Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/01/1971 Meeting , ""'III e 720 I Council Chambers Eugene, Oregon November 1, 1971 Regular meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to order by His Honor Mayor Lester E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on November 1, 1971 in the Council Chamber with the following Councilmen present:', Messrs. Teague, Mohr and McDonald; Mrs. Beal; Messrs. Williams and.:Her(3hner; Mrs. Campbell. Councilman Gribskov was absent. 1. Budget Committee Nomination Ward 4, Mr. Teague - Nominated Ralph Cobb to serve until December 1, 1974. e Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the appointment of Mr. Ralph Cobb to the budget committee be approved. Motion carried. [@ . PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Commission Reports I A. September 27, 1971 l. Alley Vacation Recommended: East Park Street, north of Eighth Avenue; and between Pearl and East Park Street (Lane County) City Manager stated that the Council had toured the sites of the Planning Commission items, but had not discussed the matters to any extent because this is a public hearing, with an opportunity for full discussion. The Council has received Planning Commission minutes, as well as an official report of the Planning Commission recommendations. This request for alley vacation was submitted by Lane County, and involves alleys which serve the County as entrances to its parking area. Some have previously been vacated, but these two were not. _. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9525 - Initiating vacation of East Park and/or North Park and alley between East 7th and East 8th and calling public hearing December 13, 1971 (Lane County) was submitted, and no councilman requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16325. I 2. Street Opening Recommended: West Broadway between Almaden and Chambers ( Ci ty of Eugene. This is a bookkeeping transaction, since the city purchased the right of way a number of years ago, and has installed street improvements. Apparently the right of way was never officially dedicated as a public right of way. - ~.~~ e Mr. _ Teague" moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that West Broadway between Almaden and Chambers be opened. Motion_carried unanimously. 3. Annexation Recommended: 9.68 acres - Spring Boulevard, east of North Shasta Loop (Dr. Larry Hirons) Action to annex this property will prepare for a proposed subdivision. Hearings will be held before the Boundary Commission and the Planning Commission has recommended adoption of a resolution indicating Planning Commission and Council approval of the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. 1976 - Initiating minor boundary change for annexation of 9.68 acres of Spring Boulevard, east of North Shasta Loop (Dr. Larry Hirons) and transmitting to Boundary Commission for public hearing was submitted. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Resolution be ad?pted. Motion carried unanimously. I e 11/1/71 - 1 .... r 7~1 e 11/1/71 -- B. October 5, 1971 I 1- Zone Changes Recommended: a. North of Railroad Boulevard between Polk and Grand - from R-2 to C-2 SR (Frank Munn) I: Planning Commission felt it would be difficult to devote this property to multiple family residential use because of the proximity of Railroad Boule- vard and the railroad track. They felt it could better be used as an extension of the used car facility. Mrs. Joseph Wasson, 1270 East 27th, said she had not been aware of the Planning Commission hearing, and that she wished to voice her objection to this rezoning. She felt the best use of the property was residential, and that there were already many residences, which were not bothered by the proximity of the rail- road. Frank Munn, 1267 Railroad Boulevard, explained the uses planned for the site, e and that he had cleaned it up and fenced it. He commented that the Planning Commission had recommended that the site be zoned C-2 SR, nather than the requested M-2, and this met with his approval. Councilman Mohr commented that members of the Council were concerned about the car lot extending to the driveway of the apartment house, and necessity for buffering. I Ci ty Manager explaamed the site review procedures, and that this included " staff review of plantings, landscaping, buffering, drainage and traffic. :' In answer to Mrs. Beal Mr. Porter explained that the site, although adjacent to Railroad Boulevard, was felt to be an excellent area for multiple family residential development, because there were s choo.:Ls ,-' as '>iell as sewage facili- " ties available. They were concerned about the traffic', but felt it was no " worse than in some other areas. Mr. Munn pointed out that there was no entrance to this property, except :1 through his property. It was a logical extension of his business. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Mr. Mohr asked that lighting and screening be added to specifications to be considered in the site reVlew. Mr. Teague added this to his motion. " I i' Vote taken on motion as amended. Mr. McDonald, Mrs. Campbell and Mrs. Beal voted no'.. Messrs. I Mohr, Teague, Williams and Hershner voted aye. The motion carried. " b. South of Elmira, both sides of Baxter - RA to M-3 SR (J. H. Baxter and Company) .1 Planning Director showed slides of this area, and the site, with its present I use as an unpaved parking lot. He explained that the area lies in an area proposed for industrial use in the 1990 Plan. Mr. Teague moved ',seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. c. South of lOth between Grant and Chambers - RA to C-2 SR (Hubert Diess) In attempting to assure residents of the area that proper screening would be e provided for an addition to the car wash now on the site, the Planning Com- mission proposed that Site Review procedures be utilized to insure buffering on the south side. Dave Van Fossen, 1910 Woodlawn, said he is manager of the property, and that it has been utilized as a car wash for 18 years. The expansion is planned to enable the owners to move some of the activity inside. In answer to Councilman McDonald, Mr. Van Fossen said the expansion will be to the existing seat cover business. There can be no more building next to the duplex next door. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding Item lc of the report. Motion carried unanimously. d. West of Country Club and south of I-105 - RA to C-2 PD (Zellner) I The Planning Commission has recommended a change of zone from RA to C-2 PD community commercial, and that final reading of the zoning ordinance be held, pending final approval of the Planned Unit Development. The property is a portion on which the Thunderbird Motel wishes to build, with the remainder of the site being located in the county. Debate at the Planning Commission meeting revolved around the desire to reserve property e 11/1/71 - 2 ~ """Il e 7Ll, 11/1/71 I ,I for public use of the river bank. EWEB has an easement which parallel's the river bank, and it is proposed that this area be reserved for public use or joint use, and that the rezoning be conditioned upon that use being made available. Mr. Van Fossen has indicated willingness of his client to cooperate in this request. City Manager said it was his understanding the County had made a similar recommendation to the Commissioners regarding Planned Unit Development and public use of the river bank area. Dave Van Fossen said he was the agent for the owner of the property, and that, since the Council had read the Planning Commission minutes, he would not repeat his comments made at that meeting. e Mr. Howard Bonnett, Planning Commission member, said the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting had been very lengthy, and there had been some confusion about Planned Unit Development conditions, but that these had been cleared up. The public strip along the river bank, if properly developed and screened, would provide a connection between larger parks along the waterway. I In answer to Mrs. Beal, City Manager said it was his understanding the City and County Commissioners have agreed that the development plan must be approved and accepted by both bodies before the zoning will be completed. Mr. Van Fossen read the motion of the County which said in part, "It is recommended that city approval be observed by the Lane County authorities." There was discussion about the requir.ements of the PUD and the ordinance for rezoning. Mr. Van Fossen said they were willing to sign the document, but had not received a request for dedication as yet from the State. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding this zone change be approved. Motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9529 - Rezone property located west of Country Club Road and south of 1-105 to C-2 PD Community Commercial Planned Unit Development was submitted, and no councilman requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only, with a recommendation that it be held for final approval of PUD (George Zellner) .".~ " .~ ~:~ .)-:~~~ Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was I read the second time by council bill number only. The bill was held for final approval pending final approval of Planned Unit Development. 2. Recommended denial of zone change requests a. South of 29th aetween Olive and Charnelton; RA to RG (Henry and Anderson) Mr. Sid Landskromer, representing the ap~licants, read Planning Commission e comments and gave reasons why he felt the rezoning should be accomplished. He felt the best use of the land would be multiple family use. Michael J. Neal, 2965 Charnelton, said he had appeared before the Planning Commission and presented a petition signed by persons living in the neighbor- hood who were opposed to the zone change. He explained that traffic conges- tion in that area is bad, and that rezoning this parcel would only increase the traffic problems. Bill Baxter, 1650 Lorraine Highway, agredd that rezoning would compound the traffic problems. Planning Director explained that this proposed rezoning would be in conflict with the interim plan for the area, and that services in the area had been planned for low density development. I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation to deny this requested zone change be approved. Motion carried. b. South of Harlow and East of Cherry; R-l to R-2 (Gary Bendix) A t the commi ttee , of . the whole meeting, Co unci lman Mohr expressed concern about densities in the Wi1lakenzie Area and requested a report on Planning commission policy regarding R-2 densities al19~able in the Wi1lakenzie e t-t-/l/71 - 3 ... ,... 723 e 11/1/71 - _...__..c,__ II '1 il I If Area and the actual densities of R-2 multiple family projects already in :1 II existence :in wil1akenzie. 'I Ii i. (Comments made at public hearing follow) Applicant proposes to build six II II I' duplexes on this property. Planning Commission felt the property should be , , I, I 1\ retained as R-l. ~ I " i ~ 515 Cherry Drive, said he was in favor of residential I: Mr. Dale Allore, development on the property, but that it should be consistent with the houses 1; already built in the neighborhood. He was concerned that any change in I, :1 zoning would also extend to the other side of the street. I, I, I' :1 I' Herman Metcalf, 411 Cherry Dr~ve, agreed with Mr. Allore that the area should Ii I, remain R-l zoning. " Mr. Mohr said he had requested a report regarding general density in the Willakenzie area. Planning Director said the Interim Willakenzie Paln indicates e density along arterial streets to be allowed R-2 up to 150' from the arterial. The property behind that could be part of an overall PUD. I' I' ,I :1 Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the Planning Commission denial for rezoning of this p:'operty. Motion carried. ' ~ 11 I: ,! Ii c. 1231 Patterson Street; R-4 to C-2 (Mervin Vater) II I I I i: Councilman Williams had asked at the Committee meeting that the staff look ii into the question of modifying conditional uses in R-4 zones. '! ii :f It.is proposed to use the site for an accounting office and permission:.-.has I' ,I been requested to use the driveway for additional parking. The area is ji I: surrounded by R-4 zoning and staff suggested that accounting offices be 1: added to R-4 as conditional uses. i: Mr., Mervin Vater, 1407 Deerhorn Road, explained that his property is in the I: University District, and that parking has become a serious problem. ,I I I' Councilman Williams said he had viewed this site, and shared the Planning :! i' d Commission concern that rezoning of this property would be spot zoning. He .. I' Ii suggested that the matter be held over until the Planning Commission could 'I I! review conditional uses in the R-4 zone. I' !i 'I Councilwoman Beal felt this was a good suggestion, since the Council would ~ ~ 11 I; really like to accommodate Mr. Vater's request. 01 I: " :' :! Planning Director said the Council could direct the Planning Commission to , , .. " consider an amendment to the ordinance to accomplish this.. II ii Ii I: Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Council withhold action on this matter until such I :: I' time as the Planning Commission has made a recommendatimto Council on the advisability of " 'I I, including additional professional offices as conditional uses in R-4 zones. Motrn0n carried. " I: C. o c"tober 11, 1971 " I' :1 !I l. Zone Change Recommended , 1 East of Hilyard, north of 30th; R-l to RP SR (Dean Linder) I' ,I a. Ii Ii I 1 The applicant proposes to use this site for an insurance office. There have been some problems with location of parking spaces. e Mr. Ray Ackerman, 2930 Alder, said he was opposed to this zoning, and suggested i; th~t it would be strip zoning along Hilyard Street. Additional business activity i; will increase traffic, which is already excessive. Mr. Ackerman could see no i ~ I' and he was opposed'to use of the :1 'I logical way cars could read this property, I' , alley for access~ Property owners would certainly not be in favor of alley I ~ improvement. ,I ;i II Dean Linder, said the lot was just north of Citizen's Bank, 'I 4155 Alder, and I, il that he wished to convert the building to residential-professional use as an I' !I insurance office. He could not foresee a traffic problem. Most of his busi- I, ness would be done over the phone. " i\ 'I I' I' Ji David Hoffman, Planning Commission member, said at the time the zone ch ange 11 I, considered for the Citizen's Bank property it was felt that the adjacent il was I \, property should be zoned residential-professional. I: Ii i ~ City Manager explained that the Planning Commission felt adequate parking could I; I, f:', be constructed at the rear of the lot so that the front yard would be retained to give a residential appearance. There was further discussion about the parking and possible traffic problems. City Manager pointed out that the Planning Commission, in working with Mr. e 11/1/71 - 4 ~ ..... e 72 'f 11/1/71 ~ ~ h Ii " I I j' Linder's parking problem, had been able to work out a parking sharing plan , ': i: wi th the bank. :: i COUNCIL BILL NO. 9530 - Rezone property located east of Hilyard Street and ,north of 30th Avenue to RP SR Residential Professional District with Site Review procedures, was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only.. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. Councilmen Williams, Campbell, Beal, Teague and'McDonald voted aye. Messrs. Hershner and Mohr voted not. The motion carried and the bill was declared passed and numbered 16329. e 2. Recommended den~al of zone change request a. East of Bailey Hill Road, south of 18th, north of Westleigh Street; RA to R-2 PD (Ellison and Platz) A l,imi ted multiple family development is proposed for this site, which could possibly be tied to the developers PUD development in this location. I In answer to Mr. Mohr, Planning Director explained Planning Commission reason- ing for not allowing high density for this property was that the General Plan allows no more than ten units per acre in this location, and the developer i' would have to stay within the overall density'on the site. Mr. Platz is in agreement with the policy and will include this area in the overall PUD. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation for denial of a zone change be approved. Motion carried unanimously. , " D. October 18, 1971 l. Zone Change Recommended Denial a. South of Cal Young Road, west of Coburg Road; RA and R-2 to C-l PD and RP PD (Northland Investments, Inc.) Planning Commission requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney about the advisability of this rezoning in view of the Willakenzie Interim Land Use Plan. The Commiffiion was very impressed with the design, but in view of past his-tory and the amount of commercial property available, it was their recommendation to deny the proposal. Planning Director explained that, if a need was felt for more commercial property, the plan should be reviewed, with rezoning done on other than a piecemeal basis. I Mr. Richard E. Miles of Northland Investments read a statement in favor of the zone change request. He outlined reason's to justify Council approval of the request, and arguments against Planning Commissimreasons for denial. " II James Fisher, 1220 Woodside Drive, was against a change in the present zoning II " for the following reasons: 1) that he had recently built a home in the neighborhood with the understanding that it was, and would probably remain, residential zoning; 2) the change was not in accordance with the Willakenzie e Plan or the 1990 Plan for that area; 3) a bad traffic problem exists. 'I A statement of the League of Women Voters, previously entered into Planning Commission minutes, was read to the Council. It protested rezoning of this I: property. Mr. Jim Redden, Architect, asked to explain the philosophy behind the planning for this site, which he termed peculiar. He explained the development, its use to the neighborhood and proposed buffering. Councilman Williams asked for an explanation of the apparent violation of the Willakenzie Plan with the addition of a tremendous amount of R-2. Planning Director explained that the Planning Commission found an excess of C-2 land, which they classified to lesser density. This was not in violation of the Willakenzie Plan. I City Manager explained that the City Attorney's office had suggested that, if it was felt the Interim Willakenzie Plan was no longer valid, a study should be made of the entire area. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation be ~ccepted and this request denied. Motion carried. 2. Annexation Recommended a. 122 acres south of 43rd and east of Amazon Drive. (Boundary Board referral) e It was noted that this is a residential area with a high percentage of failing septic tanks which drain into the city. 11/1/71 - 5 ... r"" 7~5 e 11/1/71 'i I 1 I Council has received maps of this proposed annexation, which is known as Sky- I i I' line Park. Lane County Health Department was concerned about the high II ,I percentage of failing septic tanks and the questionable quality of the privately I: 1: owned water supply. Drainage from the area is into Amazon Creek, which " affected residents of the city. When the Ansola-Parks annexation was before jl the Boundary Comm~ssion it was felt it would be appropriate to expand it to " I ,j include the entire 122 acres. Council has been requested to transmit its II II approval to the Boundary Commission. " " " " I ~ RESOLUTION NO. 1977 - Transmitting approval of annexation of 122 acres south of 43rd and " I I: east of Amazon Drive was submitted. \. i; -"- ,I i! Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. I I! III. Transfer of Ownership, Alton Baker Park - (Minutes of Committee Report of October 20, 1971) il i! ., I, " A letter from the Alton Baker Park Advisory Committee was dis~_ributed to Counc~lmen. Because Ii e I; of problems due to fragmentati on of.' b~nership, >the cornmi ttee has;recommended th9-'f:: j;h~_cLty Ii . ' . -- ~ - I' deed its property in the proposed park area to the County, and as a condition of the trans- Ii fer, that the advisory committee be officially constituted by the Board of County Commis= " si oners . It was also suggested that there be official Eugene representation on the advisory I: I' I: commi ttee, and that all major developmental decisions be reviewed by the commi ttee, wi th II recommendations to be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. :1 I II Councilman Williams csked the legal impact on the condi tional use permi t granted by the I' city to the County to permit operation of landfill on this land by the county. " He was " " ~ I, concerned that this might invalidate conditions imposed on use for the landfill purposes. Ii City Manager said it was his unders tanding that the coridi ti onal use permit was granted I: on the land, and that transfer of ownership would not affect that conditional use permit. " I: Ii Councilman McDonald sgugested that, since this would be a deed transfer, these condi tions " I: could, be listed as part of the deed. This was felt to be a good suggestion. I: In answer to further concerns, City Manager explained that the County Commissioners felt I' the transfer was necessary to assume liability for development and to be in a position to " II : make decisions regarding planning. iI Ii Mr. Maurie Jacobs, chairman of the Advisory Committe~, explained the CORmllttee recommenda- Ii " tions and that this body was representative of the entire community. :1 II Ii Mayor Anderson 'pointed out that, in looking ahead, it was likely the County would assume " responsibility for all regional parks, of whi ch Al ton Baker would be one. !\ Mr. Robert Adair was concerned that the County might not have the same control over the I; landfill operation as the city would have if it retained ownership, and that this might Ii be a detriment to the park. Mayor Anderson explained why the park was considered regional and that it should be under county jurisdiction. !i I II Mr. Adair asked to submi t his name for consideration for appointment to the Advisory Ii Ii Commi ttee. Ii There was further discussion about parks in ,the area, and which of them would be Ii considered regional., --, " Ii 'I '. . :1 In answer to a suggestion that the city manage the entire facility, the Manager explained " that the county has more financial flexibility. He was sure they would be happy if I' e Ii the Ci ty would assume the responsibility. ,f I: i\ Manager suggested that the Advisory Committee should make recommendations to the CORmllssioners I: " before final decisions are made. II I: Action will be taken on this item at the next regular Council meeting. ;\ I: I, (Comments made a public hearing follow) City Manager outlined the recommendation of 'I :i the committee and alternatives which might be acceptable, and controls which might be :' I imposed. " Ii 'I Councilman Williams expressed concern about the future, not only of this park, but of other I, 'I I, parks within the area, if they were transferred to the County. He felt the city shou:1d " I' have a clear voice in the development, and should review any development plan for the area. I! !! I' and that he was 'alse ,I Mr.. Teague said he shared Mr. Williams concerns, concerned about giving I i: ...... II away property the city had invested a great deal of money in. He felt there should be some , i: type of exchange. He also suggested that the city enter into an agreement with the County :1 concerning operation of the landfill in the park. 