HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/12/1986 Meeting (2)
MINUTES
11 Eugene City Council
Eugene City Hall--McNutt Room
November 12, 1986
Noon
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Richard Hansen, Debra Ehrman, Emily Schue, Cynthia
Wooten, Freeman Holmer, Ruth Bascom, Roger Rutan,
Jeff Mi 11 er
The adjourned meeting of October 27, 1986, of the City Council of the City of
Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Brian B. Obie.
.
1. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL, MAYOR, AND CITY MANAGER
A. Council Goal-Setting Session
Mr. Rutan said the council's goal-setting session was productive.
Later in the meeting, Mr. Miller said the goal-setting session went well but
it seemed to be unfinished. He said the City does not have enough funds to
complete projects identified previously as well as projects identified this
year. He suggested the councilors have a "centering" session in which they
discuss and agree on projects that should be priorities. He said he expects
the budget process to be difficult unless the councilors can agree on the most
e important things. He suggested the facilitator talk with councilors privately
and then facilitate a session in which competing priorities are discussed and
resolved.
Ms. Schue suggested the councilors discuss financial priorities again.
Mayor Obie said he also felt the goal-setting session was not finished.
Discussing the roles of the Budget Committee and the City Council, Mr. Holmer
said the council has the responsibility for setting policy but the council
should recognize the contribution the Budget Committee can make to
deliberations.
B. Investments in the Community
Mr. Rutan said the council recognized the significant investment EWEB is
making in the community today at the council's work session and the council
should also recognize the significant investment that the renovation of Valley
River Center demonstrates.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 1
C. League of Oregon Cities
e Ms. Bascom said Mayor Obie and Ms. Schue made significant contributions during
the recent League of Oregon Cities Convention.
Ms. Schue said the meetings went well and people seemed to enjoy Eugene.
D. Future of our Library Committee
Ms. Ehrman said the Future of our Li bra ry Commi ttee will have a public
information session on Saturday, November 15, 1986.
II. SECOND READING: WILLAMETTE GREENWAY CODE REVISIONS
Council Bill 2961 was read the second time by council bill number only.
CB 2961--An ordinance concerning the Willamette Greenway; and
amending Section 9.260 of the Eugene Code, 1971.
Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill
be approved and given final passage.
Ms. Ehrman said she wi 11 support the motion but she does not think the
revisions offer enough protection for the Willamette Greenway. She said she
hopes the council will focus on protections for the Greenway in the future.
Ms. Wooten said she will oppose the motion. She said she asked that
e consideration of the Willamette Greenway be moved forward in the Planning
Commission's and the council's work programs.
The motion passed 7:1; with Councilors Hansen, Ehrman,
Schue, Holmer, Bascom, Miller, and Rutan voting aye ana
Councilor Wooten voting nay, the bill was declared passed
(and became Ordinance 19422).
III. ORDINANCE AMENDING DOWNTOWN COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA
Mayor Obie said the Mayor, Council President, and the Council Vice president
met as the Council Subcommittee on Committees with representatives of the
Downtown Commission to discuss the downtown residency requi rement for
Downtown Commissioners.
Elaine Stewart of the Development Department distributed a map of the
downtown. She said there are about 360 households in the Downtown Plan
boundary and about 800 additional households within two-blocks of the Downtown
Plan boundary.
CB 2920--An ordinance concerning the Downtown Commission; and
amending Section 2.157 of the Eugene Code.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 2
-----
Mr. Hansen moved, sec~nded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill
be read the second time by council bill number only, with
e unanimous consent of the council, and enactment be
considered at this time.
Answering questions from Ms. Wooten, Mayor Obie said the existing ordinance
does not require a Downtown Commissioner to live within two blocks of the
Downtown Plan boundary. The ordi nance encourages the appoi ntment of a
commissioner who lives within the Downtown Plan boundary. He said there are
very few applicants for positions on the Downtown Commission who live within
the Downtown Plan boundary.
