HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 4740 Amendments
RESOLUTION NO. 4748
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGIES AND AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies were
amended by Resolution No. 4740.
B. Amendments to the SDC Methodologies are needed in order to revise the MWMC regional
wastewater SDC Methodology.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby amends Resolution No.4 740, by deleting the following portions
of the SDC Methodologies attached to Resolution No. 4740 as Exhibit A: General Methodology, Table 1;
General Methodology, Section 4.2; Appendix C, Section 2.1; Appendix C, Section 2.2.2; Appendix C,
Table 8; Appendix C, Table 10; Appendix F, Section 1.3.2; and Appendix F, Section 2.3. In place of those
sections and appendices, the Council adopts the following provisions as part of the SDC Methodologies:
General Methodology, Table 1; General Methodology, Section 4.2; Appendix C, Section 2.1; Appendix C,
Table 8; Appendix C, Table 10; Appendix F, Section 1.3.2; and Appendix F, Section 2.3, attached hereto
as Exhibit A. In all other respects, Resolution No. 4740 and Exhibit A thereto remain in effect.
Section 2. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution 4740.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 27th day of January, 2003.
f:~~ iV---/
Deputy City Recorder
Exhibit A
to Resolution No. 4748
CITY OF EUGENE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
of the
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Systems Development Charge
Methodologies
February 3, 2003
The November 4, 2002 SDC Methodologies document remains in
effect except as amended by this document.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Transportation Wastewater. Local. (City) Wastewater - Regional (MWMC) Stormwater Parks
Cost per trip = Cost per new residential Costs are based on the type of land Cost per square foot of Cost per
$1,298.72 units (e.g., single-family, use and, for industrial dischargers impervious surface area = Dwelling Unit
mobile home parks, with process flows, on the strength $0.174. Cost per single-family = $981.89.
duplexes, apartments) of discharge. The rate varies by development (SFD) with
rn = a base rate of $283.80 plu' land use. The rate for a single building footprint <3,000 sq. ft.
cu
- $0.069 per square foot of residential unit is $837.42 = $560.28, or ~3,000 sq. ft. =
co
0::: living area. Residential $840.42. Per duplex =
additions will be charged $1,120.56. For manufactured
$0.069 per square foot of home parks = $293.02 per
increased living area. space plus cost per square
Non-residential uses foot of additional impervious
= $2.15 per gallon of daily area = $0.174.
flow/discharge.
Estimated costs of Estimated non-assessable The reimbursement portion of the Estimated non-assessable Unit costs for
,~ a rteria llcollector . cost of existing system charge is based on the net local cost of existing system using various
rn street system (non using costs from "Gravity equity in the regional treatment plant costs from "Infrastructure components.
co
Ol assessable cost per Sewer Lines System and other regional assets. The Repla~ment Values Report".
- lane-mile, costs of Valuation Model" developed improvement portion of the charge is
rn
0 intersections, traffic by CH2M Hill. Charges based on current cost of capacity-
0 signals, street lights, are net of all federal grants enhancing projects to be constructed,
structures) and off- and outstanding debt. as contained in the current Capital
street bicycle paths. Improvement Program.
rn Existing levels of Design flow standards The service standards are secondary Design standards currently Existing levels
'C
~ service for various currently used by the City wastewater treatment used by the City to handle a of service for
co components as for various land use types. for flows as defined in MWMC's five-year storm. various
'C
c established by PFUs equivalents are operating permit with DEQ, and components,
co
- current City detennined per capacity enhancing capital as established
(/)
cu transportation Oregon adopted Plumbing improvements as listed in the capital in the Eugene
u design standards Code. improvements plan adopted Parks and
'~ by the MWMC. Recreation
cu Plan.
(/)
c Reimbursement fee Reimbursement fee The MWMC charge is a combined . Improvement fee Improvement
,2 cu ~40% :> 84% reimbursement and improvement fee. fee
-en The proportion of the fee that is based
co~
Uco Improvement fee Improvement fee on capacity enhancing improvements
i;:.c:
'ii)O ~60%. :> 16% varies over time as projects are
rn.... identified, funded, and scheduled.
coo
0 Charges for new or New or expanding Charges for new development, Basic SFD dwelling unit cost is Charges are
expanding residential uses are changes in use and existing computed based upon based on a
development are charged based on a per development connecting for the first assumed 35% impervious area flat rate per
based on the cost dwelling unit cost plus a time are based on the number of Flow on 9,200 square foot lot. For dwelling unit
per trip times the tri~ rate per square foot of Estimation Units (FEUs), times the SFDs with ~3,OOO sq. ft., the for all types
rate assigned for a living area. Non-residential cost per unit of measure. A FEU is cost is based upon 1.5 times of residential
c specific developmer uses are charged based on based on the size of development, the basic SFD rate. For duplex development.
0 type times the the number of PFUs at a and the effluent characteristics of development, the cost is based There is no
:;:;
co number of units of rate for the specific flow, biochemical oxygen demand on 2 times the basic SFD rate). charge for
- measurement development type. Credit and suspended solids for each type The cost commercial
c
cu proposed. for past trunk sewer levy of land use. The charge for changes for a manufactured home park development.
E
~ payments will be in use and expansion of development is computed based on assume
c. applied to the local charge. already connected to the wastewater 1,684 sq. ft. of impervious area
E system are based on the net differenCE per space plus the additional
in FEUs created by the change or cost per square foot of all othe
expansion. Credit for past property ta> impervious surface area. All
payments for debt other development is charged
service on the regional facilities will based on actual impervious
be deducted from the charge. surface area or equivalent
surface area.
Note: Administration costs are not included in the figures above; see section 2.3.1 for more information.
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Page 5
agreement, the City of Eugene must adopt rates and charges not less than those required by
the Commission.
The MWMC wastewater SDC formula is based on the allocation of costs of existing or planned
capacity to Average Flow, Peak Flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Suspended
Solids (SS) components of the regional facilities. These cost allocations are used to derive a
cost per Flow Estimation Unit (FEU), for each type of land use. The regional wastewater SDC
is determined by multiplying the applicable FEU rate per unit of measure for a specific land use
type, by the units of measure for the proposed development. The regional wastewater system
Cost of Service formula per unit of development can be found in. Appendix C. The
regional (MWMC) wastewater SDC rates can be found in the current adopted fee schedule in
Appendix F.
5.0 Stormwater System
The stormwater SDC is based upon the square footage of all impervious surface (e.g., rooftops,
driveways, sidewalks, parking lots, patios, and other non-porous surfaces). The detailed formula for
calculating the stormwater SDC cost per square foot of impervious surface is set forth in Appendix
D. The stormwater SDC is determined by multiplying the applicable rate by the unit of measure, for
the proposed development type. The stormwater SDC rates per unit of measure can be found in the
current adopted fee schedule in Appendix F.
Where the stormwater SDC is a fixed amount per dwelling unit or space, it shall be determined by
multiplying the amount- per dwelling unit or space times the number of units or spaces plus, for
manufactured home development, the amount for other features based upon the impervious area
times the rate for square footage. Where the stormwater SDC is not a fixed amount per dwelling unit
or space, it shall be determined by multiplying the rate per square foot of impervious area times the
impervious area of the proposed development. Where a development creates impact not attributable
to impervious surface area, the stormwater SDC shall be determined by evaluating equivalent
impervious surface area, multiplied by the rate per square foot of impervious area.
6.0 Parks System
The parks system components that are identified in the adopted 1989 Parks and Recreation Plan,
and the parks system com'ponents identified in Table 13, which are used to calculate the.parks SOC,
are generally described as parks (neighborhood and community) and facilities which are more
particularly described in Appendix E. The current community standard, or level of service, for parks
infrastructure is the determining factor in calculating the impact of new development on the system.
New development can be charged the costs of providing parks infrastructure for the development at
the same level of service as the existing community as a whole.
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Revised Feb-3-03 Page 10
2.0 Regional Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission Wastewater
System Development Charge (Regional Wastewater Charge)
2.1 MWMC Wastewater SDC Formula
In addition to the local wastewater SDC collected, a Metropolitan Wastewater Management
Commission (MWMC) Systems Development Charge (also known as the Regional
Wastewater SDC) will be collected on all new connections to the system. This charge is a
combined reimbursement and improvement SOC. The Charge is meant to recoup the
region's investment in reserve sewage treatment capacity and recover an equitable share of
the capital necessary to increase capacity for new development. This charge is imposed on
all new connections by all new or existing development in the Eugene-Springfield area, and
for expansion or changes in use of existing development that increase impact on the
MWMC facilities. When recommended by MWMC, the City will adopt amendments to this
methodology pursuant to EC 2.019 and 2.020.
The reimbursement fee is based on the current value of the regional wastewater facilities
in place on the date the rate is established. Outstanding debt and any state and federal
grants are subtracted from this amount to determine the local equity. An analysis of the
regional wastewater facilities reveals that there are several individual measures of capacity
which impact cost and together determine the overall capacity of the regional wastewater
system. These measures of capacity are average flow, peak flow, biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD), and suspended solids (SS). The present capacity of the wastewater
facilities are shown in Table 8., Based upon the regional system analysis, the value of the
regional system is allocated to each of these types of capacity, reflected in the percentages
shown in Table 8. Costs per unit of each capacity measurement can be determined by
dividing each measurements allocation of local equity by its capacity.
The improvement fee is based on the estimated future cost of capacity-increasing projects
included in the MWMC ten year capital improvement program at the time the fee is
calculated, the allocation of that future cost to the capacity measurements, and the amount
of each type of capacity being increased for each element. MWMC intends to maintain a
twenty year schedule of capital projects and for individual capacity-increasing capital
projects to be scheduled to begin when one or more of the individual measurements of
capacity are estimated to reach 850/0 of their design. Projects will move into the MWMC CIP
as their scheduled construction year enters the CIP's ten year window.
2.2 Calculating the MWMC wastewater SDC
The MWMC wastewater SDC shall be determined by using the reference data contained in
Table 1 0 which describes flow estimation units (FEU) and associated flow and strength
impacts of various types of development together with the unit cost of flow, BOD, and SS. If
information for a particular development is not found in Table 10, it shall be formulated
using average data of like or similar development as determined by the City Engineer. For
any development, the MWMC wastewater SDC is determined by the following formula:
}> Multiply the estimated gallons per day of flow per FEU, estimated pounds per day
BOD per FEU, and estimated pounds per day SS per FEU by their respective unit
cost;
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Revised Feb-3-03 Wastewater, Page C- 7
)> Sum these amounts, to derive a total cost per FEU for a specific type of development;
)> Multiply the total cost per FEU for a development type by the number of FEUs for a
development application.
For more detailed and specific numerical data on FEU calculations, see Table 8. For
formula illustrations, see Figure 5 in this Appendix.
2.2.1 MWMC Process Wastewater
The MWMC wastewater SDC for development that discharges process wastewater to
the wastewater system will be charged on the basis of the strength of that discharge.
The rates per FEU for land uses listed in Table 10 include process wastewater
charges. For uses not otherwise listed in Table 10 that include process wastewater,
the MWMC SDC will be calculated by combining the charge for unit of development
for general industrial uses, and adding the charge for the process wastewater FEU
that matches the strength of the proposed discharge. The strength classes shown in
10 are the same strength classes used by MWMC in the user fee system.
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Revised Feb-3-03 Wastewater, Page C- 8
TABLE 8
1. Analysis of Regional Wastewater System Value
> Wet Weather Peak Flow Improvements
$34,090,000
MWMC System Capacity and Allocation of Capital Values
hhanc.ements
Percent of Design Component
Facility Cost Capacity Value
49,000,000 22% $23,371,902 2,000,000 1% $405,000
126,000,000 43% $45,681,445 88,000,000 92% $34,090,000
66,000 19% $20,184,824 2,167 3% $1,297,048
71,600 16% $16,997,747 2,167 3% $1,297,048
100% $106,235,918 100% $37,089,096
A. Average Daily Flow:
Cost of Component + Design flow = Cost per gallon of average daily flow
($23,371,902/49,000,000) + ($405,000/2,000,000) gal per day = $0.680 per gal of average daily flow
B. Peak Flow * (allocates peak wet weather capacity to average user flow):
Cost of Peak Flow Component + Average Design flow = Cost of peak flow capacity per gallon of
average daily flow
($45,681,445/49,000) + ($34,090,000/88,000,000) gal per day = $1.320 per gal of average daily flow
C. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD):
Cost of BOD Component + Design BOD daily capacity = Cost per pound of BOD per day
($20,,184,824/66,000) + ($1,297,048/2,167) pounds per day = $904.38 per pound
o. Suspended Solids (55):
Cost of SS Component + Design SS daily capacity = Cost per pound of SS per day
($16,997,747/71,600) + $1,297,048/2,167) pounds per day = $835.95 per pound
* The reimbursement unit cost of Peak Flow is calculated on the basis of average daily plant capacity of 49,000,000 to enable
recovery of costs from system users. Flow estimation units are expressed in average daily flow.
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Wastewater, Page C- 10
TABLE 10
Regional (MWMC) Wastewater Rates
...... ....,(y..,..,... .......
I ."..':.....
'....~'..., < Impfpvement Total Cost
'.. '~I~U~~II,... ..: .
",'c'. CQst per FEU per FEU
.,:: ./j}/<:"
'if! .S'.f''.<.
1F SFD / DUPLEX DU 175 Low $365.53 $471.89 $837.42
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
1X DU 175 Low $365.53 $471.89 $837.42
(SFD WITH OTHER USES)
OTHER RESIDENTIAL -
11 DU 150 Low $313.31 $404.48 $717.79
MULTI FAMILY
ELDERL Y / GROUP HOUSING/
12 TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
RETIREMENT HOME
OTHER RESIDENTIAL - RESIDENTIAL
13 TGSF 200 Low $417.74 $539.31 $957.05
HOTEUMOTEL
OTHER RESIDENTIAL - MOBILE HOME
14 DU 150 Low $313.31 $404.48 $717.79
PARK
15 MOTEL / HOTEL TGSF 200 Medium $553.74 $839.00 $1,392.74
~ 21 HEAVY INDUSTRY/INDUSTRIAL * TGSF
0 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
co::
Ul HEAVY INDUSTRY/INDUSTRIAL *
Ul 2X TGSF 50 Low $104.44
~ $134.83 $239.27
0
0. 24 HEAVY INDUSTRY/INDUSTRIAL * TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
.E
Q) 3X HEAVY INDUSTRY/INDUSTRIAL * TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
e>
IV
L:
() Process Flow L INDUSTRIAL PROCESS LOW STRENGTH TlGAUEF 1000 Low $2,088.72 $2,696.54 $4,785.26
IV
:; INDUSTRIAL PROCESS MEDIUM
()
.~ Process Flow M TlGAUEF 1000 Medium $2,768.71 $4,195.00 $6,963.71
0 STRENGTH
Ul
(ij
>- INDUSTRIAL PROCESS HIGH STRENGTH T/GAUEF 1000 High $3,675.36 $6,192.94 $9,868.30
IV Process Flow H
E
l!! INDUSTRIAL PROCESS VERY HIGH Very
Q)
Ul Process Flow V T/GAUEF 1000 $4,582.01 $8,190.89 $12,772.90
:J
~ STRENGTH High
in INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SUPER HIGH Super
:J
'0 Process Flow S T/GAUEF 1000 $5,488.66 $10,188.83 $15,677.49
c
0/(- STRENGTH High
4X TRUCK TERMINAL TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
4X UTILlT~ES TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
5A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,646.26 $4,458.92 $7,105.18
5B QUALITY RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,646.26 $4,458.92 $7,105.18
5C HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,646.26 $4,458.92 $7,105.18
50 DRINKING PLACE TGSF 340 Low $710.17 $916.82 $1,626.99
51 WHOLESALE TRADE TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
54 CONVENIENCE MARKET TGSF 180 Low $375.97 $485.38 $861.35
54 SERVICE STATION / MARKET TGSF 180 Low $375.97 $485.38 $861.35
54 SUPERMARKET TGSF 180 Medium $498.37 $755.10 $1,253.47
55 NEW CAR SALES TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
55 TIRE STORE TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
59 RETAIL TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Wastewater, Page C- 12
5X DISCOUNT MARKET TGSF 30 Low $62.66 $80.90 $143.56
5X FURNITURE STORE TGSF 30 Low $62.66 $80.90 $143.56
5X ClOTHING I DRYGOODS I HOUSEWARES TGSF 30 Low $62.66 $80.90 $143.56
6A LAUNDRY TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
6B CAR WASH STALL 300 Low $1,044.36 $1,348.27 $2,392.63
61 FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TGSF 110 Low $229.76 $296.62 $526.38
62 OTHER SERVICES TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
63 MINI WAREHOUSE TGSF 30 Low $62.66 $80.90 $143.56
,64 AUTOMOTIVE & OTHER REPAIR TGSF 40 Low $83.55 $107.86 $191.41
65 CLINIC, MEDICAL OFFICE TGSF 150 Low $313.31 $404.48 $717.79
65 HOSPITAL TGSF 150 Low $313.31 $404.48 $717.79
65 NURSING HOME TGSF 150 Low $313.31 $404.48 $717.79
66 CONSTRUCTION TRADE SERVICES TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
67 GOVERNMENT BUILDING TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
67 US POST OFFICE TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
68 COMMUNITY COLLEGE TGSF 50 Low ' $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 DAY CARE CENTER TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 HIGH SCHOOL TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 LIBRARY TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 UNIVERSITY TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
68 OTHER EDUCA TIONAUCUL TURAL TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
69 CHURCH TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
69 FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION TGSF 50 Low $104.44 $134.83 $239.27
6X GENERAL OFFICE BLDG TGSF 100 Low $208.87 $269.65 $478.52
7X BOWLING ALLEY TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X HEALTH CLUB TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431 .45 $765.65
7X PUBLIC PARK TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X RACQUET CLUB TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X RECREATIONAL CENTER TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X TENNIS COURT TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X THEATER TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431 .45 $765.65
7X VIDEO ARCADE TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
7X OTHER ENTERTAINMENT TGSF 160 Low $334.20 $431.45 $765.65
82 VETERINARIAN SERVICES TGSF 200 Low $417.74 $539.31 $957.05
Stren~th Class
Low (and Residential)
Medium
High
Very High
Super High
Cost per Flow
Reimbursement Improvement
$2.08872 $2.69654
$2.76871 $4.19500
$3.67536 $6.19294
$4.58201 $8.19089
$5.48866 $10.18883
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Wastewater, Page C- 13
Formulas for Non-Residential Development
Non-Assessable System valuation
(Value of existing + Value of planned) =
l Build-out capacity (mgd)
Cost per unit of capacity
"'")
I
I
Per unit of capacity x flow per PFU for development type x number of PFUs
for development -= SDC for development
Calculations for Non-Residential Development
(95.890 + 9.453 M
= $2.15 per gallon per day
48.9 mgd
$2.15 x GaHon per PFU (varies by development type) x
Number of PFUs = SDC for development
1.3.2 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System Cost of Service
Formulas
Existing and increased plant local
equity related to average flow
Average daily design flow
I
Cost per gallon of average daily flow I
1
=
Existing and increased plant local
equity related to peak flow
Average daily design flow
= Cost of peak daily capacity per
gallon of average daily flow
!
I"
=
Cost per pound of biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) per day
'\
I
;
I
I
I
I
)
Cost of BOD Component
l
Design BOD daily capacity
Existing and increased plant local equity
related to total suspended solids
.-...,
!
I
=
;
I
Cost per pound of suspended solids !
