HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/08/1988 Meeting
e
e
e
M I NUT E S
Eugene City Council
McNutt Room--City Hall
June 8, 1988
11:30 a.m.
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Ruth Bascom, Rob Bennett, Debra Ehrman, Jeff Miller,
Roger Rutan, Emily Schue.
The adjourned meeting of June 6, 1988, of the Eugene City Council was called
to order by Mayor Brian Obie.
I. ITEMS FROM THE COUNCIL, MAYOR, AND CITY MANAGER
Ms. Schue said the Sunset Hills Cemetery is facing
and it is possible that the cemetery's 2,000 grave
moved. She said this issue should not be ignored.
this is an area of concern.
major financial problems
sites might have to be
Mr. Bennett agreed that
Mr. Rutan said that at a minimum, the City did not handle the situation with
the Body Shoppe, a former tenant of the Parcade, very well. He raised the
possibility that all of the possible alternatives or compromises have not
been explored.
Ms. Ehrman disagreed somewhat, saying that relative to what a private sector
landlord would have done in a similar situation, the City was quite sensitive
and accommodating to the Body Shoppe.
Referring to the decision to locate Reprographics in the space formerly
occupied by the Body Shoppe, Mayor Obie expressed a concern about an
industrial use (a print shop) being located in a high-rent building such as
the Parcade. Mr. Whitlow said staff would provide the council with more
information on the rationale behind the decision to locate Reprographics in
the Parcade.
Ms. Bascom referred to an article on the use of bicycles by downtown Seattle
police officers. She asked staff to investigate how well this has worked for
Seattle law enforcement.
Ms. Bascom also mentioned that Food for Lane County is facing a shortfall of
about $14,000.
Ms. Bascom moved to use $2,000 of the City's Civic Emergency
Fund to help Food for Lane County overcome its financial
shortfall. Ms. Ehrman seconded the motion.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 1
e
Ms. Ehrman said the City Council has discussed a concern about Eugene being
perceived as always willing to bridge financial shortfalls for social service
groups. She said this motion would send the right message: Eugene is
willing to contribute a small amount, but the other jurisdictions will have
to lend assistance as well.
The motion passed 6:0.
II. WORK SESSION: FUTURE LIBRARY PROJECT--PHASES
e
Pat Decker, Planning Department staff, said the council was scheduled to
discuss library phasing options at this meeting. Another meeting is
scheduled for June 15, during which the council will try to reach enough
closure in its discussion of the library so that a committee of three or four
councilors can begin discussing financing options for a new library. Ms.
Decker said scenarios would be presented for phasing construction of a new
library (constructing an initial phase of about 75,000 square feet and then
adding 25,000 square feet later) on several sites still under consideration.
,
Jim Robertson, Robertson Sherwood Architects, reviewed three library phasing
scenarios for the Broadway/Charnelton site. The parking requirements for the
three scenarios would be the same: about 450 spaces for the initial phase
and about 500 for the completed 100,000-square-foot library. These spaces
would serve the library and replace displaced parking but would not support
any of the retail and office development that might be part of the project.
All three s~enarios would meet these parking requirements by constructing a
level of underground parking (about 380 spaces) below the two half-blocks on
each side of Broadway. The remaining parking would be provided through an
on-site surface lot.
The three scenarios also followed a similar phasing: a first story of about
50,000 square feet and a second story of about 25,000 square feet during the
first phase, and an addition of 25,000 square feet to the second story during
the second phase of construction. The first scenario would construct the
library on the half-block south of Broadway; the other half-block would be
devoted to surface parking and a retail/office development fronting
Charnel ton Street. The second scenario would involve the closure of Broadway
between Charnel ton and Lincoln. The library would be built on the eastern
half of the site and would act as a terminus to the mall. The rest of the
site would be used for parking. This scenario probably would not accommodate
a mixed-use development of the site. The third scenario would also involve
the vacation of Broadway. The library would be built on the southern
half-blrck, surface parking would be built on the northwest corner of the
site, and the northeast corner could be devoted to a retail/office
development. This scenario would allow some sort of structural connection
between the library building and the retail/office development.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 2
e
-
e
Mr. Robertson reviewed a phased construction scenario for the 8th and
Willamette site. He said an effort was made to develop a scenario using only
the half-block on 8th between Willamette and Olive; however, this area would
not accommodate all of the development's parking and access needs. So a
scenario was developed using the two half-blocks on 8th between Willamette
and Charnelton. In order for this scenario to occur, the existing buildings
on 8th between Olive and Charnel ton would have to be demolished. A level of
underground parking would be built below both half-blocks, a two-story
library would be built (in two phases) on the half-block between Olive and
Charnelton, the quarter-block at the corner of 8th and Olive would be devoted
to surface-level parking, and the quarter-block at the corner of 8th and
Willamette would be devoted to a retail/office development. Mr. Robertson
noted that under this scenario, there might not be adequate access to the
library, given the current street directions.
Mayor Obie said it would be good if the library development could take
advantage of the City's under-utilized parking facilities, the Parcade and
the EPAC garage. He raised the possibility of elevated pedestrian walkways
connecting the two parking garages and the library.
Mr. Rutan questioned the claim that a library's parking needs could not be
met if it were constructed solely on the half-block between Willamette and
Olive. He said the Parcade would be right across the street and the EPAC
garage would be about a block away. He did not think it would be unrealistic
for library users to park a block away. He also said it would be a poor use
of land to dedicate a quarter-block to surface-level parking, as the scenario
for the 8th and Willamette development would do.
