule.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Summary of Council Goals
B. Summary of the Multi-Year Financial Plan
C. Summary of Revenue Measures Election Results – 1990 to Present
D. Tentative Election Schedule
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Staff Contact: Jim Carlson, Executive Director, Central Services
Telephone: 682-5524
Staff E-Mail: James.R.Carlson@ci.eugene.or.us
F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071128\S071128B.doc
Attachment A
Summary of 2007 Council Goals
Race
Enhance understanding of race issues and improve community relationships.
Homeless Initiative
Continue to work collaboratively with our community partners to end chronic homelessness in
10 years.
- Blue Ribbon Committee
- Youth
- Women and children
City Hall
Adopt implementation plan for parallel process for City Hall and Patrol Facility construction.
Neighborhood Empowerment
Redesign the neighborhood initiative to support the neighborhoods which includes public
participation in the livability and protection of neighborhoods and identifies specific
redevelopment strategies that preserves the integrity of residential uses, including design
standards, site review, down zoning, infill regulation, and bolstering and empowering
neighborhood associations to get more involvement.
Arts and Outdoors
Strengthen our commitment to community arts and outdoor assets.
Hospital
Facilitate the development of a full service hospital in Eugene.
Sustainability Initiative
Develop Office of Sustainability and Sustainability Commission that supports broad sustainable
practices and create a tool chest of things needed to support businesses that produce sustainable
products or provides or utilizes sustainable practices.
Downtown Initiative
Facilitate significant revitalization of downtown core.
Police Initiative
Increase police staffing with a special focus on supporting community policing and reducing
property crime.
Transportation Initiative
Develop mechanisms to adequately fund our transportation system for cars, trucks, bikes and
pedestrians including maintenance and preservation and capital re-construction.
Attachment B
Summary of Multi-Year Financial Plan
Presented to the Budget Committee
January 17, 2007
Attachment C
Summary of Revenue Measure Election Results
1990 to present
Election DateDescription Results
May 1990 Downtown Development District Tax Passed
March 1993 City Restaurant Tax Failed
May 1994 $19.0 Million of G.O. Bonds for Library Construction, Failed
Emergency Equipment and Facility Repair
November 1994 $26.1 Million of G.O. Bonds for Library Construction Failed
March 1995 Tax on Retailers’ Video Poker Revenues Passed
(subsequently pre-empted retroactively by Legislature)
September$19.1 million of G.O. Bonds for Emergency Medical Passed
1995Services and Fire Station Construction
March 1996 Affordable-Housing Utility Consumption Tax Failed
May 1997 $32.7 Million Serial Levy to Partially Restore Measure Failed*
47 Losses Over Three Years
November 1998 $25.3 Million of G.O. Bonds for Parks and Open Passed
Space Projects
November 1998 $8.7 Million Local Option Levy for Library Purposes Passed
Over Four Years
May 2000 $36.6 Million of G.O. Bonds for Downtown Police and Failed
Fire Stations
November 2000 $3.5 Million Local Option Levy for Youth Activity Passed
Programs Over Two Years
November 2000 $25.1 Million of G.O. Bonds for Downtown Police and Failed
Fire Stations
May 2002 $8.7 Million of G.O. Bonds for Downtown Fire Station Passed
and Training Facility
May 2002 $19.5 Million Local Option Levy for Library Purposes Passed
Over Four Years
November 2002 $0.86 per $1,000 of AV Local Option Levy for Passed
Youth/School Based Services Over Four Years
November 2004 $6.79 Million G.O. Bond for Civic Center Projects Failed
November 2006 $27.490 Million G.O Bond for Parks and Open Space Passed
November 2006 $10.750 Million Local Option Levy for Library Passed
Operations Over Four Years
November 2007 3¢ Per Gallon Gas Tax Increase Failed
*Received a majority YES vote, but did not receive 50% voter turnout.
Attachment D
Tentative Election Schedule
Tentative
Election Date AgencyDescription
May 2008 City of Eugene Pavement Preservation Capital Projects Property Tax
Levy (10-Year Capital LOL or G.O. Bond)
November 2008 City of Eugene City Hall and Police Patrol Facility Bonds
4J School District G.O. School Construction Bonds or Local Option
Levy
Lane Community G.O. Construction Bond
College
2010
2012 City of Eugene G.O. Bonds for Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Projects
2014 4J School District G.O. School Construction Bonds
Other possible ballot measure proposals:
No specific proposals for City measures to fund any of the Council priority items (besides
City Hall/Police Patrol Facility and Pavement Capital Preservation) have been identified at
this time.
Bethel School District may present a General Obligation Bond measure to voters for future
school construction sometime after FY09.
4J School District has been on a 6-year cycle for General Obligation Bond requests to voters.
If they stay on this schedule, the next 6-year request would be in 2008, then 2014.
4J School District received approval of a 5-year local option levy in November of 2004,
which would cover FY06 through FY10. If levy funding is to continue in FY11, voter
approval would be needed no later than the May 2010 election.