The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/23/1973 Meeting It Council Chamber Eugene., Or'egon April 23,. 1973 Adjourned meeting of the Common Council of' the city of Eugene,' Oregon--.. adjourned from the meeting held April 9, 1973 - was called to order by His Honor Mayor Lester"E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on April.2.3, 1973 in the: Council Chamber with the following councJlmen pre?ent: Mrs:. Beal, Mr. Williams~ Mr. McDonald, Mr. Hershner, Mrs.. Campbell,. Messrs. Keller, MurraY-and Wood. .. . ,- .' . I. Public Hearings' A. Bids, Public' Works 1. Echo" Hollow 'R9ad '- Opened Apr~1--3., 1973. " lia::l~ "C !lidc~r and Project Contract Cost P:\VP:C, Sr:!:\\ALKE, S';::.u:m S::~:E:R ."-'\D 51'0;'''1 ~::;~~:R: 1. L::ho ::..'ll.o\'; Rd. iro::. RO)"o'1l A~en~e to Ea,ger A~e, (490) PROPOSAL 1 4'" Pay. PROPOSAL 2 .40' Pav, PROPOSAL 3 PARKS STOll'! SF.;;ER ~ ALTE.!L"ATE ~ ALTER."ATE ~ ALTER:,ATE ~ ~ SA:nV.RY SIIR. , f ! . 1. IILdish., . ."..... .$201,105.38. . . $.~98. 395. 00.. ..$190.105. OS. ..51&9.919.30. . . . S~;;-,-Q13. 75. . ,$22,083.75., . .56JL.~~Q.,.9.0_. . .$0.545.02. .. .S;;. 0.:04.0"- 2. De\'ereacx & ?ratt..$20J.709.59...$20d.294.54....5192.188.83...5195,008.86....525.419.66...$22,196.66....583.903.84...$56.222.59....S7,?2~.20 3. E~;;ene Sand........ 5214.631. 32. . . $ 221, 259.17. . . . S 198.353.90. . .5209,1 E S. 43. . . .527,195 _ 50. . . $ 23,479.10. . . . S 97,396.51. . . $ 69,241. 44. . . . S s. 3,53; OJ 4. Delta Cc:!st...,.. ..$212.93. . 63... $~o Bie.,..... .$194.849.51., . $~;o Bid...,..., $28,383.90.. .$24 .164.70.. ,$105.126.45. ,,$ 74,221.45... ,$3 .11. . CO Cost to Abuttb~ P,op. Cost to City A::lount 8ud~e:od Re.lden:lal.. ...... $ 15.40 it/Ct............ Paving.... ....... $12,550.00..... ..........,.. ...., ,."., ." ....531,350.00 C::1Cerc'al......... $ 20.30 ft/ft Bike Lanes....... $27.050.00.........................,......... .519,560.00 Sicielo'al;:s.......... $ 3.50 ft/ft StO:1O Sewer.,.... $.\9.550.00............................,...... .561.860.00 Stem S'.-:" Direct.. $11.700.CO Pari&; Parkil'\g Se"er S:"bs and llrivelo'q adjust::ients area. cte........ $25,014.00....................................$30,000.00 .(vari.. por let) 1973-i4 Rueget Be~d Fund COMPLETION DATE: Scpte~;er 1. 1973 I ~ L. --~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~----~~------~-------------_____~__~~~_~_~___~_____~~~_~____~~_~~_~~~~~~___~:______~~__~____.~~~~~~~~_~~_~~~_~._~ - Public Works.. Director reviewed: b\ds 'and explained . 'that Proposal 1 for' 44-foot paving provi.ded for two 5-foot bike/pedestrian lanes, two ll-foot travel lanes, and one 12.,...foot 'cneter turn lane. Proposal-;:: for ~40':"'fo.ot pav-ing' provides 'for two '8-foot parking. lanes and two 12-foou travel. lanes. Prpposal J covers Parks Department on-site improvemenus adJacent to' Echo' Hollow swimming pool, estimated to cost about $6000'ciore if bid sep~rately. Assessment to' abutting properties will be on the basis of 36-foot paving, City to pay for additional width. Recommendation was to award contract to Wildish Construction on the low alternate bid for 44-foot paving, the Bicycle Com- mittee concurring in this recommendation, plus low basic bid for Parks . Department work (Proposal 3), storm sewer, and sanitary sewer for a total contract price of $296,710.. . .. , Public hearing was.openedand those speaking in favor of the proposed improve- ment were Bruce Lassen, 4448 Knoop; Basil Hayden, 4430 Willhi; Laoni Davis, member of the Bicycle Committee, 3015 Emerald; Jean Raabe, 4335 Avalon.' They maintained the.improve~ent would increase safety through separation of bike and auto traffic, provide pedestrian lane for children going to and from school, cut street maintenance costs. It was noted that Bethel- Danebo is one of the last areas in the City needing improved feeder streets and that delay would increase cost of the project. . Those opposed were Louie Patton, 1190 Echo Hollow Road; Rosealee Munn, representing Active Bethel Citizens; Joe Slagel, 430 Glenhaven Road, repre- senting also Allison Park Church;J. H. Sorensen, 4300 Avalon; B. H. Mont- gomery, 1120 Echo Hollow Road; Ed