The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance No. 20234 Exhibit B Exhibit B-1 Errata to September 2001 TransPlan Chapter 1 Errata On Chapter 1, Page 5 - revise the "Participating Agencies and Geographic Area" section to add the following paragraphs: Because TransPlan serves as both the federally required Regional Transportation Plan for the Eugene-Springfield area and as the Transportation Functional Plan for Metro Plan, two planning horizons are referred to in the document - 2015 and 2020. Jbe 2015 planning horizon is used to be consistent with the 2015 Metro Plan planning horizon. In particular, forecasted regional land use allocations use Metro Plan's 2015 land uses as a basis. The 2015 planning horizon is used in conjunction with the Performance Measures contained in Chapter 4 that are a requirement ofLCDC's Transportation Planning Rule. A 2020 planning horizon has been developed to meet federal requirements for a 20-year financial constraint and air quality conformity determination. Because there is no official land use allocation beyond 2015, the 2020 forecasts represent an extrapolation of2015 population and employment. Revenue and Cost estimates used in TransPlan are for 2020. On Chapter 1, Page 5 - revise the first paragraph under "TransPlan Legal Status and Adopted Sections" to read: Local jurisdictions will adopt TransPlan as the region's transportation plan. The portions of TransPlan that will be adopted as Metro Plan policy amendments include goals, policies and 20-year fiscally constrained Capital Investment Action project lists (programmed and unprogrammed projects). Chapter 2 Errata On Chapter 2, Page 29, revise "TSI Transit Policy #2: Bus Rapid Transit" Policy Definition and Intent to read: , . Policy DefinitionlIntent: BRT is, in essence, the use of buses to emulate the positive characteristics of a rail system, but at a fraction of the cost of a rail system. The BR T system will include: . Exclusive busways along major corridors, Faster boarding through low-floor, multiple door vehicles, Minimum ten minute frequency during peak hours; Increased convenience and comfort" Limited stops, Improved travel time through reduction of impact from normal traffic congestion through bus priority treatment A connected system of BR T corridor and neighborhood routes . . . . . . BRT, when combined with other system improvement, land use, and demand management strategies, is expected to increase the share of riders who use public transportation. BR T is also Exhibit B-1 Errata to September 2001 TransPlan expected to help the region maintain conformity with federal air quality standards. BRT, combined with nodal development, is a key strategy in the regions compliance with alternative performance measures for the Transportation Planning Rule. Commitment by the region to full system build out of BR T within 20 years is essential to meeting the alternative performance measures. The full system will include 61 miles ofBRT corridor service. The majority of each corridor will include exclusive bus treatment. When funding or traffic conditions restrict implementation of exclusive bus treatment within a corridor, priority should be given to improvements providing the greatest benefit to travel timesavings. The BRT strategy will be implemented to the extent that planning and engineering studies show that the system would increase the use of transit, is supported by the community, and can be funded. As BRT is implemented, LTD, Springfield, Eugene, Lane County, and ODOT will consider neighborhood impacts when designing elements of specific segments. Chapter 3 Errata On Chapter 3, Page 7, remove reference to Appendix G by revising paragraph above "Column 1: Name" to read: The columns/fields of information common to each table are defined below. On Chapter 3, Page 8, add reference to base year for cost estimates by revising the paragraph below "Column 5: Estimated Cost" to read: This field provides a determination of planning cost estimates. The estimated costs are not precise engineering estimates, but are used as planning estimates to assist in determining the financial impacts. Cost estimates are provided in 1997 dollars, consistent with revenue estimates used in the plan. On Chapter 3, Page 11, replace table titled Summary of Capital Investment Actions Roadway Projects ($ Thousands) with updated table (attached to this errata packet) to reflect revised calculations. On Chapter 3, Page 12 and Page 13, fix references regarding corridors requiring further study and major investments by revising the list of corridors beginning on the bottom of Page 12 and the paragraph that follows on Page 13 to read: 1. Interstate 5 2. Interstate lOS/Oregon 126 (Eugene-Springfield Highway) 3. Beltline Road (Highway 99 to Interstate 5) 4. Main StreetlMcKenzie Highway (20th Street to 70th Street) 5. McVay Highway (Franklin Boulevard to 30th Avenue interchange) 6. Franklin Boulevard (Glenwood section) 7. West 11th Avenue (Beltline to Chambers) 8. Coburg Road (Crescent to Oakway) 9. 