HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/31/1990 Meeting
.
e
M I NUT E S
Eugene City Council
McNutt Room--City Hall
January 31, 1990
11:30 a.m.
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Ruth Bascom, Roger Rutan, Emily Schue, Debra Ehrman, .
Bobby Green, Freeman Holmer, Shawn Boles.
COUNCILORS ABSENT: Robert Bennett, Mayor Miller.
The adjourned meeting of January 24, 1990, of the Eugene City Council was
called to order by Council President Emily Schue.
I. ITEMS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL, MAYOR, AND CITY MANAGER
A. Skating Party
Ms. Ehrman announced that the Jefferson Neighbors and the Westside Quality
Project Neighbors recently had a very successful neighborhood party at the
newly constructed ice skating rink and suggested that this might be a
possible activity for other neighborhoods to participate in.
e
B. Earth Day
Mr. Boles noted that Earth Day is soon approaching and requested that staff
from the Intergovernmental Relations Department give a presentation on what
activities the City has planned for this day.
C. Nude Dancing
Mr. Holmer drew council attention to a letter from a citizen concerned with
the prevalence of establishments which allow nude dancing, and asked whether
council members were interested in pursuing this issue. Ms. Ehrman commented
that one of the enterprises in question has already changed its business
which might serve as an indication for the future success of this type of
business. Ms. Schue also noted that cities seem to have difficulty
effectively regulating this type of business.
E. Committee Assignments for Councilors
Dave Whitlow, Assistant City Manager, informed council members that the City
Manager's Office (CMO) needs the Committee on Committees to convene to deal
with committee appointments and assignments and said he would schedule a time
for this. Barbara Belamy, CMO, added that the CMO also needs councilors to
turn in their requests regarding on which committees they are interested in
~ serving.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
January 31, 1990
Page 1
e
F. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)
Mr. Whitlow said that the City has scheduled a meeting with BPA officials on
February 2, at the City Manager's Office to discuss and offer input into BPA
issues and invited interested councilors to attend. Ms. Ehrman said she
would be present at this meeting.
II. SCHAEFERS BUILDING PROJECT REPORT
Mr. Rutan provided an overview about the Schaefers Building project. He said
that he participated last summer as a judge for a design project undertaken
by University of Oregon students at the historic Schaefers Building. Daphne
Walwyn, building owner, sponsored a contest whereby students in the
Architecture and Allied Arts Department were to design and develop models for
different types of space in the downtown Eugene area.
e
Mr. Rutan said that this program was a tremendous success and that many of
the designs generated out of this contest were the best that have been
developed for the downtown area in years. He pointed out the enormous
resource that the City has in the University of Oregon and suggested that
this type of partnership be considered in the future for similar types of
projects.
Ms. Walwyn indicated that the idea to sponsor this design project came out of
the need for practical use and enhancement of the public space in downtown
Eugene. The project was particularly beneficial in that it provided students
with a IIhands-onll experience for the process of city design.
Jim Gibons, University of Oregon staff, gave a slide presentation demon-
strating the structural needs that must be considered when undertaking city
redesign and identified aspects of student's projects which captured these
needs. Mr. Gibons pointed out that this project was successful because it
focused on an organic, piecemeal approach to growth most desired for downtown
growth. His presentation included slides from other cities such as Portland
and Seattle that have successfully assimilated many of these aspects in their
downtown architecture.
Mr. Boles commented that of all the contributions that the University has
made to the larger community, this city redesign project is one of the most
important; the University has provided the community with a high-quality
resource which can help solve problems associated with downtown redesign.
Mr. Boles expressed disappointment that the City will not have the
opportunity to have this same group of students and faculty assist interested
business owners in applying such principles to their downtown design
projects.
Ms. Ehrman offered appreciation to the students for their work and pointed
out specific places in the city which, as outlined in this presentation, make
for a more integrated urban environment. Mr. Green also complimented
students on their efforts; students demonstrated a good knowledge of what ;s
needed to draw people to any downtown area.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
January 31, 1990
Page 2
e
e
e
Mr. Holmer suggested that the City continue to use the University of Oregon
as a resource on its other projects as well. Students might be able to
identify broader options for problem solution than have been generated in the
past.
Ms. Bascom pointed out that the areas immediately surrounding the University
of Oregon are good examples of the type of development that are envisioned
for a successful downtown. Mr. Gibons agreed that the University area has
benefitted from organic kinds of growth and can serve as a microcosm of what
downtown could be like on a larger scale.
III. WORK SESSION: MODIFICATION OF BUILDING CODES
Doug Eveleth, Planning and Development Department, provided the council with
an overview of code origination. He indicated that because several code
adoptions will come before the City Council in the preceding months,
discussion would revolve around the adoption of the State structural code,
mechanical code, and plumbing code. Code adoptions are updated on a three-
year cycle.
Mr. Eveleth said that the International Conference of Building Officials
(ICBO) creates the model codes used in the western United States. He
emphasized that model codes evolve slowly over time; code modifications can
be proposed by any person in the form of an amendment submitted to the ICBO.
The State of Oregon receives its model code from ICBO and has the authority
to make amendments to this code. Amendments which are proposed must be at
least as strict as the model code requirements.
Ms. Bascom drew attention to the numerous volume of pages which signify
Oregon's amendments to the building codes and asked whether other states in
the western region also make numerous amendments to the code. Mr. Eveleth
commented that Oregon is considered fairly active in terms of making
amendments to the model code.
Mr. Eveleth said that although all construction within the State must comply
with the rules and regulations of the State codes, local agencies can be
responsibility for administering their own building codes. Eugene has chosen
to administer building codes locally. Responding to a question from Mr.