Lundberg, 4120 Concord; Archie DuGuid, 4320 Avalon, speaking for Carl Juhl. Their objections were based primarily on inability of senior citizens in the area to pay assessment for the widening project in addition to those for recent sewer installation. There was opposition also to. inclusion of the bike lane. Delay of the project was requested. Petitions against the project signed by owners of properties abutting the street were not. e.g... Also mem.ti.oned were other arterials planned for the area which opponent~ f~lt would obviate the need for widening Echo Hollow. Mr. DuGuid doubted that assessment against Mr. Juhl's property could be Bancrofted since he figured it would amount tOimore'than the allowed percentage of the property's worth. Manager noted letters in favor of ;the project received' from Mr. and Al Ny~gaard, 585 Taney Street; Ruth Bascom, chairman of the Bicycle -\ \1- Mrs. Committee; 4/23/7311 . Mr. and Mrs. G. E. Albertson, 5S0 Taney Street; Also, reports from ,the Active Bethel Citizens requesting delay and investigation of alternative modes of financing the project, and a report from Public Works Department. Letters opposed to the project werBreceived from Muriel E. Roberts, 4021 Roy?l Avenue; B. H. Momtgomery, 1120 Echo Hollow Road. . Manager responded to statemBnts and commented on possibility of spreading Bancroft payments over a 20-year periqd rather than the standard 10-year period, City policy on paving streets, effect of inflationary trend on paving costs, and City's assuming expense of that width beyond the standard 3D-foot pavinm. He, noted that the street came into the City through annexation and it is not known whether additional right-of-way was purchased or dedicated when adjacent properties subdivided.._ Assessment deferral program now being explored was mentioned, with the added ,comment that there is no knowledge of anyone ever having been dispossessed because of assessment foreclosure. Manager said that the design to accommodate bike paths had been under study by the engineering , and traffic engineering staffs and researched extensively with the result that they feel the recommended design is the safest overall which can be applied to this type arterial. He said that aside from addition of bike lanes the proposed improvement is not any more extravagaDt than other arterials, although somewhat different with the provision for the center turn lane. With regard to need for this improvement in view of other traffic routes planned in the area Manager said that traffic projections appear to indicate Echo Hollow probably will be ari integral part of the traffic system ~ith or without ,other facilities. Public Works Director said he knew of no other major improvements which would divert traffic from Echo Hollow, and that Echo Hollow is one of three major projects included in the rece~tly approved bond issue. It is hoped to construct Echo Hollow this year, Barger 'and Royal in the next two years, to minimize con~~ fusion and inconveni:ence to the r;teighb:<2):h::gl:0ds. ,He cited traffic counts and said there are not many designs which would De desirable al ternat'i vesA~o the 44-foot or 40-foot paving proposed. It was noted that temporary sidewalk: construction was p!,eviously vetoed by. the CouJl~c:tl.}tpic.h led-:"to requ'est \ for bond issue to provide funds' for' s'tandar'd construction' wifli-'the CIty's 'p'aying- IO':['" 'storm sewers, intersections, .additional width and thickness. . In answer to Councilman Keller, Public Works Director explained assessments now being collected on previous sewer installation. Councilman Hershner asked whether the proposed assessment deferral program, if it became a reality, wouln apply to Echo Hollow proj ect. Manager said it~wou-ld 'sinc e. assessments are made after a project is completed. The deferral would be on collection of the assess- ment, not on the actual recording of, the assessment. Public Works Director detailed for Councilman Hershner the basis on which street widths are determined - - 36-foot under normal circumstances, lesser width for short streets or cul-de- sacs. Manag~r, in answer to Councilman Murray"said wopk is now in