'I Ii 'I Mr. McDonald was'!;also concerned about the value of the property, and suggested that I, con- " ii sideration be given to a land bank. I ~ ,I It In reply to Mr. Williams concern about Council review ofa development plan, Manager " reminded Council that a generalized use plan had been prepared at the time of hearings e " :1 on the future landfill site, which outlined waterways, roadways, parking areas, etc. ~ 11/1/71 - 6 , ""'Il , e 7Ld 11/1/71 n :r " " I ,I II i He suggested that a subcommittee of the Council could refer materials to the Commissioners I i' !i ,,' for consideration. !I Mayor Anderson'stated that there was no real conce~n about county development of the park, and that the County had worked well with. the City in several instances in the past. : He felt the Advisory Committee would act as a built-in safeguard, and a subcommittee I 1 " of the Council could discuss with Commissioners any plans prior to final agreement. Mrs. Beal suggested that the committee should have 'representation of the, City Parks Department' . Mr. Mohr reminded councilmen that before any federal grants can be received, the city must have a master plan. He suggested that such a plan should be acceptable to the City Council. " Mr. Williams agreed that the City sQould see the Master Plan, and he felt the City. e shoald certainly have representation on the advisory committee. Mrs. Beal did not feel the Council would be qualified to make de.d.sions on p master plan, but suggested that the city parks department should review such plans. Mayor Anderson proposed the Council tentatively adopt the report of the Advisory Committee, I and that a subcommittee'of the Council discuss any particular conditions they mtght want :, I attached to it with the Commissioners and bring back for final approval to the Council. , Mr. Hershner agreed with the subcommittee approach, but he wanted to be sure other ,: governmental units would likewise transfer their interests. He ,would also hesi tate 'to deed.this property without some restriction that it be used for park purposes, or at least, public purposes. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the City CounciJ-acc~pt recommendations of the Alton Baker Park Advisory Committee and transfer ownership of its park property to. the County, and that a subcommittee of the Council be appointed to work with County Com- missioners and come back to the Council with a final report. Mayor Anderson explained that it was his understanding that the Council would tentatively adopt the report of the Advisory Committee to deed land to the County, but prior to final agreement, a Council committee would meet with the Commissioners to develop con- ditions to go with the agreement. Discussion could concern the possibility of an auditorium being built on a portion of the site, and the suggestion of some type of land bank or exchange of land. Vote taken on the motion. Motion carried. IV. 'Items :lto be considered with one motion, after discussion of individual items, if requested. Items'were previously discussed at committee meetings of October 13, 20 and 27, 1971. I , P0rtions typed in italics are from coamlittee reports of the meetings of October 13, 20 and 27, 1971 A. Budget Coamlittee Nominations I, 10/13/71 l. Ward IV, Mr. McDonald - Wyman Hammer I' 2. Ward I, Mrs. Campbell - Lawrence Pierce, 2066 University Street il Mrs. Campbell explained that Mrs. Smith had expressed a desire.to stay on the e budget coamlittee when she returns next year. Mr. Pierce has fJgreed to serve for just one year. , Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to approve a.ppointments listed above. Motion carried. The first orientation trip for the budget commi ttee will be Wednesday, October 20. Approve, , " B. Right of Way Purchase, North Beltline Floodway - Council authorization has been 10/l3/71 requested to purchase right of way for ~orth Be~t LineF100dway east branch from , Presbytery of Willamette Church for $5700. The parcel consists of 1.02 acres. A memo was previously circulated to Council, accompanied by a map of the area, which outlined appraisals and valuation of this property~ Staff recommends that the city acquire this property for the amount stated. It was Council consensus that approval be granted to proceed with the acquisition. Approve I C. List of Attorneys for Appointment to Fro-Tem Judge -:- In line wi th procedure' lO/13/7l suggested by Council, a list of names of attorney's who are members of the Oregon State Bar, and from whom it is proposed to appoint pro-tem judges when needed, was circulated to Councilmen. Mr. Wi lliams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the list be approved. Motion carried. Approve, 'i D. Segregation of Assessment, approved ,by Finance Department .. e 10/2Q/71 A. Paving and Sewer, request of C1if Culp for property at Spring and Firland to l1/l/71 - 7 ... r 7L 7 e I 11/1/71 IT I I to be paid $2210.59, ,balance of $6,407.63. I , I 2. I' Request of Roger Herring, property at corner of Gilham Road and Meyers Road I' Ii Balance to be paid $786.18. I I' 1: 'I " I: Ii )! Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Williams that .the requests for s~gregation of assess- " " ,I I, ment be approved. Motion carried. ApproJ,~ i' !: ,I I: E. Liquor License Applications, approved by Po1i ce Department i i: ,I lO/20j71 Package B and Retail Malt Beverage A - Club Cigar, 814 Willamette; add partner ii ii I' " Whlsle Malt Bev. and Wine - M. H. Burris Co., l865 West 6th, new location. :! I: Ii Package Class B - ,Safeway Stores, Inc. - Cal Young & Coburg Roaq, new location .. II !: Billy's Market, III Monroe, Change location, I I: 'I 'I Billy's Market, 111 Monroe, Renewal " Ii Dari-Mart, 2429 Hilyard; lost licens'e ,! I: ii :1 Ii License Renewals e I' ,I RMBA - Papa's Pizza, 1700 West 11th 'I 'I Pizza Palace, 2890 Willamette I, 11 II RMBC - Cracker Barrel, 211 Washington I. PA - Becraft & Nason, 1085 West 4th 'I I: Custom Meat, 577 Pearl " I, j! PB - Albertson's Food Center # 53l,#2 Qak Mall c::::. - Dari-Mart #6, 800 Hwy 99 N , . I I; Dari-Mart #3, 1735 West 18th " George's 19th & ,Agate, 1490 East 19th I I: Jones Market, 347 W ; t l3th ,I Everyone's Market, l245 Echo Hollow R0ad i' 24 Hour Market, 2750 Roosevelt Boulevard I ~ I: Hilyard street Market, l698 Hilyard Ii E-2 Shop Market, 2489 Willamette Shopper's Market, 2699 Roosevelt Boulevard I' Frontier Market, ,ll0l West 8th :1 " Porter Foods Unliminted, 270 West 8th i: Ii Treasure Chest, 1950 Franklin (New) I' Jiffy Market, 3443 Hilyard Ii Ii 17th and Lincoln Market - 295 West 17th " DB - Thunderbird ,Motel, 205 Coburg Road 'I !I :1 Ii Seymour's Cafe & Riviera Room, 996 Wi11amette , , 795 Willamette , LaMars , il II DCA - Columbus Club, 1144 Charnel ton I I Ii DCC - Elks Club, 2727 Centennial Drive , Ii ** Fraternal Order of Eagles, West 13th Approve,: II F. Resolution Authorizing Mayor Anderson to Sigh for Purchase of State Su:r;p1us Property Ii 1/10/20/71 Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Williams 'that the resolution be approved. Moti on , Ii carried. Approve:~ , I( 1 I, j! G. Improvement of Downtown Parking Facilities - Mr. Maurie Jacobs, Mr. Harry Ri tchie, 'I I ,i 1\10/20/71 members of Eugene Downtown Association, Mr. Bob Tomas of Eugene Renewal Agency, and I: I, Mr. A1 Williams, Traffic Engineer, have spent a great deal of time ,trying to devise :' Ii I' an attractive and more equitably supported parking program for the downtown area. I Ii They made a trip to California to look over various parking systems, and ,returned :1 , Ii wi th many ideas for improvements. It is hoped to eventually develop an efficient :! II method with complete participation by the downtown community in .an overall program of ,I compulsory support. In the meantime, a plan has been devised which should improve e II the parking situation and simplify parking for downtown patrons. At the time meters , II were installed, it was intended to provide a fund for on-street parking. The plan II I; would combine meters into the validation program which has been in effect for the 'I off~street parking lots. I ,I I, [' Mr. 4l Williams, Traffic Engineer, outlined the program on a map of Central Business ,\ Ii Distri ct parking lots. He explained that merers now on streets and parking lots !i would require alteration to accept the validation tokens, and that it was planned to I! 