HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/1985 Meeting
M I NUT E S
e
Eugene City Council
City Council Chamber
October 23, 1985
Noon
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Cynthia Wooten, Richard Hansen (noon-l :40 p.m.), Emily
Schue, Freeman Holmer, Ruth Bascom, Debra Ehrman, Roger
Rutan (noon-l :23 p.m.), Jeff Miller.
The ,adjourned meeting from October 14, 1985, of the City Council of the City
of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Brian B. Obie.
I. ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL, APPOINTMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, AGENDA
ADJUSTMENTS
A. Memo from Councilor Miller Concerning Proposed Income Tax Debate
Councilor Miller read his memorandum dated October 23, 1985, to the Mayor
and members of the council. In the memo, he said he was disturbed by the
charges made by Lane County Commissioner DeFazio that the proposed City
income tax would produce over $100 million more than is needed to fund the
e proposed projects. Mr. Miller said Mr. DeFazio had demeanded the character
of the City Council by distorting reality and truth. Mr. Miller suggested
reporters for the mass media seek out the truth and disclose it. He said the
citizens of Eugene have a right to know the truth from unbiased journalists
who seek out the complexities of the issue.
Mr. Miller urged Mayor Obie not to participate in a debate with Commissioner
DeFazio about the City income tax proposal. Mr. Miller said the citizens of
the City and Lane County would be the victims of such a debate. He said it
is important that all elected officials work together in these turbulent
times. He suggested the City Councilors and Lane County Commissioners sit
down and talk about the income tax issues in a work session He said those
who take a stand against the City income tax should do so with integrity.
They should oppose the tax on philosophical, practical or political grounds.
They should not distort the truth.
B. Eugene Agenda Committee
Reporting on the Eugene Agenda Committee, Councilor Rutan said he and
Councilor Schue are co-chairs of the committee. They have been explaining to
as many people as possible that the City income tax proposal is the best
alternative. He said although people are concernedt there is much support
for the proposal. He said people want to see progress in the city.
-
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 1
-- .- --- -
C. Proposed Debate on City Income Tax Proposal
e Councilor Hansen said a debate between Mayor Obie and Commissioner DeFazio
about the City income tax proposal would serve no purpose. He urged Mayor
Obie not to agree to such a debate.
Ms. Schue complemented Mr. Miller on his memorandum and said it expressed her
views.
Councilor Holmer agreed with the statements in Mr. Miller's letter. He hoped
cooperation between the City and Lane County will continue.
Councilor Bascom said cooperation between the City and Lane County is very
important.
Mayor Obie said his decision about the proposed debate will be based on a
desire to have accurate information available for the public and the desire
to maintain a good relationship with the Board of Commissioners. He said he
and Lane County Commissioners Rust and DeFazio were able to set aside
differences and work together for transportation funds recently. He said
that he would announce his decision as to whether he would participate in a
debate tomorrow at 1 :30 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
D. Monroe Middle School
Ms. Bascom had represented the council at the Monroe Middle School. She said
- students from the School will work in the Hendricks Park Rhododendron Garden
and Altan Baker Park and will distribute pamphlets about the 911 service.
She suggested a letter of appreciation from the Mayor and Council be sent to
the students.
E. Parking
Ms. Bascom said recent enforcement in her ward of a parking regulation had
caused problems. Mayor Obie asked the staff to work with Ms. Bascom on the
problems.
F. Memorandum from the Library Board
Mayor Obie said the Board of Directors of the Eugene Public Library had
recommended that the council permit non-residents who pay the City income tax
to receive a Eugene library card free of charge. Mayor Obie suggested the
matter be considered by the council on Wednesday, October 30, 1985.
Mr. Hansen noted the one Board member who voted against the recommendation
was concerned about additional operating costs. Mr. Hansen asked for a staff
report about additional operating costs that would be caused by the free
cards.
-
J
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 2
II. SUBMIT BALLOTS FOR INTERVIEWEES FOR PLANNING AND DOWNTOWN COMMISSION
e OPENINGS (memo, ballot, applications distributed)
A. Planning Commission
Citing his experience on the Planning Commission, Mr. Rutan said it is very
important to have experienced people on the commission. There has been a
large "turn-over" recently; and therefore, he suggested the council reapPoint
Dorothy Anderson and Randy Thwing without interviewing other candidates.
Ms. Anderson has served one term, and Mr. Thwing has served two terms on the
commission.
Mayor Obie favored Mr. Rutan's suggestion. He said Ms. Anderson and
Mr. Thwing had been excellent members of the Planning Commission.
Mayor Obie suggested the councilors submit their ballots and then decide how
to proceed. Mr. Holmer said Mr. Rutan's suggestion had been made earlier
and, consequently, some councilors, acting independently, had written only
two names on the ballot. Such action, if Mr. Rutan's suggestion is not
followed, would distort the voting. He said the council should discuss its
procedure before balloting the next time it ballots for interviewees.
Councilor Ehrman said the City makes an effort to get people interested in
serving on public bodies. If the same people are reappointed repeatedly,
some people will feel it is pointless to apply. She did not think
reappointment should be automatic when a person has served two terms.
e Councilor Wooten did not think the council should change its policy of
considering new applicants.
Mr. Hansen supported Mr. Rutan's suggestion. He said citizens who are as
dedicated as Ms. Anderson and Mr. Thwing should be reappointed. He said
interviewing others when a decision to reappoint has been made is a waste of
everyone's time.
Mayor Obie gave councilors an opportunity to add names to their previously
submitted ballots. Mr. Holmer did so.
B. Downtown Commission
Mayor Obie noted that appointments to the Downtown Commission had been
discussed at the luncheon meeting of the council which was open to the
public. The president and vice president of the council were charged with
getting information from the staff and the City Attorney and making a
recommendation to the full council on how to proceed with the appointment
process.
.e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 3
III. ROUTINE ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
e A. City Council Minutes of Dinner/Work Session of September 9; regular
meetings of September 11, 1985, and September 25, 1985 (minutes
distributed
City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item.
Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to approved the City
Council minutes of September 9, 1985, September 11, 1985, and
September 25, 1985. Roll call vote; the motion carried
unanimously, 8:0.
B. Improvement Petition for Goodpasture Lakes Loop Road (Job #2225)
(assessable costs: paving--100%; sewers--100%; sidewalks--100%)
City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item.
Res. No. 3946--A resolution authorizing paving, sanitary
sewers, storm sewers and sidewalks in
Goodpasture Lakes Loop Road (westerly portion)
from 1150 feet north of Goodpasture Island Road
to Goodpasture Island Road.
Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to adopt the
resolution. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
e 8:0.
IV. RESOLUTION CONCERNING ROOM TAX FUNDS (memo, resolution, background
information distributed)
City Manager Michea1 Gleason introduced the agenda item.
Answering questions from Ms. Ehrman, Assistant Manager Whitlow reviewed the
original allocations. He said the arts groups will receive $1,000 to $2,000
more a year if actual gross revenues collected in the 1984-85 year are used
as recommended.
Responding to a question from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Whitlow said $10,000 is
deducted annually from gross revenues of the room tax fund for expenses of
the Administrative Services Department.