progress on two methods for deferring collection of assessments, these to be ready f.or Council discussion within three or four months; And that the E~ho'Hollow projec~ waS one '0T thes~ listed prior to the bond election~., However, there is :mothing which compels its construction Slnce the language of the measure provided for no specific projects. ' Public Works Director described for Councilman McDonald'the present width and surface of Echo Hollow Road and estimated assessment per'fT2ptfoot for the improvement. . . Discussion continued between Council and staff with regard to parking provlslons, the project's effect on adjacent property values, concerns of the Active Bethel Citizens group. Mrs. Munn, secretary of the group, in answer to'Councilman Murray' said they were thinking in terms of a five-year delay and were working on something more than a ttpatch plantt to present as an alternative to the'project as bid. . Councilma~ McDonald commented on the increasing cost of construction over the past years a~d said delay wQuld:no doubt make the project even more costly than' now. He said adjacent properties would probably not be developed until upgrading of streets in the area is accomplished. He also commented on the length of time this improvement has been in planning stages. . .. Councilwoman Campbell asked Mr. Montgomery whether. spreading Bancrofting over a 20-y~ar perio~, .~o~l,sI~,_P~t theproj ect in a more f<;1vorable' light . Mr. Montgomery replled that lt would lncr,ease the overall costs because of added interest. He didn't feel he could meet the cost of the improvement regardless ,of the repayment method. . 115 4/23/73 - 2 e Councilwoman Beal askea Mr. DuGuid whether he felt street.improvements increase property values. Mr. DuGuid answered that he thought there was very little difference in resale value compa~.e9: to.the initial cost. In response to Mrs. Beal's' question whether ,the ABGwanted the improvement but objected to the cost, Mrs. Munnreferred to the group's request for delay and investigation of alternative methods of financing improvements. Councilman Hershner referred to comment that the City initially paved Echo Hollow Road without assessment to abutting properties. Manager said ~ that was the staff's understanding. . Mrs B.eal moved seconded by: Mr. Williams to award contract to Wildish Construction on low alternate bid for Proposal 1 (44-foot paving), low. basic bid on Proposal 3 (Parks), low bid on Proposal 1 for storm seyver, and, low~ bid ,on sani!arysewerfbr total contra.ct' PI"'i~e of:-" y ~.:.... $296,710~as.recommended. ! - Councilman Hershner asked whether the motion should include provision for Bancroft payments over a 20-year period, but it was felt not necessary until the assessment is levied. Councilwoman Beal asked if people presenting hardship cases under this contract would receive b~nefit under the proposed assessment deferral program. Manager said c~iteria for hardship cases would'.,be the responsi- bility of the Council. Whatever is decided upon in the deferment program would apply to this project. Councilman McDonald noted that the City has never foreclosed on assessments against homes and repeated his belief that delay of the improvement would make it more costly. Councilman Williams commented on the Joint Housing Committee's recommenda- tion in favor of an assessment deferral program for the elderly. He said he had not heard any testimony to the effect that the improvement was not needed, the only question appearing~to be who would pay for it, and that any other method than the assessment procedure would take a major policy change. - Councilman Murray said he would vote in favor of 'proceeding with the project because (1) this project was called to the voters' attention in a widely, . publicized bond issue which was approved, (2) there is possibility of spreading the cost over a 20-year period through Bancrofting, (3) there is possibility of deferring collection of assessments to serve the best interests of genuine hardship cases, (4) the improvements are needed, and (5) it is reasonably safe to assume that a five-year delay will result in a more costly project. Councilwoman Beal said she too would favor the contract award because she had not heard anyone say the improvement was not needed, delay will not lessen the cost, and planning of the project has been in ~ process for some time. Mayor Anderson expressed appreciation to residents of the area for their concern, and hoped they realized it was shared by the Council. Rollcall vote, wa's taken .on: the motion as.' stated.':-'. Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye." 2. Various- Opened April 17, 1973 (2 projects) Na=. ~f Bid!.r and Pro:eet CC<\tract Cost CC'st to Abutting Prop, Cos t to City r.C;;;;un: B.ud~etro BIKE T~\IL rAV:~G: 1, A~cn& f~a:on Channel froc Jefferson 'Street to Cha=bers S:reet (S09) ;. ;~genepSand & Gravel Co"-;>any................$ 10,019.00...........................0............................$ 1001900 $1' 5eO . .cnge aving. Ine...........................$ 11,141.75 ' . ........ ., 3. .~ldish Construct!on Co~any................$ 16,560.25 $ 9,8~0(rng'r . rSc.) . __________________-----------___________________________________________________ COY.PLETIOS DATE: August 10, 1973 S~~iTA~l S~;~R ~~D STO~~ SE.~R RECOSSTRGCTION: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2e l~ the area te't:.'een Lawrence Street a:1d ~.shi=bton Street fro~ Cheshire Street to 3r~ Avenue (540) ~. ~~n~e~h R~ Bostiek Constru~tion COlllpany.....$106.322.40............................0......,.....................$106.322,40........$66 8CO .. lU - ay ontraccors........................$110.827.L.O . , ~ _ , 3. .~ldish Construction Co"';>any..,..",..,.....$117.363,50 S99,7uO(~ng r 4. I)evereaux & Prace, Ine................~.... .$132.092 .85 Lot.) COM?LETIOS DATE: October 15. 1973 : ~-----~-------------~-------------------------~:~-:----::::~~:::~~~~~-----------------------------------------------------, I 'Co 4/23/73 - 3 Public Works Director reviewed the bids submitted. He explained that sewer reconstruction between Lawrence and Washington form Cheshire to'3rd was held until completion of the Washingto~/Jefferson overpass construction. Recommen- dation was to award contracts to the low bidders on both projects. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr~ Williams to award contracts to low bidders as recommended. Rollcall vote.. Motion 'carried",~ll. councilmen present voting . = 'aye . " B. Bids, Parks Department - Opene~ April~9, 1973 e Amazon Park - concrete walks around Amazon Village; asphalt ped/bike path from 24th to 29th along Amazon Channel; drainage of areas along asphalt path. Wildish Construction Shur-Way Contractors Devereaux & Pratt Eugene Sand & Gravel Benge Paving $ 28,702.85 29,976.01 30,801.40 31,411.20 31,635.30 31,843.20 Completion date August 1, 1973 Office Estimate We recommend that Wildish Constructipn be awarded the contract for this work. We are studying the possibility of continuing the path from 29th to 30th, due to the good unit prices involved. . Skinner's Butte, Gate~'/ay (Ferry SL Bridge) Area - extension of south bank trail to E.W.E.B. area, and River/Baker Park viewing terrace. Concrete Unlimited Wildish Construction Devereaux & Pratt $ 8,04l~.22 9,407.00 11,022.50 10,099.00 Completion date August i, 1973 Office Estimate We recommend that Concrete Unl imited be awarded the contract for the V/Oil<. ,. Due to the low bid on this work, we anticipate neg6tiating for some drain tiling along the walk to help with the poor drainage in the turf area. Skinner's Butte - Paving overlay on western portion of road ascending Skinner's Butte, beginning near the parks warehouse. A portion of this lies within the Lincoln Street R/W and is not a part of the B.O.R. Skinner's Butte Phase III project. Bob has made arrangements with Don Allen that public works pay for the tonnage applied vJithin the Lincoln Street R/h'. T:lis will amount to about 94 tons of the estimated total of 347 tons. The follow- ing bids are for the total amount, including preparation and the tack coat: .- Wildish Construction Eugene Sand & Gravel Benge Paving ~hur-Way Contracto~s Office estimate $ 8.75/ton ($3,036.25)' $ 9.49/ton~ ($3,293.03) $ 9.73/ton ($3,376.31) _p1.7~lton ($4,077.25) $11. 