18th Avenue (Bertelsen to Agate) Exhibit B-1 Errata to September 2001 TransPlan 10. Southeast Eugene corridor (Willamette, Amazon Parkway, Patterson/Hilyard, from 13th to 33rd Avenue) 11. Beltline Road/Pioneer Parkway (Beltline to Hayden Bridge Road) 12. Ferry Street Bridge (long-range capacity needs) 13. South Bank Street Improvements (Mill Street to Hilyard Street) 14. West Eugene Transportation Improvements In the case of the West 11 th Avenue and Coburg Road corridors (items #7 and #8), studies are proposed to address access, safety, and operational problems. In the case of 18th Avenue and the Southeast Eugene corridors (items #9 and # 10), studies are proposed to address major capacity issues, as well as safety, access, and operational problems. In the case of Interstate 5 (item # 1), a comprehensive study of 1-5 interchanges from the Willamette River south to 30th Avenue is proposed to address major capacity, safety, access and operational problems. The extent of further study that each corridor requires will depend on the level of analysis completed to date, the level of specificity of any proposed solutions, and the level of environmental analysis required for a project to proceed. Examples of typical studies prepared prior to construction of a system improvement include the Beltline/I-5 refinement study, the Ferry Street Bridge Study, the West Eugene Parkway Environmental Impact Study, and the Jasper Extension design study. On Chapter 3, Page 16, move Roadway Project #506 (Beltline widening, River Road to Delta)- move from Programmed to Unprogrammed. On Chapter 3, Page 42, replace Eugene with ODOT as Jurisdiction for Project 666 (1-5 Bike Bridge). On Chapter 3, Pages 14-29, replace Table la-Financially Constrained 20-Year Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects with updated table (attached to this errata packet) to reflect revised calculations and expanded Nodal Development Infrastructure Funding footnote. On Chapter 3, ~ages 69 & 70, replace Tables 4 & 5 with updated table (attached to this errata packet) to reflect revised calculations. Appendices Errata On Appendix E, Page 6, delete the last sentence of the first full paragraph (sentence to be deleted reads: Possible. nodal development patterns include neighborhood centers, commercial centers, employment centers, and combinations thereof). On Appendix F, Page 23, delete the last sentence on the page (sentence to be deleted reads: Possible nodal development patterns include neighborhood centers, commercial centers, employment centers, and combinations thereof). Exhibit B-1 Errata to September 2001 TransPlan On Appendix F, Page 9, replace last paragraph and sub-points "a" and "b" of Policy F-15 with the following language In some cases, the level of service on a facility may be substandard. The local government jurisdiction may find that transportation system improvements to bring performance up to standard within the planning horizon may not be feasible, and safety will not be compromised, and broader community goals would be better served by allowing a substandard level of service. The limitation on the feasibility of a transportation system improvement may arise from severe constraints including but not limited to environmental conditions, lack of public agency financial resources, or land use constraint factors. It is not the intent of TSI Roadway Policy #2: Motor Vehicle Level of Service to require deferral of development in such cases. The intent is to defer motor vehicle capacity increasing transportation system improvements until existing constraints can be overcome or develop an alternative mix of strategies (such as: land use measures, ruM, short-term safety improvements) to address the problem. Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects The following project categories are included in the Capital Investment Action Roadway Projects list: 1. New Arterial Link or Interchange - These projects add new links or interchanges to the arterial or freeway systems in the region. Projects typically consist of any required right-of- way acquisition, general roadway construction, and addition of pedestrian and bicycle facilities either adjacent or parallel to the roadway. 2. Added Freeway Lanes or Major Interchange Improvements - These projects add capacity to existing freeways or freeway interchanges in the region. Projects typically consist of added freeway lanes or interchange reconstruction and expansion. 3. Arterial Capacity Improvements - These projects add capacity to existing arterials in the region. Projects typically consist of improvements to traffic control, the safety of the corridor, additional turn lanes, or reconstruction, including additional lanes. 4. New Collectors - All new collector projects will generally be constructed to the implementing jurisdiction's urban standards. 5. Urban Standards - Projects with this description consist of rebuilding an existing roadway to upgrade it to urban standards, with curbs, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. 6. Study - These types of projects are detailed studies that identify and offer solutions to specific problems related to multi-modal traffic flow and safety along the corridor. Improvements identified by these studies are expected to be added to the TransPlan project list through the amendment process. The following table summarizes the total estimated cost of roadway projects by category, Project Category Status Total Cost EUGENE LANE CO. ODOT SPRINGFIELD Future $57,936 $0 $5,705 $52,231 $0 New Arterial Link or Interchange Programmed $28,799 $1,116 $10,400 $17 ,283 $0 Unprogrammed $28,500 $0 $0 $17,000 $11,500 Future $146,982 $0 $0 $146,982 $0 Added Freeway Lanes or Major Programmed $21,449 $0 $5,500 $15,949 $0 Interchange Improvements Unprogrammed $72,495 $0 $0 $72,495 $0 Arterial Capacity Improvements Programmed $2,246 $0 $500 $1 ,746 $0 Unprogrammed $12,400 $2,000 $2,000 $6,000 $2,400 Future $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Collectors Unprogrammed $57,949 $23,620 $0 $0 $34,329 Future $11,956 $0 $0 $11,456 $500 Urban Standards Programmed $22,681 $9,176 $11,765 $0 $1,740 Unprogrammed $67,170 $26,885 $18,325 $6,850 $15,110 Programmed $3,725 $0 $0 $3,725 $0 Study U np ro g rammed $2,200 $1,450 $0 $750 $0 Nodal Development Implementation $7,000 $5,400 $1,600 TOTAL: $543,488 $69,647 $54,195 $352,467 $67,179 jurisdiction, and status. *Note: The total estimated cost for Eugene does not include construction costs for potential system improvements on major corridors that arise from corridor studies. TransPlan - Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 11 w., , w,q Chapter 3: Table la-Financially Constrained 20-Year Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects 'N ,.", ......"