The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/28/16 Council Agenda Packet EUGENE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 28, 2016 5:30p.m.CITYCOUNCILWORKSESSION HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th Eugene,Oregon97401 7:30p.m.CITYCOUNCILMEETING HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th Eugene,Oregon97401 MeetingofNovember28,2016; HerHonorMayorKittyPiercyPresiding Councilors 5:30p.m.CITYCOUNCILWORKSESSION HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th A.WORKSESSION5:30p.m. EquityinContractingProgram B.WORKSESSION6:15p.m.* CouncilCommunications *Timeapproximate F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\A161128S.doc 7:30p.m.MEETINGOFTHEEUGENECITYCOUNCIL HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th 1.PUBLICFORUM - ¸®±Ȁ ThePublicForumisanopportunityforindividualstospeaktotheCity Councilonanycityrelatedissuesexceptforthoseitemswhichhavealreadybeen heardbyaHearingsOfficialorareon³®¨¦§³Ȍ²agendaasapublichearing. Eachpersonwillhavethreeminutestospeak.Whenyoucometothepodium, pleasegiveyourname,cityofresidence,and,forEugeneresidents,yourwardif known.Thetimerandlightsindicatethetimeyouhavetospeak.Theredlight indicatestheendofthreeminutes. - ¸®±¢«®²¤²³§¤0´¡«¨¢&®±´¬ £ ²ª²¥®±¢®¬¬¤³²¥±®¬³§¤#¨³¸#®´¢¨«ȁ 3.CONSENTCALENDAR (Note:Timepermitting,actionontheConsentCalendarmaybetakenatthe5:30 p.m.worksession.) A.ApprovalofCityCouncilMinutes B.ApprovalofTentativeWorkingAgenda C.ResolutionApprovingaLowIncomeRentalHousingPropertyTax ExemptionforthePropertyLocatedat3350WillametteStreet,Eugene, Oregon.(St.VincentdePaulSocietyofLaneCounty/Applicant.) #¨³¸#®´¢¨«0±¤²¨£¤³Ȁ ImovetoapprovetheitemsontheConsentCalendar. # ««¥®±µ®³¤ȁ 4.PUBLICHEARING AnOrdinanceConcerningErosionPreventionandAmendingSections 6.406,6.625,6.630,6.635,and6.640oftheEugeneCode,1971. - ¦¤±Ȁ Introducestopic,presentsbackgroundinformation. - ¸®±®¯¤²³§¤¯´¡«¨¢§¤ ±¨¦Ȁ ThosewishingtospeakduringthePublic Hearingmustsubmitacompletedȏ2¤°´¤²³to3¯¤ ªȐformtotheinformationdesk, priortothebeginningofthePublicHearing.Whenyoucometothepodium,please giveyourname,cityofresidence,and,forEugeneresidents,yourwardifknown; youwillhavethreeminutestocomment.Therearelightsonthetimer;thered lightindicatestheendofthreeminutes. - ¸®±Ȁ Closesthepublichearing. - ¸®±Ȁ AsksforquestionsorcommentsfromtheCityCouncil. F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\A161128S.doc 5.WORKSESSION IndustrialCorridorCommunityOrganization #¨³¸#®´¢¨«0±¤²¨£¤³Ȁ ImovetodirecttheCityManagertodevelopaproposed ordinanceandscheduleapublichearingonanordinancetoenablesomeonewho ownspropertywithintheIndustrialCorridorCommunityOrganizationboundary andoutsidetheCitylimitsbutinsidetheUGB,toobtainnecessarypermitsand servicesbyeither(a)annexingtotheCityiflegallyabletodoso,or(b)signingan irrevocableconsenttoannexauthorizingtheCitytoannexthepropertywhenever theannexationisauthorizedbystatelaw.Thedraftordinanceshallprovidethat theconsenttoannexshallallowthepropertytobesubjecttowhateverconditions andstandardsexistatthetimethatthepropertyisannexed. # ««¥®±µ®³¤ȁ Adjourn. ¶¶¶ȁ¤´¦¤¤®±ȁ¦®µȁ F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\A161128S.doc ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT BACKGROUND F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S161 128A.docx RELATEDCITYPOLICIES COUNCILOPTIONS CITY-!.!'%2Ȍ3RECOMMENDATION SUGGESTEDMOTION ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S161 128A.docx October 6, 2016 Colleagues, Our organization is grounded in the principles of equity and human rights. Because of the Cits commitment to these principles, it is important that we promote and advance these values in our organization, our community, and beyond. The new Equity in Contracting Program is an opportunity to make additional strides in this direction, and keep us on a path to being an organization of the future. National and regional studies show that significant systemic barriers to participation in the marketplace has led to historic underutilization of minority and women-owned businesses in public contracting. This underutilization has a dual impact: it limits the marketplace of vendors, thereby reducing market competition and innovation; and it limits business opportunities to minority and women-owned businesses, which perpetuates the barriers. The City first prohibited discrimination in contracting based on race or gender through City Code in 1975. Despite taking this action, barriers still exist for minority and women-owned businesses to participate fully in serving the community through contracting with the City. City purchasing activities equal about $124 million per year, and can be a powerful tool to help create a level playing field for all vendors. Improving minority and women owned vendors access to business opportunities with the City develops and strengthens these organizations and in turn improves the economic prosperity and vitality of our community. Rather than reflecting past practices, these changes move us to represent an organization of 2025. The City has been working on various fronts to understand utilization of minority and women owned business and improve access to contracting opportunities for those firms. Purchasing staff have been networking with other public agencies gaining guidance on best practices, while for federally funded capital projects, Public Works adheres to requirements for collecting utilization data. These are all good steps toward our goals and we know we can do more. In order to create equitable opportunities for all vendors, the City implemented an Equity in Contracting Program. The program has three focus areas: data collection and analysis, organizational engagement, and external outreach. 