00/ton--{$3 ,817.06) Completion date June 1, 1973 We recommend that Wildish Construction be awarded the contract for this . work. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to award contracts to low bidders as recommended. 'Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all '(',;:ouncilmen present voting aye. C. Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Annexation area south of Crest Drive and west of Blanton Drive (10.55 acres) (Oak ~eal~t) This annexation was approved previously but because of technical error was not completed. Planning Commission recommended transmittal again to the Boundary Commission. '.' "'" Resolution No. 2167 - Transmitting to Boundary Commission request to annex area. south of Crest Drive and west of Blanton Drive was submitte~ '. ~ - - ..t - - .- Edna Shirey.,- 3217 Whitten-Drive, speaking for asked that ietter from that group be read into indicating opposition to the annexation ondthe findings on which to recommend to the Boun ary the Crest Drive eitizens the record. It was read basi$ toat there were no CommlSSlon tnat the area group, later t;~c~Hfl~xed. I ,., 4/23/73 - 4. They argued that the request for annexation was premature. Robert Suess, 260 East 38th, objected to presentatinn of the letter without opportunity for proponents to rebut. 4It Neil Jongerward, 2863 Lydick Way, pointed out that the property in question is within the urban service boundary and that the Public Works Department has indicated City services can be provided. In answer to Councilman , Williams, Manager said the property can be serviced by an existing sewer serving the'Crest Drive school. With regard to the urban service, boundary in this area, there are two ridge lines delineating drainage areas and service boundaries are determined using ridge lines as part of the criteria. . Councilwoman Beal wondered if the Planning Commission recommendation would have been different had it received the letter written by the Crest Drive group. Planning Director said the overruling factor in the Planning Commission's deliberations was that its action should be consistent with previous action of favorable recommendation on this annexation request. He said the staff presented to the Commission the same position presented in the letter from the Crest Drive group, that the annexation request was premature. Councilman Wood expressed concern about extending City services to the area, particularly fire protection. He reminded the Council of concerns with regard to effect development in that area would have on schools and said the 1990 Plan should be given a close look with regard to the urban service boundary. Councilman Hershner inquired about the time frame for the South Hills study in relation to the original request for annexation of this area. Manager said the original recommendation for a moratorium on-development in the south hills was to limit densities on planned unit developments and allow no new annexations. However, the Council at that time felt new annexations should be considered on an individual basis. Planning Director added that the south hills study is expected to be completed at the end of this year. He said this original annexation was held at staff level, and annexation of a larger area eventually recommended after the moratorium was established. Councilman Murray and Councilwoman Campbell fe~t this annexation should be postponed. As members of the Joint Parks Committee they were concerned aoout development in the south hills area and possibility of jeopardizing plans for a ridge line park. They suggested waiting until informati.on gathered from the south hills study is available. e , Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to table the resolution transmitting the annexation request until the South Hills study is further developed and clearer guidelines are drawn. Motion carried, Councilmen Beal, McDonald, Campbell, Keller, Murray, and Wood voting aye; Councilmen Williams and'Hershner voting no. 2. Rezoning frpm C-2 and R-3 to M-2 area at northeast corner Broadway and Garfield (Donald Short) Planning Commission recommended approval to allow car wash and fueling facility. Council looked at the pr9perty on. tour; ,.it" is sorrounded by M-2 uses and residential use is not acc~ptable. . 