."",N....",.,w."".."... ... ..""... .. ,",."."."...."."......w,,,.,.,,.,. ........... .",.........,",,,, ....., ....., .., Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Project Category: New Arterial Link or Interchange Status: Programmed Jasper Road Main Street to Jasper Construct 4-lane arterial; Lane County $10,400,000 3.2 66 Extension Road phasing to be determined; improve RR X-ing at Jasper Rd; at grade interim improvement; grade separation long-range improvement Terry Street Royal Avenue to Construct new 2 to 3-lane Eugene $1,116,000 0.44 487 Roosevelt Boulevard urban facility West Eugene Seneca Road to Beltline W 11th - Garfield: 4-lane OOOT $17,283,000 1.3 336 Parkway, (1A) Road new construction; pending Completion of a study of Transportation improvements In West Eugene Status Sub-Total $28,799,000 Status: Unprogrammed Beltline Highway West 11th Avenue to Continue widening to 4 OOOT $17,000,000 1.14 312 Roosevelt Boulevard lanes; new RR Xing, interchange @ WEP, grade separation @ Roosevelt and turn lanes on West 11th Ave (OOOT: West 11th North City Limits Stage 3) Centennial 28th Street to 35th Street Construct 3-lane urban Springfield $3,000,000 0.5 930 Boulevard TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 14 Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Pioneer Parkway Extension Harlow Road to Beltline 4-5 lane minor arterial Road Springfield $8,500,000 768 Status Sub-Total $28,500,000 Project Category Sub-Total $57,299,000 TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 15 Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Project Category: Added Freeway Lanes or Major Interchange Improvements Status: Progralnmed Beltline Highway Royal Avenue to Overcrossing at Royal, ODOT $14,699,000 409 Roosevelt Boulevard continue widening to 4 lanes south to railroad structure, construct Roosevelt extension from Beltline to Danebo, full at grade signal controlled intersection of Beltline and Roosevelt (ODOT: W. 11th N. city limits stage 2) 1-5 @ Beltline Highway ROW Purchase OOOT $1,250,000 0 606 Delta/Beltline Interim/safety improvements; Lane County $5,500,000 0 638 Interchange replace/revise existing ramps; widen Delta Highway bridge to 5 lanes Status Sub-Total $21,449,000 Status: Unprogrammed 1-5 @ Beltline Highway Reconstruct interchange ODOT $53,300,000 0 606 and 1-5, upgrade Beltline Road East to 5 lane urban facility, and construct 1-5 bike and pedestrian bridge. Beltline Highway River Road to Delta Highway Widen to 6 lanes; construct new or widen existing Willamette River Bridges; revise Division/River Ave ramps; reconstruct/relocate Division Ave from Division Place to Beltline ODOT $13,390,200 1.73 506 TransPlan-loint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 16 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number 1.105 Washington/Jefferson Extend third SB lane over OOOT $5,805,000 0.75 151 Street Bridge bridge to 6th Ave exit, add lane to 6th Ave off-ramp Status Sub-Total $72,495,200 Project Category Sub-Total $93,944,200 TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 17 Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Project Category: Arterial Capacity Improvements Status: Programmed Beltline Highway @ 1-5 Safety improvements ODOT $1,746,000 0 607 Bloomberg McVay Highway to 30th Modification of connection Lane County, $500,000 0.4 297 Connector Avenue of McVay Highway to 30th ODOT Avenue Status Sub-Total $2,246,000 Status: Unprogramlned 42nd Street @ Marcola Road Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 712 6th/7th Intersection Garfield Street to Provide improvements such ODOT, $520,000 0 133 Improvement Washington/Jefferson as additional turn lanes and Eugene Street signal improvements; intersections include 6th/7th Avenues at: Garfield, Chambers, Washington/Jefferson Street Bridge Beltline Highway @ Coburg Road Construct ramp and signal ODOT $500,000 0 622 improvements Centennial @ 28th Street Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 924 Boulevard Centennial @ 21 st Street Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 927 Boulevard Centennial Prescott Lane to Mill Reconstruct section to 4-5 Springfield $1,000,000 0.3 818 Boulevard Road lanes Eugene-Springfield @ Mohawk Boulevard Add lanes on ramps ODOT $250,000 0.68 821 Highway (SR-126) Interchange Harlow Road @ Pheasant Boulevard Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 744 Irving Road @ NW Gansborough entrance to Construct overpass over Lane County $2,000,000 0.3 530 Expressway Prairie Road NW Expressway and railroad. Signalize access on north side. Main Street @ 48th Street Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 69 TransPlan-loint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 18 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Main Street @ Mountaingate Drive Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 