I
l Design suspended solids
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Revised Feb-3-03 Fee Schedule & Formulas, Page F-4
Calculations
$23,371,902 $405,000
+ = $0.680 (per gallon of average daily flow)
49,000,000 2,000,000
$45,681,445 $34,090,000
+ = $1.320 (per gallon of peak daily flow)
49,000,000 88,000,000
$20,184,824 $1,297,048
+ = $904.38 (per pound of biochemical oxygen
66,000 2,167 demand)
$16,997,747 $1,297,048
+ = $835.95 (per pound of suspended solids)
71,600 2,167
1.4 Stormwater System Cost of Service:
Formulas:
SDC eligible costs
= Cost per impervious acre
Acres of impervious surface
Cost per impervious acre
= Cost per square foot of impervious surface
Square feet per acre
Calculations:
$59,657,504
=
$7,582.30 (per impervious acre)
7,868
I
./
$7,582.30
=
$0.174 (per impervious square feat
43,560
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Fee Schedule & Formulas, Page F-5
2.0 Adopted SDC Fee Schedule: Current Rates
2.1 Transportation System:
Cost per trip $1,298.72
2.2 Local Wastewater System:
Residential dwelling unit base fee $283.80
Residential dwelling unit total living area multiplication factor $0.069
Non-Residential rate per gal/day per land use type per PFU Varies
2.3 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System:
Unit Cost by Component
Average Daily Flow (per gallon) $0.680
Peak Wet Weather Flow (per gallon) $1.320
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (per pound) $904.38
Suspended Solids (per pound) $835.95
2.4 Stormwater System:
Per Single Family Dwelling
With building footprint < 3,000 sq. ft. $560.28
(Assumes approx. 9,200 sq. ft. lot; .35 impervious surface)
With building footprint ~3,000 sq. ft. or more $840.42
(Assumes 1.5 x SFD average impervious surface)
Per Duplex (equals two Dwelling Units) $1 ;120.56
Per Manufactured Home Development
Per space in the development $293.02
(Assumes approx.1,684 sq, ft. per space)
plus per square foot of impervious area for other features $0.174
All Other Development
Per square foot of impervious/equivalent impervious area $0.174
2.5 Parks System:
Total charge per person $426.91
Total charge per Dwelling Unit (2.3 persons x $426.91) $981.89
2.6 Administration Fees:
City of Eugene if based on percentage 5.00/0
City of Eugene if based on fl.at rate $60.00
MWMC per permit application $10.00
2.7 Appeal Fee: City of Eugene per SDC appeal $100.00
City of Eugene SDC Methodology
Fee Schedule & Formulas, Page F-7
RESOLUTION NO. 4767
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY FOR LOCAL
WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND AMENDING RESOLUTION
NOS. 4740 AND 4748.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23,2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740,
B. On January 27, 2003, the SDC Methodologies were amended in part by Resolution
No, 4748. Resolution No, 4740 remains in effect except as amended by Resolution No. 4748,
C. Amendments to the SDC Methodology for Local Wastewater are needed in order to
adopt additional user categories.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge Methodology for Local Wastewater is
amended by revising Table 7, the Local Wastewater Plumbing Fixture Unit Rates, as shown on
Exhibit A attached hereto,
Section 2, Resolution Nos, 4740 and 4748, are hereby amended as described in Section 1.
Section 3, The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
Nos, 4740 and 4748,
Section 4, This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption,
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28th day of July, 2003.
c~~~
Resolution
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 4767
..
local Wastewater System Detail from Appendix C:
\
TABLE 7
LOCAL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURE UNIT RATES
1 F Single-Famil I Duplex Housing
1 X Mixed Use with ~esidential
11 Multi-Famil Housing
12 GrouplRetirement Home
13 , Residential Hotel
14 Mobile Home Park
15 Hotels, Motels, Lodging
21 Beverage/Food Mfg
24 Wood Products
2X Li ht Mfg.lPrinting
3X Manufacturing
4X Transportation & Utilities
41 Fire Station
51 Wholesale Trade
54 Retail Trade I Grocery
55 Retail Trade Automotive
59 Retail Trade Other
5A Restaurant - Fast Food
5B Restaurant - Low to Med Turnover
5C Restaurant - Higher Turnover
50 Drinkin Establishments
5E T ake/Bake & Pick Up/Delivery Establishments
5X Retail Trade / Clothing & D Goods
61 Financial Offices I Banks
62 Other Services
63 Rental/Storage Services
64 Automotive & Other Repair Services
65 Medical Services
66 Construction Trade Services
67 Government Services
68 Education I Cultural
69 . Churches/Clubs/Organizations
6A 1 Laund Services (Linen, Uniform)
6A2 Laund ,Self-Service
6A3 . Dry Cleaning S~rvice (with or w/out laundry services)
6B Car Wash
6X ProfessionallReal- Estatellnsurance
7X Entertainment, Recreation & Sports
82 Veterinarian Service
*The unit cost of capacity for the local wastewater s stem is $2.15 per gallon per day.
The flow per Plumbing Fixture Unit (PFU) is stated as gallons per day based on the size of development and type of land use.
Land use types that do not fit into the above categories will receive a default flow assignment based on the sample average.
The default flow is 47,93 gal/da x $2,15 = a cost per PFU of $103.05.
$283.80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
$283.80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
$283,80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
$283.80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
$283,80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
$283.80 + (Sq Ft Living Area x $0.069)
19.05 $40.96
39.87 $85.72
47.93 $103.05
56.62 $121.73
58,65 $126.10
18.22 $39.17
7,75 $16.66
21.37 $45.95
55.46 $119.24
~83 $1a83
39.91 $85.81
25.44 $54.70
62.47 $134.31
22.45 $48.27
54.98 $118.21
26.49 $56.95
12.35 $26.55
16.99 $36.53
28,51 $61.30
6.49 $13.95
16.17 $34.77
28.75 $61.81
13.69 $29.43
Based on specific use of development
15.66 $33.67
15.70 $33.76
538.96 $1,158.76
299.64 $644.23
36.30 $78.05
264.54 $568.76
67.76 $145.68
88.42 $1.90.10
24.79 $53.30
A rate per PFU may be assigned by the City Engineer should a proposed use not be represented by one of the published SDC
use codes and for which a default flow assignment is not representative of the proposed flow. In the case of those proposed
'~velopments that are determined to have a potential for exceptional water usage, the City Engineer may require that the
Hner(s) enter into an agreement with the City to review water usage or wastewater discharge at such time the development is in
full use or production as the final basis of the local wastewater SCD. A complete list of wastewater SDCIHUD BPR use codes is
.prQYided in Appendix A.
RESOLUTION NO. 4768
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY FOR
STORMW ATER SYSTEM AND AMENDING RESOLUTION
NOS. 4740 AND 4748.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No, 4740,
B. On January 27, 2003, the SDC Methodologies were amended in part by Resolution
No, 4748. Resolution No, 4740 remains in effect except as amended by Resolution No. 4748,
c. Amendments to the SDC Methodology for Stormwater System are needed in order to
adopt revisions to that methodology,
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge Methodology for Stormwater System is
amended by revising the following: Appendix F, Sections 1.4 and 2.4; General Methodology Section,
Table 1 and Section 5,0; and Appendix D, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2, Resolution Nos, 4740 and 4748, are hereby amended as described in Section 1,
Section 3, The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
Nos. 4740 and 4748.
Section 4, This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption,
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28th day of July, 2003.
VV\ct~
City Rec der
Resolution
, Exhibit A to Resolution No. 4768
Stormwater System Details from Appendix F:
1.4 Stormwater System Cost of Service:
General Formulas
SDC eligible costs
Unit cost per square foot of
impervious surface area
=
Total additional impervious
surface area within UGB (sq. ft)
Reimbursement:
$10,547,707
155,770,560 sq. ft.
=
$0.0677 per sq, ft.
impervious surface area
Improvement:
$11,614,175
155,770,560 sq. ft.
=
$0.0746 per sq. ft.
impervious surface area
Total Vnit Cost per Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface Area =
(Reimbursement + Improvement) = $0.0677 + $0,0746 = $0.142
2.4 Stormwater System:
Small Residential
Medium Residential
Small Duplex
Medium Duplex
(building footprint ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
(building footprint> 1,000 sq.ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.)
(unit building footprints ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
(unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.)
Manufactured Home Park
Per space (assumes 1,684 sq. ft. per space)
plus
Per sq. ft. actual impervious surface area, addt'1 common areas
All Other Development.
Per sq. ft. actual impervious surface area and/or equivalent
$255.60
$411.80
$511,20
. $823,60
$239,13
$0,142
$0,142
Stormwater System Excerpts from General Methodology Section:
Table 1:
Stormwater
Total stormwater unit cost
per sq.ft. of impervious
surface Area = $0.142.
Charges are based on
use. 1-2 Family
development under 3,000
sq.ft have tiered rates
based on est. imp. surface
areas.1-2 Family over
3,000 sq.ft. and Multi-
Family & Non-residential
are based on actual imp.
surface area. Charges for
Mfg. Home Parks are
based on est. imp. surface
area per space plus actual
impervious surface are of
additional common area.
Estimated non-assessable
cost of system-wide
capacity from future
capacity-enhancing
projects as contained in
the Stonnwater SDC
Project list and available
existing stormwater
system capacity. .
Design standards currently
used by the City to handle
a Five-year storm.
Reimbursement fee
~ 47%
Improvement fee
~ 53%
Charges for new (all) or
expanding (multi-family,
non-residential)
development are based on
estimated or actual
impervious surface areas
and the total stormwater
unit cost per square foot.
Stormwater impact not
attributable to impervious
surface area will be
charged based on
equivalent surface area
and the total stormwater
unit cost per square foot.
5.0 Stormwater System
The stormwater SDC is based upon impervious surface area (e,g., rooftops,
driveways, sidewalks, parking lots, patios, and other non-porous surfaces). The
detailed formulas for calculating the stormwater SDC unit cost (rate) per square foot
of impervious surface area is set forth in Appendix D. The stormwater SDC is
determined by multiplying the applicable rate by the unit of measure for the proposed
development type, The costs per unit of measure and resulting rates can be found in
Table 12 and the fee schedule in Appendix F.
Where the stormwater SDC is a fixed amount per dweUing unit or space, it shall be
determined by multiplying the applicable rate per dwelling unit or space times the
number of units or spaces plus, for manufactured home park development, the SDC .
is based upon the impervious surface area of all additional common areas times the
stormwater unit cost. per square foot of impervious surface area. Where the
stormwater SDC is not a fixed amount per dwelling unit or space, it shall be
determined by multiplying the rate per square foot of impervious surface area times
the total impervious surface area of the proposed development. Where a
development creates impact not attributable to impervious surface area, the
stormwater SDC shall be determined by evaluating equivalent impervious surface
area, multiplied by the rate per square foot of impervious surface area.
METHODOLOGY:
City of Eugene Systems Development Charges
Appendix D
Stormwater System Charge Detail
1.0 Formula
The impact analysis for the stormwater system is based on square footage of impervious
surface, which creates an impact on the stormwater system by land use type. Impervious
surfa~e is defined in section 6,406 Eugene code, 1971 as "any hard surface area which causes
water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from conditions
pre-existing to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to,
rooftops, walkways, driveways, parking lots, or concrete or asphalt surfaces. n The estimated
non-assessable cost of the system-wide capacity from future capacity-enhancing projects, as
contained in the Stormwater SDC-Eligible Project List, and the estimated available capacity in
the existing stormwater system projected to be used by new development is used as the _basis
for determining the stormwater SDC.
The stormwater SDC is comprised of an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee, as new
development will require the construction of additional' system capacity as well as the use of
available capacity in the existing system, The per unit cost of additional capacity for the
improvement fee is based on the value of the system-wide capacity of future capacity-
enhancing projects (current planned projects are listed in the Stormwater SDC-Eligible Project
List, Table 13) divided by the total projected impervious surface area that will be added by new
development at build-out within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The per unit cost of
existing capacity for the reimbursement fee is based on the value of available system-wide
capacity within the existing system projected to be used by new development divided by the
total projected impervious surface area that will be added by new development at build-out
within the UGB,
The value of the future stormwater system is based on the estimated .costs of planned future
capacity-enhancing stormwater projects contained within stormwater plans and the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP). Of that total value, the SDC-eligible component is attributable to those
portions of future projects that are non-assessable and capacity-enhancing and related to the
demands of-future development; Le. add new capacity for new users.
The total value of the existing system is estimated based on the replacement cost of the
stormwater system components, which include both piped system and open channel system
components. Assessable costs are excluded from the SDC-eligible existing system costs.
Assessable costs are determined using the approach specified in the City Code, The city
assesses up to and including the first 24 inches of pipe diameter or equivalent capacity. The
non-assessable portion of stormwater system costs (SDC eligible costs) is based on
replacement costs minus assessable costs. The portion of non-assessable existing system
value allocated to new development (SDC-eligible value) is established by determining the
percent of piped system and open channel system capacity projected to be used by new
development. The use of capacity of the existing system is estimated with use of "hydraulic
modeling to identify existing available capacity (based on existing land use and flow data) and
expected future conditions (based on Metro Plan designations).
The total unit cost per square foot of impervious surface area is the sum of the per unit costs of
. additional capacity of the improvement fee and reimbursement fees, Table 12 provides a
. detailed breakdown of the calculation and numerical supporting data of the stormwater SOC.
Figure 7' illustrated the calculation formula of the stormwater SDC, The stormwater SOC rates
per unit of capacity can be found in Appendix F in the current adopted SDC fee schedule.
~.O Single Family Dwelling and Duplex Rates
The stormwater SDC for single family residential development is comprised of three rate
categories: Small residential with a building footprint of 1,000 square feet or less; Medium
residential with a building footprint of greater than 1,000 but less that 3,000 square feet; and
Large residential with a building footprint of 3,000 square feet or more. Building footprint is
defined as the first floor area. plus attached or detached garage or carport. For the Small and
Medium residential. rate categories, an estimated average impervious surface area (square feet)
specific to each category is multiplied by the current total stormwater SDC rate per square foot
to determine the appropriate single-family residential stormwater SDC flat rat~ per dwelling unit.
For the Large residential category, the stormwater SDC is determined by multiplying the actual
impervious surface of the total proposed building site by the current total stormwater SDC unit
cost per square foot. The stormwater SDC for' a duplex is calculated as two times the
appropriate stormwater SDC flat rate of either a Small or Medium residential category, Duplex
units equal to or over 3,000 square feet each are treated as Large residential. Details of the
stormwater SDC analysis are provided in Table 12, Rate formulas, calculations, and fee
schedule are provided in Appendix F.
. 3.0 Manufactured Home Park Rates
Manufactured home developments are charged a flat rate per individual space based on the
estimated average impervious area for a doublewide manufactured home, plus any additional
common area impervious surface (e,g., clubhouse, private streets). To determine the amount of
stormwater SDC attributable to the proposed spaces in the park, the total number of proposed
spaces is first multiplied by the estimated average impervious surface area (square feet) per
space, the results of which are then multiplied by the current total stormwater SDC unit cost per
square foot. To determine the amount of stormwater SDC attributable to all additional common
area impervious surfaces within the park, these areas will be measured separately and the sum
of this additional actual impervious surface area (square feet) will be multiplied by the current
total stormwater SDC rate per'square foot. Details of the stormwater SDC analysis are provided
. in Table 12. Rate formulas, calculations, and fee schedules are provided in Appendix F,
4.0 Multi-Family and Non-Residential Rate
For all uses not listed in. sections 2.0 and 3.0 above (e,g. multi-family, commercial, industrial) or
whenever this Appendix D makes reference to a rate per square foot of impervious surface area,
the stormwater SDC collected is. determined to be the current stormwater SDC rate per square
foot of impervious surface area as adopted in the SOC fee schedule located in Appendix F.
5.0 Stormwater Impacts Not Attributable to Impervious Surface Area
For all uses not listed in sections 2.0, 3.0, and 4,0 above, where any development type creates
an impact through discharges to the public stormwater system (as allowed by EC 6.610) which
are not attributable to creation or modification of impervious surface area, will have stormwater
SOCs calculated by evaluating the equivalent impervious surface area which would generate a
similar impact,
6.0 Stormwater System SDC Impact Reduction Criteria
Reduction or elimination of stormwater which otherwise would be discharged into the public
stormwater system may result in a corresponding reduction of stormwater SOC collected at the
time of building and development permit issuance, Reduction of the stormwater SOC will be
proportional to the reduction of runoff entering the public system from the fully developed site,
(Note: detention facilities are not eligible for stormwater SOC impact reduction.) A 1000k
reduction in the stormwater SDC will be granted only for the complete containment and
management of all runoff from the site that would otherwise directly or indirectly enter into the
City's public stormwater system. Runoff discharged into an area that does not ultimately enter
the City's public stormwater system constitutes acceptance of responsibility for compliance with
any state or federal regulations that apply to the area or body of water receiving the runoff. To
be eligible for the impact reduction, the owner must guarantee that the system will. function as
intended,
6.1 Single-Family Development (SFD) and Duplex Development
Because stormwater SOCs for SFDs and duplexes are based on estimated average
amounts of impervious surface areas, these building can qualify only for one of two
impact reduction rates:
a)
100% SOC reduction for complete elimination and management of runoff from
the site entering the public system or discharging into an area which ultimately
enters into the public system; or
b)
50% reduction for partial reduction and management of runoff from the site
entering the public system regardless of the amount of reduction,
The SOC reduction will be granted after review and approval by the City Engineer of
construction drawings, calculations, and other supporting documents prepared by a
licenses Civil Engineer. demonstrating how the reduction in runoff will be achieved,
accompanied by a site plan showing the proposed mitigating facility and locations of
private and public stormwater facilities currently in use within and adjacent to the site,
6.2 Multi-family, Commercial, Industrial, and other Nonresidential Development
Stormwater SOCs for these uses will be reduced proportional to the reduction in total
stormwater runoff entering the public stormwater system from the fully developed site.
(Total stormwater runoff includes both runoff from the site in its natural condition and any
increase due to construction of impervious surfaces). The SOC reduction will be granted
after review and approval by the City Engineer of a report submitted by a licensed Civil
Engineer which includes a site plan showing the proposed mitigating facility and
locations of private and public stormwater facilities currently in use within and adjacent to
the site, existing natural drainage courses or other sources of water entering, the site,
Construction drawings, calculations, and other supporting documents demonstrating
how the reduction in runoff will be achieved and listing proposed maintenance
operations with a maintenance schedule.
FIGURE 7
Stormwater System
Capital Project -
Based Methodology
System Value
(SDC-EHgible Costs)
Impact Measurement
~ Improvem'ent Fee
Future capacity-enhancing cost - non SDC
eligible cost
~ Impervious Service
~ Reimbursement 'Fee
Replacement cost - non SDC-eligible cost
Formula:
Cost of Service
(Unit cost per square foot)
SDC-eligible cost
Additional impervious
surface area within UGB
=
Cost per square
foot of impervious
surface area
I
Formula:
Total Cost of Service
(Unit cost per square foot)
Improvement Unit Cost = Reimbursement Unit Cost
NOTE: The costs per unit of measure, can be found in Table 12 and the SDC fee schedule in Appendix F.
TABLE 12
[:.;: ; '~,--: _, ~:~Qfi fr};t'~~'}i~ ,D in,'H !,,,tK?~~.'l~Jt)~flii1"Y"J~?, 0" f., 11) m.","n t 0 !'h If\!ii); ;i_\~~ . _~~~ ~1i1l
1. Existing Stormwater Drainage System Value & SDC-Eligible Costs
Total Re lacement Cost - Existin
T atal Re lacement Cost - Existin
(Reimbursement Fee)
Percent of Existin
Percent of Existin
4.27%
2.34%
Future Stormwater System SDC-Eligible Project Costs
3. Stormwater System Calculation Details
(building footprint ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
(building footprint >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq.ft.)
1,800 s . ft.
2,900 s . ft.
1,780 s . ft.
4. Calculation of SOC.
rovement Fee
[$11,614,175 /155,770,560]
Small Residential SDC (building footprint ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
Medium Residential SDC . (building footprint >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq.ft.)
Small Du lex SDC (unit building footprints ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
Medium Du lex SDC (unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq.ft.)
Mf . Home Park SDC ce portion of total charge
.See Appendix F for complete rate schedule.
[1,800 sq. ft. x $0.142]
[2,900 sq.ft x $0.142]
[$255.60 x 2]
[$411.80 x 2]
[1,684 sq. ft. x $0.142]
$255.60
$411.80
$511.20
$823.60
$239.13
TABLE 13
City of Eugene
2003 Stormwater SDC-Eligible Project List
Martin Drive Pipe Improvements (02-07 CIP)
M1. Cavalry Pipe Improvements
Frederick Court Pipe Daylight
3rd Avenue Pipe Improvements .
Morse Park Ranch Park Pipe Improvements
Laurelwood Flood Control FaclPipe Imps
ackson Street Pipe Improvements
indsor Circle Pipe Improvements
est Hawkins Lane Water Quality Facility
Bell Avenue (Increase Pipe Sizes Along)
Empire Park Pond Retrofit
Royal Node Stormwater Infrastructure
Greenhill Tributary Storm Improvements Ph 2
Greenhill Tributary Water Quality Facility
Roosevelt Channel - Culvert Improvement
-1 Main Channel Culvert & Open Waterway Improvements
Lynnbrook Drive.Open Waterway & Culvery Improvements
Spring Creek Bridge Construction & Waterway Improvements
Sanders Street Water Quality Facility
Spring Creek Drive Water Quality Facility
Kirsten Street Pipe'lmprovements
Hunsacker - Open Channel Improvements (02-07 CIP)
Lenox/Salty - Culvert Replacement (02-07 CIP)
Hunsacker Culvert Replacement (02-07 CIP)
Division Avenue Tip;..Up Pipe Replacement
lrvington Drive Water Quality Facility
S1. Peter School Culvert Replacement
River Point Pond Outlet Channel
Gilham Road System Culvert Replacement
Gilham Road System Water Quality Facility
scot Park Open Waterway Modification.