'I change the maximum time on meters to two hours. Cost to the City would be app:r;oxi- !i " mately $lO,500,which would be funded through parking meter revenue. I, t1 II I: There was discussion conc~rniy.g length of time this plan would be in operation and " 1 " how soon it woul d proceed. There was some concern about emp1oy~s taking advantage ': I' (i of parking when it was no longer metered. I " :' ii :i ii Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that Council approve the parking program, , 1 " as presented, and that 'the Council recognizes that this is an interim program, and " Ii II II encourages the aty to move as rapidly as possible toward a program of totally free Ii Approve'; <I parking. Motion carried. I: I; ,I :1 'I **Under Item E, discussion which took place at the regular meeting follows: :1 II Ii Councilman Mohr commented that Councilmen had received a letter expressing concern of the II Human Rights Commission about fraternal organizations of the city which restricted membership, II and suggested that the Council should withhold approval of such license renewals. Mr. Mohr e II , " ! ~ 11/1/71 - 8 ~ ..... e 7L8 11/1/71 \1 II I !I I, felt the Council had no grounds to approve or disapprove any of the renewals requested, but II I, !I It asked for clarification of the Human Rights Commission request. " I, ,J II Mayor Anderson explained that he had requested further clarifi,cation from the Human Rights Commission on this matter, and stated some type of documentation would be required before the Council could take any action. Councilman Williams pointed out that this type discrimination should be dealt with in the Courts. City Manager pointed out that state law spells out reasons for, license denial, , and the Council " must use the same reasoning. H. AFSCME Decision re: Arbitration - AFSCME notified staff and councilmen of a demand for " lO/27/71 arbi tra ti on, and has notified the city that it must select an arbitrator by October 29. It is the city's position that there is no dispute, and they had hoped to determine the e bargaining unit and have a representation election in accordance with PERB procedures ,I and negotiate wi th the AFSCME. At this poInt, it is the ci ty' s intent to proceed wi th I, a request for injunction to halt arbitration and petition the PERB to hold an election to determine whether AFSCME represents the majority of the balance of the city employes or whether the employes want to be represented by the AFSCME. It is the City Attorney's position that this is the proper legal procedure. r: ;1 I Councilwoman Bea1 felt representatives of labor who were present should be allowed an opportunity to speak. Mayor Anderson thought this would be improper at this time, II and that the Council should not take this matter under advisement at this point. " I I' I In answer to Councilman Mohr, City Manager said it was his understanding that he was I, informing Council that staff felt the next step in proceedings was ,.to file an injunctive 'procedure. If the Council disagrees with this procedure, staff should know before they proceed. In answer to Mrs. Bea1, Mr. Swanson of the City Attorney's office said the only alterna- tive to filing of the suit would be to proceed with arbitration. There was further council discussion on what the issues might l;Je, and whether there was any reason for public hearing at this time, or whether the Council should be involved at the present. Councilman Williams agreed with Mayor Anderson that the City Council had delineated responsibility for collective bargaining to the City Manager, and he therefore, moved to endorse and support such decisions as the Ci ty Manager made in this area. Mr. Hershner seconded the motion. Mrs. Bea1 did .not agree, .and feLt this was a question qf whether it was ,to the city interest to enter into a lawsuit. In answer to the Mayor, she said she felt it was a matter of public policy whether or not the city entered into litigation. I Vote taken on motion as stated.' All aye except Mrs. Bea1 who voted no, and Mr. Mohr, who abstained. -' In answer to Mayor Anderson, Mr. Williams clarified that his motion was intended to reaffirm the' right of the City Manager to make decisions . In answer to Mrs. Bea1, Mr. Swanson said it was his opinion that there was probably e no legal requiremynt that the Council authorize the City Manager regarding institution of legal proceedings. Approve " I. Contractors License Bond Requirements - It is recommerred that the present requirement lO/27/71 of $lO,OOO license bonds be reduced to$l,OOOand that the city accept certification that the bond is on file with the State of Oregon. A meeting was held with licensed tradesmen, which resulted in the proposed amendment to the ordinance that would accomplish this. A copy, of the proposal was circulated to Councilmen. ;, Councilman Williams asked why some contractors were licensed, while others were not. , Finance Director explained that certain contractors had requested licensing as a pro- ': tection and control, both for them and for the homeowner. There was Council discussion whether all contractors should be 1ieensed or if the I ! licensing process should be done away.with entirely.. It was the consensus that a study should be made of the licensing process to determine if general contractors should be licensed. Mr. Williams moved seconded- by Mr. Mohr that authorization be given for reduction of contract bond from $10,000 to $l,OOO. Motion carried. Approve " , " J. Request from State Highway Department for City ,Compliance to Qua1i,fy for Federally e ,: 10/27/71 Funded programs.- Oregon State Highway Department has requested adoption of a resolution gi ving assurance of city compliance wi th "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real l1/l/71 - 9 ... JII""" 7.1,9 · 11/1/71 i I I Properties Acquisition Policies Act of 1970" "Civil Rights Act.of 1964" and "Anti-Kick-. I 11 back Act of 1948." :1 ,I ' I' ' r: Since t~e ci ty is already complying with these po1i cies, there js no problem,- and the '; I: reso1ut~on should be adopted. I: Ii Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to approve the recommendation. Motion carried. ;1 Approve I;' I ' i: K. Peti tion for Storm Sewer - Between Coburg Road and Luella Street from Bailey Lane I I'! lO/27/7l to 450' north - lOO% city cost, $3300. ' )1 Ii . I: Installation of this sewer is recommended to accommodate Redevco Housing for Elderly ': !i on Bailey Lane. The project will be assessed for 24" and the city will pick up the ' i! addi tional size. This is a portion of 'the same drainage which serves the Sheldon i School area. Acceptance is recommended. Mr.. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the petition for storm sewer. Motion 'I e carried. Approvei L. Ternllnation of Ad Hoc International Arboretum Committee - A letter from Barbara Newton, 10/27/71 chairman of the Ad Hoc International Arboretum Committee . was previously cJiu!Cu1ated to 'f Councilmen. It asked ternllnation of the committee, since it has achieved its objective. ,I ., ' Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to accept the recommendation of the committee :i I I for its ternllnati on. " I~ Mayor Anderson said this committee has worked hard and long and should be commended :, I' for its persistence and effi ciency. ,I :, Vote taken on motion. Motion carried. Approve: il '. I M. Minutes of Meeting of October 1l, 1971 Approve: I: N. Student Assistance to Council and Staff - A proposal has been circulated to the Council 1110/13/71 to provide assistance, from students of a political 'science class. Councilmen Teague, I: Mohr and Williams have met with representatives to review the plan and discuss means i: of implementation. i I, I j: Miss Stephanie Larson said she had talked to individual Councilmen, and explained: ii advantages ,there could be to utilization of the plan. She admitted ,there nllght be Ii problems, but felt the benefi ts could outweigh the drawbacks. I: d ,I Ii Councilman Williams suggested ,that it nllght be helpful to the Council if students did i'! If research projects as a group -, being allocated to various facets on a coordinated basis. .. ii I; Miss Larson explained that there are twenty students interested, and that it is I' extremfT.1:y difficult for students to get involved in communi ty projects. They plan to I ~i appoint a representative to the .Mayor's Social Goals Committee. I: i!' There was discussion how the group would implement the plans and what time: demands I: would be made on Councilmen and staff. Councilwoman Campbell asked if the group could 1,1 work on a project to which the Council had found po resolution - that of the noise i: problem on South Wi1lamette. I; i' I! It 'was felt this might be a good project for some segments of the class. Miss Larson :; explained that it was their intent to provide resources, time and energgyto do research e I~ on these areas. i: " ): Councilman Williams asked what time, frame the group would be working in - Whether , projects would occupy only a three7month period, or the entire school year. Miss ~. .Larson explained that it was expected to be a continuing thing, and would not bel ! abandoned until some solution had been reached or research completed. ,: ! ~ ! I Mayor Anderson suggested that the Council committee select three topics in general from broad areas t:o be dist:ribut:ed t:o groups of st:udents. Individual Councilmen could then ind.icate which i t:ems were of aprticular interest to them and could be con- tacted by students for information and advice~ ' I The st:udent committee agreed this wou1p be a g~od plan. Mayor Anderson said it would be incumbent o~ the class instructor to arrange contacts I wi th staff and minimize confli cts . Miss Larsen suggested that any approach be cleared wi t:h the Ci ty, Manager's offi ce. City Manager agreed, and said there are many areas where help is needed, but it must be properly coordinated to be_of'benefit~ Mr. Mohr suggested that the Council commi ttee meet as soon as possible to set up a st:ructure and suggest: assignments. Mrs. Beal offered to meet with the committee. :1 a ' ., ! ll/l/71 - lO ... "9IIl I e 730 11/1/71 if II ,. I I! II " jI Mayor Anderson asked Mr. Mohr to act as chairman of the conmlittee, and call a rreeting Ii " " as soon as possible. Mr. Williams, Mr. Teague and Mrs. Beal will serve with him. " " I I He suggested that Councilmen indicate which suggestions they are particularly interested , in. " Miss Larson, speaking as a member of the ASUO, said they have been trying to encourage i, better coordination betwe'en the Council and the ASUO. A representative attended " I meetings last year and another will be designated for Council meetings this year. They would like to get the students involved and contributing. This sugge9ted program has full support of the ASuO Senate. Affirm 10/27/71 Report from Student Project,"Community Problem Solving" - Councilman Mohr reported that the Council's Subcommi ttee had listed' three projec~s which !night be assigi1t~d , to Mr. Allman's class for a: student project, as they requested at the meeting of Oct- , " " ober 1,3. They are as follows: I; e 1) Use or abuse of the Mall - who is using it and who not; why using or not; reaction of people' living or working on mall to mall use regulations; how business is doing; how Urban Renewal Agency is functioning in terms of " development downtown. i ~ Data base for this kind of report would be a community survey designed by students to elicit these kinds'of reactions. " I I, 'I 2) Fact book for solid waste disposal in our community. " 'I Fact book would tell us what is going on in terms of solid waste disposal throughout the metropolitan area. 3) Defini tion of communi ty as far as kinds of thingsci tizens would expect in 'i terms of alwocations by the city. I :! What are citizens interested in having provided and what would they support in terms of property taxes. Mr. Mohr continued that there would be certain constraints put upon the students in terms of how they would represent the city, what kinds of appearance would b~ made in the community and what the relationship would be between student projects and the City " Council. How information and reports were to be presented; whether gi ven out to media ,: " " prior to Council review. As soon as Mr. Mohr has discusse,d this with the students, he will wri te a formal memorandum of understanding to ,the class in terms of describing the project and developing a letter of constraint. " Stephanie Larsen said she had presented' all three of the commi ttee' s projects to the class. Interest was expressed in all three, but most were interested in the mall, so it was decided to 'concentrate'on that item. They are curr.ent1y gathering infermation and coordinating things already done by others. ,It is felt this project will pccupy more I than a term. She explained the manner _in which the project would be dealt with, and I liaison that would be maintained with city staff. She' felt the group was interested in I personal contact wi th councilmen, and offered to get them together for discussion .. wi th indi vi dual councilmen, if they were interested. : Mayor Anderson said he was sure Councilmen would be availabl~ to discuss matters wi th students informally. He sai d the group ,s,eemed to be moving along very qui ckly and that he was quite pleased with the progress. Affirm e I !: ~ o. LElJA PrTbrity for Jail Improvement - Councilman Mohr asked for a copy of the TAC lO/13/71 report made by LEAA concerning priorities for jail rehabilitation. Assistant City I, Manager said he had expressed concern when he had seen the plan schedule for improve- " :, ment, and that i.t now appeared the priori ty would b? increased sooner than scheduled. File P. Park Vandalism - Copies of a report concerning increased park vandalism were previously 10/13/71 circulated to Councilmen. Mr. Ed Smith, Director of Parks and Recreation, explained that part of the increase in vandalism stemmed from increased usage. No one age group h~s been responsible for the various destructive acts. Steps taken to decrease vandalism include improved alarm and lighting systems, increased supervision and immediate repair of damage. " Mayor Anderson asked what progress had been made to replace flags in the Mall. Mr. Smith replied that the Police Depaxtment has been pursuing this matter, and has recovered I three flags. If it is impossible to re.cdver'jthe remaining flags, they will have, to be remade. Mrs. Campbell had been contacted by a Camp Fire Girls leader who, when leading a group on a hJi:ke up Spencer Butte, had taken a wrong turn on an unmarked trail. She had ; volunteered the services of her group to put up signs marking the trails on the Butte. Mr. Smith said it has been difficult to maintain sign's on Spencer Butte, but if she e would contact his Department, arrangements could be made to begin a project to install new signs. l1/l/71 - 11 .... ,..... 