75 Q Street @ Pioneer Parkway Traffic control improvements Springfield $200,000 0 774 S 42nd Street @ Daisy Street Signal improvement ODOT, $200,000 0 951 Springfield Traffic Control Various Locations Traffic signals, intersection Eugene $2,000,000 Improvements upgrades, turn pockets, etc. W. 11th Avenue Green Hill Road to Upgrade to 5-lane urban ODOT, $4,530,000 1.51 333 Danebo Avenue facility Eugene, Lane County Status Sub-Total $12,400,000 Project Category Sub-Total $14,646,000 TransPlan-loint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 19 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Project Category: New Collectors Status: Unprogrammed 19th Street Yolanda Avenue to Extend existing street as Springfield $891,000 0.33 703 Hayden Bridge Road 2-lane collector 30th Street Main Street to Centennial New collector street Springfield $904,500 0.67 915 Boulevard 36th Street Yolanda Avenue to Extend existing street as Springfield $1,701,000 0.63 709 Marcola Road 2-lane collector per Local Street Plan. 54th Street Main Street to Daisy New 2-lane collector Springfield $756,000 0.28 87 Street 79th Street Main Street to Thurston New 2 to 3-lane collector Springfield $1,000,000 0.37 18 Road Avalon Street Greenhill Road to Terry New major collector Eugene $810,000 0.3 432 Street Cardinal Way Game Farm Road to MDR Upgrade 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,242,000 0.46 721 north-south connector facility Daisy Street 46th Street to 48th Street New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $929,000 0.27 24 Extension facility, traffic control improvements Future Collector A Gilham to County Farm New neighborhood collector Eugene $1,890,000 0.7 651 Road @ Locke Street Future Collector C1 Linda Lane - Jasper Road New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,350,000 0.5 33 Extension collector Future Collector C2 Jasper Road - New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $3,510,000 1.3 36 Mountaingate collector Future Collector C3 Jasper Road Extension - New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,890,000 0.7 39 East Natron collector Future Collector C4 East-west in Mid-Natron New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,620,000 0.6 42 site collector Future Collector C5 Loop Rd in South Natron New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $2,700,000 45 Site collector Future Collector C6 Mt Vemon Road - Jasper New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $2,700,000 48 Road Extension collector TransPlan-]oint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 20 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Future Collector C7 North-south in mid-Natron New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,512,000 0.56 51 site collector Future Collector E Bailey Hill Road to New major collector Eugene $2,700,000 318 Bertelsen Road Future Collector F Royal Avenue to Terry New major collector Eugene $1,890,000 0.7 429 Street Future Collector H Future Collector G to New major collector Eugene $1,350,000 0.5 435 Royal Avenue Future Collector J Awbrey lane to Enid New major collector Eugene $2,160,000 0.8 441 Road Future Collector 0 Barger Drive to Avalon New neighborhood collector Eugene $1,800,000 0.5 447 Street Future Collector P Avalon Street to Future New neighborhood collector Eugene $4,500,000 1.11 449 Collector F Glacier Drive 55th Street to 48th Street Develop new, 2-lane urban Springfield $1,840,000 0.92 57 facility Glenwood 1-5 to laurel Hill Drive New collector Eugene $2,565,000 0.95 254 Boulevard Extension Hyacinth Street Irvington Drive to New neighborhood collector Eugene $600,000 0.16 537 Lynnbrook Drive Kinsrow Avenue Centennial Boulevard to New neighborhood collector Eugene $800,000 0.2 659 Garden Way lakeview/Parkview Gilham Road to County New neighborhood collector Eugene $1,755,000 0.65 644 Farm Road Legacy Street Barger Drive to Avalon New major collector Eugene $800,000 0.2 445 Street McKenzie-Gateway Within MDR site New 2 to 3-lane collector Springfield $2,160,000 0.8 756 MDR Loop Collector into MDR site MDR Site North-south within MDR Construct new 3-lane Springfield $1,440,000 0.4 762 site north-south collector Mountaingate Drive Main Street to South 58th New 3-lane collector Springfield $2,430,000 0.9 78 Street Mt Vernon Road Jasper Road Extension to Extend existing street as Springfield $540,000 0.2 81 Mountaingate Drive 2-lane collector V Street 31 st Street to Marcola New 2 to 3-lane collector Springfield $1,755,000 0.65 777 Road Vera Drive/Hayden 15th Street to 20th Street New 2 to 3-lane urban Springfield $918,000 0.34 780 Bridge Road collector TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 21 Name Geographic Limits Jurisdiction Description Estimated Cost Length Number Yolanda Avenue 31 st Street to 34th Street Extend existing street as 2-lane collector Springfield Status Sub-Total Project Category Sub-Total TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions $540,000 $57,948,500 $57,948,500 September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 22 0.2 783 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Project Category: Urban Standards Status: Programmed 18th Avenue Bertelsen Road to Willow Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene, Lane $1,065,000 0.71 303 Creek Road facility County Ayres Road Delta Highway to Gilham Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene $1,262,000 0.52 603 Road facility Bertelsen Road 18th Avenue to Bailey Hill Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene $1,035,000 