Holmer regarding the rationale behind this decision, Mr. Eveleth said that
local administration of building codes ;s more efficient.
Tom Rogers reviewed items which have been identified for changes in the
building code. He said that the section of the code which deals with
hazardous use has been changed to correspond better with the Fire Code and to
catch up with technology. Changes in this regard will affect businesses
which contain some type of hazardous material.
Mr. Rogers said that changes have also been made with respect to group-care
facilities. Although such regulations do not appear in the model code, they
are needed to fill a gap between residential and institutional type nursing
homes which, over time, have tended toward the smaller types of care
facilities.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
January 31, 1990
Page 3
e
Mr. Rogers indicated that seismic design, which deals with earthquakest
represents the first real change to the model code since 1976. These code
changes come as a result of increased information about the forces which are
applied to buildings during earthquakes.
Mr. Rogers said that the chapter of the code which deals with skylights is
specific to Oregon. This change has made the requirements less restrictive
in.some cases.
Energy conservationt a change which is also specific to the State, attempts
to make the code easier to apply in order to promote conservation practices.
In response to a question from Ms. Bascomt Mr. Rogers said that when an
amendment is made, the City is required to reprint the entire page of the
code that was revised even if only minor wording modifications were made.
Ms. Ehrman asked whether changes in the code are applied only to new
construction and new permits or whether they are also applied retroactively.
Mr. Rogers indicated that while updated code requirements apply to the
construction of all new buildings and any new additions to a buildingt it
does not necessarily bring the entire building into compliance with the
revised codes.
Mr. Boles asked how this information is integrated with HAl-MAT requirements.
In response, Mr. Rogers said that this information closely corresponds to
HAl-MAT standards and is applied at the time of plan review and inspection.
e
Mr. Boles asked how code enforcement is monitored.
inspectiont construction is inspected to check for
difficult, howevert to ensure compliance with code
inspection has been made.
Mr. Rogers said that upon
compliance. It is
requirements after
Ken Nagao, Building Construction Advisory Committee (BCAC) Chairt spoke about
the relationship between BCAC and the City. Seven members of the community
make up the committee which represents and serves as a sounding board for a
broad cross-section of citizens in the construction industry.
Most of the complaints which have come to BCAC have revolved around
coordination and communication between the Fire Department and the Building
Department. Mr. Nagao emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency
in the application of building codes.
Mr. Nagao noted that a plan review audit recently conducted by the State
revealed that the City.s building department was reviewing building plans
with the same degree of intensity as the State has recommended. The
committee itself has also compared our building department with that of Salem
and Washington County, and has also concluded that plans are being reviewed
similarly.
e
Mr. Nagao indicated that decreasing the time for building permit issuance is
paramountly important across the industry. He noted that developers within
the industry that have attended BCAC meetings have indicated that they would
support an increase in user fees, if a decrease in plan review time can be
attained. Mr. Eveleth pointed out that the method by which the City can
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
January 31t 1990
Page 4
e
e
e
charge fees for a building permit is regulated by the State; the City is
currently at this ceiling. There is a process to go above this ceiling which
requires a public hearing in Salem.
Responding to a question, Mr. Eveleth said that in order for an inspector to
do more than one type of inspection, he or she would need additional
certification; such a certification plan is currently being instituted and
many of the field inspectors can perform more than one specialty code
inspection.
IV. CULTURAL SERVICES FUNDING
Ms. Bascom reminded councilors that at their January 22 discussion of funding
for cultural services, unanimous agreement was not obtained on the source of
funding increase. She emphasized the importance of addressing this issue
today.
This new proposal submitted by the Ad Hoc Arts Funding Committee is
attempting to address Mr. Rutan's concern for networking with other groups in
proposing a room tax increase, Mr. Boles's concern for broader support for a
variety of quality of life issues, and Mr. Bennett's concern for a broad
framework under which arts fund monies will be spent.
Mr. Holmer noted that the proposal in the packet neglected to provide for a
9:1 division of support to include the Cultural Arts program which is
administered by the commission through the Lane Regional Arts Council (LRAC)
as well as the performing arts. He underscored the importance of this type
of visible, direct City support for the arts groups.
Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, that the council
urge the City Manager to include in his budget for FY91
recommendations for allocation to the major local performing
arts organizations of approximately 90 percent of the amount
by which the transient room tax revenues for FY90 exceed the
estimates in the original budget for FY90, and that 10
percent of that amount be allocated to increased support of
the Cultural Arts program; and that the sums approved in the
FY91 budget be allocated in accord with criteria developed by
the Cultural Affairs Commission and approved by the City
Council.
Mr. Rutan commended the committee on submitting an excellent proposal that he
can support. He pointed out that that the transient room tax revenues are
currently running approximately 13.8 percent ahead of last year, and although
it is likely that this pattern will continue, there is no guarantee. He
underscored the importance of arts to our community.
Mr. Boles said that although he will support this proposal, this type of
allocation to the arts does a disservice to non-performing arts groups as
well as to Eugene as a whole. He said that the best program for economic
diversification must include support for cultural, leisure, arts, sports, and
science programs as a package. He also suggested a 10-year sunset, 5-percent
restaurant tax which will raise a minimum of $40,000.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
January 31, 1990
Page 5
e
e
e
The meeting adjourned at 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Holmer's motion carried unanimously, 7:0.
Respectfully submitted,
?;r7' ~
~~~i~K~ ~1f
City Manager "
(Recorded by Traci Northman)
mncc 013190
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
,........
.,
'.
--.:...
January 31, 1990
Page 6