1.Conducting critical, systematic, and comprehensive reviews of the data will: o Help identify and understand barriers faced by minority and women- owned businesses competing for contract opportunities; o Remove barriers that have impaired access by minority and women-owned businesses to contracting opportunities and, o Help develop a better understanding of minority and women-owned businesses in the vendor marketplace. The Equity in Contracting Program provides the tools and data management to ensure collection and comprehensive review of available data. 2.The success of the Equity in Contracting Program requires active participation amongst project managers and associated City staff involved in the contracting process and related decisions. Engaging these key stakeholders in the Equity in Contracting Program increases awareness of the purpose and importance of the program, and connects City staff with the tools they need to conveniently access potential new vendors. October 6, 2016 3.The Equity in Contracting Program engages in targeted outreach to minority and women- owned businesses to facilitate greater participation in City contracts by those businesses. Outreach includes a building of partnerships between community stakeholders and toolkit materials for minority and women-owned businesses to ensure all available resources and programs are put to the best use. Local businesses are a particular focus of the effort to educate vendors about City processes and the value of becoming an MBE or WBE certified organization. The Purchasing Office in Central Services is coordinating the effort, but it takes leadership, effort and commitment from across all departments to reach our goals. The vision of having a barrier- free contracting environment with a level playing field depends on all of us participating in this important work and striving to create a different environment for our vendors. Not only does this align with how we think about our work, it helps us move toward our goals of being future- ready. Thank you for all that you do to promote the values of equity and inclusion. By doing this work we all benefit. %·¤¢´³¨µ¤ 4¤ ¬ -¤¬¡¤±²Ȁ *® 2´¨¹Ǿ City Manager 3 ± § -¤£ ± y, Assistant City Manager '«¤ +«¤¨Ǿ City Attorney +±¨²³¨¤ ( ¬¬¨³³Ǿ Central Services #§¨¤¥ *®¤ : «´£¤ªǾ Fire and EMS 2¤¤¤ '±´¡¤Ǿ Library, Recreation and Cultural Services $¤¸ "± ´£ , Planning and Development #§¨¤¥0¤³¤ +¤±²Ǿ Police +´±³ #®±¤¸Ǿ Public Works Attachment B {ǒƩǝĻǤ aƚƓƉĻǤʹ 9ƨǒźƷǤ źƓ /ƚƓƷƩğĭƷźƓŭ {ǒƩǝĻǤ vǒĻƭƷźƚƓƭ ğƓķ LƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓ Survey open 9/21/16 10/03/16 Sent to approximately 6,500 eBid registered vendors 284 respondents {ǒƩǝĻǤ vǒĻƭƷźƚƓƭʹ 1.How many contracts have you had with the City of Eugene in the last 10 years? 2.How do you learn about contracting opportunities with the City of Eugene? 3.Have you ever contracted with other public agencies in Oregon? 4.Is your business at least 51% minority or woman owned? 5.If your business is at least 51% minority or woman owned, are you certified as such? 6.What types of services or products do you offer? 7. any, have you faced with the process? 8.Which of the following topics would you likely seek more assistance with? 9.In what ways would you like to receive this assistance or information? 10.Do you have any additional comments or suggestions? Subcontractor Utilization Form City of Eugene | Finance | Purchasing Office 100 W. 10th Ave. Suite 400 | Eugene, OR 97401 Phone (541) 682-5058 | Fax (541) 682-6233 The selected contractor shall complete and submit this form to the City of Eugene within 7 calendar days of award. This information will be used to track utilization of certified D/MWESB firms within City contracting. Return the completed form by e-mail to Eugene.Purchasing@ci.eugene.or.us or by fax or mail to the contact information listed above. Project Name Bid Amount Contract Number (Agency use) Contractor (Company Name) COBID Certification Status*, check all that apply. Status*, check all that apply. Status*, check all that apply. DBE MBE WBE ESBSDVBENone ESB MBE MBE WBE WBE SDVBE Authorized Representative Authorized Representative Title Authorized Representative Title Authorized Representative Title TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Authorized Representative Phone Authorized Representative Email Authorized Representative Email Authorized Representative Email By submitting this form, the contractor acknowledges and certifies that this form accurately represents the By submitting this form, the contractor acknowledges and certifies that this form accurately represents the By submitting this form, the contractor acknowledges and certifies that this form accurately represents the intent to utilize the firms listed below, if any, for performance on this project. The contractor certifies that intent to utilize the firms listed below, if any, for performance on this project. The contractor certifies that intent to utilize the firms listed below, if any, for performance on this project. The contractor certifies that FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF the contractor had direct contact with the firms named regarding participation in this project. If more space the contractor had direct contact with the firms named regarding participation in this project. If more space the contractor had direct contact with the firms named regarding participation in this project. If more space is required, please provide the additional information on a second sheet. is required, please provide the additional information on a second sheet. is required, please provide the additional information on a second sheet. As the Authorized Representative, I certify that the information contained in this form is complete and As the Authorized Representative, I certify that the information contained in this form is complete and As the Authorized Representative, I certify that the information contained in this form is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Yes Date: accurate to the best of my knowledge. accurate to the best of my knowledge. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Name of Subcontractor(s) City State Phone COBID Certification Status* Contract Amount Phone Phone City State RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD *Only list COBID certified businesses. Certification for socially and economically disadvantaged businesses in the State of Oregon is available free of charge through the Certification Office for Business Inclusion and Diversity (COBID). Please visit www.oregon4biz.com/How-We-Can-Help/COBID for more information. ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT SUGGESTEDMOTION FORMOREINFORMATION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611281.doc ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT SUGGESTEDMOTION ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611282A.doc ATTACHMENTA MINUTES EugeneCityCouncil HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th Eugene,Oregon97401 November9,2016 12:00p.m. CouncilorsPresent: WORK SESSION:Downtown Update 1. Police Chief Pete Kerns and Assistant City Manager Sarah Medary gave a brief PowerPoint presentation on downtown, including the history and context, social services and public safety, parks plazas and facilities, programming, health, smoke-free parks, amenities, and additional strategies for improvement. Council discussion: Acknowledge the difference between homelessness and antisocial behavior. Create a short-term shelter; certain behaviors should not be tolerated. Provide more safe spaces for people to go; donation meter was a great idea. Provide additional dog waste stations, public restrooms, and way-finding maps. Park blocks feel unsafe and unwelcoming; appreciate all the tools that are being utilized. Closing the park or taking away the shelters is counterproductive to goal of creating welcoming environment. Dog license requirement should not be limited to downtown. Installation of security cameras could raise serious civil liberty issues. Many behavioral issues cannot be solved by public safety strategies alone. Send outreach team to address issues before using a police response. Presence of security cameras will just move the problems somewhere else. Focus on making actual changes/improvements to parks, rather than on closures. Greater concentration on the arts is needed. More emphasis on control of dogs by their owners is needed. MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Evans, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to have further discussion on the installation of security cameras in the Park Blocks as part of the effort to FAILED 3:5 improve safety and discourage illegal activity in the area. Councilors Poling, Clark, and Evans in support. MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Evans, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to have further discussion on the temporary closure of the areas under and around the concrete awnings in the Park Blocks, except for when the awnings are being used for permitted events, as part of the MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 9, 2016 Page 1 Work Session PASSED 5:3 effort to improve safety and discourage illegal activity in the area. , Councilors Brown, Taylor and Syrett opposed. MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Evans, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to hold a work session and direct the City Manager to schedule a public hearing on adopting smoke-free PASSED 5:3 areas in the downtown activity zone. , Councilors Brown, Taylor and Clark opposed. MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Evans, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to direct the City Manager to schedule a work session on a code amendment that requires any dog brought into the downtown activity zone to be licensed. PASSED 5:3 Councilors Brown, Taylor and Zelenka opposed. MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 9, 2016 Page 2 Work Session ATTACHMENTB MINUTES EugeneCityCouncil HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th Eugene,Oregon97401 November14,2016 7:30p.m. CouncilorsPresent:MikeClarkviaphone, CouncilorsAbsent: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG: 1. 2.ACTION:Resolution5174DeclaringtheCityof%´¦¤¤Ȍ²CommitmenttoBeinga Welcoming,Inclusive,AndSafeCommunityforEveryone MOTIONANDVOTE: .PASSED7:0 3.PUBLICFORUM: MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 14, 2016 Page 1 Meeting 4.CONSENTCALENDAR: MOTIONANDVOTE: PASSED7:0. 5.ACTION:AnOrdinanceConcerningAnnualMaintenanceoftheLandUseCodeand AmendingSections9.0500,9.2160,9.2451,9.2461,9.2600,9.2620,9.2750,9.2777, 9.7230,9.7405, 9.3165,9.3210,9.3215,9.3970,9.4130,9.6210,9.6640,9.7000,9.7015, 9.7505,9.7810,9.8005,9.8085,9.8090,9.8215,9.8220,9.8320,9.8325,9.8360,9.8423, 9.8430,9.8440,9.8445,9.8515,9.8520,9.8705,9.8710,9.8750,9.8755,9.8760,9.8810 and9.8855oftheEugeneCode,1971 MOTIONANDVOTE PASSED7:0 MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 14, 2016 Page 2 Meeting 6.WORKSESSIONHumanRightsCommissionFY2017WorkPlanandFY2016Annual Report. MOTIONANDVOTE: PASSED7:0 7.ACTION:InitiationofRenamingandRezoningProcessforBroadwayPlaza MOTIONANDVOTE: PASSED5:2 MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 14, 2016 Page 3 Meeting ATTACHMENTC MINUTES EugeneCityCouncil HarrisHall,125East8Avenue th Eugene,Oregon97401 November16,2016 12:00p.m. CouncilorsPresent: CouncilorsAbsent: 1.WORKSESSION:RestStopandOpportunityVillagePilotPrograms MOTIONANDVOTE(friendlyincluded): PASSED6:0 MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 16, 2016 Page 1 Work Session MOTIONANDVOTE: PASSED6:0 MOTION: MOTIONTOSUBSTITUTEANDVOTE: PASSED6:0 VOTEONMAINMOTIONASSUBSTITUTED:PASSED6:0 MOTIONANDVOTE: PASSED4:3 MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 16, 2016 Page 2 Work Session ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT BACKGROUND RELATEDCITYPOLICIES COUNCILOPTIONS CITY-!.!'%2Ȍ3RECOMMENDATION SUGGESTEDMOTION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611282B.doc ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611282B.doc ECC UGENEITYOUNCIL TWA ENTATIVE ORKINGGENDA November 22, 2016 NOVEMBER 28 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: Syrett A. WS: Contracting Equity Program Update 45 mins – CS/Silvers B. WS:Council Communications CS/Ruiz 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: Syrett 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest c. Resolution Approving LIRHPTE for SVDP Youth House-3350 Willamette Street PDD/Meyi-Galloway 3. PH: Ordinance Concerning Erosion and Sediment Control Program PW/Gillespie 4. WS: Industrial Corridor Community Organization PDD/Braud NOVEMBER 30 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: Syrett A. WS: Parks and Recreation System Plan 60 mins – PW/Burke B. WS: Fireworks 30 mins – Fire DECEMBER 5 MONDAY * NOTE: JEO MEETING ADDED * 5:30 p.m. Joint Elected Officials Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: Syrett A. WS: Coordinated Downtown Development CS/Medary DECEMBER 12 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: Rental Housing Code 45 mins – PDD/Nicholas B. WS: $15 Minimum Wage for City and Contract Employees 45 mins – CS/Hammitt 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest c. Adoption of Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of CAFR CS/Lauderbach d. Approval of Annexation for JLA Investments (A 16-8) PDD/Sullivan e. Approval of Annexation for Cowan, Doug (A 16-9) PDD/Sullivan 3. URA Action: Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of Annual Financial Report CS/Lauderbach 4. URA PH and Action: Supplemental Budget CS/Miller 5. PH and Action: Supplemental Budget CS/Miller 6. PH and Action: Ordinance Regulating Recreational Marijuana Business CAO/Klein 6. Action: Ordinance Concerning Erosion and Sediment Control Program PW/Gillespie DECEMBER 14 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: Coordinated Downtown Development 90 mins – CS/Medary COUNCIL BREAK: DECEMBER 15, 2016 – JANUARY 4, 2017 A=action; PH=public hearing; WS=work session F:\\CMO\\CC\\CCAGENDA.docx ECC UGENEITYOUNCIL TWA ENTATIVE ORKINGGENDA November 22, 2016 JANUARY 4 WEDNESDAY 5:30 p.m. State of the City Hult Center Lobby Expected Absences: A. State of the City JANUARY 11 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. Election of 2017 Council Officers B. Process Session (including Minutes Recording) 90 mins – CS/Cariaga JANUARY 17 TUESDAY 7:30 p.m. Council Public Hearing Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. PH: Resolution on Measure 49 Claim CAO/Davies JANUARY 18 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: Commercial Setback Code Requirement 45 mins – PDD/Planning B. WS: JANUARY 23 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest JANUARY 25 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: New Housing Development on Unimproved Roads 45 mins - PW B. WS: Renter Protections 45 mins – PDD/Jennings FEBRUARY 8 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: Inclusionary Zoning 45 mins – PDD/ B. WS: Public Notice Requirements and Policies for Property Sales 45 mins – PDD/Community Dev FEBRUARY 13 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. Committee Reports and Items of Interest B. WS: A=action; PH=public hearing; WS=work session F:\\CMO\\CC\\CCAGENDA.docx ECC UGENEITYOUNCIL TWA ENTATIVE ORKINGGENDA November 22, 2016 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest FEBRUARY 15 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: B. WS: FEBRUARY 21 TUESDAY 7:30 p.m. Council Public Hearing Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. PH: Enterprise Zone Revised Public Benefit Criteria PDD/D’Souza FEBRUARY 22 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: South Willamette Next Steps 90 mins – PDD/Harding FEBRUARY 27 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. Committee Reports and Items of Interest from Mayor, City Council and City Manager 30 mins B. WS: 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest MARCH 8 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: Overview of Chronic Nuisance Code 45 mins – PDD/Nicholas B. WS: MARCH 13 MONDAY 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. Committee Reports: PC, South Willamette EDC, LTD/EmX, OMPOC, McKenzie Watershed B. WS: 7:30 p.m. Council Meeting Harris Hall Expected Absences: 1. Public Forum 2. Consent Calendar a. Approval of City Council Minutes CS/Forrest b. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda CS/Forrest 3. PH and Action: Capital Improvement Program CS/Streepey A=action; PH=public hearing; WS=work session F:\\CMO\\CC\\CCAGENDA.docx ECC UGENEITYOUNCIL TWA ENTATIVEORKING GENDA November 22, 2016 MARCH 15 WEDNESDAY Noon Council Work Session Harris Hall Expected Absences: A. WS: B. WS: COUNCIL BREAK: MARCH 16, 2017 – APRIL 10, 2017 T=tentative; A=action; PH=public hearing; WS=work session ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT BACKGROUND 3´¬¬ ±¸®¥³§¤,)2(04%¯±®¦± ¬ 3´¬¬ ±¸®¥±¤°´¤²³¤£³ ·¤·¤¬¯³¨®¥®±³§¤36$09®´³§(®´²¤ RELATEDCITYPOLICIES COUNCILOPTIONS CITY-!.!'%2Ȍ3RECOMMENDATION SUGGESTEDMOTION ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION ATTACHMENTA ATTACHMENTB RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOW-INCOME RENTAL HOUSING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3350 WILLAMETTE STREET, EUGENE, OREGON. (St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County/ Applicant.) The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: A. St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County (“SVDP”) has entered into a Commercial Real Estate Sale Agreement to purchase real property located at 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (Assessor’s Map 18-03-07-13, Tax Lot Number 3500) owned by Cascade Presbyterian Church, Inc., 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (“the Property”). SVDP, located at 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, Oregon, 97402, has submitted an application pursuant to Subsection 2.939(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971, for an exemption from ad valorem taxes under the City's Low-Income Rental Housing Property Tax Exemption Program (Sections 2.937 to 2.940 of the Eugene Code, 1971). B. The tax exemption is being sought for 15 residential studio units and a common residential area to be constructed in the former church building on the Property. Fourteen units will be provided as transitional housing for 14 low-income homeless youth and one unit will be provided for an on-site manager. All of the units will be provided rent-free. C. The Community Development Manager of the Planning and Development Department, as designee of the City Manager, has prepared a Report and Recommendation recommending that the application be approved and the exemption granted. In making that recommendation, the Community Development Manager found that the applicant submitted all materials, documents and fees required by the application and Section 2.938(1) of the Eugene Code, 1971, and is in compliance with the policies set forth in the Standards and Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 5028. In addition, the Community Development Manager found that the applicant has complied with the criteria for approval provided in Section 2.939(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows: Section 1. Based upon the above findings and the Report and Recommendation of the Community Development Manager, the City Council approves SVDP’s application for an ad valorem property tax exemption under the City's Low-Income Rental Housing Property Tax Exemption Program for the property located at 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (Assessor’s Map 18-03-07-13, Tax Lot Number 3500), which will include 15 residential studio units and a common residential area. Section 2. Subject to the condition precedent set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution, the Property described in Section 1 above is declared exempt from local ad valorem property taxation commencing July 1, 2017, and continuing for a continuous period of twenty (20) years unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.940 of the Eugene Code, 1971, which provides for termination after an opportunity to be heard if: 2.1 Construction or development of the exempt property differs from the construction or development described in the application for exemption, or was not completed by January 1, 