Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem B: West Eugene Transportation System/MPC Update ECC UGENEITYOUNCIL AIS GENDATEMUMMARY Work Session: Collaborative Process to Identify a Transportation Solution for West Eugene and the FY06-09 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Meeting Date: July 12, 2006 Agenda Item Number: B Department: City Manager’s Office Staff Contact: Mark Schoening www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5243 ISSUE STATEMENT Attachment A is a letter dated July 5, 2006, to the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) from Matthew Garrett, Director of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). In the letter, Mr. Garrett states that substantial costs likely to be incurred by ODOT and the time required for a collaborative process to identify a transportation solution for West Eugene are unacceptable to ODOT. Mr. Garrett further states that if the City of Eugene cannot support either the current alignment of the West Eugene Parkway (WEP) or the southern alignment proposed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (Attachment B), then ODOT will recommend a “no build” decision which would bring closure to the WEP and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. Attachment C is a letter dated June 22, 2006, to the MPC from Gary Williams, Chair of the Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) Board of Directors. In the letter, Mr. Williams identifies the following actions requested of MPC by the LCOG Board: 1.At the July, 13, 2006 meeting, MPC will pass an FY06-09 MTIP. Its composition is left to the MPC to decide; and 2.Not later than the January 2007, MPC meeting (six months), the MPC will develop a dispute resolution process for delegated MPO duties which ensures MPO responsibilities will be met. This process and supporting changes to MPC bylaws must meet the approval of the LCOG Board. Mr. Williams furthers states that “Failure to comply with these two requirements will force the LCOG Board to take necessary intervention steps up to and including rescinding our delegation of MPO responsibilities to MPC.” On Thursday, July 13, the MPC is scheduled to take action on the FY06-09 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) as submitted in November 2005, and as modified by amendments to the FY05-07 MTIP. BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting held on October 26, 2005, the council failed to pass the following motion: L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060712\S060712B.doc To continue to support the West Eugene Parkway as a modernization project priority when the Metropolitan Policy Committee considers the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning Organization modernization project priorities for the 2008-2011 State Transportation Improvement Program and the 2006-2009 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program. The following subsequent motion was passed by the City Council: To direct the City Manager to consult with the City of Eugene’s intergovernmental partners and community organizations to scope a process to design and build transportation projects in West Eugene to address congestion, safety, and operation for all modes of transportation. With the direction provided by the failure of the first motion, the council’s two representatives on the MPC voted against the adoption of the FY06-FY09 MTIP at the MPC meeting held on November 10, 2005. The FY06-FY09 MTIP remains un-adopted. In March 2006, the Osprey Group was selected to conduct an assessment of the controversy surrounding the WEP, with a particular emphasis on what, if any, expanded community involvement might be helpful. The Osprey Group completed its work and prepared a report titled “Conflict Assessment, Florence-Eugene Highway Project (commonly referred to as the West Eugene Parkway or WEP)” in May 2006. The Osprey Group identified three options for moving forward towards a decision including: Proceed with the current NEPA review process A collaborative process Heightened commitment to public engagement The Osprey Group concluded that a collaborative process can best address the challenge of getting to a transportation solution for West Eugene that has widespread understanding and acceptability. The Osprey Group also concluded that without willing and active ODOT participation, such a process should not be pursued. At the City Council meeting held on May 24, 2006, the City Council passed a motion directing its MPC representatives to request that the MPC adopt a resolution that would: Adopt the FY06-09 MTIP air quality conformity Adopt the FY06-09 MTIP as modified by the reprogramming of the WEP to FY09 and by the FY05- 07 MTIP amendments adopted subsequent to November 2005 Endorse and agree to participate in a collaborative process as outlined in Option II of the Osprey Group’s May 2006 Conflict Assessment Request ODOT to delay conclusion of the NEPA process on the WEP until after completion of the collaborative process and to consider the product of that collaborative process. COUNCIL OPTIONS The council may: 1.Support the current West Eugene Parkway alignment and adoption of the FY06-09 MTIP. 2.Support the Alternative Southern Alignment as proposed by FHWA and adoption of the FY06-09 MTIP. L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060712\S060712B.doc 3.Support a “no build” decision for the WEP. 4.Decline to take any action. CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION If there is not City Council support for either the current alignment of the WEP or the southern alignment proposed by FHWA, then the City Manager recommends that the City refocus its regional transportation priorities to the Beltline Corridor from Coburg Road to River Road including the Delta Highway/Beltline interchange. SUGGESTED MOTION There is no suggested motion. ATTACHMENTS A.Letter from Matthew Garrett dated July 5, 2006 B.Alternative Southern Alignment proposed by FHWA C.Letter from Gary Williams dated June 22, 2006 FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Mark Schoening Telephone: 682-5243 Staff E-Mail: mark.a.schoening@ci.eugene.or.us L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060712\S060712B.doc