Ms. Wooten said she supported the re-allocation plan for room tax funds
reluctantly and would also support the proposed resolution reluctantly. She
did not think the economy will improve enough for the five major arts
organizations to be able to obtain private contributions to replace the room
tax funds. She did not want to support something that will lead to the
demise of the major arts organizations. She would like to review the
financing and have some recourse if the program fails.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 4
Res. No. 3947--A resolution concerning Room Tax funds,
e amending Section 4 of Resolution No. 3886
adopted by the Council on November 19, 1984.
Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to adopt the
resolution. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
8:0.
V. EUGENE WATER AND ELECTRIC BOARD MASTER PLAN (memo, background
information distributed)
City Manager Michea1 Gleason introduced the agenda item. Pat Decker of the
Planning Department gave the staff report. She introduced Jim Brownt Eugene
Water and Electric Board (EWEB) Director of Operations and Engineering-, who
said EWEB has been at its present location since about 1911. He reviewed the
development of the site and said the company's focus has been to provide
service to its customers at a low cost. He said the company has tried to be
a good neighbor and has devoted about four acres of its 21 acres to the
bikeway and landscaping. The need for a master plan became evident in 1980
when EWEB purchased the property west of the overpass and moved some
operations to other locations.
Mr. Brown said the Master Plan indicated the present EWEB site is adequate
for future EWEB operations if some materials are moved to other locations and
vertical storage and parking are provided. He said EWEB expects as much as a
e 50 percent increase in customer growth in the future. He thanked the council
for reviewing the Master Plan and said he will forward council comments on
the plan to the EWEB Board of Directors.
Using a map, Jim Saul, a consultant to EWEB on the Master Plan, discussed the
Master Plan. He said provisions in the plan respond to concerns in the
Downtown Plan and the Riverfront Park Study. He said the Master Plan
indicates that three-quarters of an acre of EWEB property will be available
for the Eighth Avenue and Hilyard Street access to the Riverfront Research
Park, expansion of the Wi11amette Street substation, and a change in the
pedestrian/bike path. He reviewed provisions for improved access to the
riverfront from FourtH Avenue and High Streett a public plaza, and a buffer
between the bikeway and EWEB operations. He said a meeting of EWEB
representatives and City officials resulted in a second walkway through the
EWEB property that will provide access to an EWEB parking area and the public
plaza. The parking area will sometimes be available for public parking.
Ms. Decker said the Downtown Commission and the Planning Commission indicated
concerns about the relationship of EWEB development to the riverfront and a
public plaza, the future of the Midgleys building, the future of the historic
Eugene Mill and Elevator Building, and the relationship of EWEB development
to the Riverfront Research Park and access to the Park.
Answering a question from Mr. Holmer, Ms. Decker said the Public Works
Department staff indicated adequate land is available to widen the Ferry
Street Bridge. .
~
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23t 1985 Page 5
Responding to a Question from Ms. Wooten, Ms. Decker said the Master Plan
e indicates the EWEB office building will be on the riverfront east of Fourth
Avenue and parking lots will be located at 4th Avenue and High Street.
However, the EWEB Board of Directors may respond to City concerns about the
parking lots.
Reviewing the staff recommendations in the staff notes, Ms. Decker said the
relationship of the EWEB office building to the public plaza can be addressed
in the Willamette Greeway conditional use process. She said the second
pedestrian access to the river will also provide access to the Fifth Street
Market area. The staff recommendations indicate that the Midgleys Building
should be retained as long as possible andt when more parking is needed, a
parking structure which will also provide parking for the Fifth Street area
should be constructed. She recommended the council forward the EWEB Master
Plan supporting the company's continued operation at the existing site and
construction of an office building and other facilities that can contribute
to riverfront development. She suggested the council add a comment
recognizing the value of the historic Mill and Elevator Building.
Answering questions from Ms. Wooten and Ms. Bascomt Ms. Decker said 6 1/2
acres east of the EWEB property are owned by the University of Oregon and
leased to EWEB. The land will be used for the Riverfront Park. Provisions
for opening the mill race are not included in the EWEB Master Plan, although
they are included in the Downtown Plan. They will have to be addressed at a
later time or in another way.
e Responding to questions from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Decker and Mr. Saul said the
EWEB property goes to the Ferry Street Bridge, but the City owns some
property between the Ferry Street Bridge and the overpass.
Answering a question from Mr. Hansent Mr. Brown said EWEB now has 417
employees. It must also provide parking for about 100 EWEB vehicles.
Responding to a Question from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Gleason said the EWEB Master
Plan is a 50-year plan. It involves an $11 million investment. If the
council thinks that EWEB operations are not the highest and best use of the
property, council members should indicate it now. In that case, EWEB
officials will probably decide not to make a large investment in the
property. The staff recommends that EWEB stay at the existing site. EWEB
officials have made the accommodations needed. There is not much room on the
site for changes. If many changes are requested, EWEB representatives will
probably have to reconsider the whole plan.
Responding to a question from Mayor Obie, Ms. Decker reviewed the pedestrian
walkways and bikeways to the riverfront.
Beginning councilors' comments, Ms. Bascom said the bikeway would not have
been completed without the cooperation of EWEB officials. She hoped EWEB
officials would cooperate with efforts to eliminate the wildness along the
river bank. She said a manicured look would add to the usefulness and
accessibility of the river bank.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 6
Mr. Hansen was pleased with the cooperation between the City and EWEB
e indicated in the Master Plan.
Ms. Ehrman was concerned about the proposed buffer along the bikeway because
crimes have been committed in that area. She hoped the area would be open
enough for people to feel it is a public area. She noted the adjacent
neighborhood is a residential one, and, therefore~ she was also concerned
about the proposed surface parking lots. She said EWEB officials should
realize the public outcry in the University area when a proposal was made by
Sacred Heart Hospital to destroy buildings to provide parking spaces. She
said air pollution problems are also developing in that area. She
appreciated the sensitivity of EWEB officials to suggestions of City
officials.
Ms. Schue was pleased with the cooperation of EWEB and City officials
indicated in the Master Plan. She hoped some provisions can be made for the
historic Mill and Elevator Building. She said Himalayan Blackberries are not
native to the Willamette Valley and they do not need to be maintained on the
river bank.
Mr. Holmer suggested the phrase lias long as possib1e" concerning the
retention of the Midgleys Building should be deleted from the second sentence
in the third staff recommendation.
Ms. Wooten thought the Midgleys Building should be retained as long as
possible because its commercial activity is important as a bridge to the
e residential community and the downtown. She said its use as a parking lot
would be wasteful.
Mayor Obie agreed with the comments concerning good cooperation between the
City and EWEB. He said the EWEB land is one of the rarest of the community's
assets. He had wondered about its best use. He appreciated the effort to
address City concerns. He would support the Master Plan and look forward to
the new building. It will be an example of good development on the
riverfront. He shared concerns about landscaping on the river bank. He was
concerned about the historic Mill and Elevator Building because it is the
last remnant of the industry that formed the community.
Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to ask the City
Manager to forward the comments on the EWEB Master Plan in the
October 23, 1985 memo in the staff notes with the following
additional comments:
1. a task team composed of representatives of EWEB, the
Historical Review Board, and the Eugene Planning Department
should coordinate the moving of the historial Mill and
Elevator Building, and
2. the landscaping along the river's edge and the bikeway
should provide a buffer as well as a feeling of
openness.