Ms. Wooten suggested that the vacant positions on the Downtown Commission be
re-advertised if the motion passes.
Ms. Ehrman said the members of the Subcommittee on Committees expressed
concern about participation of downtown residents in planning for the
downtown. She added that the Downtown Commissioners know they should make
special efforts to encourage the participation of downtown residents.
The motion carried unanimously, 8:0.
Council Bill 2920 was read the second time by council bill number only.
Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. All councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed (and became
Ordinance No. 19423).
e
IV. BALLOT FOR INTERVIEWEES FOR DOWNTOWN COMMISSION AND PLANNING
COMMISSION OPENINGS
City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the items. Cathy Freedman of the City
Manager's Office discussed the change in residency requirements for downtown
Commissioners that the council just approved. She also noted that Randy
Thwing has notified the Planning Director that he will resign from the
Planning Commission because he has been elected to the EWEB Boa rd 0 f
Directors; consequently, there will be two vacant positions on the Planning
Commission.
Mr. Hansen suggested that the positions on the Planning Commission and
Downtown Commission be advertised again.
Ms. Schue said Mr. Thwing1s resignation will allow a lawyer to be appointed to
the Planning Commission. A lawyer could not have been appointed before
because only two Planning Commissioners can be engaged in the same occupation
and Mr. Thwing and Gerry Gaydos are lawyers.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 3
Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to retain the
present applications for the Downtown Commission and the
- Planning Commission, to advertise again for the
positions that will be vacant, and to ballot for the
vacant positions before January 1, 1987. The motion
carried unanimously, 8:0.
V. WORK SESSION: BALLOT MEASURE 51--NUCLEAR FREE ZONE ORDINANCE
City Manager Micheal Gleason said the councilors asked at their goal-setting
session that a discussion of Ballot Measure 51 be placed on the agenda. Glen
Potter of the Intergovernmental Relations Division gave the staff report. He
said the councilors received information about the measure which was passed by
the voters on November 4, 1986. He said the ordinance requires appointment of
a 7-member Nuclear Free Zone Board; annual mailings to heads of state and
elected officials, signs at the city limits indicating the city is a nuclear
free zone, an annual observance on August 6, and biennial elections to the
Nuclear Free Zone Board.
Mr. Potter said the City Attorney indicated that the applicability of the
ordinance to the Federal Government, City Charter, interstate commerce, and
several other issues should be analyzed. Mr. Potter said the fiscal impact of
the ordinance will depend on staffing and how the ordinance is enforced. The
financial impact could be between $8,400 and $160,000.
Mr. Potter suggested the council amend the ordinance to change the deadline
for appointing Nuclear Free Zone Board members from 30 days to 120 days.
e Answering questions from Mayor Obie, Mr. Potter said the Nuclear Free Zone
Board will have to be appointed by December 4 if the council does not change
the ordinance. Mr. Gleason added that citizen participation would have to be
foreshortened and it would be difficult to advertise, interview, and appoint
the board by December 4. He said the City attorneys need time to analyze the
ordinance.
Ms. Wooten suggested a council subcommittee be appointed to consider the City
Attorney's analysis of the ordinance when the analysis is completed.
Responding to her questions, City Attorney Tim Sercombe said the council would
not have to hold a public hearing to amend the ordinance.
Ms. Bascom suggested that advertising for applicants for the Nuclear Free Zone
Board begin before the 120-day period ends. She wondered if Nuclear Free Zone
Board members might help the council decide about changes to the ordinance.
Mr. Hansen said the responsibilities of the Nuclear Free Zone Board should be
definite before applicants are sought.