3rd-4th Connector Stormwater Improvements (02-07 CIP)
Beaver St & Hunsaker Ln Stormwater Improvements
Greenhill Rd Stormwater Improvements
Irvington Drive - Stormwater (02-07 CIP)
Kinney Park Flow Diversion & Restoration
River Road - Stormwater (02-07 CIP)
Royal Ave., Terry to Greenhill
Services for New Development ($100,Ooo/year)
Streambank Stabilization ($ varies/year)
$93,000
$763,200
$118,300
$2,155,500
$1,054,500
$2,008,400
$77,400
$919,000
$625,300
$794,600
$385,000
$1,400,000
$374,000
$748,800
$135,900
$514,800
$482,400
$139,300
$747,300
$236,600
$383,000
$398,000
$172,000
$26,000
$10,900
$653,800
$54,600
$373,300
$27,000
$653,900
$72,200
$120,000
$50,000
$100,000
$100,000
$620,000
$50,000
$100,000
$3,400,000
$4,900,000
$93,000
$185,643
$54,418
$689,760
$115,995
$301 ,260
$19,350
$590,786
$506,195
$365,516
$77,000
$1,400,000
$127,500
$224,640
$42,916
$82,368
$144,720
$32,039
$37,365
$47,320
$111,070
$239,000
$103,000
$16,000
$2,507
$91,532
$16,380
$153,053
$27,000
$65,390
$47,652
$120,000
$50,000
$100,000
$100,000
$458,800
$50,000
$100,000
$.3,400,000
$1,225,000
RESOLUTION NO. 4770
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY FOR PARKS
SYSTEM AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NOS. 4740 AND
4748.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740,
B. On January 27,2003, the SDC Methodologies were amended in part by Resolution
No, 4748, Resolution No. 4740 remains in effect except as amended by Resolution No. 4748,
C. Amendments to the SDC Methodology for Parks System are needed in order to adopt
an interim adjustment to Parks SDC rate factors,
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge Methodology for Parks System is amended by
revising the following: Appendix F, Sections 1,5 and 2.5; General Methodology Section 6.0,
Table 1; and Table 14, as shown on Exhibit A-I attached hereto,
Section 2. Resolution Nos, 4740 and 4748, are hereby amended as described in Section 1,
Section 3, The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
Nos, 4740 and 4748,
Section 4, This Resolution shall become effective October 1,2003,
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 11th day of August, 2003.
~~
City Reco er
Resolution - 1
Exhibit A-I to Resolution No. 4770
Parks System Details from Appendix F:
1.5 Parks System Cost of Service:
General Formula:
Cost per person
x
Persons per household
= Cost
per EDU
Calcu lation:
$584,63 X
2,3
= $1 ,344,65
(per EDU)
2.5 Parks System:
Total charge per person
Total charge per Dwelling Unit (2,3 persons x $584,63)
$584,63
$1,344,65
Parks
1:
System Excerpt from General Methodology Section, Table
Parks
Cost per
Dwelling Unit =
$1,344.65
Resolution - 2
6.0 Parks System
The parks system components that are identified in the adopted 1989 Parks and Recreation Plan and
the parks system components identified in Table 14, which are used to calculate the parks SDC, are
generally described as parks (neighborhood and community) and facilities which are more particularly
described in Appendix E, The current community standard or level of service, for parks infrastructure
is the determining factor in calculating the impact of new development on the system, New
development can be charged the costs of providing parks infrastructure for the development at the
same level of service as the existing community as a whole.
The detailed calculation for each component of the parks SDC and the Cost of Service formula are set
forth in Appendix E, The parks SDC rate can be found in the current adopted fee schedule in
Appendix F, The rate per dwelling unit is determined based on equivalent dwelling units (EDU).
The parks SDC for a proposed development is determined by multiplying the rate per dwelling unit
(EDU) by the number of dwelling units in the proposed development. The cost per EDU is the sum of
all parks system components identified in Appendix E, There is currently no parks SDC for non-
residential development.
Resolution - 3
~
~
C\I C\I C\I ~ cx)M
r--- ~ ~ M ~<O
~ C\I a) to ~a)
M 1.0 CX) C\I ~~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0
CO CO CO CO CO CO
L- L- L- L- L- L-
a> a> a> a> a> a>
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a..
r--- 0 0> r--- 0 CX)
M 0 0> CX) o r---
0 O~ ~ ": 0 ~
N 0 ('I) ~ ..0 en
C\I CX) 0 ~ ~ 1.0
C\I ~ C\I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c::
0 ~ 0 0 0 0
+:i +:i +:i +:i +:i
CO CO CO CO CO CO
S S S S S ~
c.. c.. c.. c.. c..
0 0 0 0 0 8.
c.. c.. c.. c.. c..
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
q q q q q q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
L- L- L- L- L- L-
a> CU a> a> a> a>
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a..
0 0 0> 0 <0 0
C\I 0> M M <0 M
<0 C\I ~ ~ ~ M
ci ci ci ~ ci ci
CX) CX) <0 ~ 1.0 CX)
~ r--- ": CX) M M
~ ci ~ ex) M to
CX) ~ <0 1.0 C\I ~
~
~
c::
0 >-
c:: C
- 0 0
~ +:i c::
- '00 - 0
'0 "5 ~ ~ +:i
a> C" :~
C- o '0 1-
0 co ~ a> :::::J I~
Ci5 c.. C"
'0 :::::J 0 16
> c:: - 0 co
a> co Ci5 L-
'0 ~ c:: '0 :::::J
> c:: -
a> co
'0 '0 '0 '0 ~ c::
0 0 0
0 0 0 ~ ~ I~
1: 1: 1: '2 "2 c::
0 0 0 :::::J :::::J :::::J
.c .c .c E E E
.r:. .r:. .r:.
"2> .2> .2> E E E
a> a> a> 0 0 0
zz ZU UU
W
..J
m
<(
....
!a
en
~
<C
z
<C
w
C)
D::
<C
:t:
o
t-
Z
w
:E
D..
o
...J
W
>
W
c
en
:E
w
t-
en
>-
en
en
~
D::
<C
D..
C\lO<O<OO>C\lcx)~O>M
C\I~~<oor---I.O<O~<O
a)ariex)ex)Nari~Mcici
r---~~~~~~~~~
~~~ ~
-
'0 "2
6:::::Jtt
E "!::: 5 5
.~ ~ 0 0
'OC\I 0; 0;
0; 0; a.. a..
a.. a..
<OI'..<OO::>~<O<OO::>~c
I.O<OO')O')O')~~O')~~
~<OCO::><OC\l~I.O~~
0) C\I" <0" C\I" 0::>" 1'.." 1'.." ('t)" ('t)" C\I"
1.00000')<OC\lO')O')~~C\I
~Z;~~~Z;~ ~
'Oa>~tt
'" :::::J :::::J
"5~Ecooo
co - fG 0 0
WO;O;L-L-L-
a..a..~~~
c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c:: c::
~~~~~~~~~~
co co co co co co co co co co
sssssssss~
c..c..c..c..c..c..c..c..c...",...
8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.8.
0000000000
0000000000
qqqqqqo~qo~q
~~~~~~~~~~
L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L- L-
a> a> a> a> a> a> cu a> a> a>
a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a..
~OC\lcx)MO>cx)MC\lcx)
Q)~~~~~~~~~~
~ciciciciciciciMcici
::J
.s
OMOI.OMcx)~~OO
OC\lOMC\lOo>r---oo
~~~a)ci~ci~ci~
iM~N~~ ~~C\I
.0
E
::J
.s
en
- a>
t::, ~
~ '0
f!! ~
5 Ui'-g ~
U ~co '0
- _en Een-c::
~ <Ot -32e~
rn -:::::J en~enW
'0 -eno_fi\;::tcn
c:: ~tu~cocn:::::Jt
oE ~ en 5 en en a.. cu 0 :::::J
_tu:::::J'O e>OU 0
B enE 5 = ~ ~ .5 ~ ~ U
f3 _ 0 U ~ ffi u.. g e>en .r:. ~16
~- en--L-O en
:J ~ g '2 ~ Ci5 ~ --, .5 a> a>
-;::enc::enoo;::i:f!!=
LL~ oa>a>co~oocooo
Cl)O:::l-co,.:::;CI)CI)a..:t:>
-d
Q)
"0
::J
'0
.~
0) cD
c:
32 ~
en en ::J
Q. 8
~ 0 -
z "'5
"0 0)
J2 -d ~
E .$ U)
.r= :c
0 fj}
e .....
u; ~ "0
c:
~ m m
0) "0 Q)
c: c:
:c m co ~
::J ~ Q) 0
13 =:; E
x ::J :c
Q) 8 Q. (;
u) .... E 0
c: ::J m ~
0 .g
:0 U) ..... '5
~ - t::
Q) 0
c: U) U) ::J U)
Q.
c: Q) Q. 8 ::J
8 "0 ::J e
::J e
~ '0 0) (ij 0)
x .0 .~
:s Q) .~ l~
-d 0 "0 "0
=:; Q) c: Q) 0 ~
.~ Q. '5. "0 .0
0 2
l ~ 2 .....
c: U) en u; u) u;
Q) Q) "0 ~ c: ~ c:
E "0 c: 8 8
c. Q) ~ '0 .0
0 .0 J2 c: c:
"0 "E Q)
l .9 c: Q) .r=
m (ij .r= m ~
Q) "0 ~ 0
"0 Q) u) c: 1:: en .0 t
"0 c: 0 c:
:a c: 19 '6> ::J 0 .$ ::J
.$ ~ 8 'en m 8
c: ~
"0 .~ ::J Q) c: U) c:>> Q)
c: "0 .g Q) Q) .....
m ~ Q. E c: Q.
c: c: u) .~ :c u) :g .~
g .~ ~ l{> 1;) "'5 "8 m u;
'en co e Q.
c: 8 0 Q. "0 8
'S ~ Q) .c:
ff =:; E ..... 0 0) c: .....
"0 oi '2 U) c: m "2
co c: c: ..... ::J .c: :c J!l ::J
"0 ~ 15 U) 0) m .r=
0 Q) :E ~ Q)
c: E =:; fj} =
12 (ij Q) r--
U) U) co t U) co
U) U) cD Q) ::J U) Q)
Q) Q) "0 =:; 8 Q) "0 =
"0 "0 U) ::J "0 ::J
::J ::J ::J '0 ~ ::J '0 Q)
'0 '0 ~ x "5 '0 x "0
-= .E .~ w z u. .E w Z
..... ~ Q) ~ ~ @: s e e
U)
i-
2
::J
E
E
8
0)
c:
t;
X
Q)
Q)
=:;
>.
.0
....
.g
"0
(ij
Q.
c:
Q)
Q)
.0
~
m
.r=
.c:
o
.2
~
U)
~
o
J2
"0
c:
m
U)
~
en
Q.
"0
Q)
"0
c:
.2
-0
c:
o
.c
Cl
"~
1;)
'x
Q)
-
o
c:
o
:e
o
Q.
Q)
=
"0
Q)
q::
~
.9
"0
.$
U)
::J
:0-
m
"~
~
.9
c:
Q)
>
.~
Q)
.c:
~
...
RESOLUTION NO. 4776
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING UPDATED METROPOLITAN
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
REGIONAL SEWERAGE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
UNIT COSTS AND REFERENCE DATA, AND AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No, 4740, Resolution No, 4740 remains in effect except as amended by
Resolution No, 4748 on January 27, 2003, Resolution No, 4767 on July 28, 2003, Resolution No,
4768 on July 28, 2003, and Resolution No, 4770 on August 11, 2003.
B. The Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) methodology for
determining the system development charges for new development that is to be connected to the
regional sanitary sewer system allows for the unit costs and reference data upon which the charge is
to be based to be adjusted from time to time as directed by the MWMC or its Executive Officer
without going through the process required to amend the methodology, In accordance with these
provisions, the unit costs and reference data are adjusted annually,
C. The MWMC has requested that both the City of Eugene and the City of Springfield
adopt the updated unit costs and reference data set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. The City of
Springfield has already done so,
D. The City of Eugene ' s SDC Methodologies, section 2.4, provide that increases in SDC
fees based on periodic application of a specific cost index or rate factor incorporated in the
Methodologies may be made administratively if the increase is less than five percent within any 12-
month period. Fee increases exceeding five percent must be adopted by resolution of the City
Council. The increase requested by the MWMC exceeds five percent.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOL VEDBY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the updated Metropolitan Wastewater
Management Commission Regional Sewerage System Development Charge Unit Costs and
Reference Data attached hereto as Exhibit A,
Section 2. Updates to the rates as set out in Section 1 result in changes to the Regional
Resolution - 1
MWMC Wastewater System Development Charge Analysis and the Regional MWMC Wastewater
Rates in Appendix C of the City of Eugene SDC Methodologies,
Section 3, Resolution No, 4740, as amended by Resolutions No, 4748,4767,4768 and 4770,
is further amended as described in Sections 1 and 2,
Section 4. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
No, 4740,
Section 5, This Resolution shall become effective October 1,2003.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 24th day of September, 2003.
V\t\Q~ ,~
City Reco er
Resolution - 2
RESOLUTION 4776
EXHIBIT A
Regional Wastewater System Excerpt from General Methodology, Section 4.2:
4.2 Regional Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission' (MWMC)
Wastewater System
The City of Eugene entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of
Springfield and' Lane County' in 1978, which established the Metropolitan
Wastewater Management Commission. On May 15, 1997, the Commission
adopted the MWMC wastewater Systems Development Charge which includes a
regional administrative charge. In accordance with the agreement, the City of
Eugene must adopt rates and charges not less than those required by the
Commission.
The MWMC wastewater SDC formula is based on the allocation of costs of existing
or planned capacity to Average Flow, Peak Flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOD) and Suspended Solids (SS) components of the regional facilities, These
cost allocations are used to derive a cost per Flow Estimation Unit (FEU), for each
type of land use. The regional wastewater SDC is determined by multiplying the
applicable FEU rate per unit of measure for a specific land use type, by the units of
measure for the proposed development. The regional wastewater system Cost of
Service formula per unit of development can be found in Appendix C, The regional
(MWMC) wastewater SDC rates can be found in the current adopted fee schedule
in Appendix F.
The MWMC wastewater SDC Methodology provides that a review of the Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) will be initiated at such time as any single development
with an anticipated discharge' of 100,000 gallons per day or more applies for a
building permit or for connection to the system. The purpose of this review is to
determine if the demand placed on the regional system by that new user will
require a change in the timing of future capital projects that will impact the a'mount
of the regional wastewater SDC, If this o~urs, the improvement fee portion of the
charge will be modified to reflect the value of the new schedule of capacity
increasing improvements, and the modified fee will be applied to the development
that caused the need for the modification and to all future development.
Regional Wastewater System Excerpt 'from General Methodology~ Table 1:
Wastewater. Regional (MWMC)
Costs are based on the type of land
use and, for industrial dischargers
with process flows, on the strength of
discharge. The rate. varies by land
use. The rate for a single Residential
unit is $528.86.
The reimbursement portion of the
charge is based on the net local
equity in the regional treabnent plant
and other regional assets. The
improvement portion of the charge is
based on current cost of capacity-
enhancing projects to be constructed,
as contained In the current Capital
Improvement Program..
The service standards are secondary
wastewater treabnent for flows as
defined in MWMC's operating pennit
with DEQ, and capacity enhancing
capital improvements as'listed in the
capital improvements plan adopted by
the MVVMC.
The MVVMC charge is a combined
reimbursement and inprovement fee.
The proportion of the fee that is based
on capacity enhancing inprovements
varies over time as projects are
identified, funded, and scheduled.
Charges for new development,
changes in use and existing
development connecting for the first
time are based on the number of Flow
Estimation Units (FEUs), times the
cost per unit of measure, A FEU is
based on the size of development
and the effluent characteristics of
flow, biochemical oxygen demand
and suspended solids for each type of
land use. The charge for changes in
use and expansion of development
already connected to the wastewater
system are based on the net
difference In FEUs created by the
change or expansion. Credit for past
property tax payments for debt
service on the regional facilities will
be deducted from the charge.
FIGURE- 5
Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System
-
Level of Service Existing System Value Future System Value
Impact measurement Impact measurement
~ Flow - gallons per day Present value - Liabilities, Future value of
~ BOD - pounds per day grants and outstanding debt capacity-increasing projects
~ 88 - pounds per day = Local equity from CIP
I I
Formulas:
Unit Cost of Capacity
(All component costs are added to determine the unit impact per FEU land use)
The. cost of existing plus future $ystem values.
allocated to average and peak flow = Cost per gallon of daily flow
Design flow
The cost of existing plus future system values
allocated to Biochemical Oxygen D~mand = Cost per pound of daily BOD
Design BOD capacity
I
The cost of existing plus future system values
allocated to Suspended Solids = Cost per pound of daily SS
Design 88 capacity
NOTE: The cost per unit of Flow, BOD, 8S can be found in the current adopted SOC fee
schedule in Appendix F,
TABLE 8
Design Percent of Component < Design Percent of
Capacity Facility Cost Value Capacity Facility Cost Component Value
49,000,000 22,0% $22,973,702 1,000,000 3.1% $202,500
175,000,000 43,0% $44,903, ~45 16,500,000 96.6% $6,409,500
66,000 19.0% $19,840,924 1,000 0,2% $11,250
71,600 16.0% $16,708,147 1 ,420 0.2% $11,250
100,0% $104,425,918 100,0% $6,634,500
Cost of SS Component I Design SS daily capacity = Cost per pound ofSS per day
($16708,147 /7!J ,600) + $11,250/1,420) pounds per day = $241,27 per pound
*
The unit cost of Peak Flow is calculated on the basis of average daily plant capacity of 49,000,000 to enable recovery of costs from system users.
T AB L E 10
Regional (M'WMC) Wastewater Rates
" . . .
1F SFD / DUPLEX DU 175 Low $314.63 $214.23 $528.86
OTHER RESIDENTIAL
1X (SFD WITH OTHER USES) DU 175 low $314,63 21....23 $528.86
OTHER RESIDENTIAL -
11 MULTI FAMILY DU 150 Low $269.68 183.62 $453.31
ELDERLY/ GROUP HOUSING!
12 RETIREMENT HOME TGSF 100 low $179,79 122.42 . $302.21
OTHER RESIDENTIAL - RESIDENTIAL
13 HOTEUMOTEL TGSF 200 low $359.58 244.83 $604.41
OTHER RESIDENTIAL - MOBILE
14 HOME PARK DU 150 Low - $269.68 183.62 $453.31
. 15 MOTEL/HOTEL TGSF 200 Medium $493.26 $249.63 $742.89
21 HEAVYINDUSTRYnNDUSTR~* TGSF 50 low $89.89 $61.21 $151~ 10
2X HEAVYINDUSTRY~NDUSTR~* TGSF 50 low $89.89 $61 ;21 $151,10
24 HEAVYINDUSTRYnNDUSTR~* TGSF 50 low $89,89 '$61.21 $151.10
3X HEAVY INDUSTRYnNDUSTR~* T~SF 50 low $89.89 $61.21 '. $151,10
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS lOW .~
ProceSs FloW l STRENGTH \
. T/GAUEF 1000 low $1,797.89 $1,224.16 .$3, ---1.