Ms. Bascom expressed some doubts about library patrons parking a block away
in the EPAC garage.
Ms. Schue mentioned that elevated pedestrian walkways have been security
problems in some cities.
Ms. Ehrman emphasized that a library needs to allow parents to drop off and
pick up their children easily and safely. She added that bicycle access is
not very good on 8th Avenue. She also raised the possibility of displacing
current Parcade users to the EPAC garage and allowing library users to park
in the Parcade. She said downtown employees currently using the Parcade
might be willing to use the EPAC garage, if pedestrian access to it were
improved.
The council directed staff to prepare a scenario for a library being
developed solely on the half-block between Willamette and Olive.
Mr. Robertson reviewed a phased construction scenario for the existing
library site. The existing library building (37,000 square feet) would be
renovated and 38,000 square feet would be added to it on the ground level;
then, during the second construction phase, a 25,000-square-foot second floor
would be added. Parking would be provided on an underground lot with 115
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 3
e
spaces and on an expanded surface lot across Olive Street. The property for
expanding surface parking across Olive Street would have to be acquired.
In response to a question, Carol Hildebrand, Library staff, said that
removing the asbestos from the existing library would cost about $1.2
million.
Mayor Obie and several other councilors expressed opposition to the idea of
phasing construction. They did, however, raise the possibility of phasing
occupancy. For example, part of the 100,000-square-foot building could be
leased to other tenants until the library needs additional space. Or, the
shell for the entire building could be constructed and about 75,000 square
feet of the interior could be finished; the remaining interior could be
finished when the additional space is needed.
Mr. Miller said he liked the idea of a library being developed on the
half-block on 8th between Willamette and Olive. He expressed opposition to
developing a library on the Broadway/Charnelton site, saying that this would
not be consistent with good downtown management and development. He also
asked that information be provided on the possibility of using the Bon
building for a library.
Ms. Schue said councilors should keep in mind the City's efforts to recruit
private developers for the 8th andlWillamette site. She also expressed
opposition to developing a library on the half-block on 8th between Olive and
Charnelton.
e
Ms. Bascom recommended against trying to develop a new library on the
existing library site. She said the new library should be part of a vital
downtown and, therefore, needs to be closer to the core.
Ms. Ehrman said she was still willing to consider all three sites. She
expressed doubts about the feasibility of using the Bon building for a
library. She also said the idea of pedestrian skybridges for the library,
and for downtown in general, is intriguing.
Mr. Bennett said he was concerned about the cost of a new library and was,
therefore, not willing to abandon the possibility of using an existing
building for the library. He said that if a new building is built, he
probably would favor the 8th and Willamette half-block, because this site
would take advantage of existing parking facilities.
Mr. Rutan mentioned two ways to reduce the cost of developing a new library:
(1) use existing parking facilities, and (2) find other parties to help bear
the construction costs (i .e., build a library as part of a mixed-use
development). He said the 8th 3nd Willamette site has both of these in its
favor.
The council directed staff to provide cost estimates for all of the potential
library sites: existing, 8th and Willamette, Broadway/Charnelton, and the
Bon building.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 4
e
III. WORK SESSION: AMENDMENTS TO SOLAR ACCESS REGULATIONS
Jim Croteau, Planning staff, said the City Council adopted solar access
regulations several months ago and directed staff to study the impact of
these regulations after a year. The council also directed staff to consider
some special exemptions to the solar access regulations. He said he would
review the two exemptions and, if the council wished, staff would develop
detailed proposals for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider.
Mr. Croteau reviewed the first exemption, which would allow the construction
of two-story residential buildings not meeting the solar access setback
requirements if the property is surrounded by other two-story buildings
(i.e., to the north and south).
Ms. Ehrman asked whether allowing such an exemption would impair the solar
access of property to the east and west. Mr. Croteau said it would not.
The council directed staff to prepare a specific proposal for this exemption
to the solar access regulations.
e
Mr. Croteau reviewed the second exemption. Suppose there are two vacant
lots, A and B. Lot A is directly south of Lot B, and the owner of Lot A
wishes to build a house that would infringe upon the solar access of Lot B.
This exemption would allow the two property owners to enter into an agreement
allowing the construction of the house, provided that this house and any
house built on Lot B are constructed according to certain energy-saving
standards.
Mr. Bennett said it is hard to argue against this exemption if the two houses
have to be developed in a way that will save energy; however, he did not
think that this exemption would send the right message about the community's
commitment to solar access.
Mr. Miller disagreed, saying that the exemption would require energy
efficiency without precluding the development of certain lots. He did not
think this exemption would be applied on a wholesale level; rather, it would
be an exception intended to allow development where it might not otherwise
occur because of an inability to comply with solar access regulations.
Ms. Ehrman asked if any evidence exists that development of certain lots has
been precluded because of the solar access regulations. Mr. Croteau said
staff had no such evidence; however, developers have had to make certain
design modifications in order to comply with the regulations.
Ms. Schue expressed some concern that the exemption might be used to
circumvent the Solar Access Ordinance. Sha also said the purpose of the
ordinance was not just to save energy.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 5
e
e
e
Mr. Bennett suggested that consideration of this exemption be postponed until
more is known about the impacts of Eugene's and Portland's solar access
regulations. Others supported this suggestion.
At 1:15 p.m., Mayor Obie adjourned the meeting to June 13, 1988.
Respectfully submitted,
'~~')~~'V1
Michael Gleason,
City Manager
(Recorded by Leslie Scales and Monty Hindman)
MNCC 060888
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
June 8, 1988
Page 6