1 Council Bill No. 220 - Rezoning to M-2 the area at northeast corner of Broadway and Garfield was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. .:~ Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams tnat the bill be read the second time by council bill number-only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr-. Williams that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16751. 3. Rezone from County AGT to RA the area south.of 1-105 east of Centennial and north of Kins Row (Earl Green) . . -.Petitioner requested rezoning eight acres R-2 and five acres RP. Planning Commission recommended RA. Council toured previously when annexation was discussed and when zoning to allow a rest home was requested. II e 4/23/73 - 5 Earl Green, 365 West 27th Place, recounted history of annexation and the previ- ous proposed development to accommodate a rest 'home. James Redden, architect, 700 Country Club Road:, showed slides of the prope,rty and sketches ;of development proposed under R..,..2 and RE. . He maintai:q.ed single-family zoning .would not allow economically feasible development, but that RP would allow buffering alop.g Centennial and multiple-family to the :q.orth(proposed construction to be for "singles" apartments)' would. be buffered by natural barriers. Rick Cleveland, attorney, 200 East 11th Avenue, elaborated on propos'ed deveJ.:opment un.der R-2 and RP and detail~d the services to th~ area taken into consideration for the type of development envisioned. He estimated the tax return as a result of t~e proposed development and cited the need for single-apartment living in the area, suggesting 'the service' load of the proposal under' R-2and RP would. be less than RA with greater return to.the community. Councilman Williams asked whether Planning staff agreed' with the Commission"s recommendation of RArather than R-2 and RP. Jim Saul, planner, said the Commission at the time of rezoning adjace.nt proper:ties to accommodate,lodges and clubs made it clear there was no intent to indicate that type of ,zoning appropriate for the entire area. The Commission recognized different' ownerships of adjacent properties felt encouraging RP districts would be contrary to the intep.t of the General Plan. While the petitioner has indicated the proposedR-2 area would be developed for singles living, there is no way the Commission can ensure that, and they are concerned with the impact of development which could occur under the R-2 'and RP zoning on schools and traffic'in the area. . Councilwoman Beal inquired whether the capaci:ty in the Sorrel Way trunk allotted previously to Mr. Green for 'this property would be su~[icient to service. the type of development he is. now proposing. ,Manager recounted the agreement allow- ing a maximum capacity for the one parcel's use, other properties would not ,be allowed to connect to that line. Public WQrks Director said the contractual arrangement with Mr. Green allows discharge into the Sorrel Way trunk of 15 gallons per minut.e; estimated discharge for the pl'i'pposed development wou.ld' be 46t gallons p.er minute.' '. . Councilwoman Beal said it' appeared the istaff, and Commission were concerned with overall development:-of the area, not so muchtrhat the proposed development would noi5 be a good use. Mr. Saul said the Commis,sion would definitely. object to any RP u~e.The General Plan does iridicate a low density in this entir~ area, and RA does provide' the 'developer with opportunity to subdivide similar to that occurring south of' Oentenriial.PUD procedure would also be av:ailabl"e. Council Bill No. 221 - Rezoning to RA area .south of 1-105 east of Centennial and nopth of Kins Row was submi,t:tJ~d, ana, read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no . councilman present .requestingthat it be ." read in full. . .~ ._ .- . --- '--.; ,-' ;, - ,.,' ~ ~. -:. - ~ ;~- .. " . . . ~ .' -.. . . . ~ ;M:r,s. B~-<al moved sec0xlded by Mr. William$::lhat.,i"he, bill,.' be read.> the ~s'ecQI}d- . .- ',- -~ .. . , --.~ '-, ~ - - -. . . ^ n,'--' _ tiI]1e~:ty 'council.,bill number, ,ohly, ,:~ncL.