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS MEDIUM
Process Flow M STRENGTH . T/GAUEF 1000 Medium $2,466.29 $1,248.16 $3,714.45
INDUSTR~ PROCESS HIGH
Process Flow H STRENGTH T/GAUEF 1000 High $3,357.50 $1,280.16 $4,637.66
INDU~TRIAL PROCESS VERY HIGH
Process Flow V STRENGTH T/GAlJEF 1000 Very High $4,248.70 $1,312.16 $5,560.86
INPUSTRlAl PROCESS SUPER HIGH
Process Flow S STRENGTH T/GAUEF 1000 Super High $5,139,90 $1,344.16 $6,484.06
4X TRUCK TERMINAL TGSF .100 low $179.79 . $122.42 $302,21
4X UTILITIES TGSF 100 low $179.79 $122.42 $302.21
5A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,417.40 $921.71 $3,339.11
5B QUALITY RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,417.40 $921.71 $3,339.11
5C HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANT TGSF 720 High $2,417,40 $921.71 $3,339.11
50 DRINKING PLACE TGSF 340 low $611,28 $416.21 $1,027.50
51 WHOLESALE TAADE TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
54 CONVENIENCE MARKET TGSF 180 low $323.62 $220,35 $543.97
54 SERVICE STATION / MARKET TGSF 180 . low $323.62 $220.35 $543.97
54 SUPE~MARKET TGSF 180 Medium $443.93 $224.87 $668.80
55 NEW CAR SALES TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
55 TIRE STORE TGSF .50 . low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
59 RETAIL TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 i 10
;'-
5X DISCOUNT MARKET TGSF 30 low $53,94 $36.72 $9O,S
~. 5X FURNITURE STORE TGSF 30 low $53,94 $36,72 $90.6
/ CLOTHING I DRYGOODS /
5X HOUSEWARES TGSF 30 . low $53.94 $36.72 $90.6
6A LAUNDRY TGSF 100 low $179.79 $122.42 $302.2
68 CAR WASH STAll 300 low $898,95 $612.08 $1,511.0:
61 FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TGSF 110 low $197,n $134.66 $332,4:
62 OTHER SERVICES TGSF 100 low $179.79 $122.42 $302,2'
63 MINI WAREHOUSE TGSF 30 Low $53.94 $36.72 $90.6C
64 AUTOMOTIVE & OTHER REPAIR TGSF 40 low $71.92 $48.97 $120.8l
65 CLINIC, MEDICAL OFFICE TGSF 150 Low $269.68 $183.62 $453.3~
65 HOSPITAL TGSF 150 Low $269.68 $183,62 $453.31
65 NURSING HOME TGSF 150 Low $269,68 $183.62 $453.31
66 CONSTRUCTION TRADE SERVICES TGSF 100 Low $179,79 $122,42 $302.21
67 GOVERNMENT BUILDING TGSF 100. Low $179.79 $122.42 $302,21
67 US POST OFFICE TGSF 100 Low $179,79 $122,42 $302,21
68 COMMUNITY COllEGE TGSF 50 low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
68 DAY CARE CENTER TGSF 50 low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
68 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
68 HIGH S.CHOOL TGSF 50 Low- $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
68 LIBRARY TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
68 UNIVERSITY TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
) 68 OTHER EDUCATlONAUCUl TURAL TGSF 50 low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
,
69 CHURCH 'TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
69 FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION TGSF 50 Low $89.89 $61.21 $151.10
6X . GENERAL OFFICE BLOG TGSF 100 Low $179.79 $122,42 $302.2'1
7X. BOWliNG ALlEY TGSF 160 Low $287.66 $195,87 . $483.53
7X. HEAlTH CLUB TGSF 160 Low $287,66 . $195.87 $483.53
7X PUBLIC PARK TGSF 160 low $287.66 $195.87 $483,53
7X RACQUET CLUB TGSF 160 Low $287.66 $195.87 $483.53
7X. RECREATIONAL CENTER TGSF 160 Low $287,66 $195,87 $483~53
7X. TENNIS COURT TGSF 160 Low $287.66 $195.87 . $483.53
7X. THEATER TGSF. 160 - Low $287.66 $195.87 $483.53
7X. VIDEO ARCADE TGSF 160 Low $287.66 $195.87 $483,53
7X OTHER ENTERTAINMENT TGSF 160 Low $287,66 $195.87 $483.53
82 VETERINARIAN SERVICES TGSF 200 low $359,57 $244,83 . $604.41
Regional Wastewater System Excerpt from Appendix' F:
1 ~3.2 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System Cost of Service
General Formulas
Existing and increased plant local
equity related to average flow
=
Cost per gallon of average daily flow
Average daily design flow
.
Existing and increased plant local
equity related to peak flow
x
Peak flow
Cost of BOD Component
=
Cost per pound of biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) per day
Design BOD daily capacity
Existing and increased plant local equity
. related to tot.al suspended solids
=
Cost per pound of suspended solids
Design suspended sol~ds
$22,973,702
$202,500
+
$0,672 (per gallon of average daily
flow)
49,000,000 1,000,000
$44,903,145
$6,409,500 126,000,000
+ x = $1.659 (per gallon of peak
175,000,000 16,500,000 49,000,000 daily flow)
$19,840,924
66,000
+
$11,250
1 ,000
=
$311,87 (per pound of biochemical
oxygen demand) .
$16,708,147
71 ,600
+
$11,250
1,420
=
$241,27 (per pound of suspended
solids)
2.3 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System:
Unit Cost by Component
Average Daily Flow (per gallon)
Peak Wet Weather Flow (per gallon)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (per pound)
Suspended Solids (per pound)
$0.672
$1.659
$311.87
$241,27
RESOLUTION NO. 4795
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE RATES FOR REGIONAL
WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740.
B. Resolution No. 4740 has subsequently been amended by Resolution Nos. 4748, 4767,
4768,4770,4776 and, the most recent amendment, Resolution No. 4794, which adopted an amended
SDCMethodologyforRegional Wastewater System and repealed Resolution No. 4776. Inaddition,
inflationary adjustments of Systems Development Charges for Local Wastewater System,
Stormwater System, and Transportation System were adopted by Administrative Order No. 58-04..;
04-F, effective April 5, 2004.
C. Resolution No. 4793 dated June 28, 2004, adopted the MWMC Facilities Plan 20-
year proj ect list.
D. Based on Resolution No. 4793 and Resolution No. 4794, it is necessary to adopt
amended Regional Wastewater SDC rates calculated based on application of the Methodology to the
20-year project list.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge rates for Regional Wastewater are amended
as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2. Resolution No. 4740 is amended as described in Section 1 as of the effective date
of this Resolution.
Section 3. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
No. 4740.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective on July 1, 2004.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28th of June, 2004.
JlIlCL .~
City R~order ------
Resolution
g
:ia
S
11
~ S ·
:::E~
8g
~~
~ ~
_i3=~CI)
B ~ ~
;;; =) ~
~l (.)
~:::E....~
1;;:;,
8w
_LL.
s....
(!.8.
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 479
~~~~o~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.ooo~~~~~~
~~i~~~~~~~~$~~~~~$~~~~~ggg~~gggg~~~~~~i~~~
_o;;~__ ...:~-~~~~_aa~aa~.o -~~~~~~zt~~~~a~aa:;}...:~~~~
.. .. .. ~ ~... .. ...
---
i....R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
E~~2~2~~~~~!~~mmmmmmm8~~m~ggg~~gggg~~~~~~~2~~
0> =:,~ 0;; - _...... ~ ~ ~ _N ~ _N N _N _N N N C"l C"l N 00. C't. m. ~ ....... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CO') C"l N N q CO') ...... ...... ...... ......
e~-~ - -----......C"lNCO'). ----N-----
~s --___ _
~o~
.- ~~~Clll~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*8~~~~~~~~~~gggggcidgg~~N~c~~~~~~~~~~NNNdg~~~~
e-'t~-~~~...:~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~!aaaaa!aa5~~~fii~~~~~
~~Q) -----------------............N -___a_
-E~ ---
~~=>
..cuW
-Sl:LL
~~
~I
~i
gl
I
ti.
I
(/)
~~
~I
li'>:
s~~
Jli
'ii _
~
tli
i=~
c5~~
~8~aco,)~Ma~888888888~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~MMMm~~~~~
~.~~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...:MMM~~M~~~~~ddd~~~~~~
-;------o;;-~~-~~~~~!~~~~U~~~~~uuu~~~~~a~~~~
~--
E8E~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~m~~8888~8888~~~~~~~EEE
cidcidooodciodocicidddci~M~~~dcicidddocicicidcici.ciocicici
E8E~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~m~~8888~8888~~~~~~E~~~
ddocicicicicioddociciciddci~~~~~ciciciddpocidddcid.dcidoci
~~JJJJ~~;~~J~J~~~~J~,I!!J~J~~JJJ~J~~~~~~~jJ
:::E :::E ~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~!~~m!~~~~~~~!!~55555~~~!!~~~~~~~~i~~~~~
~~~~~ N
~~~~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ggg~~~~~~
NNNNN ...:
~ ~~~~~~M~mM0~~m~mmmm~~~~~ClllClllClll~~ClllClllClllClll~~~~ilM~~~~
J ~M.MMO~OM~_~_....................................~ ~ ~~Clll~~~~~~~oo ~MMMCO')
1 ~..- ..- N N N N N N C'tI N N N ("Ill N N N N cwt .. crt .. .. ...... N ~ .... ..- ..- .- .-
t .!~ - ...... ...... ...... ......
~~ ~
I j
Jli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~s~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lJ~~~~55~55~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ . ~~~~~
~
Icn ~ ~
W ~o::
~ ~~
0:: ;;iw
~~~2
QLfw~
S:5~~
~:::EO:::::E
~ . . .
j~~ ~III
j~~ ~~~~~~~
.n~a:(/)~~~~!5~~
-:u~~ffiffiffiffie~~
~~~5i3i3i3i3~~~
51
;:)
118~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~18~~~m~~m~~~~~~~~~~
~
Sa>
it~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mmm~~~~~~~~~~
",,;
i i;
~ ~hh
B ~~Z(/):J:
~ ~ ~~~~!
s i 3:fa~~~
i1j 8 0::9:::E:J:~(/)
5 U ~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~~m ~~ii~fi~S~~
i~~~~gi~IIIII~;~~
~~~ffi~~~M55555~8~:::E8
:::EFO...O:::J:lDo::;:;;;::;;;::;ii:;:;w::::E:J:
Ei~!z(/) C)
~~ ll:~~ ~
~ ~~ ~~m ~~~
~ o~ ~M~~~o..!zit
~ w ~~ %1lJ8~o..~~o
~o~~a:~~~~u.fi~~~t;
i~~~i~~~~~~~~~~
I -
1;;:;,
8w
u..
~:u
1-0.
c ~
Q) .... 0
E.g ~
Q) =: :::J
fi~fJ)
~c s
..5 12
cb .1;; ;:)
e8w
_lJ..
~g8.
-E
cb8.
l!?'t)=>
.s8w
.5 1: lJ..
~Q)
E
>:
~~
l
I >:
o~
~i
~
g
(/)
~~
0'8,
~!
(/)
i -
JI!
'iili
~ -
j I>:
!j;~
~=~
~~~
0
I J~13f
&fw
~i !k
-< ~
113i
Jli
.~
.~
o
U
~]
r- g ..
~~
8g
~~
~ ~
~ B ~ ~
;;1~1
~ ~ 8. g
~:::EJ:(/)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
g~~~~g8g~~~~~~~"""~g~~~~igN"""~-ci$N
~:;}~...:~~~~...:ao;;o;;~~_~~~~~~U~~~~~~a~~
--- --
~~~~~~re~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_g~~~co'_~_gX_g~~~~~;~gggggggggg~gggg~~
00 m nM"~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~N~
NN- - - _____ _ _____
--
~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~gg~g~~~~~~Ng~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ci~
a~~NNaM~~NN~O~CO~CO~M~M~CO~NCOCOcoC')8~
~a~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~;~
~~m~~~~~8~~88~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~
~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-~ao;;--~-o;;-----~~---------~~~__~
8 8 ~ a; Clll 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 j:! ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- ~ j:!
8 ~ a; ~ ~ ~ ~ co ~ ~ Clll Clll 8 ~ ~ 8 ~
~ Clll M N 0 0 0 0 N
ci . . 0 ci ci ci ci 0 0 ci ci ci d ci d d 0 d d ci d ci ci d ci 0 0 ci 0 ci
~ .., a ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ g ~ u; j:! 00 t:: t:: ~ ~ ~ ~ on ~ ~ u; t:: E ~ on j:! t::
~ 0 ~ 8 co ~ ~ ~ Clll 8 Clll Clll Clll
0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
ci -.i . 0 ci ci ci ci ci 0 ci d ci ci 0 d d ci ci ci d ci d 0 ci ci 0 0 ci ci ci
e
~1'1'~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:::E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~m~~~~~~~
NN""': ..,:
Clll GO GO
~~~
~~~
~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ii~~~~~~~~;~~aaa~~~~~a~;aa~~~~
~~~~~~~
00
~~
~~~~
~~~~:5~~~~~
:5~8~~~~~
ll~~~~~~~~~~~.....~~~~fJ).....u..~~~~~~~~~~~~~.....~~~
~~~~~~f'o~f'o~f'o~ ~~~~G~~~~~f'o~~""'~~"'" ~~f'o
:.1::1
!z
~
::I
-<
C ~ ~
i ::> 0:: y-.!
Z ~ ~....
ill ~i~
b ='~~~
!~~~~
il-8 ~m~~;z:gm:g~~~~~U;a1-<oN
~!B ~~~
~
:sd!~
i~lD ~ :3 ~ ~ :; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c%~i
W~%
O::O::(/)
<5<5~
~~o::
-<z<5
~
~~~
~~~~
~~~~
.~ => ~ -<
z8zo
8~~~
~ ~
G ~
ffic~,.,..J..J (/)
o~~~3!3!$:$ 2
<<or:~~~r:
~!g~~~::I~::I~S2 ~
i=c>>c>>ffi~~~~~~wo
E~~:rls=s=>~>~~g
~ag~~~~~~lt~~
::i%%~555550..J(;
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~!~i~~~~~~~
~
::I
~
w~ffi
~-<:::E
(l)t-~~~
~~5~z
~u:>~~
>-W:;,CZCI
~~~~~if
Z~z~~~
~o86o~
t:i
~12
~~
(/)0::
~~
~(/)
CD
'"
~~
~ ~
~;n~:a&:f~m~
~ ~ ~~H~
~~~~~
C>~~~
CJ)
z
o
~
C6
oc
lJ)
~
lfi
~
W
...J
~ 3:
3 ~
tu~ 0
~ffi ~~
~fij tig
5~ w~
Cl)w fJ)a..
CI)~ ~G
~:;'t-;~
~g~<3w
cc(!)c2
~~~~~
BB~5~
~iEciE>
:s u.
u.. w
~~g~g;
~
!~
x lD
~ ~
~ s
A~
CD 'C
0> II>
~ .E
> .ta
; ~
"i '"
3i ~
~ tL
~ :
RESOLUTION NO. 4794
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDED SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY FOR
REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM; AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 4740; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION
NO. 4776.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740.
B. Resolution No.4 7 40 has subsequently been amended by Resolution Nos. 4748,4767,
4768, 4770 and 4776. In addition, inflationary adjustments of Systems Development Charges for
. Local Wastewater System, Stormwater System, and Transportation System were adopted by
Administrative Order No. 58-04-04-F, effective April 5, 2004.
C. Amendments to the SDC Methodology for Regional Wastewater are needed to reflect
the adjustments to the Regional Wastewater SDC Methodology as revised and recommended by the
Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge Methodology for Regional Wastewater is
amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2. Resolution No. 4740 is amended as described in Section 1, and Resolution No.
4776 is repealed, as of the effective date of this Resolution.
Section 3. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to Resolution
No. 4740.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective on July 1, 2004.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 28th of June, 2004.
~
City Recorder
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 4827
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT OF
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES FOR LOCAL WASTEWATER
SYSTEM, STORMWATER SYSTEM, AND TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM; SUPERSEDING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 58-04-04-F; AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23,2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740.
B. Resolution No. 4740 has subsequently been amended by Resolution Nos. 4748,
4767, 4768, 4770, 4794 and 4795. Resolution No. 4793 dated June 28, 2004, adopted the
MWMC Facilities Plan 20-year project list. In addition, inflationary adjustments of Systems
Development Charges for Local Wastewater System, Stormwater System, and Transportation
System were adopted by Administrative Order No. 58-04-04-F, effective April 5, 2004.
C. Based on the national 20-city average Construction Cost Index as published by
the Engineering News-Record, it is necessary to amend portions of the Systems Development
Charges by implementing a 6.5% inflationary increase for Local Wastewater System, the
Stormwater System, and the Transportation System. Section 2.4 of the SDC Methodologies
requires that revisions to fees by more than five percent shall be established by resolution of the
Council.
D. These inflationary adjustments to the Systems Development Charges are In
conformity with applicable state law, authorized by EC 7.710(5) and Section 2.4 of the
Methodologies, and should be implemented effective April 18, 2005.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. Portions of the Systems Development Charges are amended by implementing
a 6.5% inflationary increase to the Local Wastewater System, the Stormwater System, and the
Transportation System, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2. Administrative Order No. 58-04-04-F is superseded, and Resolution No. 4740
is amended as described in Section 1, as of the effective date of this Resolution.
Section 3. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to
Resolution No. 4740 and a copy (without its attachments) to Administrative Order 58-04-04-F.
Resolution No. 4827 - Page 1
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective on April 18, 2005.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 7th day of March, 2005.
11/lo ~..~^-
City Recor er
Resolution No. 4827 - Page 2
---
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF EUGENE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
of the
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Systems Development Charge
Methodologies
April1~ 2004
Superseding Administrative Order No. 58-04-04- F
and Amending Resolution No.4 7 40
The July 12, 2004 SDC Methodologies document remains in effect
except as amended by this document.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LOCAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
(See Appendix C-2 for information regarding the Regional Wastewater SDC)
Transportation Wastewater Local (City) Stormwater Parks
Cost per Trip = $1,452.30 Cost per new residential units (e.g., Total stormwater unit cost per sq.ft. Cost per Dwelling Unit =
single-family, mobile home parks, of impervious surface Area = $1,344.65
duplexes, apartments) = a base $0.158. Charges are based on use.
rate of $317.32 plus $0.0769 per 1-2 Family development under
square foot of living area. 3,000 sq.ft have tiered rates based
Residential additions will be on est. imp. surface areas. 1-2
III charged $0.0769 per square foot of Family over 3,000 sq.ft. and Multi-
S increased living area. Family & Nonresidential are based
l'CI
0:: Nonresidential uses = $2.4039 per on actual imp. surface area.
gallon of daily flow/discharge. Charges for Mfg. Home Parks are
based on est. imp. surface area
per space plus actual impervious
surface area of additional common
area.
Estimated costs of arterial/collector Estimated non-assessable cost of Estimated non-assessable cost of Unit costs for various components.
Street system (non assessable existing system using costs from system-wide capacity from future
III cost per lane-mile, costs of "Gravity Sewer Lines System capacity-enhancing projects as
'jjj intersections, traffic signals, street Valuation Model" developed by contained in the Storm water SDC
l'CI lights, structures) and off street CH2M Hill. Charges are net of all Project List and available existing
lD
... bicycle paths. federal grants and outstanding stormwater system capacity.
III
0 debt.
u
III Existing levels of service for Design flow standards currently Design standards currently used by Existing levels of service for
'tl various components as established used by the city for various land the City to handle a Five-year various components, as
~
l'CI by current City transportation use types. PFUs equivalents are storm. established in Eugene Parks &
'tl
c:: design standards. determined per Oregon adopted Recreation Plan.
S
en Plumbing Code.
QI
CJ
'~
QI
en
c:: Street Component: Reimbursement fee Reimbursement fee Improvement fee
~ QI ~ 40% Impr. Fee ~ 84% ~ 47%
l'CI Cl ~ 60% Reim. Fee
CJ la
q::.c Bike Component: Improvement fee Improvement fee
"jjj U
11I_ ~ 100% Impr. Fee ~ 16% ~ 53%
l'CI 0
[)
Charges for new or expanding New or expanding residential uses Charges for new (all) or expanding Charges are based on a flat rate
development are based on the cost are charged based on a per (Multi-family, Nonresidential) per dwelling unit for all types of
per trip times the trip rate assigned dwelling unit cost plus a rate per . development are based on residential development. There is
for a specific development type square foot of living area. Non- estimated or actual impervious no charge for commercial
c:: times the number of units of residential uses are charged based surface areas and the total development.
0 measurement proposed. on the number of PFUs at a rate stormwater unit cost per square
.,
J9 for the specific development type. foot. Stormwater impact not
c:: Credit for past trunk sewer levy attributable to impervious surface
QI
E payments will be applied to the area will be charged based on
QI
Q. local charge. equivalent surface area and the
.E total stormwater unit cost per
square foot.
Note: Administration costs are not included in the fiQures above, see section 2.3.1 for more information.
TABLE 5
Transportation System Development Charge Analysis
'"
~
<J.
~
w
C)
~
:J:
o
t-
Z
w
:&
D..
o
-oJ
~
W
c
:i
~
~
'"
z
o
~
t-
~
o
D..
'"
~
J!:
~ en ... N ~ Ie .. ... ~ :e
N . ... ...
en ... i a
i! ~ ~ ! ~ N
i
i
5
Q.
e
8
OJ
i
~
c:
0
<D ~
'" .2
N 'li
! [
'"
....
<D
co
co
co
co
~
N N .... N ; .. . ... ~ ...
... ... en ... en . ... ...
. ... ... ... ~ ,.: ,.:
. ! ~ ! l 1 ~
...