0.6 315 Road facility Coburg Road Kinney Loop to Armitage Reconstruct to 3-lane urban Lane County $2,380,000 1.19 625 Park facility to UGB, turn lane @ park entrance, rural Delta Highway Ayres Road to Beltline Upgrade to 3-lane urban Eugene $900,000 0.91 635 Road facility Dillard Road 43rd Street to Garnet Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $450,000 0.34 233 Street facility Fox Hollow Road Donald Street to UGB Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene, Lane $841,000 0.5 245 facility County Garden Way Sisters View Avenue to Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene $1,715,000 0.75 657 Centennial Boulevard facility Goodpasture Delta Highway to Happy Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $413,000 0.19 664 Island Road Lane facility Greenhill Road North Boundary of Airport Closing of existing road and Lane County, $3,000,000 2.06 486 to Airport Road realignment of east Eugene boundary of airport property Irvington Road River Road to Prairie Road Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Lane County $2,880,000 1.44 533 facility Prairie Road Carol Lane to Irvington Reconstruct to 3-lane urban Lane County $825,000 0.35 472 Drive facility Royal Avenue Terry Street to Greenhill Upgrade to 3-lane urban Lane County, $2,680,000 1.01 481 Road facility Eugene Shelton-McMurphey Lincoln St. to Pearl St. Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $1,495,000 0.4 450 Seward St. Wayside to Manor Upgrade to local urban Springfield $40,000 0.25 787 Connection standards Gateway/Harlow Gateway/Harlow Intersection improvements Springfield $1,300,000 0.5 785 Intersection TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 23 Gateway/Game Farm Rd. East Gateway/Game Fann Rd. East intersection Intersection improvements Springfield Status Sub- Total TransPlan-loint Adopting Officials Revisions $400,000 $22,681,000 September 200 1 Chapter 3. Page 24 0.25 786 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Status: Unprogrammed 28th Street Main Street to Centennial Widen/provide sidewalks Springfield $1,050,000 0.7 909 Boulevard and bike lanes; provide intersection and signal improvements at Main Street 31 st Street Hayden Bridge Road to U Upgrade to 2 to 3-Iane urban Lane County $1,275,000 0.85 765 Street facility 35th Street Commercial Avenue to Upgrade to 3-lane urban Springfield $920,000 0.46 918 Olympic Street facility 42nd Street Marcola Road to Railroad Reconstruct to 3-Iane urban Springfield $2,060,000 1.03 713 Tracks facility 48th Street Main Street to G Street Upgrade to 2-lane urban Springfield $720,000 0.48 3 facility 52nd Street G Street to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Springfield $300,000 0.2 6 Eugene-Springfield facility Highway (SR 126) 69th Street Main Street to Thurston Widen on east side of Springfield $840,000 0.56 15 Road roadway Agate Street 30th Avenue to Black Oak Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $585,000 0.39 215 Road facility Aspen Street West D Street to Reconstruct to 2 to 3-lane Lane County, $750,000 0.5 809 Centennial Boulevard urban facility Springfield Baldy View Lane Deadmond Ferry Road to Upgrade to urban standards Springfield $420,000 0.28 715 the end of dedicated right-of-way Bethel Drive Roosevelt Boulevard to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $2,500,000 1.68 414 Highway 99 facility Centennial Blvd. March Chase to 1-5 Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $400,000 0.4 697 (north side) Commercial Street 35th Street to 42nd Street Upgrade to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,620,000 0.81 933 facility County Fann Loop North-to-South Section Upgrade to 3-lane urban Lane County, $825,000 0.55 631 facility Eugene County Fann Loop West-to-East Section Upgrade to 2-lane urban Lane County, $795,000 0.53 632 facility Eugene Deadmond Ferry Baldy View Lane to Upgrade to urban standards Springfield $1,095,000 0.73 724 Road McKenzie River Division Avenue Division Place to River Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene $1,720,000 0.86 509 Avenue facility Elmira Road Bertelsen Road to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $1,815,000 1.21 420 Highway 99 facility TransPlan-loint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 25 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number G Street 48th Street to 52nd Street Upgrade to 2-lane urban Springfield $465,000 0.31 54 facility Game Farm Road Coburg Road to 1-5 Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene, Lane $2,150,000 1.3 654 North facility County Game Farm Road Game Farm Road East to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Lane County, $1,395,000 0.93 737 South Harlow Road facility Springfield Gilham Road Northernmost New Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $690,000 0.46 662 Collector to Ayres Road facility Greenhill Road Barger Drive to West 11 th Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Lane County, $5,000,000 2.5 454 Avenue facility Eugene Greenhill Road Barger Drive to Airport Rural widening and Lane County $2,000,000 2 485 Road intersection modifications Hayden Bridge Yolanda Avenue to Reconstruct to 2-lane urban Lane County $2,310,000 1.54 747 Road Marcola Road facility Hunsaker Lane I Division Avenue to River Upgrade to 2-lane urban Lane County $1,710,000 1.14 527 Beaver Street Road facility Jasper Road S. 42nd Street to Jasper Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban ODOT $5,250,000 3.5 60 Road Extension facility; intersection improvement at 42nd Street