2020, and no extensions or exceptions were granted; or 2.2 The applicant fails to comply with provisions of ORS 307.515 to 307.523, provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971, the Standards and Guidelines adopted by Council Resolution No. 5028, or any conditions imposed in this Resolution. The tax exemption shall terminate immediately, without right of notice or appeal, pursuant to the provisions of ORS 307.531 in the event the exempt property, while being held for the development described in SVDP’s application, is used for a purpose other than for the provision of low-income housing; the county assessor determines that a change of use to other than that described in SVDP’s application has occurred; or, if a declaration as defined in ORS 100.005 is presented to the county assessor or tax collector for approval under ORS 100.110. Section 3. The tax exemption shall not take effect unless and until closing occurs on the purchase of the Property by SVDP. Section 4. The City Manager, or the Manager's designee, is requested to forward a copy of this Resolution to the applicant within ten days from the date of adoption of this Resolution, and to cause a copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Lane County Assessor on or before April 1, 2017. The copy of the Resolution sent to the applicant shall be accompanied by a notice explaining the grounds for possible termination of the exemption prior to the end of the exemption period and the effects of the termination. Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. th The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28 day of November, 2016. _____________________________________ City Recorder ATTACHMENTC RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION DENYING A LOW-INCOME RENTAL HOUSING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3350 WILLAMETTE STREET, EUGENE, OREGON. (St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County/ Applicant.) The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: A. St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County (“SVDP”) has entered into a Commercial Real Estate Sale Agreement to purchase real property located at 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (Assessor’s Map 18-03-07-13, Tax Lot Number 3500) owned by Cascade Presbyterian Church, Inc., 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (“the Property”). SVDP, located at 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, Oregon, 97402, has submitted an application pursuant to Subsection 2.939(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971, for an exemption from ad valorem taxes under the City's Low-Income Rental Housing Property Tax Exemption Program (Sections 2.937 to 2.940 of the Eugene Code, 1971). B. The tax exemption is being sought for 15 residential studio units and a common residential area to be constructed in the former church building on the Property. Fourteen units will be provided as transitional housing for 14 low-income homeless youth and one unit will be provided for an on-site manager. All of the units will be provided rent-free. C. The Community Development Manager of the Planning and Development Department, as designee of the City Manager, has prepared a Report and Recommendation recommending that the application be approved and the exemption granted. In making that recommendation, the Community Development Manager found that the applicant submitted all materials, documents and fees required by the application and Section 2.938(1) of the Eugene Code, 1971, and is in compliance with the policies set forth in the Standards and Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 5028. In addition, the Community Development Manager found that the applicant has complied with the criteria for approval provided in Section 2.939(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows: Section 1. Notwithstanding the above findings and the Community Development Manager’s Report and Recommendation, the City Council denies SVDP’s application for an ad valorem property tax exemption under the City's Low-Income Rental Housing Property Tax Exemption Program for the property located at 3350 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97405 (Assessor’s Map 18-03-07-13, Tax Lot Number 3500) because the applicant has failed to demonstrate that it is qualified for the tax exemption. Section 2. The City Manager, or the Manager's designee, is requested to forward a copy of this Resolution to the applicant within ten days from the date of adoption of this Resolution, along with a notice informing the applicant of the right to appeal in the manner set forth in ORS 34.010 to 34.100. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28 th day of November, 2016. _____________________________________ City Recorder ATTACHMENTD ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT BACKGROUND RELATEDCITYPOLICIES COUNCILOPTIONS F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611283.docx CITY-!.!'%2Ȍ3RECOMMENDATIONANDSUGGESTEDMOTION ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION F:\\CMO\\2016 Council Agendas\\M161128\\S1611283.docx ATTACHMENTA Memorandum Date: July 8, 2016 To: Mayor Piercy & Eugene Councilors From: Scott Gillespie, PE Subject: Erosion and Sediment Control Program Updates The purpose of the memo is to summarize proposed changes to the Erosion & Sediment Control Program Ordinance and Chapter 6 of Eugene Code. s Federal and State Stormwater permits. The erosion ordinance has not been updated since its original adoption in 1996. We are currently on the 4 iteration of federal and state stormwater permits and the industry practice has th evolved since the original ordinance was adopted. Proposed changes to the erosion and sediment control ordinance are intended to address current stormwater permit requirements, address problematic unregulated construction sites and reflect current industry practice. Proposed changes include: %±®²¨® /±£¨ ¢¤ Ȩ#§ ¦¤² ³® #§ ¯³¤± Εȩ Proposing to add 1 additional permit trigger. o Sites that require 5000 cubic feet of cut/fill. This specifically targets large commercial and student housing developments that have underground parking. Examples are The HUB, 13 & Patterson, th etc. Projects generally include large excavations & roadway staging. City staff have enforced outcomes and discharges on a number of occasions for projects with these characteristics. Reduce permit types down from 3 to 2. Individual and Annual ts). Put focus current practice. Staff reviewed current state and federal