.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 7
Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Mr. Miller, to amend the motion to delete
e the phrase lias long as possible" from the third recommendation on page
3 of the October 23, 1985, memo in the staff notes so that it would be:
The Midgleys Building located at the southeast corner of
4th and High makes a significant contribution to the
activity and attractiveness of the area and supports this
pedestrian connection from the downtown area to the river.
This structure should be retained in recognition of its
contribution to the area. Replacing the Midgleys Building
with a surface parking area providing space for 72 cars is
not responsive to city. . .
The amendment carried 5:4. Mr. Holmer, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Miller,
Mr. Rutan, and Mayor Obie voted aye. Ms. Bascom, Ms. Schue,
Ms. Wooten, and Ms. Ehrman voted nay.
The main motion carried unanimously, 8:0.
VI. PRIORITIES FOR OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIX-YEAR HIGHWAY
PROGRAM (memo, background information distributed)
City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Public Works
Director Christine Andersen gave the staff report. She said the Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT) is updating its Six-Year Highway
e Improvement Program. City officials learned a "united approach" that could
be supported by legislators would increase the area's chances of obtaining a
larger share of state highway funds. Therefore, the list of projects
presented to the council for inclusion in the Six-Year Highway Improvement
Program included projects for Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County. It was
approved by the Springfield City Council and would be considered by the Lane
County Board of Commissioners. The list included projects that cannot be
funded any other way.
Answering questions from Ms. Wooten and Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Andersen said the
local jurisdictions will not have to provide any matching funds for the
projects in the Six-Year Program. Mayor Obie added that the chances of
getting State funds are enhanced if some local funds can be provided.
Ms. Andersen said the list was as short as possible so that it can be
supported by the three jurisdictions. The Franklin Boulevard access to the
Riverfront Research Park was not on the list because it might be paid for
with tax increment funds and the County has been approached to provide
up-front funding. Mr. Gleason added that State funding for the Chambers
Connector will reduce Lane County road fund expenses and, in that case, the
opportunity for accessing Lane County funds to help with the Franklin
Boulevard improvements would be stronger.
Ms. Ehrman said she still favored including the Franklin Boulevard access in
the list.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 8
Mr. Miller suggested two changes in priorities. He said the Highway 99 North
e . from Garfield to Beltline project should have a Number 2 priority so that it
would be constructed before the 6th-7th Extension West 11th to Garfield
project which should have a Number 3 priority. He also said the priority
order of the Chambers Connector and the Delta/Beltline Interchange in the
Lane County projects should be reversed. Ms. Andersen explained that the
rationale for staff proposals was that the Highway 99 North project will not
increase the capacity of the road while the 6th-7th Extension will create a
road that does not exist now and will permit development.
Mr. Miller said Highway 99 is not in good condition. It has been included in
the Eugene Agenda. He also discussed the condition of West 11th Avenue and
said it needs attention regardless of what is done about 6th and 7th
Avenues. He said West 11th is hazardous and should be widened and/or the
left turn lanes should be added. Ms. Andersen noted that West 11th is a City
street. Mr. Miller also discussed another hazardous area from the Valley
River access south on 1-105. He said people must merge left on a curve.
Mayor Obie favored giving the Highway 99 North project a Number 2 priority
and the 6th-7th Extension a Number 3 priority. Responding to another
Question, Ms. Andersen said Springfield and Lane County officials would have
to be consulted if the Franklin Boulevard access project were added to the
proposal. Improvements to the Ferry Street Bridge could be proposed as an
off-systems project because it is not a State facility, however, due to the
high cost, it is unlikely to be given consideration by the State.
e Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to support the
concept of a unified metro-area highway program, adopt the list
of projects in the October 18, 1985, memo to the Mayor and City
Council concerning the ODOT Six-Year Highway Improvement
Program with the following changes:
1. the Highway 99 North project should have a Number 2
priority and the 6th-7th Extension should have a Number 3
pri ori ty, and
2. the staff should negotiate with Springfield and Lane County
officials for the addition of the Franklin Boulevard access
to the proposal.
The motion carried unanimously, 7:0. Mr. Rutan had left the
meeting.
Mayor Obie changed the order of the agenda.
V II. DETERMINE INTERVIEWEES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION OPENINGS/SET INTERVIEW TIME
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 9
..
Mayor Obie read the. ti!.11y sheet indicating tho.se .appl icants who had received
e votes from the Coun"cil to~.be interviewe~d.. - -
..
Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Mr. Hansen, to interview the
following candidates for openings on the Planning Commission:
Dorothy Anderson (who received 6 votes)
Randy Thwing (who received 6 votes)
Sally Weston (who received 6 votes)
Pat Vallerand (who received 4 votes)
John Van Landingham (who received 3 votes)
John Potter (who received 3 votes)
Joan Rich (who received 3 votes).
Mr. Hansen said he would vote against the motion as he supported the
reappoint, at this time, of Dorothy Anderson and Randy Thwing.
Mayor Obie said he also favored reappointing Ms. Anderson and Mr. Thwing to
the commission.
The motion carried 4:3. Ms. Wooten, Ms. Schuet Ms. Bascomt and
Ms. Ehrman voted aye. Mr. Hansen, Mr. Holmer, and Mr. Miller voted
nay.
VIII. EUGENE/SPRINGFIELD CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU QUARTERLY REPORT
e (background information distributed)
City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. He introduced Scott
Lieuallen, Executive Vice President of the Convention and Visitors Bureau.
Mr. Lieuallen said City Council policy indicates that convention and visitor
solicitation provides a public benefit and the City contracts with the
Convention and Visitors Bureau for the service. He said the relationship
between the Convention and Visitors Bureau staff and the City staff is
excellent. They are organizing a seminar on the long-term benefits of
tourism to the local economy.
Mr. L;euallen said most members of the bureau staff are neWt but Linda
Weston, the convention sales director, has been on the staff for more than a
year. Mr. lieuallen introduced Dan Brett, a new staff person, who is
organizing receptions for local groups to encourage them to host meetings of
large organizations.
Mr. Lieuallen said the Bureau contracted with an accounting firm and the
financial and membership records of the Bureau are now automated. The recent
audi t and management 1 etter gave the bureau a "cl ean bi 11 of health. II
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 10
Mr. Lieuallen said twenty-eight thousand delegates will attend meetings in
e the metropolitan area this September, October, and November. More
conventions will be held here in those months than in any other three
months. He reviewed advertising and promotional activities and said Van Duyn
representatives want to participate in promotional efforts for the area. He
said the efforts will raise the profile of the area and contribute to the
economic health of Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County.
Ms. Ehrman suggested that the Eugene Celebration be mentioned in
advertising. Mr. Lieual1en said it will be included in the fall campaigns.
Ms. Ehrman asked if the Convention and Visitor Bureau.s allocation from the
room tax fund had been changed by the council's action to re-allocate room
tax funds to the five major arts organizations. Mayor Obie directed the
staff to consult with Ms. Ehrman.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:48 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~. .
