Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdmin Order 56-06-02-F w/o exhibit ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 56-06-02-F of the City Manager City of Eugene, Oregon ADOPTING USED MERCHANDISE DEALER ADMINISTRATIVE RULE R-4.989. The City Manager of the City of Eugene finds that: A. Section 2.019 of the Eugene Code, 1971 ("EC"), authorizes the City Manager to adopt rules for implementation of any provisions of that Code. In addition to that authority, EC 4.989, which was adopted by Ordinance No. 20361 on February 15, 2006, specifically authorizes the City Manager to adopt rules regarding the implementation of an electronic reporting system for used merchandise dealers. B. Following the procedures set forth therein, on October 3, 2006 I issued Administrative Order No. 56-06-02 proposing the adoption of Used Merchandise Dealer Administrative Rule R-4.989 as set forth therein. C. Notice of the proposed adoption was given by making copies available to any person who had requested such notice and by publication thereof in the Register Guard, a newspaper of general circulation within the City for five consecutive days, to wit: October 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 2006. The Notice provided that written comments would be received thereon for a period of 15 days from the date of the first publication. Only one comment was received within the time or in the manner provided in the notice, to which I make the following findings: Comment: Lance Barkley submitted a letter requesting consideration of six separate questions prior to implementation of the administrative rule. However, only question (1), which asked why they were being required to keep paper records if they were required to pay the City for the services of Business Watch International for the automated transmission of second-hand dealer transactions, and an unnumbered comment questioning being threatened with jail, relate to the subject matter of the administrative rule, to which I make the following response: Findin2: Question (1): The requirement to maintain paper records is imposed by ordinance as codified in Section 4.989 of the Eugene Code, 1971. The reference in the administrative rule is to that Code requirement, which cannot be waived or altered by administrative rule. With respect to being threatened with jail, the only reference in the administrative rule to enforcement is contained in R-4.989-A.3, which provides failure to fully and accurately complete a reporting form shall constitute a violation as set out in EC 4.989(10). The penalty for such a violation is a fine of not more than $360 and/or proceedings seeking injunctive relief. No provision is made for imposing a jail sentence. No changes have been made to the administrative rule as a result of these comments. Administrative Order - 1 Based upon the above findings, the findings in Administrative Order 56-06-02, and the authority of EC 2.019 and 4.989(8), I hereby adopt Used Merchandise Dealer Administrative Rule R-4.989 to provide: USED MERCHANDISE DEALER ADMINISTRATIVE RULE R-4.989 R-4.989-A Reportin2 Form. 1. Reports required under EC 4.989(3) shall be submitted via the City's electronic reporting system. The electronic reporting system shall provide an electronic reporting form that contains the information required in Exhibit A. 2. Under the circumstances provided for in EC 4.989(3)(c), when electronic reporting is unavailable, used merchandise dealers shall manually record all purchases of regulated property on paper forms containing the information required in Exhibit A. 3. As provided in EC 4.989(3)(b), only forms completed fully and accurately with the information required in Exhibit A shall be deemed to comply with the reporting requirements of EC 4.989(3). Failure to fully and accurately complete a reporting form shall constitute a violation as set out in EC 4.989(10). R-4.989-B Contestin2 Release of Seized Property. 1. Property seized by the City from a used merchandise dealer shall be released as directed by a court with jurisdiction over the property. If no court has jurisdiction over the property, the City may release seized property to a person the City reasonably believes is the owner of the property after a notice of the City's intent to release the property is sent to the used merchandise dealer from whom the property was seized and after the time to appeal such release under EC 2.021 has run. 2. Whenever a used merchandise dealer receives a notice from the City that property seized from the used merchandise dealer will be released to a person identified by the City as the owner of the property, the used merchandise dealer may appeal the release in the manner set forth :in EC 2.021. The used merchandise dealer shall bear the burden of showing that the used merchandise dealer is entitled to the property, and the hearings officer's review shall be limited solely to whether the used merchandise dealer has established a property right in the property that is superior to that of the property owner identified by the City. The determination of the hearings officer shall be final. Administrative Order - 2 3. R-4.989-B does not govern situations in which used merchandise dealers release property to the City. These provisions also do not govern the release of property by the City to another law enforcement agency. <t Dated and effective this ~ day of October, 2006. Dennis M. Taylor City Manager Administrative Order - 3