N
~
z
w
z
o .!!
r~
u Iii
gi
UI
:i';i
I!! 8
~ Ii OJ
U1.,. 'E
z =: cu
~ - !
~ t ~
~: ~
5; i 8
~:: ~u
j!::: OJ
..J" III
cJ. 5 !
10. Z .5
o
>-
~
:i
:i
::l
UI
OJ
'E
j
OJ
Q.
en
o
u
!
'jjj
~
(:.
OJ
'E
j
~
Q.
~
.c:
en
::
OJ
OJ
.
UI
...
0>
<D
I
~
ii
5
Q.
e
8
OJ
OJ
~
2
I
.2
'li
!
OIl
....
<D
co
co
co
co
g
OJ
'E
j
~
Q.
en
8
OJ
~
i
m
ii
o
011
OJ
.g'
'C
m
OJ
'E
j
~
;
8
!
OJ
OJ
t:
OJ
1
:;
5
c:
i
~
~;~
~B8.
~~~
~.. u
S E~;
; 1!E=
Do ~~~
8 i ~ ~
!~_ t;~!
:; ~li-
It j.[)(~ Do
~ ~'C'~ :
.. >5Cl) a..
~= ~.c:t; 8
:. ~~~ "
~:Q~ !
~ ~~.! .2
c: 'li
i i
~ ~
~
o
i
u
OJ
:S .!
~ !
8 ~
~ .
Q. UI
OJ ~
~ :
:s j!:
OJ ;
t ~
~ 0
o (J
i i
~ ~
TABLE 6
Local Wastewater System Development Charge Analysis
11. Analysis of System Value
Total Replacement Cost - Pipe
Total Replacement Cost - Pumpin Stations
Cit Cost of future pro'ects within UGB
Other Wastewater Components
$442,201,138
$16,880,988
$10,570,479
$3,464,930
12. Analysis of Assessable Amount
Size
6-inch
8 to 48-inch
Total Cost
$10,047,301
$334,334,053
14. Calculation of Wastewater SDC
Total S stem Valuation, existin and planned
Cost per unit of capacit per gallon
15. Calculation of Reimbursement Percentage
Cit S stem Capacit (EDUs) in mgd
Existing Use in mgd
Percent Available for New Development in mgd
Total Value of Reserve Ca acit (value of s stem
49.0
21.4
27.6
$66,160,201
100.00%
43.7%
56.3%
1F
1X
11
12A, B, &C
13
14
15
21
24
2X
3X
4X
41
51
54
55
59
5A
5B
5C
50
5E
5X
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
6A1
6A2
6A3
6B
6X
7X
TABLE 7
Local Wastewater Plumbing Fixture Unit Rates
services)
$317.32 + (Sq Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
$317.32 + (S Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
$317.32 + (Sq Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
$317.32 + (Sq Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
$317.32 + (S Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
$317.32 + (S Ft Livin Area x $0.0769)
19.05 $45.79
39.87 $95.84
47.93 $115.22
56.62 $136.11
58.65 $140.99
18.22 $43.80
7.75 $18.63
21.37 $51.37
55.46 $133.32
7.83 $18.82
39.91 $95.94
25.44 $61.16
62.47 $150.17
22.45 $53.97
54.98 $132.17
26.49 $63.68
12.35 $29.69
16.99 $40.84
28.51 $68.54
6.49 $15.60
16.17 $38.87
28.75 $69.11
13.69 $32.91
Based on specific use of development
15.66 $37.65
15.70 $37.74
538.96 $1,295.61
299.64 $720.30
36.30 $87.26
264.54 $635.93
67.76 $162.89
88.42 $212.55
24.79 $59.59
A rate per PFU may be assigned by the City Engineer should a proposed use not be represented by one of the published SOC use
codes and for which a default flow assignment is not representative of the proposed flow. In the case of those proposed developments
that are determined to have a potential for exceptional water usage, the City Engineer may require that the Owner(s) enter into an
agreement with the City to review water usage or wastewater discharge at such time the development is in full use or production as the
final basis of the local wastewater SOC. A complete list of wastewater SOC/HUO BPR use codes is provided in Table 8.
TABLE 9
Stormwater Drainage Systems Development Charge Analysis
11. Existing Stormwater Drainage System Value & SDC-Eligible Costs
Total Re lacement Cost - Existin
(Reimbursement Fee)1
$237,226,864
$67,809,958
12. Future Stormwater System SDC-Eligible Project Costs
13. Stormwater System Calculation Details
Sin e im ervious surface area
(building footprint ~ 1,000 sq. ft.)
Medium Residential (building footprint >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq.ft.)
Mfg. Home Park Space, estimated avera e impervious surface area
1,800 sq. ft.
2,900 s . ft.
1,780 sq. ft.
14. Calculation of SDC*
Unit Cost per Square Foot, Improvement Fee
Unit Cost per Square Foot, Reimbursement Fee
[$12,900,968 /155,770,560]
[$11,716,341/155,770,560]
$0.0828 (53%)
$0.0752 (47%)
Small Residential SDC
Medium Residential SDC
Small Duplex SDC
Medium Du lex SDC
(building footprint < 1,000 sq. ft.)
(building footprint >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.)
(unit building footprints < 1,000 sq. ft.)
[1,800 sq. ft. x $0.158]
[2,900 sq.ft x $0.158]
[$284.40 x 2]
[$458.20 x 2]
[1,684 sq. ft. x $0.158]
$284.40
$458.20
$568.80
$916.40
$266.07
(unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq.ft.)
ace ( ortion of total char e
*See Appendix F for complete rate schedule.
TAB L E 10
City of Eugene
2003 Stormwater SeC-Eligible Project List
Martin Drive Pipe Improvements (02-07 CIP)
Mt. Cavalry Pipe Improvements
Frederick Court Pipe Daylight
43rd Avenue Pipe Improvements
Morse Park Ranch Park Pipe Improvements
Laurelwood Flood Control F ae/Pipe Imps
Jackson Street Pipe Improvements
Windsor Circle Pipe Improvements
West Hawkins Lane Water Quality Facility
Bell Avenue (Increase Pipe Sizes Along)
Empire Park Pond Retrofit
Royal Node Stormwater Infrastructure
Greenhill Tributary Storm Improvements Ph 2
Greenhill Tributary Water Quality Facility
Roosevelt Channel - Culvert Improvement
-1 Main Channel Culvert & Open Waterway Improvements
Lynnbrook Drive Open Waterway & Culvery Improvements
Spring Creek Bridge Construction & Waterway Improvements
Sanders Street Water Quality Facility
Spring Creek Drive Water Quality Facility
Kirsten Street Pipe Improvements
Hunsacker - Open Channel Improvements (02-07 CIP)
Lenox/Salty - Culvert Replacement (02-07 CIP)
Hunsacker Culvert Replacement (02-07 CIP)
Division Avenue Tip-Up Pipe Replacement
Irvington Drive Water Quality Facility
St. Peter School Culvert Replacement
River Point Pond Outlet Channel
Gilham Road System Culvert Replacement
Gilham Road System Water Quality Facility
scot Park Open Waterway Modification
3rd-4th Connector Stormwater Improvements (02-07 CIP)
Beaver St & Hunsaker Ln Stormwater Improvements
Greenhill Rd Stormwater Improvements
Irvington Drive - Stormwater (02-07 CIP)
Kinney Park Flow Diversion & Restoration
River Road - Stormwater (02-07 CIP)
Royal Ave., Terry to Greenhill
Services for New Development ($100,000/year)
Streambank Stabilization ($ varies/year)
$103,304
$847,759
$131,407
$2,394,319
$1,171,334
$2,230,920
$85,975
$1,020,821
$694,580
$882,638
$427,656
$1,555,113
$415,437
$831,763
$150,957
$571,837
$535,847
$154,734
$830,097
$262,814
$425,434
$442,096
$191,057
$28,881
$12,108
$726,237
$60,650
$414,660
$29,991
$726,349
$80,200
$133,295
$55,540
$111,080
$111,080
$688,693
$55,540
$111,080
$3,776,703
$5,442,896
$103,304
$206,212
$60,447
$766,182
$128,847
$334,638
$21,494
$656,242
$562,279
$406,013
$85,531
$1,555,113
$141,626
$249,529
$47,671
$91,494
$160,754
$35,589
$41,505
$52,563
$123,376
$265,480
$114,412
$17,773
$2,785
$101,673
$18,195
$170,011
$29,991
$72,635
$52,932
$133,295
$55,540
$111 ,080
$111,080
$509,633
$55,540
$111,080
$3,776,703
$1,360,724
Appendix F
Local System Formulas & General Fee Schedule
1.0 Formula and Calculation Details
1.1 General Rate Setting, Cost of Service Formula
SDC eligible costs
= SDC per unit of service
Impact measurement
1.2 Transportation System Cost of Service consists of non-assessable arterial
and collector street system cost of service plus off-street bicycle cost of service.
1.2.1 Non-Assessable Arterial & Collector Street System Cost of Service
General Formula
Non-Assessable Cost per Lane Mile X Lane Miles per trip = Cost per trip
Calculation
Street System Cost per Trip
Reimbursement: $906,694 X (0.8888/675) = $1,193.88 = Cost per Trip
Improvement: $1,079,256 X (0.8888/675) = $1,421.10 = Cost per Trip
Total Allocated Cost per Trip = $1,193.88 (0.4) + $1,421.10 (0.6) = $1,330.21
1.2.2 Off-Street Bicycle path Cost of Service
General Formulas
Miles of bicycle paths
per person
X Cost per miles = Cost per person
Cost per person I Bicycle Paths
= Cost per trip
# of Trips per person
Calculations
Path Lighting +
Path Section
($14.18)
+
($95.09)
=
$109.27 (per person)
$109.27
= $122.09 (per trip)
0.895
1.3 Wastewater System Cost of Service:
1.3.1 Local Wastewater System Cost of Service
Determination of Flow Estimation Formula for Residential DeveloDment
Graphical comparison of water consumption per month to square foot of living area results in a
slope of 0.951 gallons per month per square foot and a base flow per dwelling unit of 3,946
gallons per month.
Gallons per Month
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000 *
3000
2000
1000
o
o
Total Area Living Space
D Projected
* Sam pled Actual Data
132 30
3,946 0.951 gal/mo/sq ft
$2.4039 0.032
$317.32 $2.4039
$0.0769
The implementation of this rate structure results in each new single family dwelling being
charged a local wastewater SDC that is comprised of a base rate of $317.32 plus an additional
charge of $0.0769 applied to the total proposed living space area of the dwelling.
Formulas for Non-Residential DeveloDment
Non-Assessable System Valuation
(Value of existina + Value of olanned)
Build-out capacity (mgd)
=
Cost per unit of capacity
Per unit of capacity X flow per PFU for development type X number of PFUs
fOF development = SDC for development
Calculations for Non-Residential DeveloDment
$107,220M + 10,570M
49.0 mgd
= $2.4039 per gallon per day
$2.4039 X Gallon per PFU (varies by development type) X
Number of PFUs = SDC for development
1.4 Stormwater System Cost of Service:
General Formulas
SDC eligible costs
=
Unit cost per square foot of
impervious surface area
Total additional impervious
surface area within UGB (sq. ft)
Reimbursement:
$11,716,341
=
$0.0752 per sq. ft.
impervious surface area
155,770,560 sq. ft.
Improvement:
$12,900,968
=
$0.0828 per sq. ft.
impervious surface area
155,770,560 sq. ft.
Total Unit Cost per Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface Area =
(Reimbursement + Improvement) = $0.0828 + $0.0752 =
$0.158
1.5 Parks System Cost of Service:
General Formula:
Cost per person X Persons per household = Cost per EDU
Calculation:
$584.63 X 2.3 = $1,344.65
(per EDU)
2.0 Adopted SDC Fee Schedule: Current Rates
2.1 Transportation System:
Cost per trip $1,452.30
2.2 Local Wastewater System:
Residential dwelling unit base fee $317.32
Residential dwelling unit total living area multiplication factor $0.0769
Non-Residential rate per gal/day per land use type per PFU Varies
2.3 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System:
Residential dwelling unit $947.34
Non-Residential rate per gal/day per land use type per FEU Varies
Unit Cost by Component
Average Daily Flow (per gallon) $0.449
Peak Wet Weather Flow (per gallon) $0.467
Biochemical'Oxygen Demand (per pound) $876.610
Suspended Solids (per pound) $665.753
2.4 Stormwater System:
Small Residential (building footprint ~ 1,000 sq. ft.) $284.40
Medium Residential (building footprint> 1,000 sq.ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $458.20
Small Duplex (unit building footprints ~ 1,000 sq. ft.) $568.80
Medium Duplex (unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $916.40
Manufactured Home Park
Per space (assumes 1,684 sq. ft. per space) $266.07
olus
Per sq. ft. actual impervious surface area, addt'1 common areas $0.158
All Other Development
Per sq.ft. actual impervious surface area and/or equivalent $0.158
2.5 Parks System:
Total charge per person $584.63
Total charge per Dwelling Unit (2.3 persons x $584.63) $1,344.65
2.6 Administration Fees:
City of Eugene if based on percentage 5.0%
City of Eugene if based on flat rate $60.00
MWMC per permit application $10.00
2.7 Appeal Fee: City of Eugene per SDC appeal $100.00
RESOLUTION NO. 4875
A RESOLUTION AMENDING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
METHODOLOGY FOR REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the Systems Development Charges (SDC)
Methodologies were adopted by Resolution No. 4740.
B. Resolution No. 4740 has subsequently been amended, most recently by
Resolution No. 4795, which adopted amended SDC rates for the Regional Wastewater System,
effective July 1, 2004. In addition, Systems Development Charges for Local Wastewater System,
Stormwater System, and Transportation System were adjusted for inflation by Administrative
Order No. 58-06-02-F, effective April 3, 2006.
C. At the recommendation of a consultant retained by the Metropolitan Wastewater
Management Commission (MWMC), MWMC has requested amendments to the way the
Methodology categorizes eating and drinking establishments for purposes of their use of the
Regional Wastewater System. The Council agrees with the recommendation, which is effected
in Appendix D of the attached Exhibit A.
D. In addition, the SDC Methodology provides for an SDC rate compnslng a
reimbursement fee (based upon capacity available for growth in existing systems) and an
improvement fee (based upon capacity available for growth in future projects). The MWMC
intended that charges resulting from the Methodology would be adjusted from time to time to
reflect inflation. Legal review of the MWMC SDC Methodology revealed that the method for
adjusting existing system costs for inflation was clearly stated, but the method for adjusting the
cost of future projects for inflation was not clearly stated. The proposed modification provides
that future project costs may be adjusted from time to time using the nationally recognized
Engineering News-Record national 20-City average Construction Cost Index (ENR 20-City
CCI), the same index that is to be used to adjust the value of existing systems for inflation.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charge Methodology for the Regional Wastewater
System is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
Section 2. Resolution No. 4740 is amended as described in Section 1 as of the effective
date of this Resolution.
Resolution - Page 1 of 2
. EXHIBIT A'
REVISIONS TO
. METROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT WASTEWATER. COMMISSION
REGIONAL WASTEWATER SDC METHODOLOGY
. Effective June 12, 2006
"
Contents
System Development Charge Methodology ............................ ................................................4
Introduction................................................................................. ~.......... ....... .................... 4
System Development Charge Methodol9GY ..............................~................................. 5
Overview.......................... .......... ................................................ ............................5
Methodology ElementOne: Determine Growth Capacity Needs ............... 7
Step One .CaJ?aci!Yrarameters~....... ~.... ............... ....... ....~.... ....... ~..... ......... 7
Step Two.. Growth Capacity Requirements ............................................. 9
Methodology Element Two: Develop Cost Basis ........................................... 9
Step 'One - System Valuation ....................................................................10
Step two - Existing System Allocation...................................:................ 10
Step Three - Project Cost Allocation .............................................~........... 12
Step Four - Adjustnl.ents ........................... .... .............. .............. ...... ....... ...... 15
Methodology Element Three: Develop SDC Schedule ................................ 15
Methodology Element Four: Calculate Revenue Offsets and Credits....... 16
Past Payments............................... ..... ......................................................... 16
Future Payments............... ....................... ............. .......... ......... ................... '17
Methodology Element Five: Periodic modification of existing sytem and
fu. ture project values ......................................... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 21
Appendixes
A System Component Definitions
B Capacity Parameter Allocation
C Growth Capacity Allocation Documentation
D User Capacity Requirements
E GO Bond Credit Calculation
Tables
1 Summary of Key Methodological Requirements ................................................................... 4
2 Example Calculation for Single (Average Flow) Capacity Parameter................................. 6
3 Summary of Facility Process Component Allocation to System Capacity Parameters .... 9
4 Existing System Available Capacity by Parameter .............................................................. 11
5 Summary of Proj~t Type Allocation Criteri~....................................................................... 14
6 Growth Allocation Percentages by Project Type .................................................................. 15
B-1 Design Criteria Basis For Unit Processes Driven By Peak Flow...................................... B 22
C-l Capacity Summary of MWMC Liquids Facilities..............................................................C 27
- C-2 Projected 2025 Peak Flow Breakdown .............................................................:........~.........C 28
C-3 Capacity Summary of MWMC Biosolids Facilities (annual average dry tons per
year) ............................ ......... ......... .............. ................ ...... .................. .................... ............ ...... C 29
E-1 GO Bond Credit per $1,000 Assessed Value By Annexation Year ...............;.................. E 34
.I
System Development Charge Mtrthodology
Introduction
This document serves as the system development charge (SDC) methodology for the
Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) Regional Wastewater
. System. The MWMC is the .regional wastewater treatment agency for the Eugene-
Springfield metropolitan area. System development charges may be collected from all
development that connects to the Regional Wastewater System, including development that
changes the use of existing development, when the change of use results in a greater impact
on the system.
The methodology contained in this document was developed in accordance with Oregon
SDC legislation (ORS 223.297-223.314), and with the guidance of a Citizen Advisory
Committee (CAq appointed by MWMC. Table 1 provides a comparison of key
methodological requirements from the Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) to elements of the
MWMC methodology.
(
TABLE 1
Summary of Key Methodological Requirements.
Oregon Law Requirement
Reimbursement Fee
Determine that existing capacity exists
Methodology based on, when applicable:
(a) Rate-making principles employed to finance
publicly-owned capital improvements
(b) Prior contributions by existing users
(c) Gift or grants
(d) Value of unused capacity or cost of existing
facilities
(e) Other relevant factors
Promote objective of future. system users
contributing no more than an equitable share of
existing system costs
MWMC Methodology
Explicitly caiculates the portion of existing capacity available to
new users based on rated design capacities.
Methodology;includes:
(a) Consideration of capital financing costs
(b) Adjustment for grant-funded facilities
(c) Valuation ba~d on appreciated cost (i.e., adjusted for
inflation)
(d) Determination of unused capacity
(1) Includes a credit against SDCs for properties subject to
past general obligation bond debt service cha~es through
property tax payn:lents.
(2) Provides guidance to calculate a credit against SDCs for
future estimated user charge payments used to fund capital
inc1uded_ on the SDC project list.
Improvement Fee
Methodology demonstrates consideration of
'projected costs of capital improvements identified
in an adopted plan or list
Provides a structured process for allocation of capital project
costs that is to ge applied to an adopted project list
The reimbursement fee is based on the value of available capacity in the system that will
serve growth. The. improvement fee is based .on future facility costs associated with
providin.g growth' s additio~al capacity needs (above what is already available in the
system). Together, the reimbursement and improvement fees recover costs equal to
growth's capacity needs. .
Existing system available capacity and future improvement costs needed to expand capacity
for growth are distributed to capacity parameters (average flow"peak flow, biochemical
oxygen de~d [BOD], and total suspended solids [TSS]), and spread over the total growth
units projected,fer the period to determine weighted average rei1nbursementand
itnprovement unit costs. The SDes for individual developments are then determined by
applying the unit costs (by fee element and capacity parameter) to the individual
development estimated capacity requirements, and summing the results. The total SDC for
each development is then reduced by any applicable credits for past and future capital
payments.
Table 2 provides an example calculation for 'a single capacity parameter. The numbers
included in the table are intended. to illustrate the methodology only (when applied to the
single capacity parameter of average, flow); the numbers do not represent MWMC planning
criteria or cost data. Furthermore, the total SDC would include similar calculations for other
capacity parameters. (i.e., peak flow, BOD, and TSS). In the example provided, total system
capacity needs at the end of the planning period are 60 million gallons per day (mgd).
Existing users are estimated to require 45 mgd (90 percent) of existing capacity, leaving
5 mgd. (10 percent) available for growth. However, growth's total needs are 15 mgd,
meaning that additional investment will be r~quired to expand system capacity by 10 mgd.