and Jasper Road Jeppesen Acres Gilham Road to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $525,000 0.35 670 Road Providence Street facility Laura Street Scotts Glen Drive to Widen to 3-lane urban Springfield $800,000 0.4 750 Harlow Road facility Maple Street Roosevelt Boulevard to Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $210,000 0.14 469 Elmira Road facility Old Coburg Road Game Farm Road to Chad Upgrade to 3-lane urban Eugene $525,000 0.35 680 Drive facility River Avenue River Road to Division Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urban Eugene $1,700,000 0.85 542 Avenue facility River Road Carthage Avenue to Widen to 3-lane urban Lane County $900,000 0.38 545 Beacon Drive facility S. 28th Street Main Street to Millrace Upgrade to 3-lane urban Springfield $2,000,000 0.67 945 facility S. 32nd Street Main Street to Railroad Upgrade to 3-lane urban Springfield $800,000 0.4 948 facility S. 42nd Street Main Street to Jasper Reconstruct to 2 to 3-lane ODOT $1,600,000 0.8 954 urban facility; curbs, sidewalks and bike lanes TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 26 Geographic Estimated Name Limits Description Jurisdiction Cost Length Number Street Lighting Various Locations Add street lighting on Eugene $1,000,000 -- Arterials/collectors Thurston Road 72nd Street to UGB Upgrade to 3-lane urban Springfield $1,220,000 0.61 98 facility Van Duyn Road Western Drive to Harlow Reconstruct to 2-lane urban Eugene $375,000 0.25 696 Road facility Wilkes Drive River Road to River Loop Upgrade to 3-lane urban Lane County $1,365,000 0.91 554 1 facility Willow Creek Road 18th Avenue to UGB Upgrade to 2-lane urban Eugene $1,590,000 1.06 342 Facility Baily Hill Road Bertelsen to UGB Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $3,200,000 1.2 343 Dillard Road Gamet to UGB Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $2,000,000 1.0 298 South Willamette Spencer Crest to UGB Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $400,000 0.2 299 Summit Drive Fairmont to Floral Hill Dr. Upgrade to urban facility Eugene $500,000 0.3 452 Glenwood Blvd Franklin Blvd to 1-5 Upgrade to urban facility Springfield $800,000 0.5 836 Traffic Calming Various Locations Neighborhood traffic calming Eugene $1,000,000 101 to address problems on residential streets, including collectors Services for New Various Locations New public streets and Eugene $4,000,000 102 Development improvements to existing streets Initiated by private development and consistent with adopted CIP Status Sub-Total $67,170,000 Project Category Sub-Total $89,851,000 TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 27 Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Project Category: Study Status: Progralnnled 1.5 @ Beltline @ Interchange Project development work ODOT $3,375,000 -- 606 Study & Design Main Street! 1-5 to UGB Access management plan ODOT ISpringfield $100,000 6.0 838 Highway 126 Eugene-Springfield 1-5 to Main Corridor Study ODOT ISpringfield $150,000 6.5 835 Hwy. Main St. and 52nd 52nd to Main Interchange Plans ODOT ISpringfield $100,000 1.5 96 St./Hwy 126 Int. Status Sub-Total $3,725,000 Status: Unprogrammed 1-5 Interchange Willamette River south Comprehensive study of 1-5 ODOT $750,000 250 Study to 30th Avenue interchanges 18th Avenue Bertelsen Road to Agate Corridor study to determine Eugene $250,000 4.71 118 Street improvements Chambers Street 8th Avenue to 18th Corridor Study to determine Eugene $250,000 0.8 136 Avenue improvements Coburg Road Crescent Avenue to Access management! Eugene $100,000 2.24 619 Oakway Road safety-operational study Ferry Street Bridge Oakway Road to Long-Range Capacity Eugene $250,000 1.08 139 Broadway Refinement Plan South Bank Street Mill Street to Hilyard Develop refinement plan for Eugene, $250,000 178 Improvements Street street system ODOT W 11th Avenue Beltline Road to Access Management, Eugene $100,000 2.74 332 Chambers Street Safety, and Operational Study Willamette 13th Avenue to 33rd Corridor study to determine Eugene $250,000 5.55 187 Street! Amazon Avenue improvements Parkway/Patterson Street!Hilyard Street Status Sub-Total $2,200,000 Project Category Sub-Total TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions $5,925,000 September 200 1 Chapter 3, Page 28 Name Geographic Limits Description Jurisdiction Estimated Cost Length Number Project Category: Nodal Development Implementation Planning Various Locations Planning for implementation Of Nodal Development zoning Eugene/Springfield $5,000,000 -- Eugene Nodal Development Infrastructure Funding Various Locations Differential Nodal Development Infrastructure Cost* Eugene $2,000,000 -- Status Sub- Total $7,000,000 Project Category Sub-Total $7,000,000 Total Capital Projects: Roadway Projects $326,613,700 * For the Royal and Chase Gardens nodal development areas, allocate $2,000,000 for differential nodal development infrastructure costs. Sources of funding include a mix of local discretion STP, SDCs, "locally controlled revenue source," and other funding sources. The amount required for differential nodal development infrastructure costs will be vastly more when all the Eugene priority nodal development areas are included in this line item. Amend this line item at the first update to list the estimated differential cost of nodal development infrastructure for the priority nodal development areas over the entire fiscally constrained planning period. Springfield will use the next three years of experience to develop an estimate of costs uniquely associated with nodal development in Springfield on those nodes that are selected and protected pursuant to LCDC's approval of alternative perfonnance measures. This estimate would be included in the first update of the plan, subject to available funding. TransPlan-Joint Adopting Officials Revisions September 200 1 Chapter 3. Page 29 f/) W - C) W l- e:( a: l- f/) "C C ccs f/) W ~~en W W._Q ...I> raw== e:(a:::: I-~~ U) I- U) o o z e:( ...I a.. U) z e:( a: I- en Q) "S, S <<I .. - U) ";; ;: c CD - o 0.. ~ o .c U) CD :J C CD > CD a: - en o o .,. - c CD c o Q, E o o - "C 'i ;;:: m c ".: Q, U) i- c :J o o CD c ca ..J ar c CD m :J w - ";; (.) o ..J i Q) E I o Q) I _::J en 1_ 0.