permits for consistency. Staff also queried the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality on any potential changes at the state and federal levels. Our current program is comprehensive and consistent with current and pending permits. No changes are necessary to meet current or anticipated EPA and ODEQ regulatory requirements. The current program was reviewed with external and internal stakeholders (contractors, developers, engineers, architects, utilities etc.). There was unanimous support for keeping the outcome based program. The outcome based program allows contractors and designers to select their own techniques provided they meet prescribed outcomes and protect the stormwater system. All stakeholders appreciate the flexibility along with not having another big manual to follow. All entities understood and acknowledged the proposed changes. City staff presented the changes to the Lane County Homebuilders Association in March of 2016. The Home Builders association had no concerns with the proposed changes. A public hearing on an ordinance with proposed changes to the Erosion and Sediment Control Program within Chapter 6 of the Eugene Code will be scheduled in the Fall of 2016. ATTACHMENTB ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING EROSION PREVENTION AND AMENDING SECTIONS 6.406, 6.625, 6.630, 6.635, AND 6.640 OF THE EUGENE CODE, 1971. THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following definitions in Section 6.406 of the Eugene Code, 1971, are amended to provide as follows: 6.406 Definitions . For purposes of sections 6.401 through 6.645, unless the context requires otherwise words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them. In interpreting the meaning of words in a definition, other definitions of that word in this Code may be considered: City stormwater system . Those stormwater facilities located on city-owned property, city right-of-way, city easements and any stormwater facility the city is contractually or legally obligated to operate and maintain, including but not limited to: (a) An open drainage way, headwater stream, creek, wetland, spring, or pond, including those not maintained by the city which drain onto city- owned property or into city maintained facilities; (b) A pipe or sewer and its related appurtenances that \[carry\] convey stormwater and have been designed and constructed expressly for use by the general public and accepted by the city; (c) Streets, curbs and gutters and other surfaces in the public way which are designed to carry stormwater, roadside drainage ditches along unimproved city streets but not access drive culverts; and (d) Flood control and stormwater quality facilities (levees, dikes, overflow channels,conveyance swales, \[biofiltration facilities,\] infiltration facilities,stormwater facilities, water quality facilities, detention basins, retention basins, dams, pump stations, groundwater \[recharging\]rechargebasins, sediment \[traps\] basins, vegetated buffers, wetlands, etc.) that have been \[designed\] designated, and constructed expressly for use by the general public and accepted by the city. Construction related materials . Potential water quality pollutants that are used or created during construction activities including, but not limited to, off- site deposits of sediments by vehicles (e.g., tracking, spilling), building material wastes (e.g., scrap metals, rubber, plastic, glass, masonry, wood; paints and thinners; packaging materials; insulation, plaster grout); Ordinance - Page 1 of 8 {00201894;3 } hazardous substances (e.g., petroleum products, cleaning solvents, chemical additives, concrete curing compounds, acids for cleaning masonry surfaces, paints, thinners); and concrete washout. Construction site management plan (CSMP).A set of maps, data, drawings,specificationsand narrative that describes expected runoff from new construction sites, and establishes best management practices or equivalentmeasures to be taken for preventing erosion\[,\]and controlling sediments,surface runoff and other pollutants from construction \[related\] activities.For purposes of sections 6.401 through 6.645, the CSMP serves as the City of Eugene’s equivalent requirement to the Erosion Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) required by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required by the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency. Dewatering . The removal and disposal of surface water or groundwater during construction or for the purpose\[s\] of \[preparing a site for\] facilitating construction. Jurisdictional wetland .An area that is inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and which under normal circumstances does support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. Any parcel or portion of a parcel which meets the state or federal definition of wetlands that are under the jurisdiction of state or federal laws. Synonymous with "wetland." Minor recurring activities . Repetitive minorconstruction, maintenance and operational activities on existing infrastructure that are performed as part of an overall work plan \[and\] or program when no individual disturbance exceeds more than 500 square feet of land area and 50 cubic yards of fill or excavated material. Examples include, but are not limited to, connections and extensions of utility service, repair of utility and infrastructure facilities, and maintenance of stormwater facilities’ drainage capacity. Owner \[. The fee owner of land including the contract purchaser of such land.\] Stormwater facilities. Any structure or configuration of the ground that is used or by its location becomes a place where stormwater flows or is accumulated including but not limited to pipes, sewers, curbs, gutters, manholes, catch basins, ponds, open drainage ways, runoff control facilities, water quality facilities, wetlands and their appurtenances. Ordinance - Page 2 of 8 {00201894;3 } \[R\]elated natural resource\[s\] Stormwater r areas. \[Natural resources\] Areaslocated within or adjacent to the city's stormwater system, such as waterways, wetlands, conservation zones or easements and riparian areas, \[that\] which, due to their location, topography, vegetation, or other factors provide one or more of the following stormwater functions: flood control, streambank stabilization and water quality treatment, \[and streambank stabilization\] including pollutant removal, shading and temperature stabilization. Wetland .An area that is inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and which under