~r :..u-...<.'~ /
.~~
Micheal Gleason
City Manager
e (Recorded by Betty Lou Rarick)
BLR:pv/1894C
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 23, 1985 Page 11
.
e
October 23, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: EWEB MASTER PLAN REVIEW AND COMMENTS
I. Introduction
The EWEB Master Plan Draft is coming to the City Council at this time to
provide the Council with an opportunity for input in advance of the Board's
decision on the Master Plan and the budget process for the coming year. The
EWEB Board is considering two alternative site plans for their existing site
along with alternative sites outside the downtown area. Because EWEB's
preference is to remain on their current site, the Master Plan Draft is not
addressing alternative sites at this time.
I J. Background
e Both the Downtown Plan and the Riverfront Special Area Study provide policy
direction for the EWEB site, with the Riverfront Park Study having a direct
effect on University-owned land currently leased by EWEB to meet part of its
storage needs. While the EWEB Master Plan draft was initially prepared in
February, 1984, additional work has been done since the development of the
Riverfront Park Special Area Study to take into account the incorporation of
the University-owned land into the future research park. The draft plan has
been considered by both the Downtown Commission and Planning Commission and
both commissions have forwarded letters to the Counci 1 with their
recommendations on a future office location as well as other comments for
Counci 1 consideration. The July 8th Draft of the Master Plan provides the
basis for commission comments and has been included in the Council packets
under separate cover.
III. EWEB Master Plan Alternatives
In the draft plan forwarded by Moreland/Unruh PC and Saul and Associates, two
schemes are illustrated in map form fo 11 owi ng page six of the summary.
Alternative locations for the future EWEB office building represent the major
difference between these two schemes. Scheme 1 calls for locating the office
building adjacent to the Willamette River at the east end of 4th Avenue, while
Scheme 2 sites the office building at the southeast corner of 4th and High.
These two office locations have di fferent implications for the site, In
Scheme 1, at-grade parking is shown extending along 4th Avenue and portions of
e High Street, with eventual development of a parking structure at 4th and High,
and the removal of the existing Midgley's Building. Scheme 2 provides for at-
grade parking up to the riverfront setback, with the eventual development of a
e
parking structure between the office building and the Ferry Street Bri dge
ramps. Both of these alternatives provide for the maximum possible integration
of utility operations and utility administration on the current site.
Because of the site I s size, it wi 11 not be possible to accomodate all of
EWES's storage needs on-site and EWEB wi 11 be stori ng 1 ess frequently used
items off-site. This compromise on total operation/administration
integration results from the previously mentioned decision by the University
to retain ownership of land currently used by EWES for storage of transformers
and other construction materials.
IV. EWEB Master Plan Issues
Correspondence from the Downtown Commission and the Planning Commission
examines the EWES Master Plan Draft as it relates to four separate issues:
1. The office location decision and its impact on riverfront development;
EWES has expressed a preference for locating its proposed office building on
the riverfront at the east end of 4th Avenue and both commtssions supported
that preferenc~. This alternative provides an opportunity for the .offi ce
building to help define the space for a major public plaza where 4th Avenue .
meets the river. A ri verfront plaza in this 1 oca t i on will ma ke a major
contribution to the city's efforts in strengthening the city's relationship to
the river and the river's role as an asset in the downtown area. If the 4th
. and High Street office location were chosen, the draft plan calls for
extensive parking ar.eas along the river.
2. Site constraints and the impact of EWES's parking needs on the
commercial vitality of the 4th and High Street area.
The future of the Midgleys building and its contribution to commercial
act i vity at Fourth and High has been identified as an issue by both
commissions as well as by the owner of vacant property on the north side of 4th
Avenue. Under the preferred alternative, the draft plan calls for re~lacing
this structure with surface parking at this time, or with structured parking,
when the parking needs increase sufficiently to warrant the cost of going to a
second level. The draft plan proposes an approximately 30 foot wide area of
sidewalk, landscaping and screening to soften the effect of the parking lot
along High Street and 4th Avenue, a s we 11 as the effect of on-site storage
along High Street. .Soth commissions have commented on the importance of
Midgleys to the area and have also asked that consideration be gi ven to
incorporating ground floor retail into any structured parking developed on the
site.
3. Site constraints and the impact of EWEB's operational needs on. the
historic Eugene Mill and Elevator Building; and
Because of the constrained size of the site, EWES has indicated the need to e
pursue moving or demolition of this city landmark. Letters from the two
2
<,
~
e
commissions suggest several options for EWEB to consider as it goes through
the Eugene code provisions for moving or demolition of an historic landmark.
The Eugene Historic Review Board has expressed an interest in working with
EWEB in its efforts to preserve the Eugene Mill and Elevator Building.
4. Coordination between the EWEB Master Plan Draft and the Riverfront
Research Park.
Under the preferred alternative, EWES would play a significant role in
development along the city's riverfront area. Both commissions recommended
on-going communication between EWEB and the future developer of the Riverfront
Research Park to ensure coordination of the riverfront development. This would
be particularly needed around the 8th and Hilyard access to the Riverfront.
Research Park site and the need for expansion of the Willamette Substation in
the same area.
v. Recommended Comments To The EWEB Board
The following comments have been drafted for the Council's consideration in
formulating a set of comments and city position on the draft EWEB Master Plan:
l. The siting of an EWEB office building along the riverfront at t~e east of
4th Avenue can make, a significant contribution in helping define a future
- public plaza. in this location. During the Greenway review process for
this development, particular attention will be paid to the office
buildingl s relationship to this future public space, including the
building's potential for casting shadows on the plaza.
2. The plan IS potential for strengthening pedestrian connections to the
river can be seen in the proposed landscaped walkways along High Street
and Fourth Avenue. In addition, as a result of staff discussions
subsequent to publication of the draft plan, an opportunity exists for a
more direct pedestrian connection through the site, between the office
building and High Street along the southern edge of the proposed parking
a re as. These proposed improvements, as well as the plan's proposals for
significantly increasing landscaping along the riverfront can make a
major contribution to improving the riverfront area as an asset to the
community. The current draft plan has not addressed landscaping around
the Willamette Substation. Because there are a number of unknowns
concerning the timing for substation expansion and its effect on the 8th
and Hilyard access to the Riverfront Research Park, this issue will be
best addressed duri ng f~ture reviews of the site plan as part of the
Willamette Greenway review process.
3, The Midgleys Building located at the southeast corner of 4th and High
makes a significant contribution to the activity and attractiveness of
the area and supports this pedestrian connection from the downtown area
to the river. This structure should be retained as long as possible, in
e recognition of its contribution to the area. Replacing the Midgleys
Building with a surface parking area providing space for 72 cars is not
responsive to city policies for retaining intensity and diversity in this
3
"
--
important corner of the downtown area. If the building can be retained
until the utility's needs call for structured parking, a number of
options are possible.
4. When additional parking is needed on the site in the form of structured
parking, we would 1 i ke the Board to consider the feasibil ity of
developing structured parking that could meet EWEB's parking needs while
also contributing to solutions to parking problems in the surrounding 5th
Street District Area. When the time comes to develop structured parking,
public and private resources in the area (including the potential use of
tax increment district revenues) could be coordinated and combined to
provide a more efficient use of both land and financial resources.