Ms. Ehrman said a 30- to 60-day extension would be sufficient. She said she
would like to begin advertising for board members soon and it might be helpful
to have an applicant for the board on a subcommittee that would review the
City Attorney's report.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 4
Mr. Gleason said a 120-day delay would permit an analysis of the
constitutional issues and the legal risks in the ordinance.
e Answering questions from Mayor Obie, Mr. Sercombe said seeking applicants for
the Nuclear Free Zone Board would not raise legal risks but enforcement of
some parts of the ordinance would raise constitutional issues. He said the
constitutional issues involve the effect of the ordinance on private business.
Replying to questions from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Sercombe said the courts have
declared restrictions on the transportation of nuclear wastes to be
unconstitutional. Many other parts of the ordinance have not been tested in
the courts. He said he is concerned about the policy-making and
administrative authority of the Nuclear Free Zone Board. He said a board
authorized by a Eugene ordinance would have to be a board of the City.
Mr. Holmer said he would not want to delay implementation of the ordinance or
disempower the Nuclear Free Zone Board. He said a 60-day delay would be
suffi ci ent and it could begin, in his opinion, when the results of the
November 4 election are proclaimed.
Mayor Obie suggested a 75-day delay in appointing the board.
Mr. Hansen said the ordinance raises many issues. He said applicants for the
Nuclear Free Zone Board should know what thei r legal 1 iabil ities are.
Replying to his questions, Mr. Sercombe said the City probably would have to
amend its insurance policies to extend coverage to members of the Nuclear Free
Zone Board. He said EWEB provides insurance for its board members.
e Mr. Rutan said the legal issues are so broad that some people probably would
not apply for positions on the Nuclear Free Zone Board if the legal issues are
not resolved. He said a 120-day delay is prudent. Mayor Obie agreed with
Mr. Rutan.
Mr. Mi 11 er sa i d the council should indicate that it will implement the
ordinance with dispatch. He said changes the council makes in the ordinance
should be legal and substantive. He said citizens may have to vote on some of
the changes and be informed about the costs of implementing the ordinance.
Mr. Holmer said he is reluctant to make substantive changes in the ordinance
unless those changes are approved by the voters.
Ms. Schue said it would not be in the City's best interest to have issues
raised by the ordinance settled in the courts. She said the council should
remove the flaws from the ordinance and then implement it because the voters
approved it. She suggested the council wait for a definitive legal analysis
and then appoint a subcommittee to suggest changes.
Ms. Wooten said the 120-day delay will provide time for a legal opinion and
time to obtain participation from the supporters of the ordinance. She said
she would like an opinion from the City Attorney about Sections 2 (b), 5, and
6. She said she would like a subcommittee to address limits to the authority
of the Nuclear Free Zone Board.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 5
Mayor Obie said a subcommittee prob~bly will not be appointed until January.
e Mr. Hansen moved to accept the staff recommendation for a
120-day delay in appointing the Nuclear Free Zone Board
and to direct the staff to obtain participation from
supporters of the ordinance. The motion was not seconded
and no vote was taken.
Mayor Obie said most councilors seemed to favor some changes to the ordinance.
He di rected the staff to prepare changes that conform to Mr. Hansen's
position. Mayor Obie said the councilors can discuss specific time periods
when they consider the changes.
Mr. Hansen said the council should evaluate ballot measures that would have a
big effect on the City before elections in the future.
.
Ms. Bascom said she would like a time line for the process of implementing the
ordinance when the council considers the matter again.
Mr. Holmer said a subcommittee that evaluates the ordinance or the proposed
changes to it should include people with various points of view.
Mayor Obie recessed the meeting at 12:45 p.m. and reconvened it at 12:50 p.m.
VI. WORK SESSION: EXPANSION OF MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT
City Manager Micheal Gleason said several councilors suggested the council
e review the scope of the project, design changes, and estimated costs of the
proposed expansion of Mahlon Sweet Airport. Therefore, the agenda of this
meeting was changed.
Public Works Director Christine Andersen distributed a packet of information
about the expansion. She reviewed the estimated cost of $17.7 million for the
project and several ancillary expenses. She said the City's share will be
about $5.7 million.