normal circumstances does support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. Any parcel or portion of a parcel which meets state or federal definition of wetlands that are under the jurisdiction of state or federal laws. Synonymous with "jurisdictional wetland." Section 2. Section 6.625 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as follows: 6.625 Erosion Prevention - Purpose . Sections 6.625 to 6.645, and the rules issued thereunder, are intended to restrict the discharge of sediments or other construction related materials, including hazardous substances as defined in section 6.340, into the city's stormwater system in order to: (a) Prevent or minimize, to the maximum extent practicable, negative impacts to adjacent properties, water quality, and stormwaterrelated natural resource\[s\] areasresulting from construction activities; and (b) Maintain the capacity of the city's stormwater system by minimizing sedimentation. Section 3. Section 6.630 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as follows: 6.630 Erosion Prevention - Applicability and Compliance . (1) Scope. The provisions of sections 6.625 to 6.645, and the rules issued thereunder, apply to all construction \[related\] activities that result in any one or all of the following: (a) Land disturbance, including, but not limited to clearing, grading, grubbing, logging, excavating, filling, and storing of materials; (b) Structural development or demolition, including, but not limited to buildings, bridges, roads, and other infrastructure; (c) Impervious surfaces, including, but not limited to parking lots, driveways, walkways, and patios; or Ordinance - Page 3 of 8 {00201894;3 } (d) Dewatering. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following activities shall be exempt from the provisions of sections 6.625 to 6.645: (I) actions by a public utility, the city, or any other governmental agency to remove or alleviate an emergency condition, restore utility service, or reopen a public thoroughfare to traffic; or (ii) actions by any other person when the city determines, and documents in writing, that the actions are necessary to remove or alleviate an emergency condition, restore utility service, or reopen a public thoroughfare to traffic. (2) Compliance. Regardless of whether a permit is required under section 6.635, \[N\]no person shall engage in any construction \[related\] activity covered by subsection (1) in a manner that can potentially impact water quality, adjacent properties or stormwater related natural resource areas except as allowed by this code. All persons shall implement erosion prevention and sediment control measures designed to meet the outcomes established in administrative rules promulgated by the city manager. Failure to meet those outcomes shall subject the person to the same enforcement provisions as those applicable to a permit holder under section 6.640. Section 4. Section 6.635 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as follows: 6.635 Erosion Prevention - Permits . (1) Erosion Prevention Permit. (a) Permit required. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) below, no person shall commence any construction \[related\] activity without first obtaining from the city one of the erosion prevention permits listed in subparagraph (b) if the construction \[related\] activity: 1. Disturbs one or more acres of land \[at any one time\] by one or more phases of development, and the disturbance is located on the same parcel of land or on contiguous parcels of land under the same ownership; \[or\] 2. Is located in a sensitive area. The criteria for classifying sites, and the classification of such sites as sensitive areas shall be established in administrative rules issued by the city manager\[.\]; or 3. Disturbs more than 5,000 cubic feet of material during one or more phases of development. (b) Permit classifications. The city manager may issue \[all of\] the following types of permits, \[any\] eitherof which will meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section: 1. Individual permit. A person, property owner or easement holder of record may obtain an \[separate\] individual permit for each construction activity on the same \[parcel of land\] Ordinance - Page 4 of 8 {00201894;3 } development site (as defined at EC 9.0500), or for multiple construction activities proposed in connection with a development project on the same development site, including utility work, public improvements, private infrastructure, structures, and other site improvements. \[2. Umbrella permit. A property owner or easement holder of record may obtain an umbrella permit for multiple construction activities on the same parcel of land that are proposed in connection with a development, including utility work, private infrastructure, structures, and other site improvements.\] \[3\]2. Annual permit. A person, property owner or easement holder of record may obtain \[A\]an annual permit \[may be issued\] for minor recurring activities occurring on one or more development sites. (c) Application. The application for an erosion prevention permit shall be accompanied by: 1. Fee. A fee established by the city manager pursuant to section 2.020 of this code in an amount sufficient to recover . the city's administrative costs\[;\] 2. Construction site management plan for individual \[and umbrella\] permits. A construction site management plan prepared by a certified professional(s) designated by the manager in rules adopted hereunder. The construction site management plan need not be prepared by a certified professional if the development is one (1) single family dwelling or one (1) duplex dwelling. The approved construction site management plan shall be kept at the construction site and available for on-site inspection purposes. The construction site management plan shall identify: potential water quality impacts associated with the proposed construction activities; techniques and methods to be used to prevent and control erosion, sedimentation, and other pollutants associated with construction activity; and the location, design, and construction schedule for all erosion, sedimentation, and other construction site management control measures to be implemented and maintained\[; and\]. 