At that time, we would also like to participate a feasibility analysis
investigating the potential for ground floor commercial development
along High Street as part of the structured parking. In this way, the
removal of the Midgleys Building for structured parking and the resulting
loss of commercial vitality and intensity could be compensated for with
the activity generated by street level retail in the future parking
structure.
5. Finally, the Council would 1 i ke to express its support . for EWEB's
continued presence in the downtown area. We are forwarding these comments
in the spirit of arriving at a plan for this portion of the downtown area '-
that wi 11 ma ke a significant contribution to the community. Once the
Board makes its decision on the EWEB Master Plan's components, we would
1 i ke to offer our assistance and support in identifying and pursuing
financial resources to implement the plan.
plpdewcl
-
4
-- .. . ".......... . ...-.... . - .~.. _. _.____u_._n_...__
._- ..-.--..-.... .'-
-
~; DOWNTOWN COMMISSION
(e '\
There are three positions on this commission with terms expiring 12/30/85;
one is an at-large position, and two are downtown-boundary positions.
Term length is four years. (* = at-large; ** = downtown boundary)
Date Birth Neigh. App1t. Expire
Name Bd Applid Date ~ E Q ~ Group Occupation Date Date
Applicants:
IAmend Kip * DC 841005 460304 M W N 2 SE Firs Architect
__IIIIAsPinwall/Lambrt J* J)C 850605 Unknwn F W N 5 Cal Yng LCC Admin
Atkinson Thomas * DC 841023 530903 M W N 5 Cal Yng Telecm sls
___JI,Bridqeman Beatrice* DC 841031 051127 F W N 6 ActBeth Retired
'Burge H Stewart * DC 841107 360912 M W N Non-res RE Brkr
~ 111~affery Steven ** DC 851004 491201 M W N 2 SE Firs ExDir ORT
Cloutier James ** DC 840802 380126 M W N 2 Amazon Publshr
Fous Robert ** DC 850107 500505 M W N (non-res) GM-CmptrSol
- II/Funk David *'Ie " DC 850108 470204 M W N 1 Crest GraphicDesn
'-
_ III Gi etter Ronald ** DC 851003 480822 M W N 1 Crest VP Sales
,Harter Stephens * DC 850109 480109 M W N 2 SE Firs Bus owner
Hauke Robert '* DC 841009 440828 M W N 4 Harlow SHDirAmbSrv
Heiligman George ** DC 850108 480717 M W N 7 Friend Realtor
Landskroner Sidney**OC 850110 090217 M W N Non-res RE Sales
Miller Allen * DC 841031 190509 M W Y 1 SHills CoCommAid
.- _ f}IMiller Christine ** DC 840802 510315 F W N 1 Crest EmploySpec
INichols Joyce ** DC 851003 500726 F W N 7 W Side Relations
Norris Don '" DC 841108 330119 M W N 2 OakHill RE Brkr
~ 'fH-+Owens Dean ** DC 850927 430614 M W N 5 Cal Yng Attorney
IReingold Jeff '** DC 841119 490000 M W N 2 S Univ Prop Mgr
I Rose John '** DC 850108 510116 M W N 3 ------- Artist
- f'l-NJSchwartz Michael *'Ie DC 851001 440602 M W N 5 C Young Retail
"Slusher Joyce ** DC 840801 361003 F W N 4 Fairmnt Retailer
Strong Charles * DC 850908 091117 M N N 1 Friend RetEngneer
Tharp Michael ** DC 850116 490505 M W N 2 S Hills Attorney
Trezona Jim ** DC 841107 490000 M - - Non-res Bus owner
Tucci Daniel * DC 850109 531122 M W - 5 Cal Yng Comm RE
Valentine Shirley 'I( DC 841031 470102 F W N Non-res Bus Owner
Watters Allen '* DC 851007 470325 M W N 8 Church Engineer
Whitty James *'Ie DC 851002 550325 M W N 2 Oak Hil Lawyer
Willard Nancy ** DC 851007 520622 F W N 2 SE Firs Attorney
I Woods Sharon ** DC 841029 420423 F W N 1 S Hills Escrow Mgr
Current Members:
Owens Dean DC 840209 430614 M W N 5 Cal Yng Attorney 840815 851230
Schott Tom '" DC 820610 380903 M W N 2 Fairmou Bus. Owner 820721 851230
Schwartz Michael DC 820621 440602 M W N 5 Cal Yng Retailer 820721 851230
Bennett Anne L. DC 820622 530610 F W N 5 W Un;v. Bus. Owner 820721 861230
.~ Young Mary DC 850107 400607 F W N 1 Friend FIB V Pres 850128 861230
Pearl Stephanie DC 840209 440902 F W N 3 Westsid Store Owner 840905 871230
f -- Genasc; Donald B * DC 811005 380223 M W N 2 S Univ. Architect 820630 881230
McCoy James R.'" DC 820622 461018 M W N 7 Whiteak VP Mkting 820630 881230
Neustadter Roger DC 820616 430408 M W N 8 Crest KaufmnGM 820630 881230
_,--_ _.~._ __,_._. ...._,~.."._.~h....""...~~ ........._ _.. ..__ ._ .._.__. __W___._. __ ______ __ _ _ _. ______ __ _____ ___ _
.,.....:.__ _..". "",.:.,~~"":".,~"",..."",:,,..,......n..I.'::.' _ "_:' '_',""__. '.__'_~_''''____.,______1''1-'F
..
.. "
~~
(.- \
B ALL 0 T
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence. or
otherwise have a direct. pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to interview the following:
- I~' ~
1. ~o ~/LD/ CfylMv~ . (J-
2. ~'k ~d~~1;
3. ~1/ #~~
c7 .
4. ~f)~ !JA~
~. /J fit
5. . 'Mff~ L~ ,. .
.. I. /
Submitted by:
<:JE~ (j?~
Councilor Date
fe\ /
/.!
.;;. ~.;;-
-::'.-.~ ::.-;: "'-.::. . '~'...~': .:~;,;,:::';~:",:,'.:,;;.~:::.:;,"~':"~:'--:~'::-~:/:~~-:-:..-'::-:._'.-=::~-;-: ::'~:-:-:-~':';:..~..;, ....;:~~.....::. ;;~~~----
./"'-.
...
JI
~
,.
rreJ
B ALL 0 T
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to interview the following:
- 1- M I (HAIvL 5' CJj w /J.J2..T z..
2. . ~E/j ~/ CL /3/2 /;Jta/?/1~
3. JLI t ft n ti/1/ /)
4. JO '7 C;[ SLUf'I-IM
5. S' It /J...J2-{)J WOo.oS
Submitted by:
co{frl//df-- )O-L] -g.S
Date
,.
.~ /
~"""--=-~
- ~- .... '.'~_ :':;:~:-:::-'.,: ~...~~.~'.,;:..~.::;~~:;.~~:;"~::;.~~-~:'7:~:~~~':'=:~,7: :.:-:.-:--:-:--=;.-:=:.::.;:-.::.:.;..:....;..;.,.. .;.:-~.~:-.;.;~.______
~
,:,f ...