TABLE 2
Example Calculation for Single (Average Flow) Capacity Parameter*
60
45
15
Existing Future
System Expansion
50 10
45 0
5 10
10% 100%
$50,000,000 $12,000,000
$5,000,000 $12,000,000
$333,333 - $800,000
0.00035 0.00035
$116.67 $280.00
Element
Determine Capacity Needs
System wide Capacity (mgd)
Existing Users (mgd)
Growth (mgd)
Total
Determine Cost Basis Needs
System wide Cost
Growth Cost
Determine SDC Schedule
Weighted Average Unit Cost ($/mgd),
User Capacity Requirement (mgd)
Total SDC
$17,000,000
$1,133,333
0.00035
$396.67
*Example only; not MWMC specific
. Average flow
. Peak flow
. BOD
. TSS
These parameters are defined as follows:
· Average Flow -The. average daily flow in the dry'season as defined in the National
Pollution Discharge E1i.m41ation System (NPDES) permit. Because the NPDES permit
requires the Eugene-Springfield Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) to meet permit
discharge limits on a monthly basis, the average flow is presented in terms of dry season
maximum month values when discussing "capacity./I, The dry season maximum month
. flow includes base flow (customer flow) and the baseline or dry season infiltration and
inflow (Ill).
· Peak Flow - The peak hour flow in the wet season associated with the 5-year, 24-hour
storm event. Peak flow includes average flow and the additional increment of wet
weather Ill.
· Biochemical Oxygen Demand - The quantity of oxygen used in the biochemical
oxidation of organic matter in a specified time and at a specified temperature. BOD is a
measurement of wastewater s'trength. .
· Total Suspended Solids-Solids in the wastewater that are removable by laboratory
filtering and approximate the quantity of solids that are available to be removed from
the wastewater through sedimentation. TSS is a measurement of wastewater strength.
Table 3 provides the allocations of existing and future facility process components to the
system capacity parameters: average flow, peak flow, BOD, and TSS. A description of
process components is provided in Appendlx A. The rationale for the allocation percentages
is provided in AppendixB. These allocations are used to determine the projected costs of
capacity to be used by new development that establish the reimbursement f~e and
improvement fee cost bases. The underlying approach is to evaluate the following criteria
for each facility process component:
· Functional performance
· Design basis
The functional p.erformance criterion considers the actual purpose of the facility on a daily
basis. Is the purpose of the facility to remove BOD or TSS from the wastewater? Or is the
purpose of the facility to simply pass the flow (average andlor peak) and remove some
other parameter not represented by BOD or TSS such as screenings, grit, or pathogens?
"These questions are answered by the functional performance component. The design basis
considers what systepl capacity parameter or combination of parameters drives the sizing of
the facility and, therefore, the constructed cost. The allocation basis for each facility
component presented in Table 3 combines both the functional performance and design basis
considerations. In addition to these system parameters, because there can be projects that -
provide overall support for the wastewater system, a separate category of "indirect",
support facilities is used to provide for reallocation of these support-type costs across all of
the system capacity parameters.
· Project Cost V aluation(Improvemeilt Fee) The method for valuing future projects.
· Project Cost Allocation (Improvement Fee) - The method for allocating future projects
to growth.
· Adjustments - Deductions or additions to the cost basis to recognize past or future
capital funding methods.
Each issue is discussed below.
,(
Step One. Existing System Valuation
Calculation of the reimbursement fee begins with a review of MWMC's fixed asset records
to determine the value of the existing system. The system is valued based on'the inflation
adjusted original cost approach. Under this approach, the original cost of existing system
assets is adjusted by the Engineering News-Record natioll.al20-city average Construction Cost
, Index from the time of construction to estimate current values. The inflation adjusted cost
approach recognizes appreciation in the system since assets were constructed and assumes
that the wastewater system is maintained in perpetuity.
Step Two. Existing System Allocation
The' existing system allocation methodology, for use in determining the reimbursement fee
cost basis, is a three-step allocation process1 comprised of the following steps, as illustrated
in Figure 2:
R-l. Allocate existing facility costs to facility process components (e.g., primary treatment,
secondary treatment).
R-2. Allocate costs by component to system capacity parameters (e.g., average flow, peak
flow). '
R-3~ Allocate costs to growth based on estimated available capacity by service parameter.
The allocation of existing facility costs to facility process components is fairly straight-
forward; as most projects relate directly to an iridividual component (e.g., secondary
clarifiers are a part of secondary treatment), or support the entire treatment system (e.g.,
, control systems). Existing facility costs (valued in terms of inflation-adjusted costs) by
process component are then allocated to capacity parameters based on the allocation
fractions in Table 3.
The final step in the allocation process is to multiply the costs by capacity parameter by the
percent of capacity available by paraineter. To determine the available capacity for a
parameter, the amount of capacity thatis currently being used (or required for existing
users) is subtracted from the current rated capacity. If the current capacity requirement is
equal to or greater than the existing capacity, then there is no available capacity, and none of
the costs related to that parameter is included in the reimbursement fee cost basis. Table 4
shows existing system available capacity by paraineter based on system planning criteria.
'The documentation for these figures is provided in Appendix C.
Step Three - Project Valuation
CaICl.11ation of the improvement fee begins with a review of MWMC's adopted 20- Year ~
Project List to determine the value of future projects. Future proj~<;ts ~~ valueq. based on the
inflation adjusted original cost estinUite approach. Under this approach, the original
estiinated cost of future projects is ~djusted by the Engineering News-Record national20-city
average construction Cost Index from the. tiine of the original estimate to estimate current
values. The infltttion i.\djusted.origin~.cost estinult-eappl'Qach recognizes inflation since the
original estimate.. -
:Step Four · Project CostAUocation
The projectcostaIlbCation methodology, for :Use in detertili1Urigthe improvement fee cost
basis, is a four~step allqcation process consisting of the fQU9wingsteps:
1-1. Allocate project costs to facility prOcess componeRts(e.g., primary treatment, secondary
treatment).
1-2. Allocate costs by components to system capacity parameters (e~g., average flow, peak
flow). -
1..;3. Allocate project costs to type (capadty-improvement, perforInance ~pgrade, qr
rehabilitation).
1-4. Allocate costs to user type (existing customers or projected growth).
The project cost allocation methodology provides an equitable basis for determining.the
projects or-portions of projects that are related to growth capacity needs and are, thereby,
included in the improvement fee portion of the SDC calculation. The methodology is not
tied to a specific list of projects intended to be funded by SDCs (20-year project list), but is
intended to provide a consistent framework for allocation of ~ture projects to growth.
Each stepof the methodology is described below. The general allocation process is also
presented graphically in Figure 3.
FIGURE 3-PROJECT COST ALLCOA TION
2. Performance Improvements -Projects that increase system capaCity by inCreasing the"
level of performance provided by facilities. Unlike I capacity' projects that relate only to
the next. increment of capacity, performance upgrades are generally sized based on total
projected capacity needs at the end of the planning period (existing and future).
3. " Rehabilitation - Projects designed to remedy an existing system deficiency and do "not
enhance system capacity.
Capacity arid" performance upgrade projects can be new facilities, or upgrade/ expansion of
existmg facilities. Rehabilitation projects are the replacement of outdated. or worn out
" "equipment or facilities.
The inajorityof the projects will typically fall completely into one project type. However,
some projects may be split between capacity and performance types. The general criteria for
allocating projects to the above categorie.s are shown in Table 5. These criteria should be
applied in the" d~velopment of specific projects for inclusion in the appropriate planning
do<:ument or project list and should be considered and evaluated as part of the process of
adoption of such a plan or project list.
TABLE 5
Summary of Project Type Allocation Criteria
Project Type
Capacity
Potential Criteria
A<;tds new facllitiesfexpands existing facilities
Provides new liquids treatment or biosolids capacity beyond existing
system d~sign standard or beyond the current permitted capaCity
Adds new facilitieslimproves existing facilities
Provides capacityfenhanced capability sized for total future capacity
needs
Driven by new regulatory requirement
Driven by increase in community performance standard
Technological efficiencies
Replaces existing facility or portion of facility
Does not serve growth either through existing available or new "
capacity
Preserves existing facility performance/capacity
Performance Improvements
Rehabilitation
Once project costs have been allocated to system component and project type categories,
and the costs have been distributed to the system capacity parameters, the final step in the
project cost allocation process is to assign costs to user types. For the purposes of the SDC
methodology, there are two user types: 1) existing customers, and 2). new customers or
growth. Costs that are allocated to growth are incorporated into the SDC improvement fee
calculation. Costs allocated to existing customers must be paid through some- other fuilding
sources (e.g., existing reserVes or future user rates).
As irtdicated in Figure 3, the allocation of project costs to growth is a function of the type of
project and a detailed capacity analysis that identifies growth's share of: 1) planned capacity
expansion, and 2) total future load.
FIGURE 4-SDC SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT
Using industry reference da,ta for. charging SDCs is-consistent With the approach MWMC
has previously used to charge.SOCs. This type of approach uses flow ari4 strength
assumptions that are consistent with the system capacity parameters described previously.
For example, average flow is defined as dry season maximum month flow. This capacity
measure is used in estimating user capacity requirements. The peak-to-average flow ratio.
reflects the system planning assumptions. The flow and ~trength as~umptions for various
land uses (developm~nt types) are presented in. Appendix .D. H information for a pamcular
. development is not fotitld in AppendiX D, the SDC Will be formulated USing average data of
like or similar development as determined by the City Engfueer.
Unit Costs
x
x
x
x
Capacity.
Requirement j
SDCjUnit
-
-
Methodology Element Four: Calculate Revenue Offsets and. Credits
To comply with Oregon SDC law, the SDC methodology must ensure that~ture system users
contribute no more than an 1/ equitable share" of the capital costs of existing facilities. Before
real property is developed, it may have been subject to taxes that supported capital funding of
some of the Regional Wastewater System. After a development ~onnects to the system, it will
pay rates and, possibly taxes as well, that may also support some level of capital funding. The
SDC methodology therefore considers past and future payments to be made by new
developments, which may partially fund the same facilities for which the SDCs were paid.
Past Payments
A portion of MWMC's existing facility costs were funded through general obligation (GO)
bonds. The debt service on the bonds was retired through property taxes. Undeveloped land
in the cities of Eugene and Springfield was' subject to property taxes, and thereforaa GO
bond credit is included in the methodology..The credit is equal to the present value of past
payments on bond principal, expressed in dollars per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The
credit shall accrue from the year of annexation, and be b~sed upon the assessed value of the
real property at the time of application for connection to the system.
M'ethodology Element Five: Periodi,c 'modifi'cation of existing system and future
,'proJect values
The yalue of existing available capacity and future available capacity may be adjusted from
time to time as 'stated in Methodology Element Two: Step One and Step Three.
APPENDIX A
. System Component Definitions
The below facility process components were selected because they represent existing
distinct processes/ c6mponents,as well as new processes/components anticipated in the
future (e.g., tertiary filters and effluent reuse). These facility components also relate
differently to system capacity parameters (discussed in Methodology Element Two), so the
initial allocation of project costs to facility components facilitates the next step of allocating
costs to capacity parameters, and ultimately to user type. As regulatory requirements
change in the future, MWMC should re.view the facility component categories, and update
as appropriate.
Collection System Pipeline - The pipelines owned and operated by MWMC that collect
sewage from individual customers and deliver it to the treatmentplant.
Collection System Pump Stations - MWMC pump stations that impart energy into the
wastewater so that it flows through the collection system pipes or is lifted to a higher
elevation. The influent screw pumps at the Eugene/ Springfield Water Pollution Control
Facility (WPCF) are included in this component.
Preliminary Treatment-Screenings and grit removal facilities. Preliminary treatment
facilities are sometimes referred to as headworks facilities because they are located at the
front or head end of treatment plants.
Primary Treatment - The sedimentation process intended to remove suspended solids from
the wastewater. This component includes the primary secli.m.entation settIingtanks and
associated pumping systems for material that is removed from the top (scum/ skimmings)
and bottom (primary sludge) of the settling tanks.
Secondary Treatment - A biological process to remove the soluble and colloidal organic
matter that remains after primary treatment. Facilities typically include aeration basins and
the associated blowers that provide ~ to the basins, and secondary clarification settling
tanks and the associated pumping facilities that transport the settled biological sludge to
subsequent bioSCilids processing facilities.
DisinfectionjOutfall- Process elements at the downstream end of the treatment process.
Disinfection kills or inactivates remaining pathogens contained in the treated wastewater,
and the outfall conveys the treated wastewater to the Willamette River where it can be
distributed through a diffuser in an environmentally sound m.anner.
Biosolids - Management and disposal of the organic and inorganic suspended solids th~t
have been removed from the wastewater through the treattnent processes. This facility
component is divided into three subcomponents because of differences in available and
future required capacity. The three subcomponents are as follows:
· General- The general subcomponent consists of biosolids thickening and anaerobic
digestion at the WPCF; the biosolids pump station/force main system that conveys
APPENDIX B
. Capacity Parameter Alloc~tfonBasis
System Capacity Parameters . are based. on permitting requirements. Facility process
components. (defined in Appendix A) are allocated to each of the system capacity
p~ameters, as described below.
Collection System Pi.p.ellnes
This category consists of major gravity sewer pipelines and force mains (pressure lines) that
convey flow for the regional wastewater collection system. Since the pJ:'imary function of the
pipelines is to convey flow, the allocation is assigned to either average or peak flow and
none to ~astewater strength parameters (i.e., BOD and 1'55). The majority of the time the
conveyance system is ca,rrying average flows. However, . the limiting design criteria when
. sizing pipelines is based on peak flows.
An assessment of the wet season III, which is the key driver in determining the peak flows,
can be used as a guide in determining the average I peak ap.ocation breakdown. Table B-1
presents the wet season II I as a percentage of total peak flow for existing capacity, current
loading, and future required capacity.
TABLE B-1
Design Criteria Basis For Unit Processes Driven By Peak Flow
Average Wet Weather If I as a
Flow Wet Weather If I Total Peak Flow Percentage of Total Peak
( rilgd) (mgd) (mgd) 'Plow, %
Existing capacity 49 126 175 72%
Current loading (current 43.8 220.2 264 83%
capacity required)
Projected 2025 loading 59.3 218.78 277 79%
(future capacity required)
~~ .
a) Net reduction in total III occurs between now and 2025 as a result of t/l.reduction efforts by the cities.
The range of wet weather III as a percentage of total peak flow for these three scenarios
ranges from 72 to 84 percent. The arithmetic average of these three values is 78 percent.
TherefQre, a reasonable approach is to allocate a quarter to f~ctional use basis, or average
flow; and three quarters to the design criteria sizing basis, or peak flow.
· AverageFlow-1/4
· Peak Flow - 3/4
'Secondary Treatment
SecondarY treatment consists of two trains ~f aeration basins, eight secondary clarifiers,. and
the associated blowers and pUmps that function to treat and remove organic loading (BOD)
'and to a lesser extent 1$5 from the wastewater. On a functional basis, secondary .treatment
is regarded as . removing roughly twice as much BOD relative to TSS.
. For the design criteria basis, typical secondary treatment sizing is governed .by both average
and peak flow, but for MWMC, where the parallel primary 1 secondary approach (or high-
rate clarification approach as a second choice) is proposed for peak flow.manag.ementi the
peak flows will be split between primary treatment and secondary treatment. Therefore,
only average flow is considered in the cost allocation.
Combining the functional basis with the design criteria basis; the followinga1locatio~ is for
secondary treatment: .
· .Average Flow-1/4
. BOD-1/2
· 1'55-114
Disinfection/Outfall
Following secondary treatment, the wastewater is disinfected (chlorinated and
dechlorinated) and discharged to the Willamette River through an outfall pipe. Both the
function and sizing of these facilities are entirely based on flow. The relationship between
the functional basis and design criteria is identical to that for the collection system facilities
and, therefore, the f~llowing allocation is for disinfec.tion/outfall:
· Average Flow-1/4
· Peak Flow - 3/4
Biosolids
Biosolids are a byproduct of wastewater treatment and are produced during the primary
treatment,. secondary treatment, and to a lesser degree tertiary treatment processes. The
three subcomponents used to alloc~te biosolids treatment, handling, and disposall reuse
costs for purposes of SDC calculations are:
. General'
· Dewatering
· Biocycle Farm
The definitionS of these subcomponents are presented in Appendix C, Growth Capacity
Allocation Documentation. The three subcomponents were developed for the SDC update
because of the differing available capacities and growth percentages associated with
facilities in the subcomponents. However, iri terms of allocating the facility components to
the wastewater parameters, the methodology is identical- independent of which
subcomponent is being considered.
A-24
flows. AlSo, there are facilities such'as the dry weather headworks where a portion of their
function or design criteria siZing is based on peak flow~ .
The peak flow management category is allocated entirely to peak flow, as both the ongoing
function and the sizing design criteria sizing are based solely on peak flow~
· Peak Flow - 100 percent
Support Facilities (Indirects) . .
The support, facilities or indfred category captures certain types of treatment plaJ;lt facilities
.that serve multiple functions, sucll as the iaboratory, land acquisition, and instrumentation
CU1d control systems. Costs of these types of facilities. are allocated across the other
11 components in proportion ,to the weighted average all~ation percentages. For the
reimbursement fee, the weighted average reflects the direct al1ocati~n of existing asset costs
to the 11 facility components. For the unprovetrient fee, the weighted average reflects the
allocation of the 20-year project list to the 11 facility'components.
. Support facilities allocated proportionally to.the other 11 facility components.
A-26
Current. average flow (presented as DSMM) = ((129 x 217,737 x 1.5)/1,000,000) + 1. 7i = 43.8
'Where:
129 is the average gallons per capita per day (gpcd) of the dry season values from
1990 to 2002
217,737 is the population served in 2002
1.5 is the selected pea1dng factor to convert average dry season flow to maximum
month dry season flow (based on 1990 to 2002 data) .
l?i is the current industrial flow in mgd
The available capacity in terms of average flow is 5.2 mgd (49 - 43.8).
The projected 2025 average flow is determined as follows:
Projected 2025 average flow (presented DSMM) = ((129 x 297,585 x 1.5)/1,000,000) + 1. 7 =
59.3 mgd .
Where:
129 is the average gpcd of the dry season values from 1990 to 2002
297,585 is the projected population to be served in 2025
1.5 is the selected peaking factor to convert average dry season flow to maximum
month dry season flow (based on 1990 to 2002 data)
1.7 is the projected industrial flow in mgd (it has been assumed that the
industrial flow will remain constant over the study period)
The. total required capacity to meet the needs of growth in terms of average flow is 15.5 mgd
(59.3 - 43.8)4
Peak Flow
A summary of the peak flow breakdown is presented in Table C-2. The existing capacity in
terms of peak flow is not defined in the NPDES permit, but the plant was originally
designed for a peakflow of 175 mgd, and therefore that is defined as the existing capacity.
MWMC does not currently have the collection and treatment capabilities to accommodate
the existing peak flow (which is greater than 175 mgd), and therefore the current peak flow
loading (required capacity) cannot be explicitly measured at the WPCF. Using a computer
model of the collection system MWMC is able to estimate the current peak flow. DEQ
defines the peak flow as the peak hour or peak instantaneous flow that occurs durmg the
5-year, 24-hourstorm (3.9 inches of rainfall). Under these rainfall conditions, the model
prediCts a current flow of 264 mgd. Therefore, there is no av:ailable capacity in terms of peak
flow. Since the current average flow is 43.8 mgd, the current wet season III is 220.2 mgd
(264 less 43.8).
Using the 'projected future 2025 population and land use, the model predicts peak flows of
294 mgd without III reduction efforts outlined in the 2000 WWFMP and 277 mgd with 1/1
A-28
The projected 2025 average load is determined as follows:
Projected 2025 BOD = (0.185 x 297,585 x 1.3) + 2,402 = 74,000 mgd (actual calculated value of
73,9711001 day roUnded to the nearest hundred pounds)
Where:
0.185 is the selected pounds per capita per day (Ppcd) based on dry season
values from 1990 to 2002 .. .
- 297,5851s the p~ojected population to be served in: 2025.
1.3 is the selected peaking to convert average dry season load to D5MM load
(based on 1990 to 2002 data)
2,402 is the projected industrial flow in lbsj day (it has been assumed that the
industrial load will remain constant over the study period)
The required capacity to meet the needs of growth in terms of BOD is 19,200 lbsj day
. (74,000 - 54,8(0).
TSS
The methodology for TSS is identical to that of BOD. The existing capacity, although not
explicitly stated in the current NPDES permit, is 71,600 lbsj day, which was the value used
for the origirial WPCF design. The current loading orcurren~!,equired, presented in D5MM
terms, is 64,700lbsj day and is determined as follows:
Current 1'55 = (0.205 x217,737 x 1.4) + 2,224 = 64,700 lbsj day (actual calculated value of
64,715 lbs j day rounded to the nearest hundred pounds) .