3. Work, scope and practices for annual permit. No construction site management plan shall be required for an annual permit. Instead, the applicant shall provide a narrativedescription of the scope of work to be performed and the practices \[to be\] employed for meeting the requirements of sections 6.625 to 6.645 of this code. A copy of the annual permit and narrative shall be kept at the site and available for on-site inspection purposes. (d) Review and Issuance. The application for the erosion prevention permit shall be reviewed by the city and approved, approved with conditions, or denied, based on criteria set forth in rules adopted Ordinance - Page 5 of 8 {00201894;3 } by the city manager.The criteria to be adopted shall be designed to achieve the objectives listed in section 6.625. Issuance of an erosion prevention permit may be subject to conditions imposed by the city including, but not limited to, specific erosion and sedimentation prevention measures and schedules. (e) Permit Duration. 1.Anindividualerosion prevention permit shall remain in effect for the full period of the construction activity. The manager may extend the duration of the permit for a period of up to, but not to exceed, two years after completion of the construction activity if the manager determines the extension is necessary to ensure that the construction activity has stabilized in accordance with the outcomes identified in the administrative rules. 2. Annual permits may be issued for a full calendar year, and shall expire on or before December 31 of the year issued. Annual permits may not be extended. (2) Appeal. Within the time and in the manner prescribed in section 2.021 of this code, the owner or applicant for a permit may appeal: (a) \[t\]The denial of a permit\[,\]; (b) \[a\]Any conditions imposed on a permit\[,\]; (c) \[t\]The determination that the property is located in a sensitive area\[,\]; or (d)The denial of an extension of the duration of an individual permit under section 6.635(1)(e). (3) Waiver of Erosion Prevention Permit. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, the following activities shall not require an erosion prevention permit: (a) Construction activities involving the disturbance of less than 500 square feet of land surface area, or which consist of the excavation and/or fill of less than 20 cubic yards of material; (b) Issuance of permits and/or approvals for land divisions, interior improvements to an existing structure, or other approvals for which there is no physical disturbance to the surface of the land; and (c) Annual landscape maintenance activities on fully developed properties, necessary to maintain the existing developed landscape. This waiver applies only to the requirement to obtain an erosion prevention permit and shall not be construed as an exemption from any of the erosion prevention requirements of the Eugene Code, including but not limited to erosion prevention and sediment control measures designed to meet the outcomes established in administrative rules promulgated by the city manager. Ordinance - Page 6 of 8 {00201894;3 } Section 5. Section 6.640 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as follows: 6.640 Erosion Prevention - Enforcement . (1) Enforcement Policy. The primary focus of sections 6.625 to 6.645 is to implement measures for preventing erosion and minimizing stormwater impact that will meet the outcomes established in administrative rules promulgated by the city manager, and the city will use the amount of enforcement necessary to achieve compliance. Where possible the city will rely on education rather than enforcement. The manager may provide educational programs or other informational materials that will assist permittees in meeting the desired erosion and sedimentation controls, and other construction site management practices outcomes. (2) Inspections. The city may make periodic inspections to ensure compliance with this code, rules issued hereunder, or conditions imposed on an erosion prevention or other permit. (3) Violations. Failure to comply with the provisions of this code, rules issued hereunder, the erosion prevention permits, or conditions imposed thereon, during the period that the permit(s) remains in effect may result in: (a) The issuance of a \[stop work order or\] corrective memorandum and/oranadministrativecompliance order by the city; (b) The issuance of a \[citation into municipal court for violation of this code\]stop work order by the city; \[and/or\] (c) The imposition of an administrative civil penalty pursuant to the provisions of section 2.018 of this code as authorized by section 6.995 of this code\[.\]; and/or (d) The issuance of a citation into municipal court for violation of this code. Failure to comply with any stop work or compliance order issued by the city shall constitute a separate violation. Each day a violation continues also shall constitute a separate violation. (4) Appeal. Any person to whom an order is issued may appeal a stop work order or compliance order within the time and in the manner prescribed in section 2.021 of this code. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, a stop work order or compliance order shall be effective upon issuance, and shall continue in effect during the pendency of any appeal. Section 6. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the consent of the City Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained herein, Ordinance - Page 7 of 8 {00201894;3 } or in other provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971, to the provisions added, amended or repealed herein. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this ___ day of ____________, 2016 ____ day of ____________, 2016 ____________________________ ___________________________ City Recorder Mayor Ordinance - Page 8 of 8 {00201894;3 } ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY www.eugeneor.gov ISSUESTATEMENT BACKGROUND RELATEDCITYPOLICIES Provideampleeconomicopportunitiesforallcommunitymembers By2020,create20,000netnewjobsinthechoseneconomicopportunityareas;reducethelocal o unemploymentrateto,orbelowthestateaverage;andincreasetheaveragewagetoorabove thestateaverage. StrengthenKeyIndustries o COUNCILOPTIONS CITY-!.!'%2Ȍ3RECOMMENDATION SUGGESTEDMOTION ATTACHMENTS FORMOREINFORMATION AttachmentA Industrial Corridor Community Organization Santa Clara Community Organization E E ni d R d E E nid R d Ir vin gto n D r Ai rpo rt Rd C le ar L ak e R d Ir vin g R d Beltline River Road Community Organization Active Bethel Ma xw ell R dd ll R we ax M Citizens B arg er Dr Trainsong Neighbors Ft City of Eugene Industrial Corridor Community Organization Neighborhood Boundaries 01000 Planning and Development November 17, 2016 1,652 Acres Caution: This map is based on imprecise source data, subject to change, and for general reference only.