.,
(~I-
I
'.:.; .-:;--'"
B ALL 0 T
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
. otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to interview the following:
- 1. "ntdV
2. +6~
3. G;6t{dU (
-' .~~ , \.:~.I:;:>:\) ~[,~~";. --I i" :, Ii. ? !
4. ~~~/:~/ "'.....&\1\;. ,1/
5. 1i\:0 ~tWb
Submitted by:
6lfffMAN /()';<3,f)5
Councilor Date
/i)
,<-==~"
/:
","Y'-,.'_",", "~.....;.'~....---.,~ :,!,._,..t.,:":""~-,.""",~,,,-. -:".. '---'---~~'---"'--------'"
,~.
(i:o:-.
"'", ~ ;;
. ,
.~
l .1
....." "-
B ALLOT
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to ~the following:
- l. D~ DWC-N!
2. JlnIJCt- SCr~ wAA-h-
I ~ . ~!c) ~1ew~+- g~~ r
I -0-- .. I g>.
I ~. ~ ..~~
4. Of\L
5. ~':te,-. 4LA.cC-; ~~.{L gllAIM-~
SUbmiZ~ /~ /2--z.-
Councilor I Date
(e')
. ..
. .-. "~;~,-;~;,~ ~-.'~~: ;:'~~'';,.,: ":-:;;:;-:'.::"":'~'~:..~.='::~_:'.:-.';. ,,~:.'----'_...:"~-:-:' :;-:.. -:-:--~~---_... . -..- ::';:=~'~;,;,;~,;,,:.:;,:;,~-:,"--
'.
.' ,
.!"
~
f _,I
...0/'
BALLOT
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to interview the following:
- ~~
l.
2. ~
3. &; ,,~~
4. ~1~C.:P(
5. ~
Submi tted by:
~ /~~/~~
Councilor Date
~
~ /
----
<
/----'
( e '\
..::"'?
DOWNTOWN COMMISSION
l. Umv OIAJ.P ,A../.>
2. ht Ic~ WW~"L.
3.~ ~(
4. hA-vIJ ~LLN ke .
- 5. B. l3 IL ( a-I...- ~ /J-vt..-'
Date
.~
~ I
~_J.
-.--':.-.':':;::"':":"::.':"":. ~~:";-",:';:';";;:--=;:7;;;-":'::'~;.==~':'':-;::-:':::'~.:'' :-:-:-.~..:':':-:---.::"::~:-'::';;;:----"'" ....:;.:.:.:..~'~~---
c.
.'.' "
~ -
. .
0
,
/,.-
1_\
'~"'~
B ALL 0 T
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - Downtown-boundary
._-..---, 12130/89-.::-At-l a rge. -. -.~" -'_. ._-
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commission shall be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to int~rview the following:
- r;,h~: O~J!/~~ -46Ju'Y'--
l.
/ 2. ~~~
3. ~I ;Jlith,) .
4. ~~
'.-- ----'-- - - - - ..-:-' . --.-~ - --f!J;v~ -- -- . --.----
5.
~. Submitted by:
1, C. ~ /0 -.23
Councilor Date
~
".J
. ",-' ':.-.:';-::'-:-'::-,: ~.-:~".::-::.:~;:~-:::-:::::;....::_~.~~::.,:.:.-::-:;_:~7:';-:-.--:-:-:-'~;-:' -=,'::--;-:-:-.::.:,;;:::,;-=:.. -, ,"-': .:......:.:.'~'..,~;;...,~~_~._
. . 8"" t
~. "
.
"
;
~.
I e'\
7
,~...;._/
B ALL 0 T
(DOWNTOWN COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 3
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89 ~ Qowntown-boundary
12/30/89 --Downtown-boundary
12/30/89 - At-large
Specific Criteria: At least 5 voting members of the
commi ss ion sha 11 be employed, employ
others, own property, manage a business,
maintain a primary residence, or
otherwise have a direct, pecuniary
interest with the downtown boundary.
I wish to interview the following:
- M;~. ~hLUQyt-f-z-
' . l.
. .,
2. De.a> VI rJ 1./J\2. Yk5
~ -
3. . eh'i'I>$+rhQ, t1 dJe V"
4. 6ie-ve- o~f.p~('A
5. 8/'1.:..1 ~ -f- \" ,I (t~ J? V' Ihf'Al1 a "1 ~l..~ krilll/Ta/( -
Lonh&-Is
SUb~ . )4/~3
Q .tA=.
CO-unci lor ' De te
(~ /
Ee~~~-t t \~t I ().::-! $.. )/.
, /
h
1~( ()..,e,-
I
I
I
.
.r:.~-- - o' f
~ I
,i .
e
____4f/or~~---aYt~fr5'qn--6- _.______/tJ:a-~-
_ :j(~"'~t:tll T~ w/~ 6"
----. ------ -~--- ----- - --.._._---- -- --- ---- - - -----.-------------------
_.___________..:._.~.. we~t~__ ... _ ___~u.___ _
. - .--, ------- ------.,---. .--_# ------ ..-
'Pet-!- Vc:;t/I~r;fhd Lf
--- ---- -- -- .-------- -----. --_. -. -~ .---- ~_ ._ __ _u _.___ _. --
:JOhn .. --------- _.__.--,----- -
~~-_'}--~-~~~i/-~t?I~--.--7 _ -. - - _ - - __ _
'-'-"--- - - - ~- ----
-- ._-..... ---' ,.._, --.-,.-. - - ._- -, --'--., ---
-- ____ _ ___' .___'~hn pofr~ 3
. -, --- _. . -- - - --,-- -------I ' - __ ___, . "__' ._ - - --',---~ ,--.-. -- ---- ..
.-.--..------.-- .. --
."---- ---- ---,. :~q.,,~ _.(?J~0?____. -----L--------~- ___
~ ----- ---- ..- '. -
;0++0 G IIJWS"/ J
------___ ------1 --.p-----~ - ----- ----
._- --,-------.-. -.- ,_ __4 _ _ .__ _ _______
Jon ~+t:l/'.r~tI I
------- - --.----
----------,.~-_._-- -
- -~._-- -- ..------ -,---
!- .---- ------
-. ----- - ------ -- -- .----,,- - , - - - -'-.--- -- ----..--- ----...---------- ---,.-
- -. .- --'--'
-- ---- -, - .-------,-- .--.-,---..-- -----_.,-- . - -'--. ._.~ -- -- .--.-- - ------- ,-----.,---.--------..---.,-
.-. -- - - -- .--.,-
_ _~._, _ __ __n _... _ ._-'- _ ____ -- - ._. .- - - -. . - - - -. - .,-,
. - ___'n. _______.,____.. _n --.- ------- --- ---. '-"-_._-_.~~---
- --- - -,-,- ._-. ----- --- -_.