Where:
0.205 is the selected pounds per capita per day (Ppcd) based on dry season
values from 1990 to 2002
217,737is the population served in 2002
1.4 is the selected peaking to convert average dry season flow to' maximum
month dry season flow (based on 1990 to 2002 data)
2,224 is the current industrial TSSloadin lbsjday
The available capacity in terms of 1'55 is 6,900 lbsj day (71,600 - 64,700).
The projected 2025 average TSS is determined as follows:
Projected 2025TSS= (0.205 * 297,585* 1.4) + 2,224 = 87,600 mgd (actual calculated value of
87,6311bsj day) rounded to the nearest hundred pounds)
Where:
0.205 is the selected pounds per capita per day (ppcd) based on dry season
values from 1990 to 2002
297,585 is the projected population to be served in 2025
A-30
:s .:~ I ~ ~.~ ~.~.~~ "... E .... It) i'~ (') .... I ~. '~:'.~ '~n ~.~ - .... ':'it" ~ - .... .... It) II) ~ ~ ~
t:: t:: 8; . c>> u; 18 ~ 8. ~ ,... t:: t:: ~ .~
q "'.l d
0 00 o 000 (').0'0 0 0 0 o'C'i 1'50.0 ~ '0 cf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0 o.
:s '~8 cofS18';G I'~ .~. ~d"'" ~~ C>>C>>(') i 'I. ~ ~~ ~. ~. ~ ".... ~ it .~ ~ - .... ~ It) l8 ~ 8
q ~ .'~ l'f .C\f t'f . .. ~ ~.~ ~ ~ !~u; 8 c;:t. ~....... t::t:: ~. C!
0 o 0 0 0 (;) 0 (f),.O .0 0 0 00 cQ~ci ci (') 0 o 0 0 0'0 ci o. ci.ci o. ci ci 0 0 00
.c .c ,.c. ,.c. E
~ ! ! ! ~.~ f~ ~ ! ! ~~~~ .9) ~:'~
! ! ~ x ! ~ ~:. ~. ~ ~ ~ ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !
..J..J ~ ..J ..J ..J ~. .~ ..J ;...I f ..J ..:J..Ji..J..J ..J ..J
> >~ :i
0 ~.~ ~ ~ .,~ "~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~..~ ~.~ 8 ~ ~ ~. ~ g'~ ..~ !. ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ (;)
~ ..... (f)"..._ "... - ~ .....- ... ~ ~
m ~&~Q~al~~~~.3~~S~ ! c>> c>>mc>>cococ>>
~ -"...,... ID ID It) ~ ,... (') (')(').(') .... ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~. .,~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I~ ~ !! ~ m
N
~
~ ~ m.~ .t:;t:; 'le ~ it) 8:g;~g~l!? ~."S;
......"...C')CO)C')CO)~~~NNN_~~COCO
4)
00 .V) It) II) ID N N
~.'~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.~ ~ mm...
~,:~CW)t")<D
l!2
~
~
co
CD
~~~~~~ls~saa~ii~l
-
.....
~~aaa~l8
C')
co
Q)
~~~~~.
II)
ID
Q)
~
Q)C])
~~
N
~
NN
~~
00
~
coco
co co
0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~.~ 8 gggg ~ .~.~ 0 00 Cl> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (;) .0 0 0 0 0 0 :g 0 0 0
It) It) 00 :0 g~ 0 ~ It) 0 It) co co CO) (') ~ - ~ ~ ~ It) 10 II) It)
- .... - "... \I) ~ ......,.......... It) It) \I) - .... ....
LL LL u...u.. u.. J.L. Ii.. . u.. LL u.. u.. u.. LL'LL.LL 11. u.. u.. u.. ~ LLLL u.. LL LL LL j;L. LLLL LL u.. u.. LL u.. .f.L LL LL
en (I) ~.:.~ UJ .'(1).. (I) ..0 .en en. en (/). (/) ~'(I) g,(I),~ CI) en en en en ~.~ ~: fL~ ~. r5 en en ~ en en (/)
(!) ~ f!! f!!~ ~ ~ ~. ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.... ........ ....~~~.... ... ... F-'~ .... i
~
o
'il= 8
o
II-
lh ~
0::: :::;
Q. 8 ~
8 f2 ~
!z u..;j ::l
~ Iii ~ i.~ tf
1= ~ w!z en 0 ~ z:i m
~. ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ !z t ~ '~E
0::: Z,. - ~ ~ :> . =' ~ ~ j5 ~ ~
~ ~'.'~. '~" 5. i~.,. ~ ~':"'~. ~,',~~~L. .~z
~ ~.~. 0 5 ~ ~ ~ffi It. f3 0 ~o:O ii:0 W
W >. ~.~ ~ ~. ~8 ig ~ ~~: ~~ 0::: .~~ ~~'IF ~ F!I'" ~.
~O a::. wO t::. z. o. u.. ~ W W 0:::. fI> ..J,. 0 -. _ ',' .0
c( .... 5. Q. U5 - 0 Z W 0 - Z ~lL x:
~ 0:: ~ It ~o:::~ ~. ~.tE (;) ~ Q. ~ <i. 6 I=~W !:lli ~
o ~. Ii. ~ X ~ d 11-' ~ 0 ffi 0 ~ 0::: ax i:i ~ g: ~ g: <
Iii
x:
0:::.... lU
ffi' ~ .~Q::
~ 'E ~ I '~
en W'$Z W
0::: l~ ~ ~!z 0:::
~ ;:t> ffU~ 5 E
~~~Q.~g ~
ZOi=~o'o ~
ffi E
~ ..J
<( !i
Ii: oou..* * *
~ ~~~;t<i. ~
ffi ~~~~~ ~
ffi~~~~~~ .~
FE' . ffi~~.~
o~ ~ ~ 9 ): ~ '~i.
w E (;) (;) ~.~ ~
Ov~::l::l....enen
~~~~<55 ~
~<>->-filzz ~
<3 it! iE Ck: ~~ ~
~~~~~~i:i".~
s: ii: irl irl 8 x x;:r
~
~ m' ~ 18 l8, ,18 ~ ~ to to to to m 18 ~
<b 18 m 18 ~ ~. ~ ~
~<O~~~N~ ~ ~~
,.. .. ....
o
It)
oi~ I Q) Q c>> ~ <>> Q) Q) Q) 'c>>
N .'" .... ... It) \I) \I) II)
~; ~,;1;.' ,. , .~ ~ f9 19 ~~I ~ ~
~~~m_~~~18~~~~~~1818
~~ ~ lB lB 18 00 to to to to fB
~
It)
~ g g 8l ; ~~ .'~'~' g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~~t g 8l
!i ~ ~ ~ ~. ~.. ~.~~~ ~! ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~)\i ~ ~
..- co .... U) ,... ..... ..... ..... ~ ..-"- ... ..- .... ~ ,... ..... s:.i ~ .8 N ...... _
<b 18 18~ ~ fti18 ~H8 ~<O ~ ~ ~N N~L~ ~ ~
It)
18
m ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~,' ~ ,~ 2 &i ~
\I)
l3
~
~~!!:5u;~
coco to co coco
o
Q)
co
:g g ~ f;j. fZ .~ ~_ ON....
co Q) N N. N _ ....
~
..J
<
en
w
..J
o
:J:
* ;:
..J::=1
<<
~~
0en
55
zz
~~
.~ ~
fl>en
55
~~
~~
xx
~ ~
. APPENDIXE
GO Bond Credit Calculation
TABLE E-1
GO Bond Credit per $1,000 Assessed Value By Annexation Year
Year of Annexation
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
t993
1994
1"995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
by Year
$0.09
$0.07
$0.14
$0.18
$0.17
$0.22
$0.33
$0.40
$0.45
$0.49
$0.48
$0.45
$0.21
$0.15
$0.19
$0.17
$0.16
$0.20
$0.24
$0.20
$0.19
$0.05
$0.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Cumulative Credit (per $1,000 AV)
. $5.29
$5.19
"$5.12
$4.98
$4.80
$4.63
$4.40
$4.07
$3.67
$3.22
$2.73
$2.25
$1.80
$1.59
$1.45
$1.25
$1.09
$0.92
$0.72
$0.48
$0.28
$0.09
"$0.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
.
* Properties annexed subsequent to debt retirement (2001) not eligible for credit.
RESOLUTION NO. 4876
A RESOLUTION AMENDING LOCAL STORMW ATER SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY CONCERNING
CREDITS; AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4740.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23,2002, the System Development Charges (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No.4 7 40.
B. Resolution No. 4740 has subsequently been amended, most recently by
Resolution No. 4795, which adopted amended SDC rates for the Regional Wastewater"System,
effective July 1, 2004. In addition, Systems Development Charges for Local Wastewater System,
Stormwater System, and Transportation System were adjusted for inflation by Administrative
Order No. 58-06-02-F, effective April 3, 2006.
C. After comprehensive review of the Stormwater SDC Methodology, and due to the
pending adoption of stormwater standards, a recommendation was made to adopt a water quality
credit. Implementation of stormwater quality SDC credits is related to adoption of stormwater
development standards which require water quality treatment at sites of new development.
Stormwater quality credits for SDCs are based on a public system benefit from development
treating stormwater quality through privately constructed and maintained facilities and effective
impervious area reduction techniques. Developments utilizing private means for water quality
treatment can reduce the demand for downstream public facilities for water quality treatment.
Establishing stormwater quality SDC credits provides a general recognition of reduced demand
and provides a modest incentive for m'eeting and exceed.ing minimum water quality treatment
requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The excerpted Eugene Systems Development Charge Methodologies
document concerning stormwater quality credits attached as Exhibit A is adopted.
Section 2. Resolution No. 4740 is amended as described in Section 1 as of the effective
date of this Resolution.
Section 3. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to
Resolution No. 4740.
Resolution - Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
""'-"'-"^-"~"-'''''--~'''''~---'~''''-''-'''''''''-''''~''''~-=''''-~''''='-''''''---'''~-'~'''''''''=-''''-'''~''''=='''~~-'~_''-=_^=T~."",,,,'"''''_~_''_~'-"="""'''''''''"==_'''~_-_=__=--''''~~==''''''_C_''_~'___''''''''~__'''''''',"="==.,_._"_.,,.;-'~'-=>""",,"-=-~,---~~___,=-=-O-'"'"'-'-'-"''''''''''''_''''~==-=~'''==-~~=_~O"-,-_''->-'''',,~".._--.,-==,.'---=-".=='.,-._-,_=.".--....-.'C~.,."-"-.____>-"....-._~.=._,"'"'=-~_~"-"~.,_-'___..<~~'~~._""=ft..~~~~...~""'_,~=......~_~-"-.".~~",..,.~......-=~...~~"..,.,,~~.,.
7.0 Credits and Impact Reductions
This section provides detail on the City's administration of SDC credits and impact
reductions. Potential sources, criteria for eligibility, and the basis for calculation of credit
and impact reductions are defined, in this Methodology and in Eugene Code, 1971 section
7.730. A list of examples of facilities and programs which are potentiaUy eligibJe for credit
and impact reductio'n appears in Table 2 of this section. (Note: As development standards
change some examples may no longer be considered eligible for reduction. but may
influence future rates.) In no case may the sum of all approved . credits and impact
reductions for a single system exceed the amount of the SOC assessed for that system for
any approved building or development permit.
SOCs may be reduced by one or more of the following processes:
· Impact Reduction, based on quantified mitigation of demand generated by
the development for new identifiable. capital improvements;
· Credit, based on the specific costs for privately engineered construction of
certain public improvements as part of the development;
· Credit based on previous payment or use.
Adjustment of SDCs due to credits and impact reductions:
· Shalf not be given for improvements constructed or programs instituted prior
to City approval.
· Shall be applied up to the maximum SOC fee for each system.
· Shall reduce the SOCs paid on building permits at the time of issuance;
credit or impact reduction amounts applied will not be greater than the SDC
fees.
· Shall be applied to a particular system (e.g., Transportation, Stormwater,
Wastewater, Parks); credits or reductions approved for a particular system
can not be transferred or applied to any other system charges.
· Shall be applied to the SOCs for the particular development, may only be
further applied to subsequent phases of the same development for which
the improvement was constructed or program instituted, and can not be
transferred or applied to other properties or developments.
7.1 Impact Reductions or Mitigation
Impact reduction will be based on private physical improvements (as defined in
Appendix A) constructed as part of the development or based on programs
instituted in connection with development, which will reduce the demand from that
development for future construction of identifiable capital improvements. Such
programs and physical improvements must be privately financed and are intended
to be permanent. The anticipated reduction in demand must be demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the City Transportation Engineer (for Transportation system
7.4 Application for Credit and Impact Reduction .
An application for a credit or impact reduction, including related documentation and
information, shall be submitted by the applicant in the manner prescribed by the
City, together with any fee set by the City Engineer pursuant to Eugene Code,
1971 section 2.020. The applicant shall have the burden of demonstrating the
eligibility for a credit and/or impact reduction. No credit or impact reduction shall
be granted for an SDC that has already been imposed, collected or agreed to be
p~id . in installments unless resulting from cancellation of an active permit,
expiration of a permit without being used, or an approved change of design of an
active.. permit.
7.4.1 · Application for Impact Reduction
Applicants must submit their request for an impact reduction in writing,
accompanied by documentation that supports the basic function and
design criteria for estimated impact reduction.
For commercial development, impact reduction will be applied uniformly
for all lots or building sites in the development phase approved. Impact
reductions granted under. this methodology document may be used in
subsequent phases of a development when the applicant demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the program or improvements
continue to provide the anticipated reduction in demand, and the City has
received assurances or agreements from the developer, owner, and
owners successors, as approved by the City Engineer as is necessary to
ensure that the program or facility will continue to function as planned for
the agreed upon time period. Changes to the mitigated program or facility
attributable to the connection of an additional phase which results in any
deviation from the previously determined impact reduction will be
adjusted proportionately~
AppendixD
Stormwater System Charge Detail
1.0 Formula
The impact analysis for the. stormwater system is based on square footage of impervious
surface, which creates an impact on the stormwater system by land use type. Impervious
surface is defined in section 6.406 Eugene code, 1971 as "any hard surface area which causes
water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from conditions
pre-existing to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to,
rooftops, walkways, driveways, parking lots, or concrete or asphalt surfaces." The estimated
non-assessable cost of the system-wide capacity from future capacity-enhancing . projects, as
contained. in the Stormwater'SOC-Eligible Project List, and the estimated available capacity in
the existing stormwater system projected to be used by new development is used as the basis
for determining the stormwater SOC.
The stormwater SOC is comprised of an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee, as new
development will require the construction of additional system capacity as well as the use of
available capacity in the existing system. The per unit cost of. additional capacity for the
improvement fee is based on the value of the system-wide capacity of future capacity-
enhancing projects (current planned projects are listed in the Stormwater SOC-Eligible Project
List, Table 10) divided by the total projected impervious surface area that will be added by new
development at build-out within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The per unit cost of
existing capacity for the reimbursement fee is based on the value of. available system-wide
capacity within the existing system projected to be used by new development divided by the
total projected impervious surface area that will be added by new development at build-out
within the UGB.
The value of the future stormwater system is based on the estimated costs of planned future
capacity-enhancing stormwater projects contained within stormwater plans and the Capital
Improvem.ent Plan (CIP). Of that total value, the SDC-eligible component is attributable to those
portions of future projects that are non-assessable and capacity-enhancing and related to the
demands of future development; Le. add new capacity for new users.
The total value of the existing system is estimated based on the replacement cost of the
stormwater system components, which include both piped system and open channel system
components. Assessable costs are excluded from the SOC-eligible existing system costs.
Assessable costs are determined, using the approach specified in the City Code. The city
assesses up to and including the first 24 inches of pipe diameter or equivalent capacity. The
non-assessable portion of stormwater system costs (SOC eligible costs) is based on
replacement costs minus assessable costs. The portion of non-assessable existing system
value allocated to new development (SOC-eligible value) is established by determining the
percent of piped system and open channel system capacity projected to be used by new
development. The use of capacity of the existing system is estimated with use of hydraulic
modeling to identify existing available capacity (based on existing land use and flow data) and
expected future conditions (based on Metro Plan designations).
area, will have stormwater soes calculated by evaluating the equivalent impervious surface
area which would generate a similar impact.
6.0 Stormwater System SDC Impact Reduction Criteria
Two forms. of separate and potentially additive impact reduction credits may be provided:
reduced impact due to reduced quantity of stormwater runoff discharged to the Citystormwater
system and reduced impact due to pollution reduction water . quality treatment which exceeds
minimum standards.
6.1 . Stormwater Destination and Quantity Reduction
R.eduction or elimination of storm water which otherwise would be discharged into the public
stormwater system may result in a corresponding reduction of stormwater SOC collected at the'
time of building and development permit issuance. Reduction of the stormwater SOC will be
proportional to the reduction of runoff entering the public system from the fully developed site.
(Note: detention facilities are not eligible for stormwater SDC impact reduction.) A 100%
reduction in the stormwaterSOC Will be granted only for the complete containment and
management of all runoff from the site that would otherwise directly or indirectly enter into the
City's public stormwater system. Runoff discharged into an area that does notultimateJy enter
the City's public stormwater system constitutes acceptance of responsibUity for compliance with
any state or federal regulations that apply to the area or body of water receiving the runoff. To
be eligible for the impact reduction, the development must meet standards for stormwater
destination specified in Eugene Code 1971 section 9.6790 (3) in a manner which demonstrates
ongoing reduction in impact to the public system.
6.1.1 Sin.gle-Family Development (SFD) and Duplex Development
Because stormwater SOCs for small- and medium-residential SFOs and duplexes are
based on estimated average amounts of impervious surface areas, these buildings can
qualify only for one of two impact reduction rates:
a) 1000/0 SOC reduction for complete elimination and management of runoff from
the site entering the public system or discharging into an area which ultimately
enters into the public system; or
b) 50% reduction for partial reduction and management of runoff from the site
entering the public system regardless of the amount of reduction.
The SDC reduction will be granted after review and approval by the City Engineer of the
stormwater destination design and documentation submitted in accordance with
standards specified in Eugene Code 1971 section 9.6790 (3).
6.1.2 Manufactured Home Park, Multi-family, and Nonresidential Development
Stormwater SOCs for these uses will be reduced proportional to the reduction in total
stormwater runoff entering the public stormwater system from the fully developed site.
(Total stormwater runoff includes both runoff from the site in its natural condition and any
increase due to construction of impervious surfaces). The SDC reduction will be granted
after review and approval by the City Engineer of the stormwater destination design and
RESOLUTION NO. 4883
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN INFLATIONARY ADJUSTMENT OF
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE RATES FOR REGIONAL
WASTEWATER SYSTEM.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. On September 23, 2002, the System Development Charge (SDC) Methodologies
were adopted by Resolution No. 4740. Resolution No. 4740 has subsequently been amended,
most recently on June 12, 2006, by Resolution No. 4875, which amended SDC Methodology for
regional wastewater system, and Resolution No. 4876, which amends local stormwater SDC
Methodology concerning credits effective July 12, 2006.
B. Resolution No. 4795 dated June 28, 2004, adopted amended Systems
Development Charge rates for Regional Wastewater System. In addition, inflationary
adjustments of Systems Development Charges for Local Wastewater System, Stormwater
System, and Transportation System were adopted by Administrative Order No. 58-06-02-F, on
March 29,2006, and became effective on April 3, 2006.
C. Based on the national 20-city average Construction Cost Index as published by
the Engineering News-Record, it is necessary to amend the SDCs by implementing an 11.17%
inflationary increase for Regional Wastewater System.
D. Section 2.4 of the SDC Methodologies requires that adjustment of fees by more
than five percent shall be implemented by resolution of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The Systems Development Charges are amended by implementing an 11.17%
inflationary increase to the Regional Wastewater System as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
Section 2. The City Recorder is requested to append a copy of this Resolution to the
System Development Charge Methodologies and to Administrative Order No. 58-06-02-F.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective on August 1,2006.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 10th day of July, 2006.
VWl~L
City Record ---
Resolution
REVISIONS TO
METROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT WASTEWATER COMMISSION
REGIONAL WASTEWATER SDC RATE SCHEDULE
Effective August 1, 2006
Exhibit A
C
o
.en
.~
E
E
o
()
....
C
CD
E
CD
C)
<<I
C
<<I
:i!E
...
CD
....
