Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/28/1991 Meeting (2) e M I NUT E S Eugene City Council Council Chamber--Eugene City Hall January 28, 1991 7:30 p.m. COUNCILORS PRESENT: Roger Rutan, Shawn Boles, Ruth Bascom, Bobby Green, Randy MacDonald, Paul Nicholson, Kaye Robinette. The adjourned meeting of January 16, 1991, of the Eugene City Council was called to order by His Honor Mayor Jeff Miller. e In light of the large number of items on the council's agenda, Mayor Miller asked those testifying at the public hearings to limit their comments to three minutes in order to allow everyone the opportunity to speak. Mayor Miller read a statement on behalf of the City Council regarding the crisis in the Middle East urging the community to demonstrate mutual respect and tolerance for all persons regardless of race or ethnic origin and encouraging persons to report any acts of harassment to the Department of Public Safety immediately. I. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of City Council Minutes of October 15, 1990, Dinner Work Session; October 22, 1990, Meeting; and November 5, 1990, Meeting B. Resolutions Calling for Public Hearings to Consider Proposed With- drawals of Recently Annexed Properties from Water and Park Dis- tricts Res. No. 4222--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from River Road Water District and River Road Park and Recreation District (Paschelke, EC EU 90-15) Res. No. 4223--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from River Road Water District and River Road Park and Recreation District (Falkenstein, EC EU 90-26) e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 1 -- Res. No. 4224--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from River Road Water District and River Road Park and Recreation District (Cole/James, EC EU 90-31) Res. No. 4225--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from River Road Water District and River Road Park and Recreation District (Hoffman, EC EU 90-33) Res. No. 4226--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from Santa Clara Water District (Fegles, EC EU 90-11) Res. No. 4227--A resolution calling for a public hearing to consider proposed withdrawal of territory from Santa Clara Water District (A-4 Investment Company, EC EU 90-23) C. Segregation of Assessment for Property Located at 405 River Road, between Fir Lane and Crocker Lane on the East Side of River Road e D. Appointment: Mayor Miller's Nomination to the Airport Commission Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to approve the items on the City Council consent calendar. Roll call vote; the motion carried, 7:0:1, with Councilor MacDonald abstaining. II. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVAL OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Cathy Czerniak, Planning and Development Department, reported on the issue. The purpose of the public hearing is to adopt the draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal years 1991-92 through 1996-97. The CIP differs from the Capital Budget in that the CIP is a planning tool through which needed improvements to the City's facilities are identified, prioritized, priced, and discussed with the community. As a result of Measure 5, the CIP will be useful in strategic financial planning discussions within the community regarding levels of ser- vice, capital projects, and sources of revenue for the future. Ms. Czerniak reported that both the Planning Commission and the Budget Com- mittee have reviewed and recommended approval of the draft CIP with modifica- tions. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the draft plan with the inclusion of Errata Sheet A which outlines funding changes to the Highway 99N, Roosevelt-to-Beltline improvement project. The Budget Committee recom- mended approval of the draft CIP incorporating errata Sheets A and B. The recommendations on Errata Sheet B include the elimination of the Valley River Bridge Project from the document and moving forward both the Westmoreland/ e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 2 e 18th Avenue Bike/Pedestrian Overcrossing and the Greenway Bike Path projects. Ms. Czerniak noted that if the council chooses to move those projects for- ward, staff recommends that it do so without making other adjustments to projects at this time. Staff was available to answer questions. Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. Mort Turnbull, 2685 Turnbull Lane, submitted written testimony expressing concerns with the City's ability to provide emergency medical services to the residents of the Willakenzie/Cal Young neighborhoods. He provided a brief history of Station 6 and on behalf of the Cal Young Neighborhood Association made two requests: 1) that essential upgrades to Station 6 not be dependent upon prior construction of Station 2 or the upgrading of Station 10 and 2) that upgrades to Station 6 and associated funding be completed as soon as possible. Wally Donnelly, 2090 Providence Street, representing the Cal Young Neighbor- hood Association, voiced concern with emergency medical service response times in his neighborhood and urged the City to reconsider its past decision regarding Station 6. Tom Wolterink, 2934 SW Fairmount Boulevard, Portland, speaking as a consul- tant of the Valley River Inn, urged the council to continue to study all means of improving traffic flow in the Valley River Inn area. He stated that improved traffic flow is needed for citizens' health and safety, as well as for logistical reasons. He also encouraged the council not to eliminate any of the pedestrian/bike pathways in the area. Jean Holtham, 389 North Polk Street, supported the elimination of the pro- posed Valley River Bridge study, highlighting the adverse aesthetic impacts an additional automobile bridge would have on a residential area. In light of the fuel shortage, she said that the City should do everything possible to promote bicycle usage. -- Richard Guske, 1005 Clark Street, stated that residents