~ha,t enac-ttnept,DE? consideresF:,~'iS t:his , .time:~' :r:'TO:ti0H=f:a-:p~:i,e~.<! ..:A:ll~ .9o~nG~l~ep.' pp8s.ept.- yot,ing';~ye:.e)~c ~pt 'lV!r.-Hershne.r Li?-,,~;t~~}~;.~~~.€;.~..a9:9' the :bl~i-.w?-s: read: .~he . s,~90nd, tlme 'by-c'oun'cl.1. b~n:g.m~er -only: ~~~r~; e~~~;~n~h~~~g~~~ e~e~~~'~~~~"fr~~~~~~s Id~~g%~g:-fBI~~~~ ~~h~~r~gH1~ ~Ii~~c i ~ i es were ca.:;Lculated on the maximum number of units which would be allowed under the R~2 and RP zoning ona per capita basi~. Planning Director added that there is no way to limit development unde:r the' requested zones withoutplanne9-~eie:r9pm'2n.:t.~ requirement or some type of. contractual arrangement. . counc~l,marLW20d, asked yv:hether,'~a~tern~ii.:vej'"wer_e: suggest~d under,the,:..RK'zon'ing - ,_ which would limit a-:Lss:harge to 15 gallons per minute. Mr. Saul replied that the sewage flow was not d:l:sGussed by the Commission, it was understood it'would have to be limited to 15 gallons per minute regardless of th~ type of development. He said in further response to Mr. Wood that the discharge.limit conceivably could be maintained through planped gevelopmflJ.t arrangements. Discussion continued '~ on capacity of the Sorrel Way trunk and limit of discharge contracted for from Mr. Green's property. It was explained that there is no way of determining what type of zoning or development would use a 15-gallon-per-minute capacity. Calcula- tions in this instance were based on average capacity of the Sorrel Way trunk and worked back to possible density under the proposed zoning. Manager said the physical limitations have nothing to do with the particular use intended, that even w~th RA zone under planned development, if. the density would create a sewer demand greater than l5 gallons it would not be possible to proceed on that density. ... ...-,: . ~ , '.. :, 19 4/23/73 - 6 . Councilman Williams commented that--:-{he siYe Ci3~iacre's), under ,pun' . procedures wouid permit 104 dwelling units in an RA zone. He noted that the Commission feels strongly that RP is inappropriate. Mrs. Beal moved secDnded by Mr. Williams that the'bill. ~e approve~ and gi ven final; pas$~ge. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, ex~ept ~r. Hershner. The bill was declared pass~d and numbered 16752. 4. Rezone from M-2 to C-l SR southwest corner 11th and Oak Patch Road John Nix) - - Planning Commission recommended approval. The rezoning would extend commercial use further to the south to allow replacing the existing warehouse/garage facility. Council Bill No. 222 - Rezoning to C-l SR area at southwest corner of 11th AYBnue and Oak Patch Road was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment b~ co~sidered at this tlm~:Mbtion - carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time.by council bill number only. Mrs. Real moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the bill be ap'psoved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16753. 5. Rezone from M-2 to RP SR the northwest corner of 4th and High (C. E. Wilkins) Planning Commission recommended the change. -- Council Bill No. 223 - Rezone to RP SR the area at northwest corner of 4th Avenue and High Street was submitted and read the fist time by council bill number and title only, there being 'nO councilman~_present requesting it be read in full. ' Mrs Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the bill be read the secpnd time by council bill number only, with unanimous~_consent -of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time council bill number only. Mrs Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams t~at the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16754. It was decided after some discussion that the balance of the agenda be carried over for consideration at the meeting previously scheduled for public hearing with regard to the 1st Avenue ramps. Councilmen McDonald, Hershner, and Murray left. Resolution No. 2170 - Authorizing payment of bills and claims for the period April 9 through 23, 1973 was submitted. Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. to Monday, April 30, 1973. .~' 12.0 4/23/73 - 7