; .!'l
S~
f/)CU
<<It:
3:~
CO
<<Ic/) ~
~i ~
o';or-"g
Q,:::.I.s::
o '> C/) CJ
...~Q)C/)
~cn:CQ)
-CUCUQ)
:i!E3:I-U-
US::l
8~
(ij...
~~
;t=
f~~5
eC,)~ ~
0. 1: ... ::J
ECD.Eoo
-e
~~m
e~u..
o.c:'"
E CD CD
-EO.
IbUS::l
~ow
~~u..
E c: ...
&~~
>:
t1l
0032
oo::l
I-W
u..
lil
~
>:
t1l
032
O::l
mW
u..
lil
~
OO.r::.
~ g>~
oeE
gCi)---
5~ %
~~~3
00 ~ o.w
li~~~
~o.. ;
5;; %
(/)C:u32
~~ ~m
OOxEu..
~t1l-::::.
0:2 ;
g~ %
gj~~3
CD C)o.w
~~~~
o~ ;
~ %
.2u32
u..t1l::l
3l ~~
(0-::::
m ;
c: ~
o::l
~~~
~.~ ;-
u; .c
W::l
1:
CD
E
.r::.
.!!!
:0
~
W
'0
CD
0.
>-
I-
...
~*~
~~8
::J us CD
W t1l en
~::l
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~ooo2~~gggg~~~~~oog~~~ggg~~~~~~~~~~
oom~~~Nm~~~~C')om~~~~~~o~o~~~~~~oo~~......~:-
r~~~~~~~r~~~~~~N~O~~~rrr~*~~~~NN~r*~~
*- * * ~*~~~ **~ ***~**~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~g~~gggg~~~m~~~gg~gggg~~~~g~~ggg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~***
*~*** *** *
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~N~~~~~~-m~~m~~~N~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
......rr***......rN*~**~O~~M~~*rrr*~~~m~NNmN_**
~~~ **~ ~~~;~ ~~~ **~**~*
~~N~~~ON~~~~~m~om~~~~~~~~~~~~~mm~~ooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~
mm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~**......*~~~**~~~~N~**~......~~*~~~~~~~......~~*
* * ~~rrN ~ *__*~*~
**~
~~m~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NNN~ ~N~OOOo~~~m. o~~~ooommm~~m~ooo
ociciooooociciocio~M~~~ciooocicioociMMMciciMoocici
.r::.
0,
c:
e
Ci)
m m ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 m m m:g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ col~i~ ~ m mlml~I~llm ~ ~I~ ~
m ml~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co co co co co ~ ~ m ~ N ~ ~ ~ 0 ...... 0 ~I~ co ~ ~ ~ co co co ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~qqqq~~~~o~~q~~~qqq~~~~~~~qqq
000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0
i i j ! . ,
! E E ~ ~ E!I ,I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .:2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .:2 ~ J: =E ~ ~ ~ ~ .:21 ~ ~I ~ ~ J: J: J: ~ ~ J: ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I ::2 :2 > ~ ::2j Ii> > > >
0000000000000000000000 olol,omo 01010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
T"'" 'r""' T"'" T"'" T"'" T"'" ('l') T"'" T"'" or- T"'" T"'" ('I") LO ,..... 0> T"'" T"'" T"'" T"'" ('1'). """'IT"'" ,.... T"'" 10 LOll.() T"'" T"'" T"'" T"'" T"" T"'" T"'"
I II!! Ii; ! i I I I I I I I i
~I~ ~ ~I~~I:~I~ ~ ~ m m m m colco ~ ~ ~ co ~ CJ>'I~:I:<D.i~:m:lm~ICJ>I:m!l!m;,CJ>!~I~ CJ>l~ CJ>~I:m m
m m CJ> CJ> m m CJ> m m CJ> CJ> m CJ> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m mlm ~ .-'!~im m CJ> ~ ~ ~I~ ~ co m ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m. ~ m. ~ ~ ~I,~ ~ ~1~""""""",~,m'I~I~I,C'l C'l m ~_ ~ ~
I I I ~ C') ~ ~ ~ , ,i I ! I.... ~I....!~ ~ ~ ~ !
I I I II II I II I I I i I I, Iii I' i ! ! j I, I II!
Ii' i I i I Iii I i [ i I i
~r,~ g ~ ~I:~I~ g ~ ~ ~I~:I~ ~ ~.I~ ~ ~I~ ~I~I~I~I,~I~I~ ~I,!'~"I'~II~i$!,$I~II~I<o <0 <011
" I I '. ,N N N N N ~I,' ill i ',I, ~,~,~I i i~ I
!, I! Iii I I! : :' I I !, ! i i : !
! i i ! ii' i ii' I i I :! i i ! , : ! !! "
, I i I I, : I I I I I I I i Ii' : ! ' : ' ! i I ! I
CJ> I, ml:, ~I', ~ II ~ i ~I", ~I ~II ~i coi' co ~ CO. ~~II, ~ ~~' ~~Ii ~ i[ ~i ~ +=+=t, CO:I ~ ~,~l" ;:-1, co II',. CO ii, ~ I' ~:I ~ I ~ 'I '<t I. ~II:~ 0 riff ~ I:, ~ I;; ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ f;l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~1~1~!~I~I~!~ ~ ~,~i~ ~:~I~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I ! I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 I I I ; ! ; , I I I ' I
I . : I, ! I, I, i I I I I' I I I i I' ! !. I, " :, ' i ': "I" i, [' !
i : I I I 1 , I I I Ii! I' I, I! I , , : ' , I 'i' I
' , , I I , ! I I I Ii' I Ii" , i ' ,
I I : ! : ' i, ! 'i I : ' : I LL.L+-1- i ! '--+--T~u~-1-+- +1
~11~1';~.'gllg!lglg~goooo gglg g gilglg:I'ol.~:I~I~!lol'!,ollo,ilgi,'gi,gl.~i,~ilgliigl'O 0'10
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....IN ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~,~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~I~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! I ~,~~~""" I ,I "I I ' I, i ; I i II
! : : I I I :! !:, I I I I , : i Iii
:111u.. u..ilu. u. u.. u.. u.. u. u.. tl:db It It It'u..'u..::t;u..'Iu..fu.. u.. u.. u..'u..L:U.:Iu..lu..]u..il"iu..'u.. u..
::l ::ll::l 00 00 00 00 ::l 00 00 00 00 00 ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J 00 00 I 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 I 00 I' 00 00 I 00 00 00 00 00
o 0 0 c> (!) Cl (!) 0 Cl c> c> (!) c> <( <( ~ <( ~ c> c> Cl (!) Cl c> (!) Cl Cl (!) (!) c> c> c> I c> (!) c> (!) c>
I I- 1-11- I- I- I- I- I- I- Cl (!) '-J (!) '-J I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- ~I- I- I- I- I- I- I- l-
I I I 1-1-1-1-1- ! I : ' I
! I I...J Ii! --+ lz;iWi I
I I ~ I I I I i I I ~!g:IZ
, i I I ~ I I j!:!~ I' : ! I I [I ::, 1~181g I
~I' I m ~ I j!: ~I~ I i I I I I I:!~ fr i?
~, I ~ ~ ~ , j!: ffi j!: ~ ~ I I i I ! :, I Ii: 1~1~lfu ~
I~I~ ~ ~ ~ I I ffi ~ ffi ~'a I ! !I ' : :: ! I I 181g g: ~
I- <( 0 0 u.. !z ::.I: :::: ~:2 ~ S2 i: : I 'I I' 'I' II-I Ifr <( 8 ~
Otu..wwwww ...J...J...J...Joo oo::.I:o:: I I I 'z: 0::0 ::l
1:;;i=::.I:::.I:0::0::! ::!;::!;::!;::!; 2::.I:~W I II- I i I I I<(! 1~::lU.1 0
>1--' C,) C,) <( - mo::o:: 0:: 0:: ~ 0 0:: 0.. I WI' :0::1 I <( ::.I:
0::l<(~C,)~0 1-1-1-1-0wS2W::l' !:x:' I II h P' I~t;~ __
~1:21= w >- 0::::2 00 00 00 00 ...J :2 ::.I: > 00 I , :0::' II-' ~ 1<('1 I~ W ::21 00
~ . <( 0 ~ " 555500 00 00 00 00 I I i~1 ~: 0:: !zIt; 1::2 0:: Z 0
,--, --' , ,w...J...J Z Z Z Z 00 00 00 00 00 I IWI et::1 I :J <( W -- -- _ 0
IH ~ ~ ~ U H H ~HHnHl:;, :~ ~,J!il i'" ~ ~ ffii1l1~ ~ ~i~ ~ @
x ~ ~ ~ ~ W gn~ m t; t; t; t; g: g: g: g: g: ~ II- ~ W ~ ~ ~ lii > <(1<(1:5 ~I<( t; gs
W u; u; 0 0 ~ u; u; b ::l ::l ::l ::l ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ~ I~II- ~ Z W :, 0 w ~ ~'~Io.. <(1::2 W __
~ W W ::.I: ::.I: (!) W W ::.I: 0000 <( <( <( <( <( W <( 00 <( wO::o 0:: Cllc> Cl ...J11- 0:: (!)
::l0::0::~~wO::O::__~~~~~~~~~I-OOOOW::2Z0~ o>-~zzzo..Z::lZ
00::0::~~~0::0::...J~~~~t;t;t;t;t;:X:~~20::w>t;C,)::!u..~I-~~~(!)z5Ci:
--WWww~WWW>>>> C,)-O~I>w <(1-...J::.I:ZZZ_"ZI-
o ::.I: ::.I: 0 0 Z ::.I: ::.I: I- <( <( <( <( ::l ::l ::l ::l ::l ::ll::! 0:: 0.. Z W ~ I- 00 <( ,n -: i - _ I-; i '-' 0:: 0
u..1-1-...J...JOI-I-OWWWWoooooO::I-::.I:w~o~ww<(~~~I~O::~I~~...J
:::::::::: :::1:1:1:1:,': :':1:1:'::1:': :1:'I:I:::'I:il:I:!I:::
~!~ ~ ~I~ N ~~:~N NN rl~lri~" "1~i~l~ ~i~i'" ~1~j"'lriill@I~I~~ ~
-ci
e
'S
C"
e
15
c:
.!!!
0;
c:
.~
t1l
~
c:
t1l
;;
~
.r::.
15
OJ
c:
~
o
o
o
"0
c:
t1l
~
::J
"0
e
0.
"0
o
.E
"0
CD
Ol
t1l
~
~~
~.~
0.0.
E e
.g~
~ ~~
c: ~.c:
e ~ CD ~
X'lii.g~t1l
... .0
~~~ .~
<<i.9~~
xc:'c:
~,g5~
.g'i5~31
~-gt1li5
~ c: o..r::.
~:!!i [ 3l
~~"8116
t'!'<i=.E 0
~::l(ijl{l
~ ~.~ ~
~~~~
~ if:
. : : :
N
"-
o
'0
0>
t1l
Q.
.-
u,
~
W
0::
<(
W
...J
m
:, ~
<( 0
W ...J
...J U.
1-00 0
woo W
wo 1-00
u..o:: <(z
lJII(!) :20
0::1- i=i=
~lli fflu;
g:1i oo~
000:: z(!)
00<( gz
O::ll-...J:::i
ffig~~~
ooc>ou..
~~~~~
ooOOOO::lOOC,)
z::l::lw::li:
OOO~OW
j::j!:j!:oj!:>
<(
:>
W ::s It
~~~ ~o..
~~~5~~
c
o
";;
"~
E
E
o
o
....
c
CI)
E
CI)
C)
co
c
co
:E
...
CI)
....
~.!!!
Cl)f1)
....:i:'
enC'Cl
coe
~~
co
COCl) .!
~'- ::s
- G) "'C
o'ior-(1)
Q.~..c
o~CI)u
.......(1)CI)
;~:E(1)
:E::~~
us=>
8~
tij....
~~
:t:
lU~$~
~()~ 8:
o.c .... :J
.E~.E(J)
~~m
e()u..
Q. c ....
E CI) CI)
-EO.
lUUS
l!?o=>
:J()w
~c't
.a; ~ ~
0::
>;
<13
(J)32
(J)=>
I--W
u.
US
g
>;
<13
032
o=>
mW
u.
US
g
~;;~
I::: g' =a,
g~.s
m(J)
5 ~ ~
m~~3
(J) .>It. o.w
Q)m.E~
3: a.. ~
5;; ~
l(l5t53
C1)~ ~w
(J)xEu.
i::'<I3-:::'
o~ .9
g~ ~
l(l~~3
~ ~E~
5~-~
<( ~
~ ~
0-"0
U:~3
3l E~
<<1-:::::
m .9
.~ m
~1iIu.
~~;;;-
fIl c:
w=>
L..
~!~
~~()
:JUSCl)
W<I3f1l
3:=>
~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~m~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ciciNNN~~~~~cicicicicicicicicici~~~NNNNNNNNNNNMN
~o~~ooooooooooooooooooooo~~~~~~~~~~~oo
~~-Nmmm~~~~~MMMMC')MMMMM~o~m~mmm~mmmmmN~
-~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~ri~~~~~~-~~__~~~
~ ~
m~~R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ciciNNN~~~~~cicicicicicicicicici~~~NNNNNNNNNNNM~
NO~~oooooooooooooooOOOOOOC"lNNNNNNNNNNOO
NN~_MMMNNNNN-""""""""""""-~"""~~NONMMMMMMMMMMM~N
~- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~
~
o~m~~~~~~~~~mmmmmmmmmm~o~~mmmmmmm~mm~~
M~M~~~~~......~ ~~m~m~~~~m-m~~~~~~~~~~~~MM
~~~ci~~~~"':~"""-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NN
NmNoNNN~m~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oooooooooooo~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~O~NNN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mm~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
~M~mm~~MMMMM......~~~~~ ~-M~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~N~ci~~~NNNNN~~~~~~~~~~N"':NMMMMMMMMMMM~N
m~~N~~~~~~~~NNNNNNNNNNm~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
-~~~~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~......~
~ ~
,
~~"""~~~~~~~~~~m~mm~~~~m"""~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~
~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~OONC"lN~~""""""-ooooooooOO_~"""C"lNC"lNNNNNNNC"lM_
oocicicicicicioooociciciciciciciciciocicicicioociociciciciciooo
.c
15>
c:
e
ti)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~Im m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~
~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~OONNN""""""~~~oooooooOOO~~~NNNNNNNNNNNM~
ooociooooooooociocioooociciociooooociooocioooo
I I
I ! I I
~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J ...J1...J...J...J...J...J...J ...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J...J
i I i I I
000000000000000 qlp ~Io ql~lp~lo 00000101000000000
~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~I~~I~~I~I~~~~~~~~~m~m~m~~~
I I : I I I' I 'I I
I !! I! i I! i I i
~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~1'~I~lml"~I'~IIO> ~ ~ ~I~I~I'~I,~I~ ~ ~ll~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ lR lR lR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~I~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ! I i I i I ( i; I I I
I I 1 I I I ! 'I' I I I' II I I i I I I
I I I Ii, I ii, !' I
~II,:gI~I~ ~ ~ ~:g :g:g:g:g ~ ~ ~,~ ~I',~I,~I.~ ~I~:g ~1;:g~~T~l~II~I,:~I,,~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:g
C"l,NI MMM C"l NNNN_......~,...... ~,~I~I~ ~I,......,N ~N M!MIM,M!M[MM,MMMIM ~ C"l
: I I Ii: i I I i I i I I
! I I I 'I ,,' I I ";' i : : I I I I I I
1 ! i ill ! i , " i i :!! I I I i Ii; I
~I~I~II~II~~~ ~ ~I~~~~I~I~I~I~I~I~!,~I~I",~I~ ~I~I,~I~ ~1,1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~ ~I~
! i ',I I! II II"!:'::! Ii! :: ':,' i Ii! I II i I
I ! . Ii,', '" , ' , " i" I' I I, : , , : I !, ,I, 'I I I
' i! "I ' I I! ,,: I i
; ! I ! ' I ' i ~----: : ; i !! i r! i t T i I I
~11.glg!I~lg g g g g g g g gig glll"gi,gl:gil., gil.. gl'g:lglg g'gl'~II~:",~I',~li~'I~I'~ ~I~I~.~ g g
~I~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I [ : : I I 1- ~ ~ ~ ~i"""j~i~l~ ~ ~,~.- ~ N ~
; I I : I I Ii, f ! ! I 1
u. 'I' u. u. u.1 u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u.. u.1: u. II J1- u.1' u. ii' U.II u. u. u. u. u. u.! III i u.' u. il u. !I u. u. u. u., u. u. u. u. u.
(J)(J)(J)~(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)~(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)(J)~(J)(J)
<!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l, <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l <!l
I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I- I-- I- hI-- I--i I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I- I-- I-- 1-[ I-- I-- I-- I- I-- I-- I-- I-- I-- I--
I I I I I ! ' i
Iii I ITl j i II~III I I
: I I ' ! i ! I I~ I i
III i I ! I il I II~ I I I, I
I ' ! ! I : I ~ I I I
' ! i I I I I I::; I I
! I i I : ; i : 1~1 i~ 1,)1 I
I 1 I; I II~ Z IW I I
I II I, ! I-- Z 0 i...J1
. I " I I...J 0 ~ !o..
I I I W <!l i ,I B ~ I <( I ~I 0:: I-- ~
51 [ ~ ~ ~ 51 Iwl i I ! 1=:3 ~ 8 ~ I'()I I ~ ffi ~
~ I u. ~ ~ 0 ill I i 10::1 ~ z a:: ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ 0::
~(J)W 01-- ::>:J: [...J IwIO<( W 10:: ,Iii () -Ww
ti ~ ~ !-.M() ~ 5 ~ ~ 2 ~ 5 ...J() 0...J[ I :~I i~ ~o ~ m I:i! I-- g] ~ ~ W ~ i ~w
- 0 ..::: - ::c:: <( Z u. >- 0 II w, I() u. ::c:: 0 I-- 0:: ...J m ...J Z 0 <(
~ ~ :J: W ~ (5 t> 0:: a.. W u. 0:: :J: g >- >- ()I =>...J 0 0:: a.. <( => () 3 ~ 0 ()<( ~ n: ()
...JWWO::...J W <( ~O<(() cl-- W 0<( :J: <(0:: 0::01--() - Z<(<!l
~ (J) ~ <( <( <!l ~ ~ a.. ~ Z I-- ~ (J) [5 Z,(i) :J: 0:: >- W ~ & ~ ~ a.. ::> ffi 0 () W :J: ~ ~ ~ W Z ~
() 0:: > () C ~ - I-- W W ~ (J) W W (J) => 0:: () <( 0:: 0:: W 0 3: 0:: () Q: I-- 0 ~ ::> I-- - W ~ n: a..
zw>oo..(J)~(J)()ZW~~5:J:~~~()<wl--z w::;l--<(ozO...Jgo::@wwo..
~~~~~~S5~~6(J)~Q~oz~~~~~~~ffig]5~~ffi~~0~Q~Iii~
U:o~<(:J:z()()om<!l::>w~:J:()::>()o::;ou....J()<!lo..~I--OI--O:::J:m~>O>(J)
.- C"l,M~ ~ll!~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~~I~II~ ~IIO>'I~'I,'~I,~o>,<( ~ x,xI1x,xl'x x x x xxl'x XIN.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co ~,~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <13
i I i II i ! Iii Ii i i i Iii i >
c:
CI)
E
.c
.!!l
:c
~
W
'<-
o
CI)
0.
>.
I-
't:i
e
.5
CT
e
'0
c:
.!!l
cii
c:
.~
~
c:
<13
;;
L..
CI)
.c
'0
cii
c:
:.i2
o
o
o
"0
c:
<13
~
:J
"0
e
0.
"0
o
.E
"0
CI)
0>
J11
~!i
~.~
0.0.
E K
.c .g g-
g> ~ ~
e ~j
1i),~ ~ ~
~.gl(l~
~ ~.!!l ~
~ '0 -g .5
x,g.E:O
~ c: ' c:
.g.25:
~~ ~ 3l
f! <13 <13 5
~ .E ~.c
<13 .!!l 0. 3l
l(l~-g:a
~.g.E~
~~~~
~ e:s ~
~~~f
N
....
o
N
CI)
0>
<13
0.
rh
<(
w
0::
<(
W
...J
m
~ 3:
<( 0
W ...J
...J U.
tu~ @
wo I--(J)
u.~ <(z
w<!l ~o
~Iii i=i=
=>w ~U5
Ou. (J)~
~~ z<!l
(J)<( gz
O=>I--...J::;
ffig~<3~
00<!l0u.
~~~~~
~(J)(J)::l(J)()
z=>=>w=>:i:
ooo3:ow
i=~~o~>
< '
:>
W :5 It
~~~ ~o..
~~~5~~