of the Whiteaker neighborhood support, for health and safety reasons, the Budget Committee's recommendation to eliminate any further study of the proposed Valley River Bridge. James Fish, 296 North Grand, testified in support of eliminating the Valley River Bridge study. Jeff Lake, 345 N Grand, spoke in opposition to the Valley River Bridge study and urged the council to stop all future consideration of constructing an additional bridge in the area. Jan Wostmann, 2645 Riverview Drive, testified on behalf of the Laurel Hill Neighborhood Association in favor of approval of the draft CIP with the in- clusion of the Budget Committee's recommendations. The Laurel Hill Neighbor- hood Association supports this position for many of the reasons stated previ- e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 3 e ously and believes that the City should take actions to encourage alternate modes of transportation usage. Cheryle Hawkins, 1350 Bailey Avenue, spoke on behalf of the Whiteaker Commu- nity Council in support of the draft CIP with the Budget Committee's amend- ments. She said that the Valley River Bridge study is premature, and noted that a comprehensive study of the area needs to be undertaken to help identi- fy all factors which contribute to traffic congestion in the area. She said she felt that inadequate public notice was given for this hearing. She also stated that the draft CIP should be revised to include the entire list of Maurie Jacobs Memorial Park improvements. Ricar West, 1345 Bailey Avenue, submitted written testimony presented by Cheryle Hawkins, in favor of withdrawing the proposed Valley River Bridge study from the CIP. Richard Wright, 1043 Mill Street, testified in favor of the $25,000 alloca- tion within the CIP for street-tree planting. He commended the City on its decision to hire an urban forester and its commitment and support of the Tree Commission. e Carl Vanderzanden, 95 North Polk, spoke in favor of eliminating the Valley River Bridge study from the CIP and urged the City to take a comprehensive approach to transportation planning. Howard Bonnett, 1835 East 28th, read a statement on behalf of the Fairmount Neighborhood Organization in support of the Budget Committee's recommended modifications to the draft CIP, particularly the elimination of the Valley River Bridge study. Jennifer Hodgen, 176 North Grand, spoke in favor of eliminating the Valley River Bridge study from the CIP now and in the future. Ceila Levine, 285 Owosso, concurred with those who spoke before her and ex- pressed concern about the impact that removal of the Greenway Bike Bridge would have on the environment. She encouraged the City to retain this bridge as a pedestrian/bicycle transportation pathway. Gary Adams, 331 Maple Street, voiced concerns about the Maple Street improve- ment project (on page 156 of the draft CIP) and the impact assessments would have on his house payments. He urged the City to re-evaluate the ratio of house assessments to Systems Development Charges (SDCs), taking into account the economic nature of the neighborhood being assessed. Gwen Heineman, 331 Maple Street, concurred with Mr. Adam's concerns about the proposed Maple Street reconstruction. She objected to the sizable cost of the improvement project and the impact it would have on house payments in the neighborhood. She noted that many of the residents do not support the plan and said that if the City still believes that reconstruction of Maple Street is necessary, the bulk of the cost should not be borne by neighborhood resi- dents. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 4 __ Tamara Crafts, 345 North Grand Street, voiced objections to the construction of an additional automobile bridge in the Valley River area, commenting that the community needs to support alternative modes of transportation. Donald R. Amacher, 2067 Musket Street, spoke as a representative of three office buildings in the Valley River area urging the council to reconsider eliminating the Valley River Bridge study from the CIP. He commented on the increased traffic problems which have been generated by substantial increases in density in the area, and said that a comprehensive evaluation of the area is needed to address these problems. Carol Bakkensen, 280 North Polk, testified against the Valley River Bridge study expressing concerns for the potential safety hazard that would result from increased automobile traffic in the area. Lina Van Brunt, 1345 Bailey Avenue, spoke in favor of eliminating the Valley River Bridge study from the CIP, remarking that every effort should be made to preserve the neighborhood orientation of the area. Dick Hansen, 2744 Tomahawk Lane, identified himself as the General Manager of Valley River Center and spoke in favor of the Valley River Bridge study in order to address extreme traffic congestion problems in the area. He pointed out that the TransPlan identifies the need for construction of an additional bridge and urged the council to reconsider the Budget Committee's recommenda- tion. e Stanton Cook, 1832 Longview Avenue, testified in opposition to the Valley River Bridge study suggesting that the money which would have been used on this study be redirected toward the community's social service needs. He also commented that the lack of a bike path between Eugene and Glenwood is a significant safety hazard, and encouraged the City to consider bike path construction in this area. Greg Johnson, 110 North Jackson, testified against the Valley River Bridge study noting that a bridge would detract from the quality of life in Eugene. Gregory Ahlijian, 42083 Deerhorn Road, Springfield, testified on behalf of the Eugene Tree Commission in support of the $25,000 allocated for street trees. He thanked the council for its demonstrated support of the Tree Com- mission, and indicated that a healthy urban forest is of benefit to all Eu- gene residents. Brian Churchhill, 1610 East 43rd Avenue, spoke on behalf of the Bicycle Com- mittee in support of bike path improvements along the river corridor. He voiced opposition to the Valley River Bridge study, and spoke about the need to improve bicycle access to downtown. Edward Winter, 85354 Doane Road, identified himself as a business owner in the Whiteaker neighborhood and testified in support of all of the Budget Committee's recommended modifications to the CIP. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 5 tit Steven Mueller, 65 Lund Drive, testified in support of eliminating the Valley River Bridge study from the CIP noting that he does not support additional development along Goodpasture Island Road. Every effort should be made to preserve the park-like nature of the river corridor. Tom Thacker, 110 North Jackson, concurred with those who testified before him in opposition to the Valley River Bridge study noting that increased automobile traffic would detract from the residential nature of the Whiteaker area. Glen Lally, 346 N Grand Street, speaking on behalf of himself and his neigh- bor Susan Applegate, 340 North Grand Street, stated his vehement opposition to the construction of an additional automobile bridge across the Willamette River. P. Yuri Samer, 2940 Hilyard Street, testified on the Lorane Highway project (page 119 of the draft CIP). He voiced concerns with extreme traffic safety hazards that exist along Lorane Highway and asked that priority be given to highway reconstruction in the area. He also pointed out that some community residents believed that testimony at this hearing would be limited to the Valley River Bridge study only; as a result, the number of citizens testify- ing on the Lorane Highway issue this evening may under-represent the number of citizens interested. e Mary Bentsen, 950 West 16th Avenue, spoke on behalf of two neighborhood or- ganizations who support the decision to delete the Valley River Bridge study from the draft CIP. She also commended the Budget Committee for recommenda- tions regarding the prioritization of projects within the CIP. Mindy Wekselblatt, 1355 Bailey Avenue, speaking on behalf of her daughter, testified in opposition to the Valley River Bridge study out of concerns for the health and safety of park users in the area. Connie Toomey, 2577 Harris, identified herself as an avid bicycle commuter and spoke in opposition to the proposed Valley River Bridge overpass. She noted that bike pathways along the east bank of the river should be completed to give continuity to the bikeway system and encouraged the council to retain the non-vehicular nature of the existing Greenway Bridge. She also voiced concerns with safety in the Lorane Highway area and urged the City to make the necessary improvements in that area. Bedo Crafts, 2674 Harris, testified in support of increased pedestrian orien- tation rather than automobile access around the area of Valley River Center and urged the council to look for new solutions to traffic problems in the area. Linda Frohbach, 133 West Hilliard Lane, identified herself as a long-time community resident and testified in support of eliminating the Valley River Bridge from further study. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 6 tit Mayor Miller noted that several letters have been received on this issue. There being no additional requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. Ms. Czerniak indicated that staff from various City departments would be available to answer council questions. Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Les Lyle, Public Works Department, said that the council could re-initiate the Lorane Highway Project. (In the early 80's, the council did not overturn a remonstrance of the project.) He pointed out that because road fund moneys are involved in the project, choos- ing to move it forward would alter priorities in the CIP. Ms. Ehrman asked the council to consider re-initiating this project as a means of moving it forward. e Mr. Gleason advised the council that if it is interested in moving forward the Lorane Highway project that it look to the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) for a joint funding effort using road fund moneys. Responding to a question from Mr. Robinette, Mr. Gleason said that funding for the Valley River Bridge study involves the County, the City, and the private sector. Money that has been allocated for this study could not be transferred for efforts to reopening Station 6. Mr. MacDonald noted that although previously opposed to moving the Lorane Highway study forward because of the history in the area of resident opposi- tion to assessment costs, he would be willing to reevaluate this position. He asked the council to consider moving this project forward contingent on the ability to obtain agreement on the part of residents in the area. Responding to questions from Mr. Boles regarding the Maurie Jacobs Memorial Park improvements, John Etter, PARCS Department, said that the entire list of park improvements was not included in the CIP because the projects did not follow the normal City processes with respect to funding. He indicated, however, that it would be appropriate to include the full list of projects in the CIP. Mr. Boles clarified that projects be listed within the CIP in clear priority order and, in turn, that regardless of their funding source, they be funded with respect to that prioritization order. Responding to a question from Mr. Green, Mr. Lyle said that the Maple Street improvement was identified a potential project in both the TransPlan and the Bethel-Danebo Refinement Plan. Because this street is classified as a col- lector, SDC funds would be involved in the street improvement. Responding to a question from Mr. Green, Mr. Lyle said that because of the scale of the Valley River Bridge project, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analysis of the area would be appropriate. In response to questions from Ms. Ehrman, Dave Reinhard, Public Works Trans- portation, said that the Willakenzie Refinement Plan addresses and