-0 >- 'a' Q)Q)-o(/) !~Q) 8a:-oc: 'ogc: <( .-::. <(.Q 1<( ctS g .-::. a: en CO ! .-::. ~ ctS (I) a -Q) t: ,(I) _ ~ - a.. 0 ,- c: ~ - ~ a. I ~ 'cu ~ ::; en -l ~ !::;::: ~ o-a>ctS 'O-a.. ,^ 0> 0 L... I(/) "U \U c: .- I- ' 0 L... a> :;::; ~ 0 I a> c: .E ::J rt. Q) - 1::Jc:.Q O>i c: (/) - , - c:' Q) c: Q) 5i 61~ ~:ol ~ .Q 0 c: 01Q) Q) c:1 a: :a ~ 0 (/)Ia: 00. 01 - c: c: 0._,_ CO' ctS 0 Q) E ~I ~ a> a> I ga C 0 L...lo 0 (1)1 -l 'cu a ~ l-l .a :J I ;: ~ ::: c a!;: Q) en' a> E oe:s Q) -, Q) a: (j) 2 Q) E c: 12 - > _ > (I) Q) Q),_a: Q) (ij c: ctS c: (I) E I c: a -l :e Q) a.. g :; 0.1 a>E a.. Q) 0 E L... ctS .c.Q, L... 0 .c. a> Q) L... E a>1a> a>'s (/) 0.. ;: a> -- > '0.. ;: ~ Eoo.a>a>IEoQ) 0 - -lOa: 01_ -l (/), 2 , , tl') I ,.... I ..- , C\J' ..-1 I , , , , , , , , , , , , ~: ~I , , I , ~! R! ..-: : 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I ~l ~I I , I I ~! ~! C\JI I , , , , , , , , , , ~l ~I C:, 0, ~! ~, Q)I (1)1 Q)I L..., a.. 1 1 oe:sl Q)l 0' c:l ~, c:l Q)' -, C:' __I ctSl ~: 1 -I (1)1 c:1 0: ,-, -, ctS, L..., a>' ~ 0: Q): c:' a>1 ~ UJ' I ~ I ,..... ~~ ,....0) ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ c: o ~ ~ Q) (I) Q) a: oe:s Q) o c: ctS c: Q) C -cu ::: c: .Q, -, ~, ~l Q)l 0' ~l a.. I , oe:sl Q)I 0' ~! ~! -, c:, 'cu I :::! (1)-: 5! ~! L..., Q), 0 Q-l 01 321 -~: -, Oll 'EI Q..l (/): en c: o ~ L... Q) ~I~ :e!:e ~I~ (/)!(/) 0'0 z!z , , , , I , I , , , , , , , ~I~~ , , ~!~ ~ ..-1 ,..... 1 , , 1 , ~!~~ , , ~i~ ~ "-1 ,..... , , , , , ~I~~ (I), -, c:, Q)' EI Q)I >1(1) 01_ CJC: E,Q) -IE E!~ Q)'O -'L... (I)' ~E ,- olE -'Q) 01_ Q),(I) =, o'(/) al -, -,- ctS,c: 'L;:' ::J Q):O t:la <(I Q) >-:c:.Q :!::,ctS ::3 a:-l CI) -, (I), Q) ~ ::J o (/) Q) ::J c: ~ Q) a: (ij o o -l ;: Q) 2 .E (ij :e Q), 0 -o,.c. .21 en g! 0 -,2 , ~l , , , , , , , , , ~l , , , , , I , , , , , , , , ~I , , ~I , , , , , , , , ~I , , , , , , , , , , , , cl ,QI -, ctS' ~I a>1 (I)' ~I a.. I , oe:sl Q)' 01 ~! ~! -, c:, 'cu I :::! enl 5! '-I coI <01 Q-l 01 ~! Q::l a>: ~, '-I coI -, ctS' ~H -l: ~, , , tl')l ..- , , , , , , , , , ~I , , , tl')' , ..- , , , , , , , , ~l ~, c:' a>1 EI Q)' >' 01 L..., QA EI -, El Q)I -, (I)' >J WI Q)I ~, ,-, CO, 1 -, Q)' Q)' ~I (/): I , =::' 0: , -I ctS' 0' 01 -l' I (ij :e o .c. en o 2 ~co ~ ..- ~~~ ~ 0) ~ ,..... tl') tl') ~~~ ~~ 8 ,.... ~~~ (I) - c: Q) E Q) > o L... Q) ~ iD Q) Q) L... en c O~ (ij2";; o -g - .3 CI) ~ = c::: ~'ctS :et-E ~~ (/)f1) 0'0 z!z , , , , I , I , , , , , , , ~I~~ , , ,.... '..- co ,.... I,.... ~ ~ 1..- CO , , , , , , ~l~~ , , ~!r::: ~ ~ 1..- co , , , , , ~l~~ 6' I- ..J - - (.) ".: - en C c: 0, ~! ~I a>' (I)' Q)I L..., a.. , , oe:sl Q)I 0' c:I(I) ctSl- c:1C: Q)IQ) 'EIE .-, Q) ctSl> :::' 0 , L... u)'lo., c:lE: 0'-' :;::; IE: ~:Q): Q)'-' c:l.l ~ I o I(/) 1_ olol,! 1-11-: 0 -l:-l :t- - "U; c ca .. t- CD C <<I ..J i , , , , , , tu "= ffi , :0 :z: (1)'0 a:b a,L... a.. 10 ~'- Q)t~ L...~ <( IQ) ~l::; .'t:: :::; ou. g-lo ~:; Q)~ :::l~ <ore ;:n.. O'Q) -llc: -'0 0.10. Q)J+:i 81~ <(P- , 010> 0> co '0 co I C\J C\J , , , , , , ~I~~ , , (O!~ 8 ..- 1..- M 1 1 1 , , , ~l~~ , , ~!f;:! ~ C\JIM LO , , , 1 1 ~l~~ t=' c:, o 0' o :;::; I o ctS, _ ~I c ~! ~ ~I ca a..: 1: oe:s! ~ ~! c ~!~ ca c:,c: ~ Q)IQ) _ c!E o 'cu I ~ C :::!e CD -, a., E ~IE: 1: 0'-1 ca :;::;IEl Q, ~IQ)I CD Q)'_I o o.!~! cO:(/) : o 1-11- 1 m 0101";; e 010:- o 0101~ 1 , in (W) ~ o in o ~ ..... c::i ~ C\J >- lJ... ..c: g> e :S s::: o .~ o ..c: 0') .s::: t: s::: ~ 0.. Q) :S '- .E ~ ~ "t) s::: ~ ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ,..... o o ~ at ..... o ..J <t t- o t- o Z <t a: " 'S ~ o ..c: <I) ~ ~ <I) ~ ::3 .g> ~ (/) w ~ z w > w a: olS (/) l- (/) o f.t)O WZ~ ...<g m'" 0- <Q.~ I-(/)fh Z- < a: I- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o (,) - en - - c "is ... - en c o o c o en - c CI) E E o o 'i 1: o .c CJ) CI) :s c CI) > CI) a: - en o o en - c CI) c o Q, E o o - "t'J G) ;;: C't C "i: Q, CJ) >; - c :s o o CI) c ca ..J Gi' c CI) C't :s w - 'i o o ..J '0 0> o "- ::J o (I) "0 ~ (5 "- - C o o ~ co o .Q 3: (I) C - C 0> E (I) c.. .s en lo~ 10> 10> 1- letS 1"- I- lcn 1- 10 IC 10 I~ letS lc ,0- 1..0 IE 0>10 ::J 10 cl~, (I) I 0..1 > 10..1 ~!<( I . I I I l I I I I I I I fhlfh I I I . I . ex:>'~' ex:>'0)' C\J l l . I I . I I . . I . I I fhlfhl . . . . ex:>l~l ex:> 10) I C\Jl I I I I I I fhlfh I I I I . . I I I lc 101 10_1 CI-I oletSl ~I 2:. etSlo>l 2:l(l)l 0>10>. (1)1"-1 0>10... . I a:lcdl _xlo>l "VIOl o>lCl OletS. clcl etSIO>. CI-I IC' 0>10_' _I etS. o~!~! etS I ~. ~. (I). IC' en!.Q! g:~: ~l o>l ~l Q-l O>lal a91 321 . 0> I 0>10_1 '_1 cl ell O>.CI O)IOC I ::J l Q-l wlcnl co t o ..c cn o Z fh (I). 1'-0) 00::> ~ fh (I). 1'-0) 00::> ,-~ fh (I). a C o ~ etS 2: 0> (I) ~ a.. cd 0> o C etS C 0> E o(ij ~ en C o ~ etS CD E ::J o o 0> C etS ...J ~l~ t!t ~!~ cnlcn 010 ZIZ I I I I I I I I I I I . fhlfh{l). I I . I ~!~ ~ ,-1 .,... . I I I I I fhlfh{l). I I I'-lex:> ~ ('t')l~ -.J '-1 .,... I I I . I I fhlfh{l). (1)1 -I CI 0>1 El o>l >1(1) 01_ CiJc E'O> -IE E!