.------ - -- - .--- -. ---- -. -----..-- .------ --". ..,----. '--" ----
_ _'u._-__ _ _ __ _',____ __ _._, . ,__, __ _ , ___, _, -- -- -- -- . - ~---- --- -.. ---
-- --- ._-.-- _. ----- --- --------
- __._ _._, ________.,.-1. _ " ----. --.--- .-- ' '-.. - ---.. _. --
..' -_. ._--. "-.-
--- ---- .. -- - --- ,---. -- --_.._-'.- --- ---- --- . ------
,.~ - -..---.-. -,.. - -._, ,_. - -- ,- - - --'- - .._---~.- ~ ,-,----
.- -'- ---- ----. -,--..- .-------- - ---'--- '. ---- ----- -- -
--.. ,_... - --., -- -..- - -- _. - '_u'.. _ __ .--
'. - ,_. .-, - -. --- - - __ u '__' _ .'____.4. .__ __'
-----. ... - -, - - ._n ._n_
-.-- . -' . --- -. ---, - - - -_.- - -- - --- ... -- -----,
----_.- .. -- --- ---.-, - -_.'..- --.- _.._--....
--- --- -- -- -- -
_. -- -. - .-.-- ,- -------,-' -- -., ,. ,.-,-- . - ----.-- - ,--
__.._ ._..___u._ . ___A. _____ - ,_ - . _____ - - .._- ._---,---- .-
---- ----r--.--- "'-'---'-- --- .----- -.-------------.-------.- ----_..--
,- ---- - - ----- - - - .-
I
,
._._----,-'--- ----- ---- ----------
-- -------
I_
. {
- --- ___-1...,______
..---- -.--- '-----_.__._~- .._- ---" ----
j'
; ;
----:--~------;..-- ----.---=-- - - - .. .- --------
I- ',' -..... --- . --- - "-- -- _...-- .- --
I
.... ! i ,-,-'. "'~;~..-~~
-- ~.:.._, -
,.. --'.. ~ " ".. ...;- -',--"'-- - -. '_.., n - . .- -.---.- - ----------
., ..
.
,
e PLANNING COMMISSION
Two positions on this commission have terms expiring 1/1/86; term length
is four years. Professions represented by the remaining five positions are:
real estate (2), attorney, vocational rehabilitation, and education.
Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than two commissioners being engaged
in the same occupation.
Date Birth Neigh. App't. Expire
Name Bd Aoplid Date ~ B Q '!i Group Occupation Date Date
Applicants:
Adey Stephen PC 841028 500413 M W N 7 Whiteak TaxCnslt
I fhI. Anderson Dorothy PC 851002 290507 F W N 2 S Univ Hswife
Atkinson Thomas PC 841023 530903 M W N 5 Cal Yng Telecm sls
Baxter Eunice PC 841114 320000 F W N 7 Far Wst SocResAnlst
Billings, Jack PC 841114 460702 M W N 7 Friend Attorney
Burge H Stewart PC 841107 360912 M W N Non-res RE Brkr
Duncan Richard PC 850116 490707 M W N 1 Crest RE Apprsr
Fitkin Reed PC 841126 Unknwn M W N 8 Church AthClbMgmt
Frear Samuel PC 841013 310211 M W N 2 S Hills Writer
I Glausi Otto PC 841107 351218 M W N 8 Church PresGl siOil
Hauke Robert PC 841009 440828 M W N 5 Cal Yng SHDirAmbSrv
Kaufo 1 d Leroy PC 841009 240916 M W N 5 Cal Yng Retired
Keller Barbara PC 851004 491205 F W N 2 SE Firs Architect
e Malin Greg T PC 841113 511109 M W N 5 Cal Yn9 Draftsman
Mehas Arthur PC 841114 360520 M W N 5 Cal Yng LndscpCntrc
Moye Gary PC 841031 411227 M W N 2 Fairmnt Architect
Parker Teresa PC 841114 551110 F W N 1 Crest NutrtnMgr
, II Potter John PC 841031 501103 M W N 2 SE Firs Admin-OCDLA
III Rich Joan PC 841031 260829 F W - 3 Friend Unknwn
Schmidt Ludd F PC 841028 ------ M W N Non-res RetMktAsst
I Stafford Jonathan PC 841114 441011 M W N 7 W Side Architect
Stein Alan PC 841114 540807 M W N 7 W Side Bus Owner
I t-f..Ll Thwi ng Randa 11 PC 850920 450630 M W N 5 Cal Yng Attorney
, III Vall erand Patri c; a PC 841031 510621 F W N 2 Amazon Attorney
I III Van Landingham John PC 841114 460928 M W N 7 Whiteak Attorney
H-U Weston Sally PC 851003 340629 F W N 4 Fairmnt Homemakr
Woods Sharon PC 841029 420423 F W N 1 S Hills Escrow Mgr
~
:JJ Current Members:
Anderson Dorothy PC 811104 290507 F W N 2 S Univ Housewife 811216 860101
Thwing Randall PC 811013 450630 M W N 5 Cal Yng Attorney 780101 860101
Bennett Robert PC 830914 420000 M W N 4 Harlow Prop Mgmt 831012 870111
Gaydos Gerry PC 841109 470330 M W N 4 Fairmnt Attorney 841119 880101
Mulder Eleanor PC 831029 290717 F W N 2 Amazon VocRehCnslr 791210 880101
Ellison Jim PC 841112 350812 M W N 5 Cal Yng LCCDnTelcm 841119 890101
Prichard Hugh PC 841109 460227 M W N 2 Amazon RE Broker 841119 890101
-- ealebcc2
--
, '~:__-.;__~~:".:""r:"".,.;....:.:'::';;;:;";:....._____-:.-_-,..~ ..~~.,:.._.:'_"':;' -..--- .-:-.:::.-:-.::-....:-~;.;...;.:-~~;..:...-:..._.......1,.-.._'..-~....,..... .-..,.' ..._......--'~ --
;0.
......' \
-. "
. .
e
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
'tI.ed/-- .. /~f~J ~ I
~d(cd
I wish to il'ttsl' . u-the following:
~ ~ lv vfJ
1-
e 2. 1>01 o~ Mc,:so/
3.
4.
5.
Date
e
~:;",i:""'~,'.;.:-..~:;;,.:::...::.. ~~~'::.~~'';'''';';~:'','~.:::;:.:.;''::''::;'::::;''.::':'~=':':::::-..::.~...~'.,:.:~~....:.....;.~.~ '~J."':'=""_____-'''''''_'''''~''.''''' "'___,~ -
~
~ :.:-;.'''f''
.,
i' ,:;;-
--
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
I wish to interview the following:
1. -i~N ~ofttV
e 2. :JOlid 1c0~
3. JO~ UtA lA~'1 V\~
4. PAt 0Ml~l\Jrt1d
5. ~~ W6~~.
Submitted by:
61/2/4/W IO/if5
Councilor
.(t
--
/ -
:'::.-~~:'~.":~..."7..~:;;=~~~:~~:=.;.; ,~;.;.:;..:;..- _..._-;;;,;:..:.";.:.--:;::....-:,.;:~,:~; _:::..,~.::-..-:::~-:;- ,:-:;'.,:":~;""~'.;...~~~.:" ~lo.,...:...----.-----'''..._..~,. ,..~.......__'__l I
~.