Ms. Andersen said funding from diverse sources has been sought and found. For
example, funds from the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), State lottery funds,
and the Lane County Road Fund will be used for the expansion. In addition, the
airlines that serve Eugene support the expansion. She said the City's share
is about one-third of the estimated cost of the project. She revi ewed the
contingency funds.
Ms. Andersen said the cost of the air-side and land-side improvements has
increased from $2.8 million to $5.5 million in the last year. The shift is
because the original project emphasized improvements to the terminal. It did
not include such things as increased parking areas and road improvements.
However, efforts to diversify the funding and consideration of long-term
effects on the road system resulted in funds that were dedicated to air-side
and land-side improvements. Consequently, those parts of the project were
increased. She discussed Douglas Drive.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 6
Bob Shelby, Mahlon Sweet Aviation Director, said the passenger volumes at the
airport this year have exceeded the projections. He revi ewed the cost
e reductions in the terminal building that the Airport Commission presented to
the council in January, 1986, and that were approved by the Airline Technical
Committee. He also reviewed bid alternates and things that will be financed
by private contributions.
Answering questions from the councilors, Mr. Shelby said the bid alternates
will be constructed if the bids are lower than anticipated. Ms. Andersen said
the contingency funds could be used for bid alternates if the contingency
funds are not needed for contingencies. Mr. Shelby said the walkway in the
parking lot will be covered, the additional FAA funds cannot be used for the
terminal, and the ticket lobby was reduced 30 feet at the request of the
airlines and 30 feet because Frontier Airlines went out of business.
Answering other questions, Mr. Shelby sa i d the counc il could decide to
construct 30 feet of lobby space for another airline that might come to
Eugene. Thirty feet of lobby space would cost the City about $300,000 to
construct. However, Mr. Shelby said the terminal is designed so the ticket
lobby can be expanded at one end and the baggage faCility can be expanded at
the other end. Some of the changes suggested by the Airport Commission will
increase maintenance. For example, the stucco will have to be painted about
every eight years.
Responding to other questions, Mr. Shelby said the windows were reduced on the
north side of the terminal, instead of the south side, to keep air
conditioning costs down.
e Mr. Shelby said some consideration has been given to asking the council to
defer the required art works.
Mr. Holmer said he is dismayed at the things that have been eliminated. He
said the council should think carefully about the changes suggested by the
Airport Commission.
Ms. Ehrman said the council definitely told the staff to maintain the $17.7
total cost of the project. She said the deletions are not devastating. She
said she is comfortable with the project as proposed now.
Ms. Schue agreed with Ms. Ehrman. Ms. Schue said she is pleased with the air-
side and land-side improvements because the community will get a better
project than originally planned for about the same cost.
Mr. Miller said he did not understand previously that the State and additional
Federal funds cannot be used on the terminal.
Mayor Obi e sa i d several peop 1 e expected the State and Federal funds to
decrease the City's share of the terminal expansion. Instead, the State and
Federal funds seem to have expanded the air-side and land-side improvements.
He said the communications do not seem to have been clear. He said the
deletions are reasonable although they are disappointing. He said he will be
sorry if the porte cochere has to be eliminated. He is also concerned about
the reduction in the size of the ticket lobby.
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 7
Ms. Wooten said the reduction in toe size of the ticket lobby seems short-
sighted. She said the council should consider the matter carefully before
e reducing the requirement for art works.
Answering questions from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Rutan said the Airport Subcommittee
will recommend a funding source for the City's share as soon as possible.
Ms. Schue said she would like to know the optional funding sources considered
by the Airport Subcommittee when it reports to the council.
Mayor Obie adjourned the meeting at 1:40 p.m.
R~:~
..~ '-
.
Micheal Gleason
City Manager
(Recorded by Betty Lou Rarick)
mncc1112
e
e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 12, 1986 Page 8