~ 0>10 _I "- (I)I ~E cnl- olE _10> 01_ 0>.(1) =. o'cn 01 -' -1- etS.c "C' ::J 0>10 -elO <(10) ~!@ OI...J i I I I I I I I I I I I enl Q) ~ ::J o cn 0> ::J C 0> > 0> a: CO o o ...J 3: 0> Z!~ o~rE (l)lo "01..c ::J I cn o!o ElZ I I I I I I . I I I I I fh!fh I I ~ :'.0 . .'-. I . I . . . . . I I I . I . fhlfhl . . I . . . ~Ilt). l'-l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I fhlfh' I I I I cl oQl -I etSl 2:: 0>1 (I)' ~l 0..1 cdl~ 0>!a51 olEl cl(I)' etSl>1 a5! e! E l Q..l '(ij lEI -=:::.-. ..::: l E l enl.sl g!~ ~lcnl "-lo>l 0> ~J~: ~ OlCO: CO .-. -g! ~! 0..' "-I -1(i51 0> I I . ~I-I a5101 I I colcol gIg! ...J:...J: CO t o ..c cn o Z fh (I). fh ~ ~ b; <0 fh (I). fh ~ ~ b; <0 fh (I). fh (I) - C 0> E 0> > o "- Q) 0> "- en I C O!!! co.Eii o -g - .3 CJ) ~ ~!~ tIt ~!~ cnlcn 010 ZIZ I I I I I I I I I I I I fh!fhfh I I 1'-1,- ex:> 1'-11'- ~ ~I'- <0 I I I I I fhlfhfh I I I'- 1,- ex:> 1'-11'- ~ ~I'- <0 I I I I I I fhlfhfh C 01 ~! 2:1 ~I 0>1 "-I 0..1 cdl . 0>' 01 CI(I) ~!E 0>10> _ EI E o O(ij l. 0>> '': - ~Ie en '0- enl 0..1 clE: - 01-1 'ii) ~ I E I c ~l 0> l ca 0>'-' ... c..l ~ I t- alcn l_ ~ olo:':9 ca ..... I ..... I 0 ..J ...J I ...J : t- C t- ..J - (I) a: o a.. etSi(j) ~b <( 1(1) ijl:; :t::t3 oU: g-Lg J::len (I)'t) ~I(I) ,,-to' (1)1,,- 3:0:: 010> ...J I C -10 0..10.. ~!t5 010 <(Jl. I I I I I I I I I I I I fhlfh fh I I I ,- I C\J ('t') <o1~ 0 ,- 1'- ('t') I I I I I fhlfh fh I I ,- I C\J ('t') <OI~ 0 ,- 1'- ('t') I I I I I I fhlfh fh i='c OO.QI -I o etSl _ 2:1 c ~! ~ ~l ca a.. I 1:: cd! ~ ~! c ij!~ ca CI C ... 0> I 0> .... E! E '0 o(ij: ~ c ~!e CI) ~I 0..1 E ~:E: 1:: .QI-l ca -lEI Q, ~Io>l CI) 0>1_' o o..!~! c alcn I o ..... I..... I C't ala Iii ! 0101- o alal~ I I 0- c:i ~ C\I )... lJ... .c: ~ e -s a o~ o .c: 0> .t: c: t: ~ Q. Q) -s '- .E ~ ~ "t) t: ~ ~ -S! ~ I'.. ~ .,... en 'l:t ut ,... 0- en 'l:t ut ,... 0- ..J <C .... o .... o Z <C a: e" oS ~ Q .c: (J) ~ ~ (J) ~ ::J .g> ~ Exhibit B-2 Second Errata, including corrections to September 2001 TransPlan And to Exhibit B-1, Errata to September 2001 TransPlan [Changes from September 2001 TransPlan and Exhibit B-1, Errata to September 2001 TransPlan, are shown in legislative format: new text is underlined; deleted text is shown in strikee\ft.] Chapter 2 Errata: Correction to Exhibit B-1. Errata to September 2001 TransPlan and to September 2001 TransPlan: Chapter 2, Page 29, make further revisions to the Policy Definition/Intent statement for TSI Transit Policy #2, Bus Rapid Transit, to read as follows: Policy Definition/Intent: BRT is, in essence, the use of buses to emulate the positive characteristics of a rail system, but at a fraction of the cost of a rail system. The BR T system will include: · Exclusive busways along majer eerridors the maioritv of each corridor, · Faster boarding through low-floor, multiple door vehicles, · Minimum ten minute frequency during peak hours, · Increased convenience and comfort, · Limited stops, · Improved travel time through reduction of impact from normal traffic congestion through bus priority treatment · A connected system of BR T corridor and neighborhood routes BR T, when combined with other system improvement, land use, and demand management strategies, is expected to increase the share of riders who use public transportation. BR T is also expected to help the region maintain conformity with federal air quality standards. BR T, combined with nodal development, is a key strategy in the region~g. compliance with alternative performance measures for the Transportation Planning Rule. Cohunitment by the region to full system build out of BR T within 20 years is essential to meeting the alternative performance measures. The full system will include 61 miles ofBRT corridor service. The majority of each corridor will include exeIHsi'/e bHS t-reatment exclusive buswavs. When funding or traffic conditions restrict implementation of elJlelHSi'le bas treat meet exclusive busways within a corridor, priority should be given to improvements providing the greatest benefit to travel timesavings. The BR T strategy will be implemented to the extent that planning and engineering studies show that the system would increase the use of transit, is supported by the community, and can be funded. As BRT is implemented, LTD, Springfield, Eugene, Lane County, and ODOT will consider neighborhood impacts when designing elements of specific segments. Exhibit B-2 - Page 1 Chapter 3 and Appendix A Revisions/Errata: Correction to Exhibit B-1. Errata to September 2001 TransPlan and to Seotember 2001 TransPlan: Chapter 3, Page 3-28, Page 3-13 and the Financially-Constrained Roadway Projects Map in Appendix A, make further revisions as follows: (1) revise the geographic limits for the 1-5 Interchange Study to read: "McKenzie V/illamette River south to 30th Avenue"; and (2) add the following footnote to the description of the geographic limits on page 3-28: "Inclusion of the Beltline/I-5 Interchange in this study is not intended to delay the Beltline/I-5 Interchange Project. but to incorporate the design elements from the final Environmental Assessment in the overall interchange study. " Appendix F Errata: Correction to September 2001 TransPlan: On Appendix F, Page 9, revise Section 2 of Policy F-15 for consistency with Chapter 2, page 26 to read as follows: 2. Acceptable and reliable performance is defined by the following levels of service under peak hour traffic conditions: Level of Service E within desigBated Bodal de,.~elef>meBt areas and Eugene's Central Area Transportation Study (CATS) area, and Level of Service D elsewhere. Exhibit B-2 - Page 2