makes e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 7 e recommendations for many transportation issues in the area, but does not include a study of transportation issues in the Valley River area because the feasibility study was already planned within the CIP. Responding to ques- tions about the State's responsibilities with respect to transportation plan- ning in this area, Mr. Reinhard said that the City regards the Valley River Bridge issue as primarily a local responsibility. However, any discussions of traffic in the surrounding area would involve discussions and coordination with the State. Responding to public testimony regarding the proximity of the proposed Valley River Bridge and the Greenway Bike Bridge, Mr. Reinhard assured the public that if a bridge was to be constructed, it would be constructed downstream from the bridge and have as little impact on bike/pedestrian pathways and park land as possible. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Lyle said that none of the EIS studies that have been conducted within the past decade have yielded a no- build solution. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Reinhard said that the addition of a third lane on Delta Highway at the Valley River interchange area added some traffic capacity to the area and appears to have improved the congestion problems, as well as improved traffic safety in the area. e Mr. Gleason remarked that the City needs to conduct an in-depth analysis of the entire Delta Highway system prior to discussions about the location of a bridge. He emphasized that increased traffic loads are expected to take place on the Delta Highway over the next several years, regardless of whether the City meets its aggressive alternative modes goals. Mr. Nicholson commented that the lack of General Fund resources is a primary reason why no action has been taken to reinstate the Cal Young/Harlow fire station. He asked if there would be alternative funding sources for this project if it were advanced in the CIP. Dave Whitlow, Assistant City Manag- er, reminded the council that the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC) would be making a recommendation next month on the final draft of the Long- Range Plan. This would be the appropriate time for the council to hold this discussion at which time it could consider whether to move this item forward in the CIP. Ms. Bascom asked whether the Beltline Bridge is identified in the TransPlan as seriously deficient. Mr. Reinhard responded that the bridge is identified in the State highway planning process for long-range improvements. The City would coordinate with the State on discussions about the relationship between the Beltline and Valley River areas. (At 9:20 p.m., the council took a five minute break). Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Robinette, to adopt the draft e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 8 e Capital Improvement Program for FY91-92 through FY96-97, in- corporating amendments recommended by the Planning Commission as noted on Errata Sheet A. Ms. Bascom said that the motion does not deal with the issues discussed this evening. Recognizing that the Valley River traffic problem is very broad and should be analyzed prior to making a final decision, she submitted the fol- lowing amendment: Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Robinette, to amend the motion to replace the proposed Valley River Bridge study list- ed in the CIP with a comprehensive study of Goodpasture Island Road access. e Ms. Ehrman asked whether a redefined study such as the one that Ms. Bascom is suggesting would include an EIS. In response, Christine Andersen, Public Works Director, said that the scope of the study being suggested by Ms. Bascom would be larger than traditional EIS studies. It would require a review of TransPlan and would include a thorough analysis of alternative modes of transportation. Environmental impacts would be analyzed, but an EIS would not be undertaken as part of the comprehensive study. Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Andersen said that Beltline, 1-105, and the Ferry Street Bridge would be included as part of the area of impact. The State would be involved in these discussions. Mr. Boles said he cannot support the motion for this study because the impli- cations and consequences of undertaking such a study are unclear, particular- ly with respect to the private sector, which is expected to contribute fund- ing resources. Mr. MacDonald said that that City needs a comprehensive study of traffic flow in the Goodpasture Island area. Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Reinhard said that the Val- ley River Bridge study is included in the long-range section of TransPlan. TransPlan indicates that an Environmental Assessment would have to be con- ducted prior to deciding on the need or location of a bridge. Mr. Gleason pointed out that while the private sector was planning to partic- ipate in funding of the study, it is unclear whether it will still be willing to participate financially now that the nature of the study has changed. Mr. Nicholson expressed concern with the process by which this issue has reached the council. He stated that a comprehensive TransPlan analysis should be conducted prior to making any decision. Mr. Green commented on the significant congestion problem that exists during peak traffic areas in Valley River and pointed out the ramifications of such congestion in terms of willingness to pay. He disagreed with those who feel that helping Valley River Center merchants would only harm downtown and e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 9 e pointed out that consumers' buying patterns have dictated a closed-in shop- ping arena. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to end debate on the amendment. Roll call vote; the motion carried, 5:3; with councilors Rutan, Green, Bascom, Ehrman, and Robinette voting in favor; and councilors Boles, MacDonald, and Nicholson vot- ing opposed. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Gleason clarified that the type of study contemplated within the amendment would be broader than previously anticipated. It would not result in an EIS but would include some assessment of environmental impacts. The amendment carried, 5:4; with councilors Bascom, Green, Ehrman, and Robinette, and Mayor Miller voting in favor; and councilors Boles, Nicholson, Rutan, and MacDonald voting op- posed. e Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to include a listing of the Maurie Jacobs Memorial Park improvements within the CIP. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. Mr. MacDonald provided the council and the City Manager with a list of com- ments on the Valley River Bridge study. He stated further that he is willing to put forth an effort to work with all parties involved in the Lorane High- way issue to find an acceptable solution and noted that adjacent property owners are key parties in the solution. Mr. MacDonald moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to amend the mo- tion to move the Lorane Highway project forward one year in the CIP, contingent on the ability to demonstrate agreement among stakeholders and interested parties in this issue. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Gleason indicated that moving this project forward one year within the CIP would be congruent with his suggestions for handling this issue vis-a-vis the County road funds. The amendment carried unanimously, 8:0. Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Nicholson, to amend the motion to move the the Westmoreland/18th Avenue Overcrossing project and the Greenway Bike Path projects forward in the cIP, consistent with the Budget Committee's recommendation. Mr. Green said he was not convinced of the need to move the bike path con- structions forward. Acknowledging concerns for a lack of available funding for these projects, Ms. Ehrman commented on the need to make a statement about the City's commit- ment to supporting an alternative modes of transportation system. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 10 e The motion carried, 7:1, with councilors Rutan, Boles, Bascom, Ehrman, MacDonald, Nicholson, and Robinette voting aye; and Councilor Green voting nay. The main motion carried 6:2, with councilors Rutan, Bascom, Ehrman, Green, MacDonald, and Robinette voting in favor; and councilors Boles and Nicholson voting against. III. PUBLIC HEARING: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMITS e City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and indicated that staff would be available to answer questions. Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. There being no requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. CB 4278--An ordinance concerning hazardous materials; amending Sections 3.005, 3.045, 3.190, 3.192, 3.194, and 3.196 of the Eugene Code, 1971; repealing Section 3.198 of that code, and declaring an emergency. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, that the bill, with unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. Council Bill 4278 was read the second time by number only. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. proved and given final passage. ors present voting aye, the bill became Ordinance 19746). Boles, that the bill be ap- Roll call vote; all council- was declared passed (and IV. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE REGARDING AUTHORITY TO SET PLAT-CHECK FEES City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. This code amendment would make the setting and charging of plat-check fees consistent with other City fees. Les Lyle would be available to answer questions. Mayor Miller opened the pubic hearing. There being no requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. Responding to a question from Mr. MacDonald, Mr. Gleason said that if this ordinance is not passed with an emergency clause, the City will not be able to take action for 30 days which will result in lost revenue. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 11 -. . . e In response to a request from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Lyle said that consistent with Code requirements, the City Council would be notified in advance of fee schedule changes. Mr. Boles requested that the fee schedule be presented to the council with information about the true cost of service provision and whether the fee-setting process includes phased-in cost recovery. Mr. MacDonald indicated that he will be attending a meeting with members of the building community and asked Mayor Miller for feedback regarding the impacts of increased fees on the development community. In response, Mayor Miller said th~t while concerns have been expressed in the past on the part of the development community about bearing the full burden of development, the community has not seemed unwilling to pay its fair share. CB 4279--An ordinance concerning a plat-checking fee; amending Section 9.025 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, that the bill, with unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. Council bill 4279 was read the second time by number only. e Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. proved and given final passage. ors present voting aye, the bill became Ordinance 19747). Regarding Agenda Item II discussed earlier, Mr. Gleason clarified that the transportation analysis of the scope being contemplated in the Goodpasture Island Road area might affect the private sector's willingness to share in the funding of the study. Mr. Rutan asked Mr. Gleason to look beyond the current funding sources for this comprehensive transportation study. Boles, that the bill be ap- Roll call vote; all council- was declared passed (and The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~~-.-1 Micheal Gleason City Manager (Recorded by Traci Northman) mncc 012891-730 e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 12