731 e 11/1/71 '1 Ii I Q. II I Amendment, Billboard Size Regulations ~ Obie Outdoor Advertising has requested an II I' lO/l3/71 amendment to a section of the Sign Code to increase area limitations for billboards II from 650 square feet to 672 square, feet to accommodate signs used by that company I; ,I i in rotation to various areas. Planning COrrmllssion discussed this matter, and in I! ,I minutes of that meeting have been circulated to Councilmen. The ,Planning COrrmllssion I: recommendation was that the Council not change the area allowed for billboards. I' ;1 I' " representati ve of ObLe Outdoor Advertising, I: Mr. George Haines, explained that his ,I company now has four billboards which are in excess of the allowable area. He II explained that they have branches in other cities and states which allow the larger Ii si gns , and that it is a hardship if they have to be remade for use in this city. . I: ..... I In answer to Councilman Williams, Mr. Haines said that the signs are made locally, ,I but that they. are made for use in other areas,.as well as this city. ,I I; " " I: Councilmen questioned Mr. Haines further about general size of signs and reasons I for the request. In answer to some council concerns, Planning Director explained e II I, that the Sign Code was not intended to recotnize national standards, but to set :1 standards for our city. At the time of adoption, an additional 50 square feet was I: " added to this section to allow for cut-outs, and it was never the intent to allow I ~ 1; a larger sign. ,I I' Mayor Anderson pointed out that this was an indication of the type request the Council II I, would be faced with when the arrortizat,ion period begins to expire for some signs , I, I Ii I " affected by the Code. He suggested the Council and Planning COrrmllssion meet jointly I' , to discuss the Sign Ordinance. He pointed out that several: members of the Council H , were not present at the time of hearings and adoption, and coul d probably benefi t i' , from such an educational process. , I' , 'I II City Manager agreed. that this could be beneficial, but pointed out that it should be I, II 'I understood that this would not be reconsi derati on of the ordinance. Many signs have '[ " " :1 been installed under the limitations of the new code. Mayor Anderson agreed that this i il Ii should merely be an orientation session, and not a rehearing of the existing ordinance. II " He felt the Council should meet with the Planning Comnrrssion to be better informed i I' " I' before making judgments on the exceptions that will be requested of them. i Ii " " 11 I: Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that this matter be placed on file. Motion ,Mr. carried. City Manager suggested that it might be helpful to make an analysis of the kinds of appea~s which had come before the Sign Code Board of Appeals, and whether there were tli some obvious problems. - -- File i; R. L-COG Restructuring - Mayor Anderson commented that L-COG is in the process of :1 10/20/71 restructuring, and that a proposed restructuring document has been received. He , assured Council that he would refer the revised document to them for final approval and s ugges ti ons for change. i ~ Councilman McDonald commented that the Mayor was the Council representative to L-COG, I I: and that this appeared to be a proper recommendation. :1 I Councilman Gribskov felt that, since a public hearing would ultimately be held, ,I ,I I: this was certainly a good procedure. File I' II ; ~ Verification of 1971-72 Tax Rate - During the budget process, " S. an attempt was made " " ii lO/20/71 to develop a budget which would result in an $8.67 per thousand tax rate. Act ual ; ~ e 1: rate came to $8.68 per thousand, which is a little higher than anticipated. File , ,I :! i; 'I \1 T. ,Detoxification Center S~atus - One of the elements of the Mayor's COrrmllttee on the Ii 10/20/71 Criminal Code involved a recommendation to discontinue the practice of jailing :1 alcoholics and substitution of a detoxification center. Manager read a report I; Ii from the Chief of Police on the .status of the program, and will keep the Council i: posted on further developments. File II u. Report on Collective Bargaining with Local 1724A of AFSCME - A memorandum was 'I )llO/20/71 previously distributed to Councilmen outlining action between city staff and Local I il l724A AFSCME relating to collective bargaining since passage of the charter amend- " ment regarding co11ecti ve bargaining., " II " ,I II ~ \ Manager explained that it had appeared it ,would be necessary to request C<:)unci1 i' approval to file a request for in~uncture against the arbi trators. Since distrit:. bution of the memorandum, a meeting was held at the PERB between representatives of I ci ty staff and AFSCME which resulted in postponement of the request for proceeding with a representation election among city employes. Therefore, no discussion of the memo is necessary at this time. File - V. ,Mass Transit District, Progress Report - Councilman Mohr asked for a report from the lO/27/71 Mass Transit District on the status of its funding proposal, federal funding and I, other concerns. ! Ii I' e I,', Mayor Anderson said this had been discussed at the last L-COG meeting, and that federal funding has not been forthcoming. ~ l1/l/71 - l2 ""'II e 732 11/1/7l Ii I II Introduction of new Minority Relations Specialist - City Manager introduced Mr. q W. ~ I ,10/27/71 Lewis Peters, who has just been appointed Minority Relations Specialist by the I: Manager as a 'result of a selection procedure set up by the Mayor's committee. Mayor Anderson welcomed Mr. Peters to the city staff and said he hoped his tenure would be long and successful. File Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the above i terns be approved, affirmed or filed. Rollcall v:-ote. All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried. ORDINANCES ;, ~'...e:::~ .~. .0.. . COUNCIL BILL NO. 9525 - Initiating vacation of East Park and/or North Park and alley between East 7th and East 8th and calling public hearing December 13, 1971 (Lane County) was submitted, I .and no councilman present requesting that it be re~d in full, was read the firsttime by council bill Ii number only. I e Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second ,time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Mot ion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16325. I COUNCIL BILL NO. 9526 - Rezoning property located north of Railroad Boulevard between Polk Street and Grand Street to C-2 SR (Community Commercial District with site review procedures)(f,rank Munn) was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be regd in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was decla~ed passed and numbered 16326. - COUNCIL BILL NO. 9527 - Rezone property located south of Elmira Road and to the east and west of Baxter Road to M-3 SR Heavy Industrial District with Site Review procedures (H. H.Baxter &, Co.) was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill. be read the second time by council bill number only, wi th unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. ,. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. MOhr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16327. I COUNCIL BILL NO. 9528 - Rezone a portion of property located south of lOth Avenue East between Grant Street and Chambers Street to C-2 SR Community Commercial District with Site Review (Hubert Diess,) was submitted, and no counci~ma~ pres:~~ requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only: ~,. -. ~ " Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried e unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. ~r. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was de81ared passed.and numbered 16328. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9529 - Rezone property located west of Country Club Road and south of I-105 to C-2 PD Community commercial Planned Unit Development. Hold for, final ppproval of PUD (George ZellnerO was, submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, wi th unanimous consent of the COuncil, and that enactment be considered at this time. M'()tion carried ' unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. .The bill !'las, ~fre.ltLfor fi~al'apprpv~r-9':f.,J?).il:nI1edVD.i.1:; _.D.eye,lqpmen:e ." :',~' - , ,'.'---- : " ---~:_~. '.",'~-",,,~ _r; .__ _~.~;_," ,..,~. - '___/~!..M .~.., .' ,,o .;'t..... :-.. _::._,~...." _---. _...,.__ I COUNCIL BILL NO.- '3530 - Rezone-'prope'rty' located east of HIlyard Street and north of 30th Avenue to RPSR Residential Professional District with Site Review procedures, was submitted, and no council- man present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. IDeague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only; wi th unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. e All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16329. 11/1/71 - 13 .... ,.... I 733 e 11/1/71 COUNCIL BILL NO. 9531 - Concerning bond requirements for certain licensed businesses and amend- I ing the Eugene Code, and declaring an emergency was submitted, and no councilman present requresting that it be read .in full, ~as read the first .time by council bill number only. " I' Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be ~ead the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion " " carried unanimously'and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. :; I, , !' Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen presBat voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16330. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9532 - Vacate a portion of Spring Boulevard 700 feet south of North Shasta Loop (Larry Hirons) was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. 1 Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion e carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconaed by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16331. COUNCIL BILL NUMBER 9533 - Construct storm sewer between Coburg Road and Luella Street from I Bailey Lane to 450' north and declaring an emergency was submitted and no councilman present request- i I ing that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time bycouncil bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16332. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9534 - Adopting plans and specifications to construct storm sewer between Coburg: Road and Luella Street from Bailey Lane to 450' north and declaring an emergency was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill num- ber only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. "Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16333. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9535 - Lev yi.ng assessments for paving 10th Avenue from Garfield Street to West 600' and widening Garfield Street from 10th Avenue to 11th Avenue was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bil~ number only. I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bil.l be held over to the meeting of December 13, 1971 to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was held. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9536 - Levying assessments for paving alley between Hayes Street and Garfield Street from 11th Avenue to 12th Avenue and between 11th Avenue and 12th Avenue from Garfield Street to east (71-13) was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was e read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be held over to the meeting of December 13, 1971 to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties. Motion carried unanimously~ and the bill was held I I COUNCIL BILL NO. 9537 - Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within Saratoga Park Subdivision and sanitary sewer within 160' of Saratoga Park Subdivision was submitted and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be held over to the meeting of December 13, 1971 ': to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties. Motion carried i unan~mo~usly and the bill was held. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9538 - Levying assessments for paving alley between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue I from Lawrence Street to Washington Street was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be held over to the meeting of December 13, 1971 to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was held. !' COUNCIL BILL NO. 9539 - Levying assessment s for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within II Royal Ann Park 1st Addition (71-18) was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be e read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. ~ 11/1/71 - 14 ''''''Il e 73~ 11/1/71 'II I' II Ii ,I I II ii COUNCIL BILL NO. 9540 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in area bounded by 5th Avenue, II Ii ,I !I Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks and Highway 99 (71-32) was submitted, and no councilman present .f :j requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be held over to the meeting of December 13, 1971 to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties. Motion carried I, unanimously and the bill was held. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 1976 - Initiating minor boundary change for annexation of 9.68 acres of Spring " Boulevard, east of North Shasta Loop (Dr. Larry Hirons) and transmitting to Boundary Commission for public hearing, was submitted. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. I' e RESOLUTION NO. 1977 - Transmitting approval of annexation of 122 acres south of 43rd and east of Amazon Drive was submitted~ Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 1978 - Certification that the city of Eugene complies with Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Properties Acquisition Policies Act, etc. was submitted. I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 1979 - Certification of Mayor Anderson to sign for transfer of supplus property was submitted. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 1980 - Authorizing payment of bills, claims and progress payments, was submitted. Mr. Teague moved seconded.by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the resolution carried. Regarding the bills, City Manager explained in answer to Mr. Hershner that the city has acted as a banker for an executive supervisory training program, to secure media and materials. Other agencies will reimburse the city. ' . - Mayor Anderson announced a committee of Williams, as chairman assisted by Hershner and Campbell as a Council subcommittee to work with County Commissioners on a master plan for Alton Baker Park. The meeting was adjourned to November 22, 1971. I :1 e I II " e ....