.,' "
,- - ,#
.;- ,"
It
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
profe~s~ons: real est~te .(,2-r~' att?rney\, vocational
rehablll tatl on ,educatl on, ~f< (i)
I wish to interview the following:
1. II-~
- 2. ~~,
, ~3. - tv~~
/l1civk
~4. f(~
-- -
\A-
S. ~~-
Submitted by:
~~~
Council or Date
-
7::J~';'~';;:;;":':";'~':C:;~':"':"""~-~';:;';;';-'~":':'::_~':= ::;::-::'::"-~-'-"'-:;;:'-':':";;':~'';';''''~;-~''';-'''':';'~~~'''-'--''''''-.~_._-
'.. :.v ;. '! ;'
--:"! ...
.
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
'1 wish to interview the following:
1. Do fl. 0 TJI 'j I) ffIJ/?JL-5 Dd
e 2. f2--f} /'II) IJ L 77/ Vv//VG-
3. JC> If~1/ fJ D 7/Tl/L
4. J"D /!IV 12--( cd
5. ~;J C~7 WJ5 TOM;
Submi tted by:
M-~ It) - L..> -6r--
C nc r Date
.
:....:;.".!~~.,::.:.~~.;:~'~-:~:;'::=-.:..;; ~..::~.;.;:.;....;.,.~.,;.~..~::'..~~__.~..::.....-..:.:.;.;..::..':.'....;.~~_-::.~'~-:::.~..;-7"::.','.:.;~_...:...~__._,:J.~___""''''''' ._..','............_."" .
p,'"
.4'" .
.7 '5 .... . - ..
o.
"~ .'='-
-
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
I wish to interview the following:
1-
e 2.
3. BJt. \l,e;'/t.lI
4. R.~(l;r> VO )/~V'Of} J
. '" . .,
5. Jb], ~ ~~ Lt1I1) :JII~ hel~
. ~ - ,
Submitted by:
. {!Al#~ JIJ/~
Councfl or ' Date
e
.,..-
-.:::.',';..-....;:.:.;;;.;..;.:.;~~r~:;:.;:--.;..'.:...;,;-.'.~.:~.:.;~..:.:~~~..#.,.~...::.:..:.;:~.:....:.;.--:=,:.:.;;.::.;...,.. >--:-::~...-~_:__...,.....;.;:......-':l__f_-'.....#..."..........',~.~-
.~~
~;,1:--;... .
""
~ .
. ,..
... ."""
.
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expi re: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
I wish to interview the following:
1. ~_ <<f?<tC~oC
e 2. ~~Q~ .
3. ~ ~/+dkn:!,~~
4. ~~~
5. ()~~ ~
Submitted by:
~,~ (
/d -- 1-~
Councilor Date
-
--
"~:'..:--;,:-'~';:;'::..."..:':~';;;':.i:.;..,;.-,;,:,;:,'::,;;~.~.~..~,;,;~,;~;,.;..: '~,::,;:.:'::":':"':';':~'';;'::'':~::'';:'_:.::''-:;'':.~_::~."7:::~'.:_'~:'~~~...~:......._ ___,,-,.....-..,... ..-.....-,....
,.
, '
. . .
.;if ..
'. ..
,~
-.;'> .'~'
-
....-;::....
B ALL 0 T
(PLANN I NGCOMr1 I 55 ION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education.
I wish to interview the following:
1. .LJ~~( ~L1J./HA/
. 2. ~~ wtL<~'r
3. Y~1 ~U-~
4. (Jar ~~~
5.
Submitted by:
~ G2?~~ /()i0J-
Council or Daye
e
~.
/- '-:-'.;;.;...':~.\';;;~-:";::;;":"::::';"",;:';.:,.":",~:;;,;;,,;:,:,.. ~.:.:....~:~::-:..~;:.::.;..:':-;;:,~';":'.;::-.;:.-.-::~~..:..:.:.~~.~~~;;.....~.-~ .".;.:......___..._~".. '.......,. ~~.-"_.few
/1 ~. ." . .
,".~,~~/~ ~ ~,
S-
..... -,
.
B ALL 0 T
(PLANNING COMMISSION)
Number of Openings: 2
Terms to Expire: 12/30/89
12/30/89
Note: Oregon Revised Statutes prohibit more than
two commissioners from engaging in the same profession.
Current commissioners represent the following
professions: real estate (2), attorney, vocational
rehabilitation, education. J~+
I wish to interview ~~~G~;n~~~ AftOl~+-
1. DdU~ f* ~J-'
e 2. .~ -1J. w/";'t
3.
4.
5.
SUbmi~t ,a/v---
Councilor Date
:e
-...!.
.~ ~
.~
MEMORANDUM
- October 24, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire and Emergency Services Department
RE: LONG RANGE PLAN
Staff in the Fire and Emergency Services Department have completed a long-
range planning process and are bringing before the Council for ~ublic
hearing the draft Long Range Plan for Fire and Emergency Services, which is
expected to provide direction and policy guidance for the department over
the next 15 years. The plan document covers every phase of department re-
sponsibility, including fire suppres~ion, fire prevention, emergency medical
services, and related emergency and support activities. The draft plan is
organized into seven sections; four of these sections~-Metro Services, Code
Development and Enforcement, Department Infrastructure, and Public Education--
have been before the Planning Commission, which amended and now forward them
to the Council. Three additional sections of the plan--Emergency Operations,
Human Resources and Training, and Department Administration--are being review-
ed by the City's executive managers, but are included in the draft document
to allow for public review and comment.
.
The planning process began in mid-1984. In order to give the department1s
e employees a sense of ownership, and due to the technical aspects of many
of the department1s operations~ the initial step in developing the plan
wa~: the formation of a number of committees, made up of department members.
The initial recommendations of these committees were placed into plan format.,.
at which point a Citizen Advisory Group was formed to: l)review the draft
document to ensure that it was complete, practical, and understandable to the
general public, 2)advise planning committees of community concerns not ade-
quately addressed in the draft, and 3)inform their constituent groups of the
planning process, solicit input, and support the plan through adoption. After
consulting with staff in the City Manager's Office, the following groups/
organizations were invited to provide representation on the CAG: Eugene Area
Chamber of Commerce, Lane County Board of Commissioners. Emergency Medical
Services Advisory Board, Lane County Chapter of the American Red Cross, Lane
Community College Advisory Board. Lane County Insurance Agents Association,
Lane County Fire Defense Board, City of Springfield, Lane County Medical
Society, Neighborhood Leaders, the local chapter of the American Association
of Retired Persons. and the League of Women Voters. The CAG was chaired by
Gerry Gaydos, the Chamber of Commerce representative, and a member of the
Planning Commission.
Following the CAG's review and modification of the document, it was publicized
through the news media and presentations on the proposea plan were made to the
e Neighborhood Leaders, the Chamber of Commerce Planning and Land Use Sub-
committee, and the Joint Committee on Economic Development. In addition. the
plan was the topic of a number of presentations made by department staff to
various civic groups.
The Planning Commission, following a worksession on the plan. held a September
17 public hearing on the plan, receiving written testimony on the document
.
~
from the Chamber of Commerce and the Lane County Homebuilders Asociation.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission amended Policy 10.0 in the
Code Development and Enforcement section of the plan and voted unanimously -
to approve the plan, as amended and forward it to the Council for consider-
ation.
ACTION REQUESTED: Pass resolution adopting plan
fajpllrp
-
.'
.